Maintenance of the joint line and posterior condylar offset are the most notable variables for successful outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Controversy regarding which variables should be prioritized for better outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) exists. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the variables affecting RTKA outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 87 RTKAs in 82 patients who were performed between March 2014 and February 2020. Range of motion (ROM), including flexion contracture (FC) and further flexion (FF), was analyzed according to the covariates. The covariates included mode of failure, joint line position, anteroposterior (AP) position, rotational alignment of the femoral component, and patellofemoral alignment. The differences between the final follow-up values of each RTKA variable and those of the native knee were evaluated. The clinical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the joint line positions of the RTKA and native knees. The patellar and AP positions of the femoral component were restored to pre-TKA values. The femoral component had an external rotation of 2.78° compared with the native knee. In multivariable stepwise regression analysis, restoration of the adductor tubercle joint line and posterior condylar offset (PCO) were significant variables affecting ROM. Septic RTKA (33 knees) resulted in poor FF outcomes (p = 0.030) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index stiffness (WOMAC S) scores (p < 0.001), compared with aseptic RTKA (54 knees).

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration of the joint line position and PCO are crucial factors for improved ROM in RTKA. Joint line elevation in RTKA resulted in worse ROM than joint line lowering. In addition, RTKA due to septic failure had inferior ROM and WOMAC S scores compared with RTKA due to aseptic failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, cohort study.

Patella scores are similar both with gap balancing and measured resection after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized single-centre study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective study was to compare femoral component rotation (FCR) values when adjusted with 'gap balancing' (GB) and 'measured resection' (MR) techniques following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The study hypothesis was that the GB technique would be better on FCR than MR in TKA.

METHODS

From a total of 93 unilateral TKAs performed between August 2019 and November 2020, the FCR values were adjusted by GB in 46 cases and MR in 47. Post-TKA magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was applied for FCR assessment. Orthoroentgenograms and lateral knee radiographs were taken to determine the mechanical axis and posterior condylar offset (PCO) ratio, respectively. Both groups were compared radiologically. The Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) patella scores were calculated and compared between the groups preoperatively and at the end of 6 months, and 1 and 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the groups in respect of the demographic data. The mean HSS patella score was 86.4 ± 4.1 in the GB group and 84.6 ± 3.8 in the MR group in the 2nd year (p = 0.047). A higher degree of external rotation in the FC was determined in the GB group [2.2° (1.7°-4.3°)] compared to the MR group [1.7° (0.8°-3.0°)] (p = 0.009). The postoperative increase in PCO ratio was higher in the GB group (p = 0.005). All other variables were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that at the end of the 2nd year, the HSS patella scores were better, FCs were more externally rotated and PCO ratios were higher in TKAs using the GB technique. However, taking into account that the difference between the 2nd year HSS patella scores was too small to be considered clinically significant, it was shown that both the GB and MR techniques can be used for FCR in clinical practice without any hesitation.

Balancing the flexion gap first in total knee arthroplasty leads to better preservation of posterior condylar offset resulting in better knee flexion

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the flexion first balancing technique, developed in an attempt to solve the dissatisfaction due to instability in total knee arthroplasties, leads to better restoration of joint line height and medial posterior condylar offset. This might result in better knee flexion, compared to the classic extension first gap balancing technique. The secondary objective is to show non-inferiority of the flexion first balancing technique in terms of clinical outcomes as measured by the Patient Reported Outcome Measurements.

METHODS

A cohort of 40 patients (46 knee replacements) operated using the flexion first balancing technique was retrospectively analyzed and compared with a cohort of 51 patients (52 knee replacements) operated using the classic gap balancing technique. Radiographic analysis of the coronal alignment, joint line height and posterior condylar offset was performed. Clinical and functional outcome data were analyzed pre- and postoperatively and compared between both groups. The two sample t test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test and a linear mixed model were used for performing statistical analyses, after normality analyses were executed.

