A new method of pulse control in cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Continuous femoral pulse check

OBJECTIVES

The reliability of manual pulse checks has been questioned but is still recommended in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines. The aim is to compare the 10-s carotid pulse check (CPC) between heart massage cycles with the continuous femoral pulse check (CoFe PuC) in CPR, and to propose a better location to shorten the interruption times for pulse check.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on 117 Non-traumatic CPR patients between January 2020 and January 2022. A total of 702 dependent pulse measurements were executed, where carotid and femoral pulses were simultaneously assessed. Cardiac ultrasound, end-tidal CO2, saturation, respiration, and blood pressure were employed for pulse validation.

RESULTS

The decision time for determining the presence of a pulse in the last cycle of CPR was 3.03 ± 1.26 s for CoFe PuC, significantly shorter than the 10.31 ± 5.24 s for CPC. CoFe PuC predicted the absence of pulse with 74% sensitivity and 88% specificity, while CPC predicted the absence of pulse with 91% sensitivity and 61% specificity.

CONCLUSION

CoFe PuC provides much earlier and more effective information about the pulse than CPC. This shortens the interruption times in CPR. CoFe PuC should be recommended as a new and useful method in CPR guidelines.

Awareness campaigns of atrial fibrillation as an opportunity for early detection by pharmacists: an international cross-sectional study

Atrial fibrillation (AF) accounts for up to one third of strokes, one of the lead mortality causes worldwide. The European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend opportunistic screening as a means to increase the odds of early detection and institution of appropriate treatment according to risk factors identified. However, in most countries there are various barriers to effective uptake of screening, including low awareness. The Atrial Fibrillation Association is a patient association engaged with raising awareness of AF. Establishing a partnership with the International Pharmacists for Anticoagulation Care Taskforce, we set as goals to test a model for raising awareness of AF involving pharmacists globally; and to identify barriers and enablers to its implementation. A cross-sectional study was conducted during the Arrhythmia Alliance World Heart Rhythm Week. Pharmacists from 10 countries invited individuals (≥ 40 years; without anticoagulation therapy of AF) to participate in the awareness campaign. Participants agreeing were engaged in the early detection of AF (EDAF) using pulse palpation. Individuals with rhythm discrepancies were referred and prospectively assessed to have information on the proportion of confirmed diagnosis, leading to estimate the detection rate. Interviews with country coordinators explored barriers and enablers to implementation. The study involved 4193 participants in the awareness campaign and 2762 in the EDAF event (mean age 65.3 ± 13.0), of whom 46.2% individuals were asymptomatic, recruited across 120 sites. Most common CHA₂DS₂-VASc risk factor was hypertension. Among 161 patients referred to physician, feedback was obtained for 32 cases, of whom 12 new arrhythmia diagnoses were confirmed (5 for AF, 2 for atrial flutter), all among elders (≥ 65 years). Qualitative evaluation suggested a local champion to enable pharmacists' success; technology enhanced engagement amongst patients and increased pharmacists' confidence in referring to physicians; interprofessional relationship was crucial in success. This study suggests pharmacists can contribute to greater outreach of awareness campaigns. Effective communication pathways for inter-professional collaboration were suggested enablers to gain full benefits of EDAF.

Comparison of femoral and carotid arteries in terms of pulse check in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

There is no gold standard pulse localisation for pulse check in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

AIM

To compare the femoral and carotid arteries in terms of pulse check in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and recommend the most appropriate pulse localisation in advanced life support guidelines and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training programmes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively conducted the study with patients who developed non-traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest between September 2018 and March 2019. The pulse check team was established and divided into two groups, A and B. Both carotid and femoral arteries were checked simultaneously for pulse by members of groups A and B, with the groups alternating between sites to avoid bias. We used some criteria to make pulse detection more effective. These were ETCO2, rhythm and cardiac ultrasonography.

RESULTS

We evaluated 1289 pulse checks in 102 patients. As a result of the statistical analysis with manual palpations and pulses criteria, which we used to detected the presence of a pulse in CPR, we found that the sensitivity of the carotid artery was significantly higher than that of the femoral artery (p = 0.017), with almost identical specificities.

CONCLUSION

The carotid artery should be recommended as the gold standard localisation for pulse checks in cardiopulmonary resuscitation in CPR training programmes and ACLS guidelines.

Checking the pulse in the 21st century: Interobserver reliability of carotid pulse detection by point-of-care ultrasound

INTRODUCTION

Detection of a pulse is crucial to decision-making in the care of patients who are in cardiac arrest, however, the current standard of manual pulse palpation is unreliable. An emerging alternative is the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for direct assessment of the carotid pulse. The primary objective of this study is to determine the interobserver reliability for physician interpretation of pre-recorded point-of-care ultrasound pulse-check clips for patients who are in cardiac arrest.

METHODS

We conducted a web-based survey of residents and physicians working in an academic center. Participants were shown a tutorial demonstrating POCUS detection of the carotid pulse and then asked to interpret 15 carotid pulse ultrasound clips from patients who were in cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was interobserver reliability for carotid pulse assessment. Secondary outcomes included interobserver reliability stratified by physician role and POCUS experience, median tutorial and median pulse assessment duration. Interobserver reliability was determined by Krippendorff's ⍺.

RESULTS

68 participants completed the study, with a response rate of 75%. There was high interobserver reliability for pulse assessment amongst all study participants (⍺ = 0.874, 95% CI 0.869 to 0.879). All sub-groups had ⍺ greater than 0.8. Median tutorial duration was 35 s (IQR 29). Median pulse assessment duration was 6 s (IQR 5) with 76% of assessments completed within 10 s.

