[Surgical outcomes and complications following third kidney transplantation]

BACKGROUND

After two consecutive kidney transplant failures, a third kidney transplantation improves survival for patients on the waiting list. The surgical outcomes and complications of third kidney transplantations remain poorly known.

METHODS

We analyzed the last 100 third kidney transplantations performed in our center between January 2000 and August 2018. The data, relating to donors and recipients, were extracted retrospectively from medical records and from the prospective DIVAT database (computerized and validated data in transplantation). Continuous variables are expressed as means, medians, first and third quartiles (median, [Q1;Q3]). Categorical variables are expressed as percentages. Patient and transplant survivals were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Mean age of recipients was 46.4 years (47, [36;53]). Thirty-five percent had kidney failure due to urinary tract malformations. Mean age of donors was 48.2 years (52, [39.75; 58]) with 63% of donors with standard criteria. Mean cold ischemia time was 22.4hours (21, [16.5; 29.2]). Surgical mortality rate was 2% and surgical complication rate was 45%. Third kidney transplants survival was 73.1% and 58.8% at 5 years and 10 years. Mortality rate with a functioning transplant was 18%.

CONCLUSION

A third kidney transplant offers satisfactory functional outcomes but remains associated with high morbi-mortality and a significant death rate with a functioning transplant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Benefit of Kidney Transplantation for Post Lung Transplantation Renal Failure

INTRODUCTION

Nephrotoxicity is a significant side effect of thoracic transplantation. Many lung transplant patients will require subsequent renal transplantation (KAL). Recently, simultaneous lung/kidney transplants (SLuK) have become an attractive option for patients with end-stage renal disease at the time of lung transplantation. This article explores SLuK outcomes compared to conventional KAL, as well as outcomes among KAL patients against those were KAL listed but never transplanted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing/the Organ Procurement and Transportation Network database was used to identify SLuK patients (n = 74), KAL transplants (n = 456), and patients who were listed for KAL but were never transplanted (n = 626). Significance was determined by chi², Wilcoxon rank sum test, or independent t-tests. Death-censored graft survival for subgroups was estimated using Kaplan-Meier with log-rank for significance. Analyses were completed using SPSS Statistics 28.

RESULTS

The SLuK cohort was older (P = 0.04), more likely diabetic (P < 0.001), and had shorter life expectancies (P < 0.001) than KAL patients. Of those SLuK transplants within 5 y, 84% of patients were alive 1 y post transplant and 82% were alive 3 y post-transplant (compared to 74.6% and 60.3% of overall SLuK). Patients who did undergo KAL were younger and had a lower body mass index (both P < 0.001) compared to those who did not. Those who received a kidney had increased survival times compared to WL patients (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional KAL transplants are still favorable for average lung recipients. However, recent improvements have made SLuK an option for patients with renal dysfunction. Those patients who were able to receive KAL transplants were better surgical candidates than those who remained on the waitlist.

Pediatric kidney retransplantation focused on surgical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Despite survival rates after pediatric kidney transplantation (KT) are on the rise it is still likely that most pediatric recipients will require more than one retransplant in their lifetime. The earlier the age at the first KT the higher is the risk of repeat pediatric kidney transplantation (RPKT).

OBJECTIVE

The current study aims to analyze the outcomes of repeat pediatric kidney transplantation (RPKT) among pediatric kidney transplant recipients focusing on surgical complications and compare the outcomes of second and subsequent grafts with those of the first kidney graft.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of RPKT (<18 years) undertaken between January 2000-2020. We analyzed primary etiology of renal disease, time to graft loss (GL), etiology of initial graft failure, history of acute rejection, previous delayed graft function, HLA-mismatches at the initial transplant, surgical complications and outcomes. Additionally, we compared the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent RPKT (group 1) with those who received a first kidney graft (group 2).

