Foot angular kinematics measured with inertial measurement units: A reliable criterion for real-time gait event detection

Accurate and reliable real-time detection of gait events using inertial measurement units (IMUs) is crucial for (1) developing clinically meaningful gait parameters to differentiate normal and impaired gait or (2) creating patient-tailored gait rehabilitation strategies or control of prosthetic devices using feedback from gait phases. However, most previous studies focused only on algorithms with high temporal accuracy and neglected the importance of (1) high reliability, i.e., detecting only and all true gait events, and (2) real-time implementation. Thus, in this study, we presented a novel approach for initial contact (IC) and terminal contact (TC) detection in real-time based on the measurement of the foot orientation. Unlike foot/shank angular velocity and acceleration, foot orientation provides physiologically meaningful kinematic features corresponding to our observational recognition of IC and TC, regardless of the walking modality. We conducted an experimental study to validate our algorithm, including seven participants performing four walking/running activities. By analyzing 5,555 ICs/TCs recorded during the tests, only our algorithm achieved a sensitivity and precision of 100%. Our obtained temporal accuracy (mean ± standard deviation of errors ranging from 0 ± 3 to 6 ± 5 time samples; sampling frequency: 100 Hz) was better than or comparable to those reported in the literature. Our algorithm's performance does not depend on thresholds and gait speed/modality, and it can be used for feedback-based therapeutic gait training or real-time control of assistive or prosthetic technologies. Nevertheless, its performance for pathological gait must be validated in the future. Finally, we shared the codes and sample data on https://www.ncbl.ualberta.ca/codes.

A method for gait events detection based on low spatial resolution pressure insoles data

The accurate identification of initial and final foot contacts is a crucial prerequisite for obtaining a reliable estimation of spatio-temporal parameters of gait. Well-accepted gold standard techniques in this field are force platforms and instrumented walkways, which provide a direct measure of the foot-ground reaction forces. Nonetheless, these tools are expensive, non-portable and restrict the analysis to laboratory settings. Instrumented insoles with a reduced number of pressure sensing elements might overcome these limitations, but a suitable method for gait events identification has not been adopted yet. The aim of this paper was to present and validate a method aiming at filling such void, as applied to a system including two insoles with 16 pressure sensing elements (element area = 310 mm²), sampling at 100 Hz. Gait events were identified exploiting the sensor redundancy and a cluster-based strategy. The method was tested in the laboratory against force platforms on nine healthy subjects for a total of 801 initial and final contacts. Initial and final contacts were detected with low average errors of (about 20 ms and 10 ms, respectively). Similarly, the errors in estimating stance duration and step duration averaged 20 ms and <10 ms, respectively. By selecting appropriate thresholds, the method may be easily applied to other pressure insoles featuring similar requirements.

Foot centre of pressure and ground reaction force during quadriceps resistance exercises; a comparison between force plates and a pressure insole system

The study compared the centre of pressure measurements (COP) and vertical ground reaction forces (vGRF) from a pressure insole system to that from force plates (FP) during two flywheel quadriceps resistance exercises: leg press and squat. The comparison was performed using a motion capture system and simultaneous measurements of COP and vGRF from FP and insoles. At lower insole-vGRF (<250 N/insole) COP accuracy deteriorated and those data were excluded from further analysis. The insoles systematically displaced the COP slightly posteriorly and medially compared to the FP measurements. Pearson's coefficient of correlation (r) between insole- and FP-COP showed good agreement in both the anteroposterior (squat: r = 0.96, leg press: r = 0.97) and mediolateral direction (squat: r = 0.84, leg press: r = 0.90), whereas the root-mean-square errors (RMSE) were lower in the mediolateral (squat: 3.9 mm, leg press: 4.5 mm) than the anteroposterior (squat and leg press: 11.8 mm) direction. Vertical GRF was slightly overestimated by the insoles in leg press and RMSE were greater in leg press (8% of peak force) than in squat (6%). Overall, results were within the range of previous studies performed on gait. The strong agreement between insole and FP measurements indicates that insoles may replace FPs in field applications and biomechanical computations during resistance exercise, provided that the applied force is sufficient.

Plantar pressure measurements and running-related injury: A systematic review of methods and possible associations

Pressure-sensitive measuring devices have been identified as appropriate tools for measuring an array of parameters during running. It is unclear which biomechanical characteristics relate to running-related injury (RRI) and which data-processing techniques are most promising to detect this relationship. This systematic review aims to identify pertinent methodologies and characteristics measured using plantar pressure devices, and to summarise their associations with RRI. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, ScienceDirect and Scopus were searched up until March 2015. Retrospective and prospective, biomechanical studies on running using any kind of pressure-sensitive device with RRI as an outcome were included. All studies involving regular or recreational runners were considered. The study quality was assessed and the measured parameters were summarised. One low quality, two moderate quality and five high quality studies were included. Five different subdivisions of plantar area were identified, as well as five instants and four phases of measurement during foot-ground contact. Overall many parameters were collated and subdivided as plantar pressure and force, plantar pressure and force location, contact area, timing and stride parameters. Differences between the injured and control group were found for mediolateral and anteroposterior displacement of force, contact area, velocity of force displacement, relative force-time integral, mediolateral force ratio, time to peak force and inter-stride correlative patterns. However, no consistent results were found between studies and no biomechanical risk patterns were apparent. Additionally, conflicting findings were reported for peak force in three studies. Based on these observations, we provide suggestions for improved methodology measurement of pertinent parameters for future studies.