Parental Preferences Regarding Outpatient Management of Children with Congenital Heart Disease

The objective of this study was to identify patterns of health care usage among children with congenital heart disease (CHD) and determine predictors for contacting cardiologists for routine care. Parents of children with CHD completed surveys, indicating which provider they would contact first for 12 concerns. Predictors for preference for cardiologist evaluation were identified by multivariable logistic regression. Surveys were completed by 307 of 925 (33.2%) parents. Median patient age was 9.4 years [interquartile range (IQR) 5.1-14.4 years] with a median of 1 cardiac surgery (IQR 1-3). Most parents agreed primary care physicians (PCPs) could identify problems related to CHD (70.0%) and when to refer to cardiologists (89.6%). More felt PCPs best understood their values (63.2 vs. 29.6%, P < 0.001) and were more accessible (63.5 vs. 33.6%, P < 0.001) than cardiologists. Parents preferred first evaluation by PCPs for 9 of 12 concerns. Preference for cardiology evaluation was independently associated with the number of cardiac catheterizations [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for ≥2 catheterizations 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-4.9], belief the cardiologist better knew the child's medical history (AOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3-4.6), and provider accessibility (AOR 3.6, 95% CI 1.8-7.4). Parents of CHD patients reported close alignment with PCPs and would contact PCPs first for most routine care. However, some populations continue to contact cardiologists for routine care. Further study is needed to clarify best practices for clinician and parent education.

Parent preferences for adolescent depression treatment: The role of past treatment experience and biological etiological beliefs

BACKGROUND

Parents play a crucial role in facilitating depression treatment for adolescents, yet parental preferences for adolescent treatments are ill-understood. Past treatment experience and belief in a biological model of depression may impact preferences, and warrant investigation.

METHODS

Parents (N = 143) of teens (12-18 years) completed a survey assessing preference for adolescent depression treatments, treatment knowledge, and beliefs about the biological etiology of depression. Details about parents' and adolescents' past mental health concerns and treatment were obtained. Parents indicated degree of preference from 0 (Not at all preferable) - 10 (Highly preferable) for six treatment options (counselling, antidepressant medication, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, exercise, no treatment) for three adolescents vignettes depicting varying depression severity (Mild/Moderate, Severe, and Treatment-Resistant).

RESULTS

Mean preference ratings across all vignette severities were high for counselling (range: 8.57-9.38) and exercise (range: 9.04-9.25). Multiple regression revealed parental past experience of psychopharmacological treatment was significantly associated with current preference for adolescent antidepressant medication, with increased helpfulness and milder/fewer adverse events associated with stronger preference. Greater perceived helpfulness of past teen psychopharmacological treatment was significantly associated with greater current parental preference for adolescent antidepressant medication. Strength of biological beliefs and counselling preference were significantly positively associated.

LIMITATIONS

Sample was highly educated, predominately female, and majority treatment-utilizing limiting the generalizability of findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents' own past medication experiences and degree of biological etiological beliefs appear to be associated with current teen depression treatment preferences. Counselling and exercise were highly preferred across depression severity.

Parental Preference for Treatment Location and Inclusion in Decision Making in Painful Pediatric Procedures: Towards an Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline

PURPOSE

To determine parental preference for treatment location of painful procedures for pediatric patients, and the involvement of parents in decision-making about procedure location.

DESIGN AND METHOD

A descriptive survey design was applied. Parents of hospitalized children were asked what procedures their child had undergone, where the procedures were performed, who decided on the location, what their preference was, and why. Data was collected over a twelve-day period in seven wards of a tertiary pediatric hospital.

RESULTS

Of 312 different procedures, 244 (78%) were performed in the patient's room. The treatment room was reserved for complex procedures such as lumbar punctures. Seventy-three percent of parents surveyed indicated a strong preference for procedures to be performed in the patient's room, with the most common reason being 'comfortability'. Parents were only involved in procedure location decision-making in 50% of the reported cases.

CONCLUSIONS

For parents, the patient's room is the preferred location for many procedures. The opinion of parents was not always taken into consideration by health care professionals, in contrary to the principles of patient-centered care. These findings are important for health care professionals in pediatric settings to reconsider the location of procedures and how parents are involved in decision making.

A survey of caregiver preferences regarding research participation in the paediatric emergency department

Objectives

Emergency department (ED) visits can be stressful for families and can affect caregiver willingness to consent to participating in research. Our objective was to describe when and how caregivers wish to be informed about clinical research during their child's ED visit.

Methods

An electronic survey was performed for families presenting to 10 Canadian paediatric EDs. A convenience sample of 1456 caregivers with children aged 0 to 17 years were enrolled. The survey tool was created (with an expert panel) using published methodological guidelines, including item generation/reduction, pre- and pilot-testing, and clinical sensibility assessment. Research-specific questions included the best time to be approached, the breadth of study opportunities presented, and best ways to encourage families to participate.

Results

Caregivers reported that the best times to be approached regarding research were in the waiting room (45.3%, 653/1441), after physician assessment (39.0%, 562/1441), or just prior to discharge (9.9%, 143/1441). 52.2% (351/672) wanted to hear about all available research studies, while 47.8% (321/672) wanted to be informed of studies relevant only to their child's condition. Reported best ways to encourage families to participate in research included: incentives (e.g., gift cards/parking passes [31.2%, 230/737]), providing a clear explanation of study intent (30.7%, 226/737), and appealing to altruism (25.4%, 187/737).

Conclusions

There is wide variability in family preferences for timing of research-related conversations, suggesting that families could be approached in the waiting room, and if that is inconvenient or impractical, they could be offered a deferred conversation (i.e., after physician assessment or prior to discharge).

A discrete choice experiment on Chinese parents' preferences of vaccine schedules against six childhood infectious diseases

Background

China's Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) provides vaccinations against 12 vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs) at no cost to families. For some VPDs, parents may opt to substitute equivalent non-program vaccines, including combination vaccines, for EPI vaccines; substitute vaccines must be paid for by the family. Although parents have several choices for vaccinating their children, their preferences for vaccines and immunization schedules have not been systematically evaluated. We used a discrete choice experiment to evaluate four attributes of vaccines for routine immunization: number of injections, risk of mild side-effects, out-of-pocket cost, and location of manufacturer (domestic or imported).

Methods

In a questionnaire-based survey conducted in vaccination clinics, guardians were asked to select their preferred vaccination schedule from five options in ten choice sets with the four attributes. We used a mixed logit model to determine parental preferences for vaccination schedules, relative importance of attributes, and predict the likelihood of successful vaccination under different scenarios.

Results

A total of 581 parents from seven provinces and cities in China participated in the survey, and 488 respondents had internally consistent responses and were included in the analysis. The number of injections in the schedule was the most important attribute for predicting uptake, followed by risk of mild side-effects. Preferences varied by region and parental role. Predicted uptake in the preferred vaccination scenario relative to base-case schedule uptake was a 99.55 % increase.

Conclusions

Number of injections and risk of mild side-effects were the two most important attributes of the routine immunization schedule. Results from this study can help optimize the immunization schedule in China to improve coverage of childhood vaccines.