A model for ribosome translocation based on the alternated displacement of its subunits

A meaningful dilemma in ribosome translocation arising from experimental facts is that, although the ribosome-mRNA interaction force always has a significant magnitude, the ribosome still moves to the next codon on the mRNA. How does the ribosome move to the next codon in the sequence while holding the mRNA tightly? The hypothesis proposed here is that ribosome subunits alternate the grip of the ribosome on the mRNA, freeing the other subunit of such interaction for a while, thus allowing its motion to the following codon. Based on this assumption, a single-loop cycle of ribosome configurations involving the relative position of its subunits is elaborated. When its dynamic is modeled as a Markov network, it gives expressions for the average ribosome translocation speed and stall force as functions of the equilibrium constants among the proposed ribosome configurations. The calculations have a reasonable agreement with experimental results, and the succession of molecular events considered here is consistent with current biomolecular concepts of the ribosome translocation process. Thus, the alternative displacements hypothesis developed in the present work suggests a feasible explanation of ribosome translocation.

Allosteric Effects of EF-G Domain I Mutations Inducing Ribosome Frameshifting Revealed by Multiplexed Force Spectroscopy

Ribosome translocation catalyzed by elongation factor G (EF-G) is a critical step in protein synthesis where the ribosome typically moves along the mRNA by three nucleotides at each step. To investigate the mechanism of EF-G catalysis, it is essential to precisely resolve the ribosome motion at both ends of the mRNA, which, to our best knowledge, is only achieved with the magnetic-based force spectroscopy developed by our groups. Here, we introduce a novel multiplexed force spectroscopy technique that, for the first time, offers single-nucleotide resolution for multiple samples. This technique combines multiple acoustic force generators with the smallest atomic magnetometer designed for biological research. Utilizing this technique, we demonstrate that mutating EF-G at the GTP binding pocket results in the ribosome moving only two nucleotides on both ends of the mRNA, thereby compromising ribosome translocation. This finding suggests a direct link between GTP hydrolysis and ribosome translocation. Our results not only provide mechanistic insights into the role of GTP binding pocket but also illuminate how allosteric mutations can manipulate translocation. We anticipate broader applications of our technique in the ribosome field, leveraging its high efficiency and single-nucleotide resolution.

Multi-channel smFRET study reveals a compact conformation of EF-G on the ribosome

While elongation factor G (EF-G) is crucial for ribosome translocation, the role of its GTP hydrolysis remains ambiguous. EF-G's indispensability is further exemplified by the phosphorylation of human eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2) at Thr56, which inhibits protein synthesis globally, but its exact mechanism is not clear. In this study, we developed a multi-channel single-molecule FRET (smFRET) microscopy methodology to examine the conformational changes of E. coli EF-G induced by mutations that closely aligned with eEF2's Thr56 residue. We utilized Alexa 488/594 double-labeled EF-G to catalyze the translocation of fMet-Phe-tRNAPhe-Cy3 inside Cy5-L27 labeled ribosomes, allowing us to probe both processes within the same complex. Our findings indicate that in the presence of either GTP or GDPCP, wild-type EF-G undergoes a conformational extension upon binding to the ribosome to promote normal translocation. On the other hand, the T48E and T48V mutations did not affect GTP/GDP binding or GTP hydrolysis, but impeded Poly(Phe) synthesis and caused EF-G to adopt a unique compact conformation, which was not observed when the mutants interact solely with the SRL. This study provides new insights into EF-G's adaptability and sheds light on the modification mechanism of human eEF2.