RESULTS

Out of 229 kT, 59 patients underwent RPKT (26 females/33 males). At the time of RPKT median age was 11.37 years (SD:5.7). The most frequent primary renal disease was congenital nephrotic syndrome in 11 (18.6%). Fifty-four (91.5%) were on renal replacement therapy at the time of transplant. Fourty-one patients received their second KT (69.5%), 14 (23.7%) the third, 3 (5.1%) the fourth and 1 (1.7%) the fifth. Transplant graft nephrectomy (GN) was performed in 26 patients (44.1%) prior to retransplantation. Fifty-four (91.5%) received a cadaveric graft and 5 (8.5%) a living-related graft. An extraperitoneal approach was achieved in 53 patients (89.8%), whereas in the remaining 6 (10.2%) the graft was placed intraperitoneally. We observed 10 surgical complications (16.9%): 9 major which required reintervention and 1 minor (perirenal hematoma). No vascular complications were observed and none of the surgical complications were involved in graft loss. Graft survival at 1,3 and 5 years was 91%, 84% and 73% respectively. The most frequent cause of GL was chronic graft nephropathy in 15 (25.4%). After a mean follow-up of 9.40 years (SD: 4.7) only 2 patients died (3.4%), both with functioning grafts.

DISCUSSION

Pediatric recipients of second and subsequent kidney grafts constitute a remarkable high-risk population but are becoming more frequent at reference pediatric transplant centers.

CONCLUSIONS

RPKT is technically challenging but can yield good results. In our series overall the incidence of surgical complications and particularly vascular complications was low.

Progress in living donor liver transplantation for biliary atresia and challenges faced: A thirty-year single institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Biliary atresia (BA) is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the pediatric population, and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) have been established as a radical treatment for BA .The aim of this study was to clarify the long term outcomes and risk factors affecting the LDLT outcomes, as well as the challenges faced.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 2019, 666 BA patients underwent LDLT in our institution and were enrolled in this study. Data regarding the recipient's age, anatomic findings of the biliary tree at Kasai's portoenterostomy, basic characteristics at transplantation, transplant profiles, donor characteristics, and outcomes of LDLT were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 1-, 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-year graft survival rates of BA patients who underwent LDLT were 88.1%, 85.4%, 81.5%, 78.9%, 76.6%, and 75.5%, respectively. The transplant era, age at transplantation, ABO incompatible transplant, and presence of pulmonary vascular complications were identified as significant risk factors for overall graft survival. When the study period was divided into the first (1990-1999) and second (2000-2019) phases and re analyzed, the outcomes of ABO-incompatible transplants and LDLT for adult BA patients remained inferior to others in the second phase. The 20-year graft survival rate in patients who underwent re transplantation in the second phase was 54.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of LDLT in children are generally good, but the immunosuppression procedures need to be further improved for ABO-incompatible cases in the future. Further improvements in LDLT results for adult patients and re transplantation remain challenges to be addressed in this field, and future attempts, including revision to the organ allocation system of deceased donors, are necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (case control study).

Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome at 3 Years After Transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The long-term efficacy and possible adverse events of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are unknown. This study performed a 3-year follow-up of the patients in our previous clinical trial to clarify these aspects.

METHODS

This study included 125 patients (104 females, and 21 males): 38 in a placebo group, 42 who received 30 g of donor feces, and 45 who received 60 g of donor feces. Feces was administered to the duodenum. The patients provided a fecal sample and completed 5 questionnaires at baseline and at 2 and 3 years after FMT. Fecal bacteria and dysbiosis index were analyzed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene polymerase chain reaction DNA amplification/probe hybridization covering the V3 to V9 regions.

RESULTS

Response rates were 26.3%, 69.1%, and 77.8% in the placebo, 30-g, and 60-g groups, respectively, at 2 years after FMT, and 27.0%, 64.9%, and 71.8%, respectively, at 3 years after FMT. The response rates were significantly higher in the 30-g and 60-g groups than in the placebo group. Patients in the 30-g and 60-g groups had significantly fewer IBS symptoms and fatigue, and a greater quality of life both at 2 and 3 years after FMT. The dysbiosis index decreased only in the active treatment groups at 2 and 3 years after FMT. Fluorescent signals of 10 bacteria had significant correlations with IBS symptoms and fatigue after FMT in the 30-g and 60-g groups. No long-term adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

FMT performed according to our protocol resulted in high response rates and long-standing effects with only few mild self-limited adverse events. This study was registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT03822299).

Lung Retransplantation

Lung retransplantation remains the standard treatment of irreversible lung allograft failure. The most common indications for lung retransplantation are acute graft failure, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and postoperative airway complications. Careful patient selection with regards to indications, anatomy, extrapulmonary organ dysfunction (specifically renal dysfunction), and immunologic consideration are of utmost importance. The conduct of the lung retransplantation operation is arduous with special considerations given to operative approach, type of surgery (single vs bilateral), use of extracorporeal circulatory support, and hematological management. Outcomes have improved significantly for most patients, nearing short and midterm outcomes of primary lung recipients in select cases.

