Murphy Estes C, Flynn A, Born H, Clark C, Sulica L. Performers With History of Voice Injury: A Survey Study of Treatment Outcomes and Vocal Function.
J Voice 2023:S0892-1997(23)00233-3. [PMID:
37648624 DOI:
10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.07.024]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Past studies show that performers are more susceptible to voice injury, have higher incidence of injury, and experience greater vocal impairment than non-performers. Despite literature demonstrating otherwise, there remains fear and stigma that voice injury is a career-ending circumstance. Much of this is due to a lack of information about post-treatment vocal function.
METHODS
An anonymous online survey was distributed via email, flyer, and social media to a target audience of performers with a history of voice injury. It inquired about occupation, vocal symptoms, professionals consulted, and treatment adherence. Outcome measures included ability to perform, resolution of symptoms, and attitudes about their voices after voice injury. Findings were analyzed descriptively with statistical analysis to determine factors that may be related to favorable outcomes.
RESULTS
The survey was completed by 151 performers representing a range of genres, including musical theatre, classical, and popular genres. The most reported vocal symptoms were decreased range, singing voice quality changes, increased singing effort, and vocal fatigue. Most initially sought care from an otolaryngologist, laryngologist, or voice teacher. Diagnoses and recommendations varied, but those who adhered to treatment were more likely to report resolution of voice symptoms (P = 0.025). Those with symptoms for 2-4 weeks reported greater vocal confidence than those with a longer symptom duration (P = 0.0251). Performers working with a voice teacher were more likely to find treatment helpful (P = 0.0174). Those with neurogenic voice conditions reported less vocal reliability than participants with other pathologies (P = 0.0155).
CONCLUSION
The majority of participants continued to perform, reported resolved or improved voice symptoms after treatment, and reported positive attitudes about their voices, regardless of their injury or current presence or absence of pathology on exam. Findings of this study highlight a need for continued outreach to voice teachers, education programs, and production teams about vocal function after voice injury.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse