Pythium insidiosum keratitis: Review of literature of 5 years' clinical experience at a tertiary eye care center

BACKGROUND

Pythium insidiosum is an important cause of infectious keratitis from tropical and sub-tropical countries. Due to its closely mimicking clinical and microbiological features with fungus, it remained unidentified and managed as fungal keratitis for a long time. Previously all patients had poor outcomes with antifungal therapy and needed surgical treatment with higher rates of recurrences of infection leading to loss of an eye. Thus, a novel approach was required to treat it and, in this article, we would like to elaborate on the drastic change which these 5 years have brought in the management of this condition.

METHODS

In view of making a consolidated article comprising all the required information and also our clinical experience in the management of Pythium keratitis, we extensively reviewed several articles available on it over PubMed and Google scholars. Relevant literature describing details about Pythium, its clinical correlation, and recent advances from 52 articles including 12 articles from our group were finally included.

RESULTS

Our group identified and highlighted the unique clinical and microbiological features of Pythium insidiosum, performed several in-vitro, in-vivo studies along with clinical trials, and proposed the strategic way of its diagnosis and treatment. The use of antifungals was replaced with antibacterial medications and this resulted in better medical and surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis and management of Pythium insidiosum is constantly evolving with several recent works pointing out the possible changes in the practice patterns for the management of this challenging form of keratitis.

Unusual Presentation of Pythium Keratitis as Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis: Clinical Dilemma

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical picture and outcome of a case of Pythium keratitis, presenting as peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK).

CASE SUMMARY

A 54- year- old male presented to the clinic with a PUK in the right eye. Systemic investigations were performed to rule out associated collagen vascular disorders. Microbiological examination of corneal scrapings was performed to rule out secondary infection which revealed gram positive cocci on Gram stain. There was no growth of any organism on culture. Topical vancomycin 5% and ciprofloxacin 0.3% were started initially. On regular follow-up, there was worsening of clinical signs. Topical and oral corticosteroids were further added. Due to progressive worsening of infiltrate size and corneal perforation, therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty was performed. Pythium insidiosum (confirmed by DNA sequencing and zoospore formation) was grown from excised corneal button and the histopathology revealed filaments suggestive of Pythium species.

CONCLUSION

This case describes the uncommon manifestation of Pythium insidiosum keratitis presenting as peripheral ulcerative keratitis.

Retrospective multifactorial analysis of Pythium keratitis and review of literature

Purpose:

The aim of this work was to study the demographic profile, clinical diagnostic features, challenges in management, treatment outcomes, and ocular morbidity of microbiological culture-proven Pythium keratitis in a tertiary eye care hospital in South India.

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of microbiologically proven Pythium keratitis patients was performed at a tertiary eye center from October 2017 to March 2020. Demographic details, risk factors, microbiological investigations, clinical course, and visual outcomes were analyzed.

Results:

Thirty patients were analyzed. The mean age was 43.1±17.2 years. Most common risk factors were history of injury in 80% and exposure to dirty water in 23.3%. Visual acuity at baseline was 20/30 to perception of light (PL). The most common clinical presentation was stromal infiltrate and hypopyon in 14 (46.6%) patients each. The microbiological confirmation was based on culture on blood agar and vesicles with zoospores formation with incubated leaf carnation method. Seven (23.3%) patients improved with topical 0.2% Linezolid and topical 1% Azithromycin, 19 (63.3%) patients underwent Therapeutic keratoplasty (TPK) and 4 were lost to follow-up. Seven (23.3%) patients had graft reinfection, and 3 (10%) developed endophthalmitis. The final visual acuity was 20/20- 20/200 in 6 (20%) patients, 20/240-20/1200 in 5 (16.6%) patients, hand movement to positive perception of light in 16 patients and no perception of light (Pthisis Bulbi) in 3 (10%) patients.

Conclusion:

P. insidiosum keratitis is a rapidly progressive infectious keratitis with prolonged and relapsing clinical course. It usually results in irreparable vision loss in majority of the patients. Prompt diagnosis, clinical awareness, and specific treatment options are needed for successfully managing this devastating corneal disease.