The utility of augmented teledermatology to improve dermatologist diagnosis of cellulitis: a cross-sectional study

Dermatology consultation for cases of presumed cellulitis improves diagnostic accuracy and management. However, access to in-person consultation remains limited, a gap that could be filled with teledermatology. Augmented teledermatology may improve outcomes. In this cross-sectional study, 20 dermatologists (60% of whom reported conducting inpatient consults > 1 month per year) reviewed 10 real-life cases representing either cellulitis or pseudocellulitis as diagnosed by in-person dermatology consultation. For each case, respondents recorded their diagnosis, confidence, and management decisions after viewing the history and standard teledermatology photos, the responses to a physician-reported cellulitis questionnaire, and finally thermal images. Overall mean diagnostic accuracy increased from 84 ± 4% with the history and physical to 89 ± 3% when adding a cellulitis questionnaire and thermal images (p = 0.23). Accuracy for cellulitis cases specifically significantly increased from 76 ± 6% to 88 ± 4% when adding a cellulitis questionnaire and thermal images (p = 0.049). Accuracy for pseudocellulitis was consistently ≥ 94%. Augmented teledermatology with a standardized questionnaire and thermal images improved diagnostic accuracy for cases of cellulitis and may increase physician confidence. Dermatologists were able to accurately diagnose regardless of experience with inpatient consults, increasing the pool of potential dermatologists who could diagnose cellulitis remotely.

Retinoblastoma associated with orbital pseudocellulitis and high-risk retinoblastoma: a study of 32 eyes

PURPOSE

To study the correlation between retinoblastoma (RB) associated with orbital pseudocellulitis and high-risk histopathology features.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 32 patients who underwent primary enucleation for RB presenting with orbital pseudocellulitis.

RESULTS

All RB patients presented with orbital pseudocellulitis. The mean age at presentation of RB was 30 months (median, 24 months; range, 3-70 months). There were 14 (44%) males and 18 (56%) females. All patients were referred with a diagnosis of RB with orbital pseudocellulitis. Tumor was bilateral in 12 (38%) patients but orbital pseudocellulitis was unilateral in all cases. The pseudocellulitis features included proptosis (n = 9; 28%), eyelid edema (n = 22; 69%), conjunctival congestion (n = 23; 72%), and conjunctival chemosis (n = 15; 47%). Based on clinical features and orbital imaging, all patients were diagnosed to have group E intraocular RB. All patients received intravenous steroids prior to enucleation. On histopathology, tumor necrosis was present in all cases with a mean % necrosis of 60% (median, 60%; range, 10% to 90%). Most tumors (72%) were poorly differentiated. High-risk histopathology features were noted in 23 (72%) cases and adjuvant chemotherapy was advised for all these patients. The most common high-risk histopathology features included post-laminar optic nerve infiltration (34%) and scleral infiltration (22%). Over a mean follow-up period of 34 months (median, 9 months; range, < 1-188 months), there was no event of metastasis or death in any patient.

CONCLUSION

RB presenting with orbital pseudocellulitis is associated with high incidence of high-risk histopathology features.

Handheld infrared thermometer to evaluate cellulitis: the HI-TEC study

OBJECTIVES

Differentiating cellulitis from pseudocellulitis is challenging, and misdiagnosis leads to unnecessary antimicrobial use and increased healthcare expenditure. Clinical diagnosis remains the criterion standard and may involve expert consultation. Our objective was to evaluate the usefulness of a handheld infrared thermometer to improve diagnostic certainty in cases of suspected cellulitis.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study from August 2018 to January 2020 at a tertiary-care hospital in Montreal, Canada. We enrolled adult patients with suspected limb cellulitis. Using the infrared thermometer, we compared the average temperature of the affected area with that of the contralateral limb, and we used Youden's method to determine the optimal temperature difference which best differentiated cellulitis from pseudocellulitis as determined by an independent and blinded infectious diseases specialist. We used bootstrapping to estimate 95% confidence intervals for the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve.

RESULTS

Of 65 patients screened for enrolment, 52 patients were recruited (median age: 64 years, IQR 52-76); 39 of these were diagnosed with cellulitis and 13 were not. The mean temperature difference between affected and unaffected limbs was 2.6°C (95%CI 2.1-3.1°C) for patients with cellulitis and 0.4°C (95%CI -1.2°C to 2.1°C) for patients without (p < 0.001). An average temperature difference between limbs of 0.8°C or more was 95% sensitive (95%CI 74-100%) and 69% specific (95%CI 44-95%) for the diagnosis of cellulitis (c-statistic 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

In this proof-of-concept single-centre study, a handheld infrared thermometer was a useful aid to differentiate cellulitis from pseudocellulitis.

Distinguishing Cellulitis from Its Noninfectious Mimics: Approach to the Red Leg

Cellulitis is a common clinical diagnosis in the outpatient and inpatient setting; studies have demonstrated a surprisingly high misdiagnosis rate: nearly one-third of cases are other conditions (ie, pseudocellulitis). This high rate of misdiagnosis is thought to contribute to nearly $515 million in avoidable health care spending in the United States each year; leading to the delayed or missed diagnosis of pseudocellulitis and to delays in appropriate treatment. There is a broad differential diagnosis for pseudocellulitis, which includes inflammatory and noninflammatory conditions of the skin. Accurate diagnosis of the specific condition causing pseudocellulitis is crucial to management, which varies greatly.

Orbital Pseudocellulitis: A Retinoblastoma-Associated Masquerade Syndrome

Introduction

A masquerade syndrome is an atypical presentation of a neoplastic process that mimics an inflammatory condition. In this paper, we focus on orbital pseudocellulitis.

Case Series

Our case series includes 5 retinoblastoma patients with orbital pseudocellulitis at presentation. In 3 patients the disease was bilateral, in 1 trilateral, and in 1 unilateral. The eyes with pseudocellulitis were enucleated, while the fellow eyes were treated conservatively, when affected. Four patients responded well to the therapy and showed remission of the tumor. The patient with trilateral retinoblastoma did not respond to therapy and died of disease.

Discussion

Differential diagnosis with infectious orbital cellulitis is extremely important. Patients with orbital cellulitis present with fever, sinusitis, leukocytosis, and raised inflammatory markers, while ophthalmoscopic examination is negative and imaging studies show sinus involvement. On the contrary, patients with retinoblastoma do not show systemic inflammation, while ophthalmoscopic examination reveals leukocoria, buphthalmos, and an intraocular tumor mass associated with retinal detachment. Magnetic resonance imaging shows intralesional calcifications and soft tissue edema without sinus involvement. Histology confirms the diagnosis.

Conclusions

Medical history, physical examination, and imaging studies are crucial in the diagnosis of retinoblastoma-associated orbital pseudocellulitis. Retinoblastoma should be excluded in all patients with signs of pre-septal orbital cellulitis through fundoscopy and/or imaging studies.

Recurrent pseudocellulitis due to gemcitabine: underrecognized and underreported?

Pseudocellulitis has been previously described with the use of chemotherapy agent gemcitabine. This condition is thought to occur due to vascular toxicity and increased localized permeability of the skin capillaries. We report herein a case of recurrent pseudocellulitis due to gemcitabine in a patient with metastatic pancreatic cancer. We believe this condition is underreported and underrecognized. Furthermore, it may be misdiagnosed as cellulitis and inappropriately treated with systemic antibiotics. As the diagnosis is clinical and the condition is self-limited, referral to other specialists is usually not required. Awareness of gemcitabine-induced pseudocellulitis is important in order to reassure the patients, their families, and non-oncology providers and to avoid unnecessary (and often costly) diagnostic work-up.