A shorter R wave peak time in left bundle branch pacing may not be a marker of more physiological ventricular activation: A case report

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBp) is a promising alternative to conventional biventricular pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy. The left anterior fascicle (LAF) is adjacent to the left ventricular outflow tract, while the left posterior fascicle (LPF) dominates a broader area of the left ventricle. Whether LAF or LPF dominates ventricular activation has not been determined. We present the case of a 76-year-old man who underwent LBBp implantation and propose the left ventricular activation domination in LPF pacing, an alternative when LBBp is unavailable.

Septal scar as a barrier to left bundle branch area pacing

BACKGROUND

The use of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) for bradycardia pacing and cardiac resynchronization is increasing, but implants are not always successful. We prospectively studied consecutive patients to determine whether septal scar contributes to implant failure.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for bradycardia pacing or cardiac resynchronization therapy were prospectively enrolled. Recruited patients underwent preprocedural scar assessment by cardiac MRI with late gadolinium enhancement imaging. LBBAP was attempted using a lumenless lead (Medtronic 3830) via a transeptal approach.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were recruited: 29 male, mean age 68 years, 10 ischemic, and 16 non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Pacing indication was bradycardia in 26% and cardiac resynchronization in 74%. The lead was successfully deployed to the left ventricular septum in 30/35 (86%) and unsuccessful in the remaining 5/35 (14%). Septal late gadolinium enhancement was significantly less extensive in patients where left septal lead deployment was successful, compared those where it was unsuccessful (median 8%, IQR 2%-18% vs. median 54%, IQR 53%-57%, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of septal scar appears to make it more challenging to deploy a lead to the left ventricular septum via the transeptal route. Additional implant tools or alternative approaches may be required in patients with extensive septal scar.

R wave peak time and no reflow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Immediate and short-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

No reflow (NR) remains an important constraint in management of ST elevation myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Most ECG parameters validated till date including ST resolution are postprocedural. R wave peak time (RWPT) is a dynamic parameter and reflects conduction delay in ischaemic myocardium in selected leads supplied by infarct related artery (IRA). The present study was undertaken to see whether preprocedural RWPT per se or RWPT following primary PCI can predict persistence of NR along with immediate and short-term clinical outcome.

METHODS

200 patients were enrolled after exclusion. Clinical, Biochemical, ECG parameters including RPWT and angiographic parameters (pre- and post-procedure) were recorded. ECG papers was analysed using digital image processing software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). All patients were followed up for 6 months.

RESULTS

NR was observed in 35% of the patients. Age, Diabetes, symptom to balloon time, higher thrombus burden, peak CPK-MB level (pre and post procedure) were significantly higher in NR group. On ECG analysis, baseline RWPT, QRS duration and pathological Q wave were significantly higher in NR group. On multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.10 CI 1.00-1.21 P = 0.04), thrombus grade ≥ 3 in IRA (OR 12.38 CI 2.08-73.58 P = 0.006), symptom to balloon time (OR 2.18 CI 1.6-3.0 P < 0.001) and baseline RWPT on ECG [OR 1.86 CI 1.24-2.78, P = 0.003] were found to be independent predictors of NR. Increase in RWPT following primary PCI was found to both highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing persistence of NR after primary PCI. Follow up at the end of 6 months has shown that patients with increased RWPT following primary PCI had worse short-term cardiovascular outcomes compared to those with decreased RWPT following primary PCI.

CONCLUSION

Baseline RWPT is a significant predictor of NR in patients of STEMI undergoing primary PCI. A persistently increased RWPT following primary PCI is also a highly sensitive and specific ECG marker of persistence of NR which is associated with adverse short-term clinical outcome.

The Predictive Value of R Wave Peak Time to Detect Thrombus Burden in St-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Tertiary Medical Center

UNASSIGNED

Background: Patients with higher thrombus burden have higher procedural complications and more long-term adverse cardiac events. Detecting patients with high thrombus burden (HTB) before coronary intervention could help avoid procedural complications. Objective: The research aimed to analyze the R wave peak time (RWPT) on the electrocardiogram to predict thrombus burden before coronary angiography in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Materials and Methods: A total of 159 patients with STEMI were included in the study conducted at a tertiary medical center. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) thrombus scale was applied to assess the thrombus burden. TIMI thrombus grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 were accepted as low; 4 and 5 had HTB. RWPT was measured from the beginning of the QRS complex to the R-peak from the leads pointing to the infarct-related artery. Results: Patients were divided into two groups according to their angiographically defined thrombus burden as low and high. The low thrombus burden group (LTB) comprised fifty-four patients, whereas the HTB group comprised 105 patients. In the LTB group, RWPT was 47.96 ± 9.17 ms, and in the HTB group was 53.58 ± 8.92 ms; it was significantly longer (p < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that a cut-off value of preprocedural RWPT of > 46.5 ms predicted the occurrence of HTB with a sensitivity and specificity of 87.62% and 51.85%, respectively (AUC 0.682, 95% CI 0.590-0.774, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The present study evaluated the relationship between the RWPT and thrombus burden in STEMI patients. Based on the results, RWPT is an independent predictor of HTB.

Delayed intrinsicoid deflection: Electrocardiographic harbinger of heart disease

Delayed intrinsicoid deflection (DID) is an emerging electrocardiogram (ECG) marker of major clinical significance that is increasingly getting attention. Intrinsicoid deflection measures ventricular depolarization in the initial portion of the QRS complex, and DID is defined as an R wave peak time of ≥50 ms in leads V₅ and V₆ . Prior studies have identified an independent association between DID and cardiovascular conditions such as left ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. The exact mechanism that results in DID remains unknown. Animal models indicate that DID may result from abnormal calcium and potassium conductance as well as extracellular matrix remodeling. DID remains an ECG marker of interest given its potential predictive value of underlying cardiovascular pathology and adverse events. This review provides an update on the proposed mechanisms and associations, as well as the clinical and research implications of DID.

