The regenerative potential of Pax3/Pax7 on skeletal muscle injury

Background

Skeletal muscle mishaps are the most well-known incidents in society, especially among athletes and the military population. From the various urgency, this accident needs to be cured more quickly. However, the current treatment still has some shortcomings and is less effective. In this case, Paired box 3 and Paired box 7 (Pax3/Pax7) proteins that induce stem cells could potentially be an alternative treatment for skeletal muscle injuries. This paper aimed to analyse the potential treatment of Pax3/Pax7 proteins inducing the stem cell for skeletal muscle injuries.

The main body of the abstract

We did a narrative review by gathering several scientific journals from several leading platforms like PubMed and Scopus. As common accidents, skeletal muscle disease could be due to workplace and non-workplace causes. The highest risk occurs in the athlete and military environment. The treatment of current skeletal muscle injuries is protection, rest, ice, compression, and elevation (PRICE), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and mechanical stimulation. However, it is considered less effective, especially in NSAIDs, inhibiting myogenic cell proliferation. The current finding indicates that the stem cells have markers known as Pax3/Pax7. The role of both markers in muscle injury, Pax3/Pax7, as transcription factors will induce cell division by H3K4 methylation mechanisms and chromatin modifications that stimulate gene activation.

Conclusion

Regulation by Pax3/Pax7 factors that affect stem cells and stem cell proliferation is one of the alternative treatments. This regulation can accelerate the healing of injury victims, especially injuries to the skeletal muscles. Finally, after being compared, Pax3/Pax7 induces stem cells to have the potential to be one of the skeletal muscle injury treatments.

Keywords

Pax3 and Pax7, Pax3/Pax7, Skeletal muscle, Athlete, Stem cells, Cell proliferation, Injuries.

Everybody wants to move-Evolutionary implications of trunk muscle differentiation in vertebrate species

In our review we have completed current knowledge on myotomal myogenesis in model and non-model vertebrate species (fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals) at morphological and molecular levels. Data obtained from these studies reveal distinct similarities and differences between amniote and anamniote species. Based on the available data, we decided to present evolutionary implications in vertebrate trunk muscle development. Despite the fact that in all vertebrates muscle fibres are multinucleated, the pathways leading to them vary between vertebrate taxa. In fishes during early myogenesis myoblasts differentiate into multinucleated lamellae or multinucleate myotubes. In amphibians, myoblasts fuse to form multinucleated myotubes or, bypassing fusion, directly differentiate into mononucleated myotubes. Furthermore, mononucleated myotubes were also observed during primary myogenesis in amniotes. The mononucleated state of myogenic cells could be considered as an old phylogenetic, plesiomorphic feature, whereas direct multinuclearity of myotubes has a synapomorphic character. On the other hand, the explanation of this phenomenon could also be linked to the environmental conditions in which animals develop. The similarities observed in vertebrate myogenesis might result from a conservative myogenic programme governed by the Pax3/Pax7 and myogenic regulatory factor (MRF) network, whereas differences in anamniotes and amniotes are established by spatiotemporal pattern expression of MRFs during muscle differentiation and/or environmental conditions.

Primary myogenesis in the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis) limb bud

Our studies conducted on reptilian limb muscle development revealed, for the first time, early forelimb muscle differentiation at the morphological and molecular level. Sand lizard skeletal muscle differentiation in the early forelimb bud was investigated by light, confocal, and transmission electron microscopy as well as western blot. The early forelimb bud, filled with mesenchymal cells, is surrounded by monolayer epithelium cells. The immunocytochemical analysis revealed the presence of Pax3- and Lbx-positive cells in the vicinity of the ventro-lateral lip (VLL) of the dermomyotome, suggesting that VLL is the source of limb muscle progenitor cells. Furthermore, Pax3- and Lbx-positive cells were observed in the dorsal and ventral myogenic pools of the forelimb bud. Skeletal muscle development in the early limb bud is asynchronous, which is manifested by the presence of myogenic cells in different stages of differentiation: multinucleated myotubes with well-developed contractile apparatus, myoblasts, and mitotically active premyoblasts. The western blot analysis revealed the presence of MyoD and Myf5 proteins in all investigated developmental stages. The MyoD western blot analysis showed two bands corresponding to monomeric (mMyoD) and dimeric (dMyoD) fractions. Two separate bands were also detected in the case of Myf5. The observed bands were related to non-phosphorylated (Myf5) and phosphorylated (pMyf5) fractions of Myf5. Our investigations on sand lizard forelimb myogenesis showed that the pattern of muscle differentiation in the early forelimb bud shares many features with rodents and chicks.