Primary Nonfunction and Early Allograft Dysfunction after Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite continuous progress in the field of liver transplantation, considerable proportion of patients still suffer from the postoperative graft dysfunction. Clinically, it presents as early allograft dysfunction (EAD), and its more severe form defined as primary nonfunction (PNF). Posttransplant liver dysfunction translates into significantly worse treatment outcomes.

SUMMARY

Both entities are multifactorial, with donor (graft), recipient, and procedure-related factors playing the key roles. Ischemia-reperfusion injury is a major driver of their development. So far, various noninvasive (pharmacological) and invasive strategies have been tested to mitigate its negative effects. This article pre-sents the current approach to diagnosis, prediction, and management of EAD and PNF.

KEY MESSAGES

Different pharmacological interventions may be considered to improve graft function after liver transplantation. Machine perfusion seems to be the most effective method at the moment.

Extracorporeal life support as a bridge to pulmonary retransplantation: prognostic factors for survival in a multicentre cohort analysis

OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary retransplant (ReTx) is considered a controversial procedure. Despite literature reporting outcomes following ReTx, limited data exist in recipients bridged to their ReTx on extracorporeal life support (ECLS). The goal of this study was to investigate the outcomes of recipients bridged to a first-time ReTx by ECLS.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicentre cohort analysis from 10 centres in Europe, Asia and North America. The primary outcome was overall survival. Risk factors were analysed using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

ECLS as a bridge to a first-time ReTx was performed in 50 recipients (ECLS-ReTx). During the study period, 210 recipients underwent a first-time ReTx without bridging on ECLS (regular-ReTx) and 4959 recipients had a primary pulmonary transplant (index-Tx). The overall 1-year (55%) and 5-year (29%) survival was significantly worse for the ECLS-ReTx group.Compared to the index-Tx group, the mortality risk was significantly higher after ECLS-ReTx [hazard ratio 2.76 (95% confidence interval 1.94-3.91); P < 0.001] and regular-ReTx [hazard ratio 1.65 (95% confidence interval 1.36-2); P < 0.001].In multivariable analysis, recipient age ≥35 years, time interval <1 year from index-Tx, primary graft dysfunction as transplant indication, venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Zurich donor score ≥4 points were significant risk factors for mortality in ECLS-ReTx recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Recipients for ECLS-ReTx should be carefully selected. Risk factors, such as recipient age, intertransplant interval, primary graft dysfunction as transplant indication and type of ECLS should be kept in mind before bridging these patients on ECLS to ReTx.

Characterization of Kidney Retransplantation Following Graft Failure Due to BK Virus Nephropathy

INTRODUCTION

Immunosuppression following kidney transplantation increases risk of BK polyomavirus reactivation, a common cause of graft dysfunction and failure. Subsequent retransplantation is a viable option that has not been extensively studied. This study further characterizes BK Virus Nephropathy (BKVN) and retransplantation in the most expansive population to date, geographically, temporally, and in magnitude.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The OPTN/UNOS database was used to identify patients who received kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation between 1987 and 2018 that resulted in BKVN-attributed failure (n = 1587). This population was divided into those who underwent retransplantation (n = 495) and those who did not (n = 1092).

RESULTS

The retransplanted cohort was younger (45 vs. 53 yr; P<0.0001) and had fewer prior kidney transplants (P<0.003), lower expected post-transplant survival (P<0.001), lower rates of delayed graft function (DGF) (14.1% vs. 22.2%; P=0.0008), a greater proportion of white patients (55.4% vs. 43.2%; P=0.0002), a greater proportion of living donors (35.8% vs. 23.0%; P<0.0001), and longer allograft lifespan (2.95 vs. 2.41 yr; P<0.0001), compared to those not retransplanted. Among retransplants, DGF and high kidney donor profile index (KDPI) were associated with decreased allograft lifespan (P=0.001, P=0.0005, respectively). Steroid induction had no effect on allograft lifespan when compared to steroid-free regimens (P=0.915). Retransplanted allografts lasted longer than previous BKVN-failed grafts (10.44 and 3.70 years, respectively; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Retransplantation following BKVN-associated graft failure has been associated with favorable outcomes. To maximize allograft lifespan in retransplantation, clinicians may consider selection of low KDPI donors, prevention of delayed graft function, and tailored immunosuppressive regimens that minimize steroids.

