The subcoracoid distance is correlated with pain and internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Background

A proposed etiology of anterior shoulder pain and limited internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is impingement of the humeral component on the coracoid or conjoint tendon. The primary goal of this study was to investigate radiographic surrogates for potential coracoid or conjoint tendon impingement and their relationship to postoperative pain and internal rotation after RSA.

Methods

A retrospective review of a clinical registry was performed to identify patients with (1) primary RSA, (2) minimum 2-year clinical follow-up, and (3) satisfactory postoperative axillary lateral radiographs. The primary radiographic measurement of interest was the subcoracoid distance (SCD), defined as the distance between the posterior aspect of the coracoid and the anterior glenosphere. Additional measurements were as follows: anterior glenosphere overhang, posterior glenosphere overhang, native glenoid width, lateralization of glenosphere relative to the coracoid tip, lateralization shoulder angle, and distalization shoulder angle. The primary clinical outcome of interest was the 2-year postoperative Visual Analog Scale score. Secondary outcomes were (1) internal rotation (IR) defined by spinal level (IRspine), (2) IR at 90 degrees of abduction, (3) American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, (4) forward flexion, and (5) external rotation at 0 degrees of abduction. Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship of the various radiographic measures on the clinical outcomes of interest.

Results

Two hundred seventeen patients were included. There was a statistically significant relationship between the SCD and Visual Analog Scale scores: B = -0.497, P = .047. There was a statistically significant relationship between the SCD and IRspine: B = -1.667, P < .001. Metallic lateralization was also positively associated with improving IRspine; increasing body mass index was negatively associated. There was a statistically significant relationship between the SCD and IR at 90 degrees of abduction: B = 5.844, P = .034.

Conclusion

For RSA with a 135° neck shaft angle and lateralized glenoid, the postoperative SCD has a significant association with pain and IR. Decreasing SCD was associated with increased pain and decreased IR, indicating that coracoid or conjoint tendon impingement may be an important and potentially under-recognized etiology of pain and decreased IR following RSA. Further investigations aimed toward identifying a critical SCD to improve pain and IR may allow surgeons to preoperatively plan component position to improve clinical outcomes after RSA.

REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY DESIGN: INLAY VS. ONLAY DOES IT REALLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

BACKGROUND

The design of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) implants has evolved significantly over the past 50 years. Today there are many options available that differ in design of the glenoid and humeral components, fixation methods, sizes and modularity. With respect to the humeral component the literature has generally focused on the differences between inlay and onlay designs and the potential impact on outcomes. However, inlay and onlay design represents only one factor of many.

METHODS

It is our hypothesis that separating onlay and inlay designs into two distinct entities is an oversimplification as there can be wide overlap of the two designs depending upon surgical technique and the implant selected. As such, the differences between inlay and onlay designs should be measured in absolute terms-meaning combined distalization and lateralization.

RESULTS

By reviewing the many factors that can contribute to the glenosphere - humerus realtiuonship the role of inlay and onlay humeral designs as an important distinguishing feature is shown to be limited Preliminary studies suggest that the amount of distalization and lateralization of the construct may be the most accurate method of describing the differences in the constructs.

CONCLUSIONS

Inlay and onlay humeral component design represents only one factor of many that may impact outcomes. A more accurate method of defining specific design and technique factors in RSA is the degree of lateralization and distalization.

Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes following uncemented reverse shoulder replacements for proximal humerus fractures

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty remains regarding the role and long-term outcomes following uncemented reverse shoulder replacements (RSRs) in managing displaced proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). Although RSRs for trauma have traditionally undergone cemented fixation of the humeral component, there is increasing interest in uncemented RSRs. Our primary aim was to evaluate 2-year outcomes following uncemented RSR fixation for 3- and 4-part PHFs in the elderly. A secondary aim was to evaluate if timing of surgery affected outcomes.

