Cellular immune response following pre-exposure and postexposure rabies vaccination by intradermal and intramuscular routes

Purpose

Immunization against rabies in humans induces protective neutralizing antibodies; however, the induction of type 1 or type 2 cytokine mediated cellular immune responses following rabies vaccination is not understood. Hence, the present study investigated cellular cytokine responses in vaccinated individuals.

Materials and Methods

The study groups included healthy rabies antigen naive controls (n=10), individuals who received intradermal primary (n=10) or booster pre-exposure vaccination (n=20) and subjects who received postexposure rabies vaccination either by intradermal (n=18) or intramuscular (n=20) routes. The antigen specific cellular responses were analyzed by stimulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells with a rabies vaccine antigen in the interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay. These responses were compared to the rabies virus neutralizing antibody (RVNA) titers that were measured by rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test.

Results

We observed that cellular and humoral immune responses to primary intradermal rabies vaccination could be greatly enhanced by a booster vaccine; and both type 1 and type 2 cytokine responses were significantly elevated. The magnitude of type 1 and type 2 cytokine responses did not differ significantly among the intramuscular and intradermal routes of postexposure vaccination. The number of cells producing IFN-γ and IL-4 correlated significantly with the levels of RVNA.

Conclusion

Both type 1 and type 2 cellular cytokine responses are strongly induced after rabies vaccination and directly correlate with levels of RVNA titers. The neutralizing antibody as well as the type 1 and type 2 cytokine responses may be important for vaccine induced protective responses against rabies.

Animal Inflicted Maxillofacial Injuries: Treatment Modalities and Our Experience

INTRODUCTION

Animal inflicted injuries to the face and neck are becoming much more common as people lavish affection on pets. Injuries caused by animal attacks to the face can cause complex injuries to soft and hard tissues, presented as perforations, lacerations, crushes, avulsion or fractures. An uncountable number of bacteria and virus can be found in such injuries, with a potential pathological effect to humans, regarding infections. Although the infection rate is low due to excellent blood supply to face, the injuries have disfiguring effect with possible psychological repercussion to the patients. The treatment of animal inflicted injuries must address the soft tissue defect, neurovascular injuries, and bone injuries as well as prevention of post treatment infection. Primary wound repair is the treatment of choice for most clinically uninfected bite wound where as delayed closure should be reserved for wounds at high risk of infection or already infected wounds and tissue defect may require local flap or micro-vascular re-implantations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this article, we have elicited up to date considerations regarding the management of animal inflicted injuries to the face based on literature search and exemplified by multiple case reports.

CONCLUSION

For bite injuries on face, immediate primary wound repair after meticulous wound debridement and irrigation with sufficient volume added by antibiotic prophylaxis gives good cosmetic results with minimum risk of infection. Depending upon type of attack and age of victims, psychiatric or social counseling may also be required.

Surgical Management of Pediatric Dog Bites: A Systematic Review and Treatment Guideline

INTRODUCTION

Dog bites are a unique and unusual injury in children, associated with atypical bacterial species, high infection rates, and controversial surgical treatment. Expert recommendations currently guide management and no surgical evidence-based guidelines exist. We conducted a systematic review to answer three management questions: (1) What are the best practices for wound management? (2) In what circumstances should prophylactic antibiotics be administered? (3) In what circumstances should rabies prophylaxis be given?

METHODS

A structured review was performed using a keyword search querying "pediatric" "dog bite" "management". Results were reported according to the PRISMA methodology. The quality of nonrandomized studies was evaluated according to Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Qualitative analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 803 studies were identified and 53 studies were included in the final analysis. Current literature suggests that primary closure of bites which are well irrigated and sharply debrided within 8 h of injury, is not associated with increased infection. While dog bites are associated with an overall high rate of infection (6-25 %), routine antibiotic prophylaxis in low-risk wounds does not lower that risk. Postexposure prophylaxis for rabies is indicated for all dog bites where the rabies status of the dog cannot be determined, or the animal cannot be quarantined for 10 days.

CONCLUSION

High-quality evidence regarding the surgical management of pediatric dog bites is limited. Trial data have demonstrated improved outcomes in wound healing and infection rates with a focus on copious irrigation and diligent wound debridement, although independent validation is needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II - systematic review.