Critical points and potential pitfalls of outbreak of IMP-1-producing carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa among kidney transplant recipients: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection after kidney transplantation (KT) is associated with high mortality.

AIM

To analyse an outbreak of infection/colonization with IMP-1-producing CRPA on a KT ward.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted. Cases were identified through routine surveillance culture and real-time polymerase chain reaction for carbapenemase performed directly from rectal swab samples. Controls were randomly selected from patients hospitalized on the same ward during the same period, at a ratio of 3:1. Strain clonality was analysed through pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and whole-genome sequencing was performed for additional strain characterization.

FINDINGS

CRPA was identified in 37 patients, in 51.4% through surveillance cultures and in 49.6% through clinical cultures. The median persistence of culture positivity was 42.5 days. Thirteen patients (35.1%) presented a total of 15 infections, of which seven (46.7%) were in the urinary tract; among those, 30-day mortality rate was 46.2%. PFGE analysis showed that all of the strains shared the same pulsotype. Multilocus sequence typing analysis identified the sequence type as ST446. Risk factors for CRPA acquisition were hospital stay >10 days, retransplantation, urological surgical reintervention after KT, use of carbapenem or ciprofloxacin in the last three months and low median lymphocyte count in the last three months.

CONCLUSION

KT recipients remain colonized by CRPA for long periods and could be a source of nosocomial outbreaks. In addition, a high proportion of such patients develop infection. During an outbreak, urine culture should be added to the screening protocol for KT recipients.

HLA matching and rabbit antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy to avoid multiple forms of rejection after a third liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite immunosuppressive drug regimens, T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection with donor-specific antibodies, and chronic rejection occur after liver transplantation (LTx). Rejection may significantly impact allograft survival and often a standard re-LTx is required. However, in some cases rejection recurs. Little is known on how to approach this and which aspects to consider.

CASE

Here we describe a case in which two successive liver grafts where lost due to T cell-mediated rejection, possible antibody-mediated rejection with de novo donor-specific antibody formation, and chronic rejection that occurred within a month. In an attempt to avoid recurrence with the third graft, we decided to administer a more rigorous immunosuppressive drug induction regimen with rabbit antithymocyte globulin, while applying HLA matching between recipient and donor. This resulted in rejection free survival for 337 days until a mild T cell-mediated rejection occurred, which could then be easily treated with high dose steroids. Graft survival is now at least 683 days without chronic rejection, antibody-mediated rejection or de novo donor-specific antibody formation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, when a liver graft is lost due to multiple forms of rejection short after LTx, the combination applied in this case could be considered as a viable option to improve graft and patient survival instead of a standard re-LTx.

Iterative renal transplantation: our experience on third transplants

PURPOSE

To report our experience on third kidney transplantation, analyzing the complications and graft survival rates as compared to previous transplants.

METHODS

Retrospective study of third renal transplants performed at our center. Outcomes were compared with a cohort of first and second transplants.

RESULTS

Of a total of 4143, we performed 72 third transplants in 46 men and 26 women with an average age of 46 years and mean time on dialysis of 70 months. Thirty-seven patients were hypersensitized [panel-reactive antibody (PRA) > 50%]. They were all from deceased donors, with a mean cold ischemia time of 19.2 h. The extraperitoneal heterotopic approach was used in 88.8%, transplantectomy was performed in 80.6% and vascular anastomoses were realized mostly to external iliac vessels, using the common iliac artery in 15 cases, and the inferior vena cava in 16. The main ureteral reimplantation technique was the Politano-Leadbetter (76.4%). Third transplantation reported a significantly higher incidence of lymphocele (13.9% vs. 3.2% in first and 4.5% in second transplants; p < 0.001), rejection (34.7% vs. 14.9% and 20.5%, p < 0.001) and urinary obstruction (11.1% vs. 3.6% and 6.3%, p 0.002). Graft survival rates for first, second and third transplants were 87%, 86% and 78% at 1 year, 83%, 82% and 74% at 3 years and 80%, 79% and 65% at 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Iterative transplantation constitutes a valid therapeutic option with adequate surgical and survival results compared to previous transplants. It is a challenging procedure which must be performed by experienced surgeons.