RESULTS

Radiologic evaluation showed a decrease in posterior condylar offset using the classic gap balancing technique (p = 0.040) versus no change using the flexion first balancing technique (p = n.s.). No statistically significant differences were noted for joint line height and coronal alignment. Using the flexion first balancer technique leads to a greater postoperative range of motion with deeper flexion (p = 0.002) and a better Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

The Flexion First Balancing technique is a valid and safe technique for TKA, resulting in better preservation of PCO with consequently greater postoperative flexion and better KOOS scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The flexion-extension gap is predictive of patient-reported outcome measures after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the association between the flexion-extension gap difference and patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study of 60 cruciate-retaining single-radius TKAs. Soft tissue balancing was measured using an offset seesaw tensioner and centre-type digital knee balancer under joint distraction forces of 20-50 lbf and 1.5 times body mass index (1.5 BMI). At the last follow up of 2.0-6.5 (mean, 4.5) years postoperatively, patients were asked if they perceived their knee joint as 'natural' (26 knees) or 'artificial' (34 knees). Age, sex, and the flexion-extension gap were compared between the two groups. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine cut-off values of variables predictive of a natural joint perception.

RESULTS

Natural joint perception was associated with a greater flexion-extension gap difference under a distraction force of 1.5 BMI (P = 0.016), higher knee function (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, P = 0.019), and quality of life (EuroQol 5-Dimension, P = 0.029). A gap difference of 0.95 mm under 1.5 BMI distraction predicted a natural joint perception post-TKA (sensitivity, 97.1%; specificity, 88.5%). Using a gap threshold of 1.0 mm under a 1.5 BMI distraction force yielded significant between-group differences in postoperative flexion (P = 0.040), satisfaction (P = 0.043), knee joint function (P < 0.001), quality of life (P = 0.032), and posterior femoral condylar offset (P = 0.037) CONCLUSION: A flexion-extension gap difference ≥1.0 mm under a distraction force of 1.5 BMI predicted superior outcomes, including patient satisfaction, after cruciate-retaining TKA. It was suggested that posterior femoral condylar offset could influence this finding.

Intraoperative changes in medial joint gap after posterior femoral condylar resection, posterior osteophyte removal, and femoral component placement during primary total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

"Mid-flexion stability" is important for superior patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Thus, it is important to control medial joint gap intraoperatively as a countermeasure. However, reports on the precise intraoperative changes in medial joint gap during TKA are scarce. This study evaluated the intraoperative changes in medial joint gap during TKA.

METHODS

We studied 167 knees with varus osteoarthritis that underwent 80 cruciate-retaining (CR) and 87 posterior-stabilized (PS) TKAs between January 2018 and December 2020. We measured the intraoperative changes in medial joint gap with a tensor device at 137.5 N.

RESULTS

The medial joint gap after posterior femoral condylar resection was significantly increased not only at 90° of flexion but also at 0° of extension in CR and PS TKAs (p < 0.01). The medial joint gap after posterior osteophyte removal was significantly increased not only at 0° of extension but also at 90° of flexion in CR and PS TKAs (p < 0.01). The medial joint gap at 0° of extension was reduced by 0.60 mm after femoral component placement in PS TKA.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons need to pay close attention to these intraoperative changes in medial joint gap by measuring the medial joint gap before and after each procedure or assuming the changes in those values before bone cutting to achieve superior patient satisfaction following TKA.

Posterior condylar offset and posterior tibial slope targets to optimize knee flexion after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship between posterior tibial slope (PTS), posterior condylar offset (PCO), femoral sagittal angle (FSA) on clinical outcomes, and propose optimal sagittal plane alignments for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of 265 medial UKA was analysed. PTS, PCO, FSA were measured on preoperative and postoperative lateral radiographs. Clinical assessment was done at 6-month, 2-year and 10-year using Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Knee and Function scores, Short Form-36, range of motion (ROM), fulfilment of satisfaction and expectations. Implant survivorship was noted at mean 15-year. Kendall rank correlation test evaluated correlations of sagittal parameters against clinical outcomes. Multivariable linear regression evaluated predictors of postoperative ROM. Effect plots and interaction plots were used to identify angles with the best outcomes. (p < 0.05) was the threshold for statistical significance.

