Narrative Review of Uniportal Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy

Cervical radiculopathy is a common and disabling cervical condition characterized by symptoms including axial neck pain, radicular pain, weakness, and numbness in one or both arms. Common causes include herniated discs and foraminal stenosis, often accompanied by varying degrees of degenerative disc disease and uncovertebral joint hypertrophy. In the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, there is an increasing preference for posterior foraminotomy over anterior cervical discectomy and fusion due to the avoidance of fusion-related complications. As endoscopic spine surgery techniques continue to evolve, there is a rising interest in posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy as effective treatments for cervical radiculopathy. Because these procedures can performed through a single subcentimeter incision with minimal soft tissue damage, they can often be carried out as ambulatory procedures. In this narrative review, we examined current literature addressing the indications, surgical techniques, outcomes, and potential complications associated with posterior cervical endoscopic approaches.

Reprint of: Safe Route for Cervical Approach: Partial Pediculotomy, Partial Vertebrotomy Approach for Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy

BACKGROUND

Cervical radiculopathy is a common cervical spine condition. However, a paucity of data is available on the effect of partial pediculotomy and partial vertebrotomy (PPPV) for posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (PECF) to treat cervical radiculopathy. We investigated the radiological and clinical outcomes of this approach.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective evaluation of 30 patients with cervical radiculopathy who had undergone PPPV PECF. Pre- and postoperative radiographs were performed to evaluate for stability, and computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate the foraminal dimensions and area in the sagittal view. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the area of decompression was also performed. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale, Oswestry disability index, and the MacNab criteria.

RESULTS

No complications or recurrence developed in our PPPV PECF cohort during the study period. At the preoperative, 1-week postoperative, 3-month postoperative, and final follow-up examinations, the mean visual analog scale scores and mean Oswestry disability index showed significant improvement (score, 7.6, 3.0, 2.1, and 1.7, respectively; P < 0.05; and score, 73.9, 28.1, 23.3, and 21.5, respectively; P < 0.05). All the patients scored good to excellent using the MacNab criteria. The radiological findings showed that PPPV PECF resulted in a significant increase in decompression in the foramen area for all CT-measured parameters compared with the mean preoperative values: 1) the sagittal area increased 60.1 ± 23.1 mm²; 2) the craniocaudal length increased 4.0 ± 1.54 mm; and 3) the ventrodorsal length increased 4.0 ± 1.97 mm; Also, the 3-dimensional CT scan reconstruction decompression area had increased 996 ± 266 mm² (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PPPV PECF is a safe route for decompression of the cervical spine with good clinical and radiological outcomes.

Posterior endoscopic cervical foramiotomy and discectomy: clinical and radiological computer tomography evaluation on the bony effect of decompression with 2 years follow-up

PURPOSE

Cervical radiculopathy is a common disabling cervical spine condition. Open anterior and posterior approaches are the conventional surgical treatment approaches with good clinical outcomes. However, the soft tissue damage in these procedures can lead to increase perioperative morbidity. Endoscopic spine surgery provides more soft tissue preservation than conventional approaches. We investigate the radiological and clinical outcomes of posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy.

METHODS

A prospective clinical and radiological study with retrospective evaluation were done for 25 patients with 29 levels of cervical radiculopathy who underwent posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy from November 2016 to December 2018. Clinical outcomes of Visual Analogue Scale, Neck Disability Index and MacNab's score were evaluated at pre-operative, post-operative 1 week, 3 months and final follow-up. Preoperative and post-operative final follow-up flexion and extension roentgenogram were evaluated for cervical stability assessment. Pre-operative and post-operative computer tomography cervical spine evaluation of foraminal length in ventro-dorsal, cephalad-caudal dimensions, sagittal foraminal area and using 3D CT reconstruction coronal decompression area were done.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine levels of cervical radiculopathy underwent posterior endoscopic cervical decompression. The mean follow-up was 29.6 months, and the most common levels affected were C5/6 and C6/7. There was a complication rate of 12% with 2 cases of neurapraxia and one case of recurrent of prolapsed disc. There was no revision surgery in our series. There was significant clinical improvement in Visual Analogue Scale and Neck Disability Index. Prospective comparative study between preoperative and final follow-up mean improvement in VAS score was 5.08 ± 1.75, and NDI was 45.1 ± 13.3. Ninety-two percent of the patients achieved good and excellent results as per MacNab's criteria. Retrospective evaluation of the radiological data showed significant increments of foraminal dimensions: (1) sagittal area increased 21.4 ± 11.2 mm², (2) CT Cranio Caudal length increased 1.21 ± 1.30 mm and (3) CT ventro-dorsal length increased 2.09 ± 1.35 mm and (4) 3D CT scan reconstruction coronal decompression area increased 536 ± 176 mm², p < 0.05.

CONCLUSION

Uniportal posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy are safe, efficient and precise choreographed set of technique in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. It significantly improved clinical outcomes and achieved the objective of increasing in the cervical foramen size in our cohort of patients.

Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression: Review and Technical Note

Endoscopic spine surgery for the treatment of degenerative spinal diseases from lumbar to cervical spine has accelerated over the past 2 decades. Posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD) has been described as a safe, effective, and minimally invasive procedure for cervical radiculopathy or even part of the myelopathy. This procedure also has been validated with comparable outcomes to open and microscopic surgery. Radiculopathy due to foraminal disc herniation or foraminal stenosis should be the optimum indications of this procedure. Intraoperative 3-dimensional navigation can help surgeons to get quick and great quality guidance for endoscopic surgeons. In this review, we will focus on the technical details and evidence-based results of PECD which is a promising procedure for cervical radiculopathy with the advantages of a minimally invasive method.

Safe Route for Cervical Approach: Partial Pediculotomy, Partial Vertebrotomy Approach for Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy

INTRODUCTION

Cervical radiculopathy is a common cervical spine condition. There is a paucity of literature discussing the effect of partial pediculotomy and partial vertebrotomy for posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (PPPV PECF) on cervical radiculopathy. We investigated the radiologic and clinical outcomes of this approach.

METHODS

This was a retrospective evaluation of 30 cases with cervical radiculopathy who underwent PPPV PECF. Preoperative, postoperative roentgenogram for evaluation of stability, computed tomography (CT) evaluation of foraminal dimensions, and area in sagittal view was performed. Three-dimensional reconstruction area of decompression evaluation was performed. Clinical outcomes of the visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Macnab score were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no complication and recurrence in our PPPV PECF cohort during the study period. At preoperative, 1 week postoperative, and 3 months postoperative and final follow-up, the mean visual analog scale score had significant improvement, with scores of 7.6, 3.0, 2.1, and 1.7, respectively, P < 0.05, and also the mean Oswestry Disability Index, with scores of 73.9, 28.1, 23.3, and 21.5 respectively, P < 0.05. Macnab criteria showed all patients scoring good and excellent. Radiologic results showed PPPV PECF had a significant increase in decompression in the foramen area in all CT-measured parameters, as compared with the mean preoperative values; 1) sagittal area increased 60.1 ± 23.1 mm², 2) CT craniocaudal length increased 4.0 ± 1.54 mm, 3) CT ventrodorsal length increased 4.0 ± 1.97 mm, and 4) 3-dimensional CT scan reconstruction decompression area increased 996 ± 266 mm², P < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

PPPV PECF is a safe route of decompression of cervical spine with good clinical and radiologic outcome.