Outcomes of first versus third kidney transplantations: propensity score matching and paired subgroup analysis-a single-centre experience

Background

In the Eurotransplant, 12.6% of kidney transplantations are a repeat procedure. Third transplants are significantly more complex than first and second ones. We compared the results of first (PRT) versus third (TRT) transplantations.

Methods

Between 2011 and 2016, we performed 779 deceased donor adult kidney transplantations, 14.2% out of them were second, 2.6% (20) third, and 0.3% fourth. We compared the pre-, intra-, and postoperative data, kidney function, and survival rate.

Results

Recipients of TRT were younger (53.4 vs. 47.3 p = 0.02). HCV infection rate (20%, p = 0.00) is ten times higher. The operation time is longer (132 vs. 152 min, p = 0.02), and delayed graft function is much more frequent (22.4% vs. 60%, p = 0.00). Induction therapy was given to every TRT (7.9% vs.100%), but as a result, the rejection rate was the same (~ 15%). Hospital stay is a week longer. Patient’s survival at 1, 3, and 5 years for PRT is 96.4%, 93.9%, and 91.2% and for TRT is 90%, 85%, and 78.4%, respectively (p = 0.023). TRT’s odds ratio of fatal outcome is 4.35 (1.5–12.5). Graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years for PRT is 93.1%, 91.4%, and 90.3% and for TRT is 75%, 75%, and 75%, respectively (p = 0.020). TRT’s odds ratio of graft loss is 3.14 (1.1–8.9). Of PRT 85.76%, out of PRT 85.76%, while out of TRT 60% live with a functioning graft, p=0.00149.

Conclusion

In a third transplant, both graft and patient survival are significantly inferior to primer ones. Careful selection is required to minimize the patient risk and graft loss.

The role of the comprehensive complication index for the prediction of survival after liver transplantation

In the last years, several scoring systems based on pre- and post-transplant parameters have been developed to predict early post-LT graft function. However, some of them showed poor diagnostic abilities. This study aims to evaluate the role of the comprehensive complication index (CCI) as a useful scoring system for accurately predicting 90-day and 1-year graft loss after liver transplantation. A training set (n = 1262) and a validation set (n = 520) were obtained. The study was registered at https://www.ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03723317). CCI exhibited the best diagnostic performance for 90 days in the training (AUC = 0.94; p < 0.001) and Validation Sets (AUC = 0.77; p < 0.001) when compared to the BAR, D-MELD, MELD, and EAD scores. The cut-off value of 47.3 (third quartile) showed a diagnostic odds ratio of 48.3 and 7.0 in the two sets, respectively. As for 1-year graft loss, CCI showed good performances in the training (AUC = 0.88; p < 0.001) and validation sets (AUC = 0.75; p < 0.001). The threshold of 47.3 showed a diagnostic odds ratio of 21.0 and 5.4 in the two sets, respectively. All the other tested scores always showed AUCs < 0.70 in both the sets. CCI showed a good stratification ability in terms of graft loss rates in both the sets (log-rank p < 0.001). In the patients exceeding the CCI ninth decile, 1-year graft survival rates were only 0.7% and 23.1% in training and validation sets, respectively. CCI shows a very good diagnostic power for 90-day and 1-year graft loss in different sets of patients, indicating better accuracy with respect to other pre- and post-LT scores.Clinical Trial Notification: NCT03723317.

Beyond the Limits: How to Avoid a Surgical Nightmare in the Third and Subsequent Renal Transplantation Procedures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Approximately, 25% of the patients with ESRD will enter the waiting list for kidney transplantation. Among these patients, almost 15% will require a retransplantation surgery. This review aims to summarize the most recent information on different controversial issues regarding retransplantation, to provide the reader with a clear and updated view on the topic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite current evidence is mainly based on retrospective, small, single-center experiences, it seems clear that retransplantation remains a surgical and immunological challenge, for which the perioperative management still remains crucial to avoid mishaps. Different surgical approaches have been tested, but the general consensus advocates for the heterotopic extraperitoneal in first instance. Although higher immunological risk and complication rates are reported invariably in the available series, the benefits in terms of overall survival are superior to those obtained under dialysis, thus still representing the most recommended option for this group of patients.

Heart Retransplantation: Candidacy, Outcomes, and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the incidence and epidemiology of heart retransplantation in adults and children and to review the risk factors associated with adverse outcome following retransplantation to help guide recipient selection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Heart retransplantation is associated with inferior short-term and long-term survival when compared with primary heart transplantation and its use remains controversial although less so in the pediatric heart transplant population.

