Soluble CD40 ligand expression in stable atherosclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The role of inflammation in atherosclerosis development and expression in different arterial territories is unclear. Soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) mediates inflammation and atherogenesis. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed whether sCD40L was dysregulated in stable atherosclerosis, irrespective of the diseased arterial territory, and whether this dysregulation differed according to the specific territory.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase for studies reporting circulating sCD40L levels in individuals with and without stable atherosclerosis. sCD40L levels were compared using random-effects meta-analysis, weighted by the inverse variance method (study protocol: PROSPERO CRD42020181392).

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies (59 estimates) including 7705 patients and 7841 controls were analyzed. sCD40L levels were found to be increased in patients with atherosclerosis, irrespective of the territory (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.43, 95% CI 0.29-0.57; 59 estimates; χ² heterogeneity p < 0.001; I² = 92%). SMD was greatest in carotid atherosclerosis (SMD 0.58, 95% CI 0.30-0.86; 17 estimates), followed by coronary (SMD 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.62; 33 estimates), lower extremity (SMD 0.26, 95% CI -0.02-0.54; 7 estimates), and renal atherosclerosis (SMD -0.07, 95% CI -2.77-2.64; 2 estimates) (χ² heterogeneity p < 0.001; I² ≥ 80% for all). Subgroup analysis revealed that sCD40L levels were increased in clinical, but not subclinical, atherosclerosis.

CONCLUSIONS

sCD40L levels were increased in stable atherosclerosis, particularly in the carotid and coronary territories. These novel data support sCD40L as a marker of systemic atherosclerosis, possibly with differential roles in specific territories.

Restenosis of Aorto-renal Venous Grafts: Report of Two Patients Treated by Endovascular Stenting

Introduction

Renal venous graft restenosis is an uncommon event usually associated with significant clinical impact. Its treatment by endovascular stenting is seldom reported in the literature.

Report

Two cases of successful stenting for restenosis in aorto-renal venous grafts are described, detailing the technique and in one case reporting for the first time the use of a covered stent in this condition.

Discussion

Technical success may be achieved with proper material selection for the patient's anatomy and with dilation at relatively high pressures. The use of a covered stent may provide extra safety when treating vein grafts.

Outcomes after stenting of renal artery stenosis in patients with high-risk clinical features

BACKGROUND

In patients with renal artery stenosis, revascularization was seen as a mean to improve outcomes, but large studies failed to show significant benefit in general population. However, data on benefits of renal artery stenting in patients with high-risk features, such as rapidly declining renal function and cardiac destabilization syndromes, are limited, as they were excluded from trials. In this descriptive study, we aimed to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes in high-risk patients with renal artery stenosis, treated by angioplasty and stenting. We have retrospectively interrogated our local databases for renal artery percutaneous interventions; patients at high-risk (rapidly declining renal function; stable chronic renal failure and bilateral renal artery disease; severe hypertensive crisis) were selected for the current analysis.

RESULTS

Of 30 patients undergoing renal artery stenting, 18 patients were deemed "high-risk." On short term, good in-hospital control of hypertension and cardiac stabilization were obtained in all patients. Renal function improved significantly only in patients admitted with rapidly declining renal function, with significant creatinine level fall from median 3.98 mg/dL to 2.02 mg/dL, p = 0.023. However, for the whole group, creatinine change was non-significant (- 0.12 mg/dL, p = NS). On the long term, five patients (27.8%) ended-up on chronic hemodialysis and six patients died (33.3%) after a median of 20 months. No death occurred during the first year after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous procedures are feasible and safe in patients with high-risk renal artery stenosis, especially in those with rapidly declining renal function, probably saving some of them from the immediate need for renal replacement therapy, but long-term results are negatively influenced by the precarious general and cardio-vascular status of these patients and by the pre-existing significant renal parenchymal disease, non-related to the renal artery stenosis.