METHODS

This cohort series evaluated 2-year outcomes for 42 patients with Neer 3- and 4-part PHFs treated with uncemented RSRs between October 2016 and December 2019. Thirty-eight patients (90%) had clinical and radiologic follow-up at a minimum of 2 years. The primary outcomes compared postoperative range of movement, radiographic outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The PROMs collected included Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSSs), satisfaction scores, and the Friends and Family Test. The secondary outcome involved a subanalysis to see if outcomes were affected by treatment timing-within 2 weeks, 2-12 weeks, and >12 weeks.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 74.1 years (range 58-89). There were 11 males and 31 females. No intraoperative fractures were sustained. There was 1 transient axillary neurapraxia, which fully resolved by 4 months. Three patients required postoperative transfusions. During the study follow-up period, no patients developed either deep infections requiring a washout or dislocation, and none underwent further surgery. At 2-year follow-up, radiologic follow-up demonstrated tuberosity union in 29 of 38 cases (76%). Eight of 38 patients (21%) demonstrated some glenoid notching (Sirveaux 1 or 2 only) on radiographic follow-up. There was no evidence of loosening. The mean OSS was 38 (range 15-48). Mean range of movement achieved at 2 years was as follows: forward flexion 122° (50°-180°), abduction 116° (46°-180°), and external rotation 25° (range 5°-60°). Eighteen patients (47%) described their result as excellent, 17 (45%) as good, and 3 (8%) as poor. When comparing the time from injury to treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in complications or radiographic outcomes between the groups. Patients had a reduced forward flexion when treated between 2 and 12 weeks compared with the other groups (P = .019).

CONCLUSION

Uncemented RSR is a safe treatment option for the management of complex PHFs in the elderly. We report low complication rates, high patient satisfaction, and good outcomes at 2-year follow-up.

Surgeon-designed patient-specific instrumentation improves glenoid component screw placement for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in a population with small glenoid dimensions

PURPOSE

Glenoid component loosening is a potential complication of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), occurring in part due to lack of adequate screw purchase in quality scapular bone stock. This study was to determine the efficacy of a surgeon-designed, 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) compared to conventional instrumentation (CI) in achieving longer superior and inferior screw lengths for glenoid component fixation.

METHODS

A multi-centre retrospective analysis of patients who underwent rTSA between 2015 and 2020. Lengths of the superior and inferior locking screws inserted for fixation of the glenoid baseplate component were recorded and compared according to whether patients received PSI or CI. Secondary outcomes included operative duration and incidence of complications requiring revision surgery.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients (31 PSI vs. 42 CI) were analysed. Average glenoid diameter was 24.5 mm (SD: 3.1) and 81% of patients had smaller glenoid dimensions compared to the baseplate itself. PSI produced significantly longer superior (44.7 vs. 30.7 mm; P < 0.001) and inferior (43.0 vs. 31 mm; P < 0.001) mean screw lengths, as compared to CI. A greater proportion of maximal screw lengths for the given rTSA construct (48 mm) were observed in the PSI group (71.9% vs. 11.9% superior, 59.4% vs. 11.9% inferior). Operative duration was not statistically significantly different between the PSI and CI groups (150 min vs. 169 min, respectively; P = 0.229). No patients had radiographic loosening of the glenoid component with an average of 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

PSI facilitates longer superior and inferior screw placement in the fixation of the glenoid component for rTSA. With sufficient training, PSI can be designed and implemented by surgeons themselves.

Intraoperative and early postoperative complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A current concepts review

Background

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a common procedure performed for a variety of shoulder pathologies.

Aims and objectives

This current concept review evaluates the intraoperative and early postoperative complications, with a specific focus given to neurological and vascular injury, fracture, dislocation and venous thromboembolism.

Conclusion

A detailed knowledge of potential complications will allow surgeons to mitigate risk and maximise outcomes.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty used for revision of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

Background

As reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) cases increase, so too will the need to revise subsequent failures. Many of the complications associated with revising anatomic total shoulder and hemiarthroplasty have been adequately addressed by RSA including glenoid bone deficiency, instability, and functional outcomes. However, the risk for complication when revising a failed reverse prosthesis may be more pronounced with increased bone and soft tissue deficiency. The ability for the reversed prosthesis to accommodate these insufficiencies following a prior reversed prosthesis is unclear.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were queried for articles which fit the inclusion criteria of a reversed prosthesis used to revise a failed primary reverse prosthesis with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and clinical outcome reporting.

Results

After exclusions, 9 studies reporting on 242 reverse shoulders with a mean follow-up of 40.29 months were analyzed. The differences between preoperative and postoperative weighted means were not significant for Constant (P = .26), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score (P = .61), SSV (P = .57), and visual analog scale for pain (P = .48). Functional improvements in elevation (74°-102°) and external rotation (18°-21°) were consistent with those reported for primary reverse procedures, although differences in preoperative and postoperative measures were not statistically significant. Patient satisfaction was 89% with a major complication rate of 25%.

Discussion

The reverse shoulder prosthesis has proven satisfactory in revising hemiarthroplasty and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. The current results indicate RSA is also a satisfactory treatment option when revising a prior reverse prosthesis. Inherent to revision shoulder surgery is the obstacle of humeral and glenoid bone loss, an attenuated soft-tissue envelope, and instability. The reverse prosthesis may adequately address these commonly confronted difficulties with its inherent design characteristics. RSA provides a secure glenoid fixation for bone grafting, the ability to increase construct stability with component sizing, and a reliance on the deltoid for function. As our learning about revision of RSA improves, so will our ability to preemptively address potential issues which may lead to decreased complications in these cases. Despite the 25% rate of major complication, patients reported satisfaction of 89% which demonstrates the improvements in function and pain relief that are provided by the reverse prosthesis.