SUMMARY

In the most recent era of heart transplantation, patients retransplanted for CAV, greater than 1 year from their primary transplant, and who are not in critical condition have improved survival compared with other retransplant recipients. Survival with retransplantation can approach that of primary transplantation when patients are appropriately selected. More research is needed regarding the optimal timing for retransplantation and the optimal management for patients after retransplantation.

Recurrent Idiopathic Liver Allograft Failure

OBJECTIVES

Many transplant programs have had patients who develop idiopathic recurrent liver allograft failure, necessitating serial transplants, and are deemed to have refractory or recurrent rejection. The frequency and the etiology of this immunologic dysfunction have not been well characterized.

METHODS

Herein, we illustrate the case of a patient who required three retransplants over a period of 20 years for recurrent liver allograft failure. By extensively compiling the patient's many liver biopsy specimens and explants over time, we demonstrate that antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was a major contributing factor from the outset. We conducted a review of the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients database to estimate the potential frequency of AMR.

RESULTS

As illustrated by this case, AMR has varied histologic findings in the setting of elevated donor-specific antibody titers.

CONCLUSIONS

The cause of recurrent allograft failure in this patient was likely a combination of acute cellular rejection and AMR, manifestations of likely underlying immune dysregulation. Pathologists and transplant physicians should recognize the variable histologic presentations of AMR, which is imperative for its timely intervention. This case demonstrates how difficult the diagnosis of AMR can be to make, highlighting the need for strong clinical suspicion in patients having difficult-to-treat rejection and recurrent allograft failure.

Reuse of cardiac organs in transplantation: an ethical analysis

Background

This paper examines the ethical aspects of organ transplant surgery in which a donor heart is transplanted from a first recipient, following determination of death by neurologic criteria, to a second recipient. Retransplantation in this sense differs from that in which one recipient undergoes repeat heart transplantation of a newly donated organ, and is thus referred to here as “reuse cardiac organ transplantation.”

Methods

Medical, legal, and ethical analysis, with a main focus on ethical analysis.

Results

From the medical perspective, it is critical to ensure the quality and safety of reused organs, but we lack sufficient empirical data pertaining to medical risk. From the legal perspective, a comparative examination of laws in the United States and Japan affirms no illegality, but legal scholars disagree on the appropriate analysis of the issues, including whether or not property rights apply to transplanted organs. Ethical arguments supporting the reuse of organs include the analogous nature of donation to gifts, the value of donations as inheritance property, and the public property theory as it pertains to organs. Meanwhile, ethical arguments such as those that address organ recycling and identity issues challenge organ reuse.

Conclusion

We conclude that organ reuse is not only ethically permissible, but even ethically desirable. Furthermore, we suggest changes to be implemented in the informed consent process prior to organ transplantation. The organ transplant community worldwide should engage in wider and deeper discussions, in hopes that such efforts will lead to the timely preparation of guidelines to implement reuse cardiac organ transplantation as well as reuse transplantation of other organs such as kidney and liver.

The outcomes of pediatric liver retransplantation from a living donor: a 17-year single-center experience

PURPOSE

Liver retransplantation is the only therapeutic option for patients with graft failure after liver transplantation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of pediatric retransplantation from living donor at a single center.

METHODS

Between December 1998 to August 2015, retransplantation from a living donor was performed for 14 children (<18 years of age) at Kumamoto University Hospital. The characteristics of the retransplantation recipient and the clinicopathological factors between primary transplantation and retransplantation were analyzed to detect the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

In retransplantation, the operative time was longer and the amount of blood loss was greater in comparison to primary transplantation. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates from the date of retransplantation were 85.7, 85.7, and 78.6%, respectively. The rates of re-laparotomy after primary transplantation, bile leakage and postoperative bleeding after retransplantation were higher than after primary transplantation. Among the three patients who died after retransplantation, the operative time, the rate of re-laparotomy after primary transplantation and the incidence of gastrointestinal complications were higher in comparison to the surviving patients.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric retransplantation from a living donor is an acceptable procedure that could save the lives of recipients with failing allografts when organs from deceased donors are scarce. To ensure good results, it is essential to make an appropriate assessment of the cardiopulmonary function and the infectious state of the patients before Re-LDLT.