R-peak time in clinically healthy dogs with different thoracic conformations

R-peak time (RPT) is an electrocardiographic parameter that represents the time taken for electrical activation to spread from the endocardium to the epicardium. In human medicine, right ventricular RPT is measured from lead V₁ to lead V₂, and left ventricular RPT from lead V₅ to lead V₆. The aim of the present study was to define RPT duration in a group of clinically healthy dogs with different thoracic conformations. Sixty clinically healthy dogs underwent a 12-lead electrocardiogram recorded using a previously described precordial system. The dogs were allocated into three morphologic groups. In the brachymorphic group, the median and 25th-75th percentiles for RPT in V₁ were 10.5 ms (10-12 ms); V₂, 18 ms (16.5-20 ms); V₃, 19 ms (18-22 ms); V₄, 20 ms (17-23.5 ms); V₅, 21 ms (18.5-24 ms); and V₆: 22 ms (18.5-25.5 ms). In the mesomorphic group, RPT in V₁ was 16 ms (14-18 ms); V₂, 22 ms (20-24 ms); V₃, 23 ms (21-25 ms); V₄, 23 ms (22-25 ms); V₅, 25 ms (23-27 ms); and V₆, 28 ms (25-30 ms). In the dolichomorphic group, RPT in V₁ was 15 ms (13-17 ms); V₂, 29 ms (26-32.5 ms); V₃, 30 ms (27-33.5 ms); V₄, 29.5 ms (26-35 ms); V₅, 30 ms (28-34 ms); and V₆, 31.5 ms (28-35 ms). RPT in V₁ was significantly shorter than RPT in V₂ to V₆ in all morphotypes (P < 0.05). In all precordial leads, RPT was significantly different between morphotypes (P < 0.05). These results are in agreement with previous findings in humans and with the observation that V₁ reads the right ventricle and V₂ to V₆ read the left ventricle. These preliminary data provide RPT ranges in clinically healthy dogs of different morphotypes.

The relationship between R wave peak time and left ventricular mass index in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis

PURPOSE

Cardiovascular complications have been reported to be the main cause of mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Although left ventricular hypertrophy is the most common clinical presentation of cardiac remodeling, cardiovascular complications may also include disturbances of the heart conduction system. The R wave peak time (RWPT) has been previously associated with left ventricular hypertrophy and myocardial ischemia. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between RWPT and echocardiographic parameters in patients with ESRD.

METHODS

This study enrolled 66 patients (29 females, age 57.2 ± 12.8 years) with ESRD, and 72 controls (37 females, age 55.3 ± 10.1 years) with similar risk factors. All patients underwent electrocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography. The RWPT was defined as the interval between the onset of the QRS complex and the peak of the R or R' wave.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in terms of clinical and demographic parameters between ESRD patients and controls. Left ventricular ejection fraction was similar between the groups. However, left atrial diameter, interventricular septal thickness, posterior wall thickness, left ventricular mass (LVM) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were significantly higher in patients with ESRD. Among electrocardiographic parameters, P wave and QRS complex durations and RWPT were significantly higher in patients with ESRD. Prolonged RWPT, increased LVM and LVMI were identified as associates of ESRD. Furthermore, RWPT correlated well with LVM and LVMI.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that RWPT prolonged significantly in patients with ESRD. Furthermore, prolonged RWPT has been associated with increased LVM and LVMI.

The association between electrocardiographic R wave peak time and coronary artery disease severity in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate possible association between QRS duration (QRSD), R wave peak time (RWPT), and coronary artery disease severity identified using the SYNTAX score (SS) in patients with unstable angina pectoris (USAP) or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

METHOD

A total of 176 USAP/NSTEMI patients were enrolled in the study.

RESULTS

The high SS group (>22, n:45) patients had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM); presence of ST segment depression ≥0.5 mm and 1 mm; ST segment elevation in the AVR lead (AVRSTE); longer QRSD and RWPT; and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) than the low SS group (≤22, n: 131). The LVEF, AVRSTE, and RWPT (OR: 1.035, 95% CI: 1.003-1.067; p = 0.030) were independent predictors of high SS.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that RWPT and AVRSTE could be used as predictors of high SS.

R-Peak Time: An Electrocardiographic Parameter with Multiple Clinical Applications

In the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), the time from the onset of the QRS complex (Q or R wave) to the apex or peak of R or to R' (when present), using indirect or semidirect surface unipolar precordial leads, bipolar limb leads or unipolar limb leads, is called ventricular activation time (VAT), R wave peak time (RWPT), R-peak time or intrinsicoid deflection (ID). The R-peak time in a specific ECG lead is the interval from the earliest onset of the QRS complex, preferably determined from multiple simultaneously recorded leads, to the peak (maximum) of the R wave or R' if present. Irrespective of the relative height of the R and R' waves, the R-peak time is measured to the second peak. The parameter corresponds to the time of the electrical activation occurring from the endocardium to the epicardium as reflected by the recording electrode located at a variable distance on the body surface, depending on the lead type: a unipolar precordial lead, a bipolar or unipolar limb lead. In normal conditions, the R-peak time for the thinner-walled right ventricle is measured from lead V1 or V2 and its upper limit of normal is 35 ms. The R-peak time for the left ventricle (LV) is measured from leads V5 to V6 and 45 ms is considered the upper limit of normal. In this manuscript, we review the clinical applications of this parameter.