RESULTS

There were significant correlations between PTS, PCO and FSA. Younger age, lower BMI, implant type, greater preoperative flexion, steeper PTS and preservation of PCO were significant predictors of greater postoperative flexion. There were significant interaction effects between PTS and PCO. Effect plots demonstrate a PTS between 2° to 8° and restoration of PCO within 1.5 mm of native values are optimal for better postoperative flexion. Interaction plot reveals that it is preferable to reduce PCO by 1.0 mm when PTS is 2° and restore PCO at 0 mm when PTS is 8°.

CONCLUSION

UKA surgeons and future studies should be mindful of the relationship between PTS, PCO and FSA, and avoid considering them in isolation. When deciding on the method of balancing component gaps in UKA, surgeons should rely on the PTS. Decrease the posterior condylar cut when PTS is steep, and increase the posterior condylar cut when PTS is shallow. The acceptable range for PTS is between 2° to 8° and PCO should be restored to 1.5 mm of native values.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

The Impact of a Gap Balancing or Measured Resection Surgical Technique on Posterior Condylar Offset and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Background

To increase total knee arthroplasty procedure satisfaction, surgeons are exploring improvements in surgical technique. The impact of gap balancing or measured resection approach on posterior condylar offset (PCO) is not well understood.

Methods

We reviewed the clinical and radiographic results of 498 unilateral posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties. Radiographs were assessed to measure the primary endpoints of anterior-posterior width, PCO, and anterior condylar offset. Clinical outcome measures were used to assess patient improvement measures. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to determine the clinical factors related to our primary endpoints.

Results

No significant difference was observed between groups in anterior-posterior width (P = .24) and PCO (P = .78). Significant positive correlations were observed between postoperative PCO and knee range of motion (r = 0.12, P = .04) and total Knee Society Scores (r = 0.14, P = .02).

Conclusion

No impact of surgical technique on PCO was observed. Correlations were observed between postoperative PCO and the functional subscore and total Knee Society Score. All patients reported clinical improvements at 1 year postoperatively.

Effect of posterior condylar offset in post operative range of motion in cruciate retaining and sacrificing TKR: A comparative analysis

Background

Restoration of posterior condylar offset (PCO) during TKA is believed to be an important to improve knee kinematics, maximizing range of motion (ROM) and minimizing flexion instability. The aim of prospective study was to find out the role of PCO in post-operative ROM after cruciate retaining (CR) and cruciate sacrificing (CS) TKA.

Methods and materials

A total of 90 patients were divided into the CR knee group (49) and CS knee Group (41) intra-operatively by the surgeon based on the status of Posterior Cruciate Ligament. Preoperative and postoperative PCO was evaluated on true lateral knee radiographs. The ROM was measured pre operatively and post operatively at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 months, 1 year and 2 years. Appropriate statistical tests were used and results were interpreted.

Results

The mean flexion angle was 113.86° in CR knees and 118.29° in CS knees with a significantly greater improvement observed for the latter group. Preoperative mean PCO was 35.08 mm in CR knees and 36.37 mm in CS knees, while the corresponding values post operatively were 32.74 mm and 34.88 mm respectively, at follow-up. In order to evaluate the relationship between change of PCO and postoperative improvement in range of flexion, we divided the patients into three sub groups according to the difference in pre and post-operative PCO. The first sub group had a difference in PCO ≤ 1 mm after surgery (CR: 5 and CS: 8), second sub group with a difference in PCO 1-3 mm after surgery (CR: 28 and CS: 26) and the third subgroup with a difference in PCO >3 mm after surgery (CR: 16 and CS: 7). Then a comparison of difference in PCO and post-operative range of motion was done in both CR knees and CS knees separately. The final post-operative range of motion (flexion) in CR knees was 117.6°, 115.93° and 109.06° for the three subgroups respectively. Similarly, the final post-operative range of motion (flexion) in CS knees was 116.12°, 118.81° and 118.86° for the three subgroups respectively. Thus a significant difference between three sub groups was observed in CR knees (P < 0.0001), while no difference was observed in the PS knees.