Kidney retransplantation in children following rejection and recurrent disease

Retransplantation accounts for approximately 15 % of the annual transplants performed in the USA, and in the recent International Collaborative Transplant Study report on pediatric patients 15.2 % of the 9209 patients included in the report were retransplant recipients. Although the significant advances in clinical management and newer immunosuppressive agents have had a significant impact on improving short-term allograft function, it is apparent that long-term allograft function remains suboptimal. Therefore, it is likely that the majority of pediatric renal allograft recipients will require one or more retransplants during their lifetime. Unfortunately, a second or subsequent graft in pediatric recipients has inferior long-term graft survival rates compared to initial grafts, with decreasing rates with each subsequent graft. Multiple issues influence the outcome of retransplantation, with the most significant being the cause of the prior transplant failure. Non-adherence-associated graft loss poses unresolved ethical issues that may impact access to retransplantation. Graft nephrectomy prior to retransplantation may benefit selected patients, but the impact of an in situ failed graft on the development of panel-reactive antibodies remains to be definitively determined. It is important that these and other factors discussed in this review be taken into consideration during the counseling of families on the optimal approach for their child who requires a retransplant.

Inferior vena cava stenosis-induced sinusoidal obstructive syndrome after living donor liver transplantation

The sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) is a complication that usually follows hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It is also known as veno-occlusive disease, which is a rare complication of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Herein, we reported a 34 year-old female patient presenting SOS after LDLT. Its underlying cause was presumed to be associated with liver abscess and subsequent inferior vena cava stenosis. SOS led to graft failure, thus requiring retransplantation with a deceased donor liver graft. The underlying causes of SOS are complex pathologic entity with multifactorial etiology. It is likely that its multifactorial etiology includes a decrease of hepatic venous outflow that is caused by graft liver infection and inferior vena cava stenosis.

Predictive factors for survival and score application in liver retransplantation for hepatitis C recurrence

AIM: To identify risk factors associated with survival in patients retransplanted for hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence and to apply a survival score to this population.

METHODS: We retrospectively identified 108 patients retransplanted for HCV recurrence in eight European liver transplantation centers (seven in France, one in Spain). Data collection comprised clinical and laboratory variables, including virological and antiviral treatment data. We then analyzed the factors associated with survival in this population. A recently published score that predicts survival in retransplantation in patients with hepatitis C was applied. Because there are currently no uniform recommendations regarding selection of the best candidates for retransplantation in this setting, we also described the clinical characteristics of 164 patients not retransplanted, with F3, F4, or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) post-first graft presenting with hepatic decompensation.

RESULTS: Overall retransplantation patient survival rates were 55%, 47%, and 43% at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Patients who were retransplanted for advanced cirrhosis had survival rates of 59%, 52%, and 49% at 3, 5, and 10 years, while those retransplanted for FCH had survival rates of 34%, 29%, and 11%, respectively. Under multivariate analysis, and adjusting for the center effect and the occurrence of FCH, factors associated with better survival after retransplantation were: negative HCV viremia before retransplantation, antiviral therapy after retransplantation, non-genotype 1, a Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score < 25 when replaced on the waiting list, and a retransplantation donor age < 60 years. Although the numbers were small, in the context of the new antivirals era, we showed that outcomes in patients who underwent retransplantation with undetectable HCV viremia did not depend on donor age and MELD score. The Andrés score was applied to 102 patients for whom all score variables were available, producing a mean score of 43.4 (SD = 6.6). Survival rates after the date of the first decompensation post-first liver transplantation (LT1) in the liver retransplantation (reLT) group (94 patients decompensated) at 3, 5, and 10 years were 62%, 59%, and 51%, respectively, among 78 retransplanted individuals with advanced cirrhosis, and 42%, 32%, and 16% among 16 retransplanted individuals with FCH. In the non-reLT group with hepatic decompensation, survival rates were 27%, 18%, and 9% at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively (P < 0.0001). Compared with non-retransplanted patients, retransplanted patients were younger at LT1 (mean age 48 ± 8 years compared to 53 ± 9 years in the no reLT group, P < 0.0001), less likely to have human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection (4% vs 14% among no reLT patients, P = 0.005), more likely to have received corticosteroid bolus therapy after LT1 (25% in reLT vs 12% in the no reLT group, P = 0.01), and more likely to have presented with sustained virological response (SVR) after the first transplantation (20% in the reLT group vs 7% in the no reLT group, P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION: Antiviral therapy before and after retransplantation had a substantial impact on survival in the context of retransplantation for HCV recurrence, and with the new direct-acting antivirals now available, outcomes should be even better in the future.