Minimum five-year outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a trabecular metal glenoid base plate

AIMS

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) using trabecular metal (TM)-backed glenoid implants has been introduced with the aim to increase implant survival. Only short-term reports on the outcomes of TM-RTSA have been published to date. We aim to present the seven-year survival of TM-backed glenoid implants along with minimum five-year clinical and radiological outcomes.

METHODS

All consecutive elective RTSAs performed at a single centre between November 2008 and October 2014 were reviewed. Patients who had primary TM-RTSA for rotator cuff arthropathy and osteoarthritis with deficient cuff were included. A total of 190 shoulders in 168 patients (41 male, 127 female) were identified for inclusion at a mean of 7.27 years (SD 1.4) from surgery. The primary outcome was survival of the implant with all-cause revision and aseptic glenoid loosening as endpoints. Secondary outcomes were clinical, radiological, and patient-related outcomes with a five-year minimum follow-up.

RESULTS

The implant was revised in ten shoulders (5.2%) with a median time to revision of 21.2 months (interquartile range (IQR) 9.9 to 41.8). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimate at seven years was 95.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 91.7 to 98; 35 RTSAs at risk) for aseptic mechanical failure of the glenoid and 94.8% (95% CI 77.5 to 96.3; 35 RTSAs at risk) for all-cause revision. Minimum five-year clinical and radiological outcomes were available for 103 and 98 RTSAs respectively with a median follow-up time of six years (IQR 5.2 to 7.0). Median postoperative Oxford Shoulder Score was 38 (IQR 31 to 45); median Constant and Murley score was 60 (IQR 47.5 to 70); median forward flexion 115° (IQR 100° to 125°); median abduction 95° (IQR 80° to 120°); and external rotation 25° (IQR 15° to 40°) Scapular notching was seen in 62 RTSAs (63.2%).

CONCLUSION

We present the largest and longest-term series of TM-backed glenoid implants demonstrating 94.8% all-cause survivorship at seven years. Specifically pertaining to glenoid loosening, survival of the implant increased to 95.9%. In addition, we report satisfactory minimum five-year clinical and radiological outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(8):1333-1338.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Technique, Decision-Making and Exposure Tips

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to introduce surgical decision-making pearls for reverse shoulder arthroplasty and describe optimization of surgical exposure for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

RECENT FINDINGS

While the technology of reverse shoulder replacement and the associated prosthetic options have expanded, the principles involved in successfully exposing the humerus and glenoid in arthroplasty remain the same. Reverse shoulder replacement should be considered in arthroplasty situations with rotator cuff disease, deformity, bone loss, and instability as part of the diagnosis. Optimal exposure in reverse shoulder arthroplasty can be obtained by (1) releasing deltoid adhesions, (2) removal of humeral osteophytes, (3) generous humeral head cuts, (4) thorough humeral and glenoid capsular release and (5) optimal glenoid retractor placement. Neuromuscular paralysis can also aid glenoid exposure.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a cementless short metaphyseal humeral prosthesis without a stem: survivorship, early to mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes in a prospective study from an independent centre

INTRODUCTION

The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has increased for the management of cuff-deficient glenohumeral joint arthritis and fractures. With bone preservation being a major target in reverse shoulder arthroplasty, metaphyseal humeral components without a stem were developed. The aim of this study is to present the survivorship, functional and radiological outcomes of a novel short metaphyseal prosthesis without a diaphyseal stem from an independent centre.

METHODS

Clinical function and radiological features of patients undergoing stemless reverse shoulder arthroplasty were prospectively recorded. Patients' demographics, indications for surgery, complications, functional and radiological assessment at the final follow-up as well as survivorship with the end point of revision for any reason were recorded.

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2016, 36 patients received 37 reverse shoulder arthroplasties with the stemless Verso prosthesis. Mean age of the patients was 76.9 years. The most common indication for surgery was cuff tear arthropathy. Mean follow-up was 3 years (range 1-7 years). Oxford shoulder score improved from an average of 11 pre-operatively (range 2-19) to 44 post-operatively (range 29-48) (p < 0.0001). There was one case of a deep post-operative infection that needed washout, liner exchange with retention of the prosthesis. Radiographic analysis showed no lucencies, or stress shielding around the humeral or glenoid components. Constant score at the final follow-up was on average 63 (range 35-86). Activities of daily living with requirement for internal and external rotation score (ADLEIR) was on average 12 pre-operatively (range 0-27) and 31 post-operatively (range 18-36) (p < 0.0001). There was 100% survivorship of the prosthesis in this early to mid-term study.

