Ovarian activity during regular oral contraceptive use

The aim of this study was to assess whether during regular OC use ovarian activity might lead to ovulation, as assessed by ultrasound (US) evaluation of follicular growth and blood levels of 17-beta-estradiol and progesterone. A total of 51 healthy women with normal menstrual cycles (28 +/- 3 days) and no gynecological symptoms were recruited. A total of 22 patients were given a triphasic OC pill containing 35 mg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 50 mg desogestrel (DSG) in the first seven tablets; 30 mg EE and 100 mg DSG in tablets 8 to 14, and 30 mg EE and 150 mg DSG in tablets 15 to 21; 29 patients received one of two OC pills, both containing 20 mg EE plus 150 mg DSG (15 patients) or 75 mg of gestodene (14 patients). A total of 86 cycles were monitored: 51 during the 3rd-4th cycle and 35 during the 6th-8th cycle of OC treatment. Follicular-like structures were observed in nine patients. The frequency of follicular-like structures was similar during the 3rd-4th cycle (9%) and during the 6th-8th cycle (11%). There was no relationship between follicular growth and blood levels of E2 and progesterone, which always appeared suppressed. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that during OC use (even with low dose of ethinyl estradiol), a little ovarian activity may be present without ovulation.

Concentration of fat, protein, lactose and energy in milk of mothers using hormonal contraceptives

Energy, protein, lactose and fat were studied in the milk of mothers who were using different types of contraceptives. One hundred and eleven mothers made up the following groups. C: control (barrier and natural methods, or sterilization), n = 22; combined pill: LDP (low dose pill (levonorgestrel 0.15 mg + ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg)), n = 12 and MDP (medium dose pill (levonorgestrel 0.25 mg + ethinylestradiol 0.05 mg)), n = 13; MP (minipill (norethindrone 0.35 mg)), n = 37; DMPA (injectable progesterone (depot medroxiprogesterone acetate 150 mg)), n = 17; and IUD (plastic or copper intrauterine device), n = 10. The mean stages of lactation were, respectively, 15, 17, 5, 9, 5 and 9 weeks. The mean duration of observation for the study groups ranged from 2 to 4 weeks. Milk samples were collected before and after initiation of treatment (mean = 20 days; range = 14-103 days). The stage of lactation and the interval of nursing before sampling were recorded so that statistical account could be taken of these uncontrollable sources of variability. When incorporated as covariates, they showed that no significant differences existed between the groups tested, either before or after treatment.

Progestins and breast cancer: an epidemiologic review

OBJECTIVE

To provide a worldwide review of all studies that have examined the relationship between progestins, as contained in both contraceptive and postmenopausal replacement therapies, and breast cancer risk. An overview of utilization patterns for progestins, as well as a review of possible biological mechanisms for progestins' action on breast tissue, are also presented.

DATA IDENTIFICATION

All major epidemiologic studies conducted since 1980 have been identified through MEDLINE searches through the published literature and personal communications with prominent researchers in the area.

STUDY SELECTION

Only studies that specifically examined the effects of progestin use are discussed here; these include investigations of progestins, in combination or singularly, as the main hypothesis or a subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

The majority of studies have examined combination estrogen and progestin products (oral contraceptives), and subgroup analyses of progestins have been impeded by low statistical power and the fact that each progestin possesses different types of pharmacological activity. Only a few studies of long-acting injectable progestins exist, confirming a general lack of specific information on the progesterone-breast cancer relationship. Investigations of the effect on breast cancer of the addition of progestins to postmenopausal replacement therapy have also produced inconsistent results.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, there is no consistent evidence of an association between progestins and breast cancer. There is need for further study, particularly of patients in potentially high-risk groups, including those with (1) extended hormone exposure before age 25 and/or first full term pregnancy and (2) exposure in the postmenopausal period.