Conclusion

The postoperative decrease in posterior condylar offset by more than 3 mm decreases the post-operative ROM in CR TKA but not in CS TKA. So it is critical to preserve PCO in CR but perhaps not CS knees to ensure optimal ROM postoperatively.

Flexion First Balancer: description of new technique in TKA to reproduce joint line and pre-disease mechanical alignment

A considerable proportion of patients (19%) are dissatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Possible factors contributing to this dissatisfaction are decreased posterior condylar offset (PCO) with subsequent joint line elevation, leading to mid-flexion instability. Secondly, the pre-disease mechanical alignment is changed into a neutral alignment. The Flexion First Balancer was developed to avoid these problems. This technique aims to maintain MCL isometry by restoring medial PCO and medial joint line to its pre-disease level. Also, to reconstruct the pre-disease mechanical alignment by adjusting the distal femoral angle. In this study we provide a detailed technical overview of the Flexion First Balancer technique.

Posterior condylar offset changes and its effect on clinical outcomes after posterior-substituting, fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: anterior versus posterior referencing

Background

We sought to determine whether there was a difference in the posterior condylar offset (PCO), posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) and clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with anterior referencing (AR) or posterior referencing (PR) systems. We also assessed whether the PCO and PCOR changes, as well as patient factors were related to range of motion (ROM) in each referencing system.

Methods

This retrospective study included 130 consecutive patients (184 knees) with osteoarthritis who underwent primary posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-substituting fixed-bearing TKA. The difference between preoperative and postoperative PCO and PCOR values were calculated. Clinical outcomes including ROM and Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) scores were evaluated. Furthermore, multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine the factors related to postoperative ROM in each referencing system.

Results

The postoperative PCO was greater in the AR group (28.4 mm) than in the PR group (27.4 mm), whereas the PCO was more consistently preserved in the PR group. The mean postoperative ROM after TKA was greater in the AR group (129°) than in the PR group (122°), whereas improvement in WOMAC score did not differ between the two groups. Preoperative ROM was the only factor related to postoperative ROM in both groups.

Conclusions

There was no difference in postoperative PCO in AR and PR group and the PCO was not associated with postoperative ROM. PCO was more consistently preserved after surgery in the PR group. The postoperative PCO and PCOR changes did not affect the postoperative ROM. Furthermore, similar clinical outcomes were achieved in the AR and PR groups.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered (Trial registration number: 06-2010-110).

Risk factors of hyperextension and its relationship with the clinical outcomes following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of postoperative hyperextension after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and its clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included 387 knees of primary TKA patients after a 5-year follow-up. The clinical outcomes and radiographs including posterior condylar offset (PCO), femur and tibial slope angle and its discrepancy were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups (group 1: non-hyperextension, group 2: hyperextension). An extension greater than 5° measured using a goniometer at the final follow-up was defined as hyperextension. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 43 knees (11.1%) with hyperextension were observed at the last follow-up. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of the clinical outcomes although the functional scores were worse in group 2. There was no significant difference in the postoperative radiologic evaluation except for a change in PCO (group 1 vs. group 2; - 0.2 mm ± 3.8 vs. - 2.4 mm ± 3.0, p = 0.003), distal femoral resection slope angle (- 9.1° ± 2.1 vs. - 12.1° ± 1.7, p < 0.000) and discrepancy of the slope angle (0.3° ± 4.5 vs. - 3.6° ± 3.9, p < 0.000). The change in PCO [odds ratio (OR) 0.86, p = 0.012], discrepancy of the slope angle (OR 0.8136, p = 0.000) and the preoperative mechanical femorotibial angle (OR 1.09, p = 0.003) were associated with hyperextension.