CONCLUSION

Interpretation of the carotid pulse by POCUS showed high interobserver reliability. Further work must be done to determine the performance of POCUS pulse assessment in real-time for patients who are in cardiac arrest.

Assessing the validity of two-dimensional carotid ultrasound to detect the presence and absence of a pulse

BACKGROUND

Traditional assessment of return of cardiac output in cardiac arrest by manual palpation has poor accuracy. Point of care ultrasound of a major artery has been suggested as an alternative. We conducted a diagnostic accuracy study of two-dimensional carotid ultrasound to detect the presence or absence of a pulse, using cardiopulmonary bypass patients for pulse and pulseless states.

METHODS

A cross-sectional multi-patient, multi-reader repeated measures diagnostic study was conducted. For patients undergoing routine cardiopulmonary bypass, a portable ultrasound was used to record four 10-s videos the common carotid artery, three aimed for a pulse in high (>90 mmHg), medium (70-90 mmHg) and low (<70 mmHg) systolic blood pressure (SBP) ranges, and a pulseless video was recorded on cardiopulmonary bypass. Critical care physicians viewed the videos and were asked to nominate within 10 s if a pulse was present. True pulse-status was determined via the arterial-line waveform.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients had all four videos collected. Median patient age was 64 (IQR 14), sixteen were male (70%) and median BMI was 27. The median SBP in high-, medium- and low-SBP groups were 120 mmHg, 83 mmHg and 69 mmHg respectively. Forty-six physicians reviewed a subset of 24 videos. Overall sensitivity was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.89-0.93) and specificity 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.93). Sensitivity was highest in the high-SBP group (0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.98) and lowest in the low-SBP group (0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.87).

CONCLUSION

2D ultrasound of the common carotid artery is both sensitive and specific for detection of the presence or absence of a pulse.

The POCUS pulse check: A randomized controlled crossover study comparing pulse detection by palpation versus by point-of-care ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Manual pulse checks (MP) are an unreliable skill even in the hands of healthcare providers (HCPs). In the context of cardiac arrest, this may translate into inappropriate chest compressions when a pulse is present, or conversely omitting chest compressions when one is absent. To date, no study has assessed the use of B-mode ultrasound (US) for the detection of a carotid pulse. The primary objective of this study was to assess the time required to detect a carotid pulse in live subjects using US compared to the traditional palpation method.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled crossover non-inferiority trial. HCPs attended a 15 minute focused US workshop on identification of the carotid pulse. Both pulse check methods were timed for each participant on two different subjects in random order. The primary outcome was time to carotid pulse detection in seconds (s). Secondary outcomes included confidence levels of pulse detection measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) and rates of prolonged pulse checks (> 5 s or >10 s). The study was powered to determine whether US pulse checks were not slower than MP by greater than two seconds. The results are presented as the difference in means with a 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

111 participants completed the study. Mean pulse detection times were 4.22 s (SD 3.26) by US compared to 4.71 s (SD 6.45) by MP with a mean difference in times of -0.49 s (90% CI: -1.77 to 0.39). There were no significant differences between US and MP in the rates of prolonged pulse checks of greater than 5 s (23% vs 19%, p = 0.45) or 10 s (9% vs 8%, p = 0.81). First attempt at detection of pulse checks was more successful in the US group (99.1% vs 85.6%, p = 0.0001). Prior to training, participants reported higher confidence using MP compared to US; 68 (IQR 48-83) vs 15 (IQR 8-42) mm (p < 0.001). Following the study, participants reported higher confidence levels using US than MP; 91 (IQR 82-97) vs 83 (IQR 72-94) mm (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid pulse detection in live subjects was not slower using US as compared to palpation, and demonstrated higher first attempt success rate and less variability in measurement times. A brief teaching session was sufficient to improve confidence of carotid pulse identification even in those with no previous US training. The preliminary results from this study provide the groundwork for larger studies to evaluate this pulse check method for patients in cardiac arrest.

Comparison of manual pulse palpation, cardiac ultrasonography and Doppler ultrasonography to check the pulse in cardiopulmonary arrest patients

OBJECTIVE

For health professionals, the absence of pulse checked by manual palpation is a primary indicator for initiating chest compressions in patients considered to have cardiopulmonary arrest (CA). However, using a pulse check to evaluate perfusion during CA may be associated with some risks of its own. Our objective was to compare the efficiency of cardiac ultrasonography (CUSG), Doppler ultrasonography (DUSG), and manual pulse palpation methods to check the pulse in CA patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was prospectively performed in 137 patients older than 16 years of age who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). CUSG, DUSG, and manual pulse palpation were practiced simultaneously as suggested in the relevant guidelines. Findings of the patients were recorded at the first min, at min 15 and at the end of CPR. SPSS 18.0 was used for statistical analysis.

FINDINGS

A total of 72.3% (n = 99) of the cardiopulmonary arrest incidents occurred out-of-hospital. CUSG (4.76 ± 2.19, 4.33 ± 2.17, and 3.68 ± 2.14 s), DUSG (9.59 ± 2.37, 8.22 ± 2.86, and 7.60 ± 2.83 s), and manual pulse palpation (10.76 ± 1.03, 9.72 ± 3.01, and 9.29 ± 3.36 s) measurements of the first, second, and last inspections were detected, respectively. The false negative rates (100%, 28%, and 0%) and false positive rates (5.3%, 3.5%, and 0%) of manual pulse palpation the first, second, and last inspections were calculated, respectively, as well.

CONCLUSION

The use of real-time CUSG during resuscitation provides a substantial contribution to the resuscitation team. CUSG will allow earlier and more accurate detection of pulse than manual pulse palpation and DUSG.