Immunologic and non-immunologic complications of a third kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients who undergo repeat kidney transplantations (KTs) are considered at high risk for experiencing immunologic and non-immunologic complications. In this study, we investigated the clinical outcomes, including medical and surgical complications, of patients who underwent a third KT at our center.

METHODS

Between March 1969 and December 2012, a total of 2,110 KTs were performed at the Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Of them, we examined 11 patients who underwent a third KT, and investigated the allograft outcomes and complication rates.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration after KT was 72.4 ± 78.3 months. The mean age at KT was 38.2 ± 8.0 years, and seven patients (63.6%) were males. Nine patients (81.8%) underwent living-donor KT. A cross-match test yielded positive results in four of the nine patients, and all underwent pretransplant desensitization therapy. After KT, three patients (27.2%) showed delayed graft function. Acute rejection developed in four patients (36.4%), and surgical complications that required surgical correction occurred in three patients. Allograft failure developed due to acute rejection (n = 3) or chronic rejection (n = 1) in four patients. Allograft survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 81.8%, 42.9%, and 42.9%, respectively; however, the allograft survival rate at 5 years was > 80% in patients who underwent KT only after results of the panel reactive antibody test became available.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, a third KT procedure may be acceptable, although aggressive pretransplant immune monitoring and patient selection may be required to reduce the risks of acute rejection and surgical complications.

Kidney retransplantation for BK virus nephropathy with active viremia without allograft nephrectomy

BK virus nephropathy is an important cause of kidney allograft failure. Retransplantation has been successfully performed for patients with previous allograft loss due to BK virus nephropathy; however, whether allograft nephrectomy and viral clearance are required prior to retransplantation is controversial. Some recent studies have suggested that retransplantion can be successfully achieved without allograft nephrectomy if viremia is cleared prior to retransplant. The only published experience of successful retransplantation in the presence of active viremia occurred in the presence of concomitant allograft nephrectomy of the failing kidney. In this report, we describe a case of successful repeat kidney transplant in a patient with high-grade BK viremia and fulminant hepatic failure without concomitant allograft nephrectomy performed under the setting of a simultaneous liver-kidney transplant.

Liver retransplantation for adult recipients

Living donor liver graft can be used for the first or second liver transplantation. The timing of retransplantation also should be stratified as 2 types according to the reoperation timing. Combination of these two classifications results in 6 types of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT)-associated retransplantation. However, late retransplantation to LDLT might have not been performed in most LDLT programs, thus other 4 types of LDLT-associated retransplantation can be taken into account. The most typical type of LDLT-associated retransplantation might be early living donor-to-deceased donor retransplantation. For early living donor-to-living donor retransplantation, its eligibility criteria might be similar to those of early living donor-to-deceased donor retransplantation. For early deceased donor-to-living donor retransplantation, its indications are exactly the same to those for aforementioned living donor-to-living donor retransplantation. Late deceased donor retransplantation after initial LDLT has the same indication for ordinary late deceased donor retransplantation.

Pediatric liver transplantation outcomes in Korea

Pediatric liver transplantation is the standard of care for treatment of liver failure in children. The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of pediatric liver transplantation in centers located in Korea and determine factors that influence outcomes. This retrospective study was performed using data from between 1988 and 2010 and included all recipients 18 yr old and younger who underwent pediatric liver transplantation in Korea during that period. Our data sources were hospital medical records and the outcome measure was overall patient survival. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were undertaken using the Cox proportional hazards model. Five hundred and thirty-four pediatric liver transplantations were performed in 502 children. Median age and average pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) score were 20 months and 18 point, respectively. Biliary atresia (57.7%, 308/534) was the most common cause of liver disease. Eighty-two (15.3%) were deceased donor liver transplantations and 454 (84.7%) were living donor liver transplantations. Retransplantation was performed in 32 cases (6%). Overall, 1-, 5-, and 10-yr patient survival rates were 87.8%, 82.2%, and 78.1%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, independent significant predictors of poor patient survival were chronic rejection and retransplantation. This study presents the epidemiologic data for nearly all pediatric liver transplantation in Korea and shows that the independent prognostic factors in patient survival are chronic rejection and retransplantation.