CONCLUSION

Mobile-bearing TKA with hyperextension over 5° showed worse functional outcomes at the mid-term follow-up, even though no serious complications were observed. Care should be taken to maintain the posterior condylar offset and to match the resection angles in femur and tibia due to the risk of hyperextension and worse functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Biomechanical analysis of a changed posterior condylar offset under deep knee bend loading in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The conservation of the joint anatomy is an important factor in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The restoration of the femoral posterior condylar offset (PCO) has been well known to influence the clinical outcome after TKA.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanism of PCO in finite element models with conservation of subject anatomy and different PCO of ±1, ±2, ±3 mm in posterior direction using posterior cruciate ligament-retaining TKA.

METHODS

Using a computational simulation, we investigated the influence of the changes in PCO on the contact stress in the polyethylene (PE) insert and patellar button, on the forces on the collateral and posterior cruciate ligament, and on the quadriceps muscle and patellar tendon forces. The computational simulation loading condition was deep knee bend.

RESULTS

The contact stresses on the PE insert increased, whereas those on the patellar button decreased as posterior condylar offset translated to the posterior direction. The forces exerted on the posterior cruciate ligament and collateral ligaments increased as PCO translated to the posterior direction. The translation of PCO in the anterior direction, in an equivalent flexion angle, required a greater quadriceps muscle force.

CONCLUSIONS

Translations of the PCO in the posterior and anterior directions resulted in negative effects in the PE insert and ligament, and the quadriceps muscle force, respectively. Our findings suggest that orthopaedic surgeons should be careful with regard to the intraoperative conservation of PCO, because an excessive change in PCO may lead to quadriceps weakness and an increase in posterior cruciate ligament tension.

Posterior condylar resections in total knee arthroplasty: current standard instruments do not restore femoral condylar anatomy

INTRODUCTION

Correct femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important for femoropatellar knee kinematics as well as for the overall clinical success. The goal of the present study was to evaluate how accurately standard instruments of various manufacturers with specific rotational settings in posterior referencing restore the posterior femoral condylar anatomy and allow a rotational alignment which matches a particular anatomic rotational landmark on CT.

METHODS

The anatomical transepicondylar axis (aTEA) and the posterior condylar line (PCL) were identified and the angle formed by these two axes was measured on 100 consecutive CT scans of knees. A virtual posterior condylar resection was performed relative to the aTEA for femoral sizers of various manufacturers in different external rotations ranging from 3° to 7°. The resections of medial and lateral posterior condyle were calculated as well as the condylar twist angle (CTA) between PCL and aTEA.

RESULTS

The posterior condylar resection varied between 9 mm and 14 mm on the medial side and between 4 mm and 10.5 mm on the lateral side. The mean CTA was 5.5° of internal rotation (SD ± 1.9°). External femoral rotation resulted in increased resection of the medial posterior condyle and decreased resection of the lateral posterior condyle.

CONCLUSION

Femoral sizers using a posterior referencing technique increase, with rising external rotation, medial posterior condylar resection to an extent that may exceed the implant thickness in the majority of systems. Surgeons should be aware that current standard instruments do not restore the anatomy of the posterior medial and lateral condyle and do not align the femoral component parallel to the aTEA, which may result in internal rotation of a symmetric femoral component.

Adequate joint line restoration and good preliminary clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty using the Flexion First Balancer technique

INTRODUCTION

Up to 20% of patients are dissatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Factors which could possibly contribute to this dissatisfaction are a decreased posterior condylar offset (PCO) and subsequent joint line elevation which leads to mid-flexion instability. The Flexion First Balancer (FFB) technique aims to adequately restore the medial PCO and thereby reconstruct the medial native joint line to its pre-disease height.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 59 patients operated using the FFB technique was analyzed and matched with a historic measured resection (MR) cohort of 59 patients. Groups were matched for age, gender, BMI and ASA classification. Joint line and PCO changes as well as patient reported outcome measurement scores (PROMs) were evaluated at one year [1.0 - 1.6] postoperatively.

RESULTS

Radiographic evaluation revealed no changes in joint line height in the FFB group, whereas an elevation in joint line was seen in the MR group (p = 0.002). The PCO increased after surgery in both group without any statistically significant differences. Evaluation of PROMs found no differences between the two groups for total OKS and KOOS scores, nor in re-operation or complication rates.