CONCLUSION

This early to mid-term prospective study demonstrates excellent survivorship and radiological results of the Verso reverse shoulder replacement. It needs a simple reproducible technique, and the results have been replicated at an independent centre. This study underlines its survivorship in the early to mid-term and confirms lower incidence of complications such as instability, notching, loosening and the need for revision surgery. Most importantly, it conserves the humeral bone stock for revision arthroplasties in the future. Our results are similar to those of the currently published literature.

Preoperative patient expectations of elective reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine patients' preoperative expectations before primary elective reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). We hypothesized that younger patients, patients with better preoperative function, patients with shoulder osteoarthritis (OA), and patients with no prior joint replacements would have higher expectations of RSA.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 333 primary RSAs performed for cuff tear arthropathy (n = 242), OA (n = 68), or post-traumatic arthritis (n = 23). Expectations were assessed preoperatively using the Hospital for Special Surgery's shoulder surgery expectations survey. Preoperative patient-reported measures were assessed with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score; Shoulder Activity Scale score; Short Form 12 mental component and physical component scores; and visual analog scale scores for pain, fatigue, and general health. A Poisson regression model was performed to control for potential confounding variables.

RESULTS

Relief of night-time pain, relief of daytime pain, improvement in self-care, improvement in the ability to drive or put on a seat belt, and improvement in the ability to perform daily activities were reported as "very important" by approximately half of patients. No association was found between age and overall expectations. Multivariate analysis showed that better preoperative Shoulder Activity Scale and Short Form 12 physical component scores were associated with greater expectations (P < .001). OA was associated with greater expectations compared with cuff tear arthropathy (P < .001). A history of either contralateral RSA or any joint replacement was associated with lower expectations (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients have the highest expectations for pain relief and the performance of simple tasks after RSA. Patients with higher preoperative function, OA, and no previous joint replacements have greater expectations of RSA.

Management of glenoid bone defects with reverse shoulder arthroplasty-surgical technique and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Management of significant glenoid bone loss in patients undergoing a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) poses a significant treatment challenge. The long-term outcome of single-stage RSA with glenoid bone grafting is unknown. This study assesses the indications, technique, and outcome of RSA with glenoid bone grafting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2001 and 2010, there were 1074 RSAs performed at our institution; 94 patients had significant glenoid bone loss. Each glenoid defect was subclassified as centric or eccentric and graded 1-4. The patients underwent a single-stage or 2-stage RSA with glenoid bone grafting. A retrospective analysis of the preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiologic outcome was carried out. The mean follow-up was 2.4 years (0.52-10.7 years).

RESULTS

Of these patients, 17% had a centric defect and 83% had an eccentric glenoid defect. Composite glenoid grafts were required in 12 patients, 9 of whom required a glenoid baseplate with a long central peg; 92.5% (87/94) of the patients could be managed with a single-stage procedure. Improvement in the Constant score of 61 points (17.9 to 78.9; P < .01) and the mean Simple Shoulder Test score of 5.8 points (1.6 to 7.5; P < .001) was noted. No correlation was found between the clinical outcome and indication for surgery, age, location of defect, and size of defect.

CONCLUSION

Severe glenoid bone loss can usually be managed by a single-stage bone graft and RSA. A 2-stage procedure is recommended when primary baseplate stability is not attainable.

Reverse polarity shoulder replacement: Current concepts and review of literature

Shoulder replacement in cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) is an unsolved challenge. CTA poses a soft tissue deficiency in an arthritic glenohumeral joint which the anatomical total shoulder replacement and hemiarthroplasty cannot reliably provide stability, range of movement, function or satisfactory long term outcome. In the past two decades since the introduction of the reverse shoulder replacement, the prosthesis has evolved and has shown promising results. It is a partially constraint joint by virtue of its design features. The reversal of the concavity and convexity of the joint to the proximal humerus and the glenoid, respectively, also shifts and improves its center of rotation onto the osseous surface of the glenoid with less exposure to shear stress. It is a successful pain relieving procedure, offering good outcome in patients with irreparable massive rotator cuff tear with or without osteoarthritis. Consequently, this has led to wider use and expansion of its indication to include more complex elective and trauma cases. Whereas originally used in the more elderly patients, there is increasingly more demand in the younger patients. It is important to have good quality long term data to support these increasing indications. Therefore, we review the literature on the concepts of reverse shoulder replacement and the contemporary evidence.