CONCLUSION

The FFB technique seems to be a safe technique to use in TKA and reconstructs the pre-disease joint line in contrast to the MR technique. The clinical outcomes were comparable between both groups.

Gender differences in morphology exist in posterior condylar offsets of the knee in Korean population

PURPOSE

This study aimed to analyze the morphometric data from magnetic resonance images of arthritic knees in Korean adults, and to identify the existence of morphological differences of femoral posterior condylar offset (PCO) between genders.

METHODS

The differences in anthropometric PCO data in 975 patients (825 female and 150 male) were evaluated. The distances from the anterior and posterior femoral shaft cortex line to the most posterior femoral condyle tangent line were defined as the anterior-posterior dimension (AP) and the PCO. The PCO ratio (PCOR) was calculated as PCO/AP.

RESULTS

The medial PCO was greater than the lateral PCO (26.3 ± 2.2 vs. 24.3 ± 2.3 mm, p < 0.01). This difference was observed in both female patients (medial: 26.2 ± 2.2 mm vs. lateral: 24.2 ± 2.2 mm, p < 0.01) and male patients (medial: 26.8 ± 2.3 mm vs. lateral: 24.8 ± 2.4 mm, p < 0.01). The medial and lateral PCO values were also greater in male patients than in female ones (p < 0.01). In contrast, PCOR was greater in female patients than in male ones, both in the medial and lateral femoral condyles (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

It was shown that medial and lateral PCO and PCOR were asymmetric, and that there was gender difference in Korean population in our study. In addition, our data showed that the PCOR of contemporary TKAs may be small for Asian patients that may not be sufficient to meet the needs of the Korean patient population. These results confirm that a gender-specific femoral component design is necessary to recreate the PCO for male and female Asian populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Non-consecutive patients, Level III.

Comparison of the biomechanical effect of posterior condylar offset and kinematics between posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The effect of the changes in the femoral posterior condylar offset (PCO) on anterior-posterior (AP) translation and internal-external (IE) rotation in cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the kinematics in CR and PS TKA with respect to the difference in prosthetic design and PCO change through a computational simulation.

METHODS

We developed three-dimensional finite element models with the different PCOs of ±1, ±2 and ±3 mm in the posterior direction using CR and PS TKA. We performed the simulation with different PCOs under a deep knee bend condition and evaluated the kinematics for the AP and IE in CR and PS TKA.

RESULTS

The more tibiofemoral (TF) translation in the posterior direction was found as PCO translated in posterior direction for both CR and PS TKA compared to the neutral position. However, the change of the AP translation with respect to the PCO change in CR TKA was greater than PS TKA. The more TF external rotation was found as PCO translated in the anterior direction for both CR and PS TKA compared to the neutral position. However, unlike the TF translation, the TF rotation was not influenced by the PCO change in both CR and PS TKA.

CONCLUSION

The PCO magnitude was influenced by a postoperative change in the kinematics in CR TKA although a relatively smaller effect was observed in PS TKA. Hence, surgeons should be aware of the PCO change, especially for CR TKA.

Is there a difference in joint line restoration in revision Total knee arthroplasty according to prosthesis type?

Background

The aim of this study is (1) to compare joint line (JL) restoration and clinical outcomes in revision TKA based on the contemporary prosthesis type and (2) to determine the restoration of posterior condylar offset (PCO) according to the use of a femoral offset stem.

Methods

Sixty knees that underwent revision TKA from April 2003 to December 2013 with a minimum of 1 year follow up were included. These were further subdivided into three groups according to prosthesis type: group I (2 mm offset), group II (4.5 mm offset), group III (2, 4, and 6 mm offset). The JL position change was defined as a change in the adductor tubercle distance, preoperatively versus postoperatively. We also collected the change of PCO in distal femur and clinical outcomes including range of motion (ROM) and knee scores at the preoperative and last follow-up periods.

Results

The JL elevation for group III was significantly lower than that of the other groups. Usage of the tibial and femoral offset stem in group III was more frequent than in the other groups. PCO in revision TKA with a femoral offset stem was significantly greater than in those with a femoral straight stem. The JL position in revision TKA with a femoral offset stem was less elevated than in those with a femoral straight stem.

Conclusions

More recent developed revision prosthesis with various sizes option of offset stem may be effective in restoring the native joint line as using the femoral offset stem more convenience in revision TKAs.

Effects of posterior condylar offset and posterior tibial slope on mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty using computational simulation

BACKGROUND

Postoperative changes of the femoral posterior condylar offset (PCO) and posterior tibial slope (PTS) affect the biomechanics of the knee joint after fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the biomechanics of mobile-bearing is not well known. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether alterations to the PCO and PTS affect the biomechanics for mobile-bearing TKA.

METHODS

We used a computational model for a knee joint that was validated using in vivo experiment data to evaluate the effects of the PCO and PTS on the tibiofemoral (TF) joint kinematics, patellofemoral (PF) contact stress, collateral ligament force and quadriceps force, for mobile-bearing TKA. The computational model was developed using ±1-, ±2- and ±3-mm PCO models in the posterior direction and -3°, 0°, +3°, and +6° PTS models based on each of the PCO models.

RESULTS

The maximum PF contact stress, collateral ligament force and quadriceps force decreased as the PTS increased. In addition, the maximum PF contact stress and quadriceps force decreased, and the collateral ligament force increased as PCO translated in the posterior direction. This trend is consistent with that observed in any PCO and PTS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show the various effects of postoperative alterations in the PCO and PTS on the biomechanical results of mobile-bearing TKA. Based on the computational simulation, we suggest that orthopaedic surgeons intraoperatively conserve the patient's own anatomical PCO and PTS in mobile-bearing TKA.

Influence of stem length on component flexion and posterior condylar offset in revision total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Hyperextension of the femoral component and excessive slope of the tibial component may delay the cam-post engagement in semi-constrained revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Further, it may compromise the posterior condylar offset (PCO). No prior study has determined whether a short 50-mm stem, or longer stems (100mm and 150mm) lead to less hyperextension of the femoral component or excessive slope and its influence on the posterior condylar offset.

METHODS

Flexion/extension of the femoral component with respect to the sagittal femoral anatomic axis of the distal diaphysis (SFAA) and the tibial slope were measured from rotationally controlled lateral X-rays of 126 consecutive patients with a one- or two-stage revision TKA. Stems of 50mm, 100mm and 150mm were analyzed. Further, reconstruction of the PCO with respect to stem length and component flexion was evaluated.

RESULTS

The average flexion (+) or extension (-) of the femoral component in the sagittal distal anatomical axis was -4.1°±2.8° (mean ± std) for components, which have been implanted with 50-mm stems and 1.1°±1.1° for components with 100- or 150-mm stems, respectively (P=0.0001). The average slope of the tibial was 2.6°±1.5° for tibial trays with 50-mm stems, which was more than the 1.3°±1° for trays with 100-mm stems (P=0.0001). The average PCO ratio was 0.8±1.7 for femoral components with 50-mm stems, which was less than the 1.0±1.7 for trays with 100-mm stems (P=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Because 50-mm stems resulted in about three degree hyperextension of the femoral component with respect to the SFAA compared to 100-mm or 150-mm stems, the longer stems do not alter the natural femoral flexion and a delay of the cam-post engagement may be avoided. Further, a better reconstruction of the PCO may be archived with the use of longer stems.

A computational simulation study to determine the biomechanical influence of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty

Objectives

Posterior condylar offset (PCO) and posterior tibial slope (PTS) are critical factors in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A computational simulation was performed to evaluate the biomechanical effect of PCO and PTS on cruciate retaining TKA.

Methods

We generated a subject-specific computational model followed by the development of ± 1 mm, ± 2 mm and ± 3 mm PCO models in the posterior direction, and -3°, 0°, 3° and 6° PTS models with each of the PCO models. Using a validated finite element (FE) model, we investigated the influence of the changes in PCO and PTS on the contact stress in the patellar button and the forces on the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), patellar tendon and quadriceps muscles under the deep knee-bend loading conditions.

Results

Contact stress on the patellar button increased and decreased as PCO translated to the anterior and posterior directions, respectively. In addition, contact stress on the patellar button decreased as PTS increased. These trends were consistent in the FE models with altered PCO. Higher quadriceps muscle and patellar tendon force are required as PCO translated in the anterior direction with an equivalent flexion angle. However, as PTS increased, quadriceps muscle and patellar tendon force reduced in each PCO condition. The forces exerted on the PCL increased as PCO translated to the posterior direction and decreased as PTS increased.

Conclusion

The change in PCO alternatively provided positive and negative biomechanical effects, but it led to a reduction in a negative biomechanical effect as PTS increased.

Cite this article: K-T. Kang, Y-G. Koh, J. Son, O-R. Kwon, J-S. Lee, S. K. Kwon. A computational simulation study to determine the biomechanical influence of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:69–78. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0143.R1.

Changes in femoral posterior condylar offset and knee flexion after PCL-substituting total knee arthroplasty: comparison of anterior and posterior referencing systems

PURPOSE

Anterior referencing and posterior referencing are two major techniques for positioning femoral components and balancing the sagittal plane during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in medial and lateral posterior condylar offset (PCO) after bilateral TKA using anterior referencing (AR) or posterior referencing (PR) systems and compare the effect of the PCO changes on knee flexion.

METHODS

Twenty female patients (mean age, 68.6 years) underwent bilateral TKA using the AR technique in one knee and the PR technique in the contralateral knee. Three-dimensional reconstructed computed tomographic images from the sagittal plane were used to evaluate PCO before and after arthroplasty. Knee Society scores and range of motion were evaluated postoperatively at a mean of 2.9 years.

RESULTS

Postoperative medial and lateral PCOs were significantly greater (p < 0.001 and p = 0.048, respectively) in the AR group (30.9 ± 2.2 and 29.1 ± 1.5 mm, respectively) than those in the PR group (29.1 ± 2.7 and 27.3 ± 2.3 mm, respectively). In addition, the degree of change in the PCO after TKA was greater in the AR group than in the PR group. On the final follow-up, no differences in the degree of knee flexion were observed between the two groups (124.7° for AR and 124.5° for PR). Knee Society scores were similar in the two groups both preoperatively and postoperatively. On the final follow-up, individual changes in the medial and lateral PCO were not associated with changes in the knee flexion angle.

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration of PCO after TKA was more accurate with the PR technique than with the AR technique. However, the postoperative differences in PCO showed no correlation with changes in knee flexion 2 years after PCL-substituting TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level I.

Posterior femoral condylar offsets of a Chinese population

BACKGROUND

The effect of posterior condylar offset (PCO) on maximal flexion of the knee after TKA is controversial. Another parameter, the posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR), has been recently introduced to describe the posterior condylar geometry. This study measured the posterior femoral condyle geometry of a Chinese population and compared with those of a Western population published in the literature.

METHODS

We measured the PCO and PCOR of 100 Chinese knees (50 males, 50 females). The distances from the anterior and posterior femoral shaft cortex line to the most posterior femoral condyle tangent line were defined as the anterior-posterior dimension (ACP) and posterior condylar offset (PCO). The PCOR was calculated as PCO/ACP. The measured PCO and PCOR were compared to those of a Western population reported in the literature.

RESULTS

The PCOs were 25.80±2.71 and 27.32±2.34 mm for the Chinese females and males, respectively, where the PCO of the females was significantly smaller than that of the males (p<0.05). The PCORs were 0.47±0.04 and 0.46±0.03 for the Chinese females and males, respectively, where the PCORs were similar among the Chinese males and females (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

While the PCO of the Chinese females was smaller than that of the males, their PCORs were similar. Compared to the data of a Western population reported in literature, the PCO of the Chinese population is significantly smaller, but the PCOR is significantly larger.