Cardiovascular changes induced by targeted mild hypercapnia after out of hospital cardiac arrest. A sub-study of the TAME cardiac arrest trial

AIM

Hypercapnia may elicit detrimental haemodynamic effects in critically ill patients. We aimed to investigate the consequences of targeted mild hypercapnia versus targeted normocapnia on pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular function in patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

METHODS

Pre-planned, single-centre, prospective, sub-study of the Targeted Therapeutic Mild Hypercapnia After Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest (TAME) trial. Patients were randomised to mild hypercapnia (PaCO2 = 6.7-7.3 kPa) or normocapnia (PaCO2 = 4.7-6.0 kPa) for 24 hours. Haemodynamic assessment was performed with right heart catheterisation and serial blood-gas analyses every4th hour for 48 hours.

RESULTS

We studied 84 patients. Mean pH was 7.24 (95% CI 7.22-7.30) and 7.32 (95% CI 7.31-7.34) with hypercapnia and normocapnia, respectively (P-group < 0.001). Pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI), pulmonary artery pulsatility index, and right atrial pressure did not differ between groups (P-group > 0.05). Mean cardiac index was higher with mild hypercapnia (P-group < 0.001): 2.0 (95% CI 1.85-2.1) vs 1.6 (95% CI 1.52-1.76) L/min/m2. Systemic vascular resistance index was 2579 dyne-sec/cm-5/ m2 (95% CI 2356-2830) with hypercapnia, and 3249 dyne-sec/cm-5/ m2 (95% CI 2930-3368) with normocapnia (P-group < 0.001). Stroke volumes (P-group = 0.013) and mixed venous oxygen saturation (P-group < 0.001) were higher in the hypercapnic group.

CONCLUSION

In resuscitated OHCA patients, targeting mild hypercapnia did not increase PVRI or worsen right ventricular function compared to normocapnia. Mild hypercapnia comparatively improved cardiac performance and mixed venous oxygen saturation.

Assessment of Right Ventricular Function-a State of the Art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The right ventricle (RV) has a complex geometry and physiology which is distinct from the left. RV dysfunction and failure can be the aftermath of volume- and/or pressure-loading conditions, as well as myocardial and pericardial diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging and right heart catheterisation can assess RV function by using several qualitative and quantitative parameters. In pulmonary hypertension (PH) in particular, RV function can be impaired and is related to survival. An accurate assessment of RV function is crucial for the early diagnosis and management of these patients. This review focuses on the different modalities and indices used for the evaluation of RV function with an emphasis on PH.

Prognostic meaning of right ventricular function and output reserve in patients with systemic sclerosis

Background

The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of right ventricular (RV) function at rest and during exercise in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) presenting for a screening for pulmonary hypertension (PH).

Methods

In this study, data from SSc patients who underwent routinely performed examinations for PH screening including echocardiography and right heart catheterization at rest and during exercise were analysed. Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed to identify prognostic parameters.

Results

Out of 280 SSc patients screened for PH, 225 were included in the analysis (81.3% female, mean age 58.1±13.0 years, 68% limited cutaneous SSc, WHO-FC II–III 74%, 24 manifest PH). During the observation period of 3.2±2.7 (median 2.6) years 35 patients died. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) at rest <18 mm (p=0.001), RV output reserve as increase of cardiac index (CI) during exercise <2 l/min (p<0.0001), RV pulmonary vascular reserve (Δ mean pulmonary artery pressure/Δ cardiac output) ≥3 mmHg/l/min (p<0.0001), peak CI <5.5 l/min/m² (p=0.001), pulmonary arterial compliance <2 ml/mmHg (p=0.002), TAPSE/systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) ratio ≤0.6 ml/mmHg (p<0.0001) and echocardiographic qualitative RV function at rest (p<0.0001) significantly predicted worse survival. In the multivariable analysis TAPSE/sPAP ratio and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide ≤65% were identified as independent prognostic predictors and had 75% sensitivity and 69% specificity to predict future development of pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) during follow-up.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that assessment of RV function at rest and during exercise may provide crucial information to identify SSc patients who are at a high risk of poor outcome and for the development of PH and/or PVD.

Correlation Between Doppler Echocardiography and Right Heart Catheterisation-Derived Systolic and Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressures: Determinants of Discrepancies Between the Two Methods

BACKGROUND

There is still controversy about whether transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can provide reliable estimations of pulmonary artery pressures (PAP). The primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate the correlation between TTE and right heart catheterisation (RHC) in estimating systolic (SPAP) and mean (MPAP) pulmonary artery pressures.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and December 2018, 141 consecutive patients (average age 63.6±11.5 years; 84 women) with suspected or confirmed pulmonary hypertension (PH) were enrolled into this retrospective observational monocentric study. All patients underwent TTE and, within 3 hours, RHC. The correlation between TTE and RHC in estimating both SPAP and MPAP was retrospectively determined.

RESULTS

Seventeen (17) of the patients were excluded due to insufficient TTE signal quality. Of the remaining 124 patients, 18 had no PH. There was moderate correlation between both SPAP and MPAP estimated by TTE and those assessed by RHC (r=0.65 and r=0.60, respectively). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of -11.9 mmHg (with the 95% limits of agreement ranging -45.4 to +21.5 mmHg) for SPAP estimation and -4.6 mmHg (with the 95% limits of agreement ranging -27.9 to +18.8 mmHg) for MPAP estimation, suggesting a general overestimation of PAP by TTE. The main factors responsible for discrepancies between TTE and RHC were: female gender, arrhythmic cardiac electrical activity, systemic arterial hypertension, and diuretic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Transthoracic echocardiography frequently overestimated PAP in comparison with RHC, especially in hypertensive women with arrhythmias and under diuretic treatment.

The effect of sildenafil on pulmonary haemodynamics in a canine model of chronic embolic pulmonary hypertension

The effects of different doses of orally administered sildenafil on pulmonary haemodynamics in dogs with pulmonary hypertension (PH) have not been documented in an invasive and quantitative manner. In this study, we examined the effects of oral sildenafil using a canine model of chronic embolic PH (CEPH). This CEPH model was created by repeatedly injecting microspheres through a catheter into the pulmonary artery under general anaesthesia at regular weekly intervals over several months. The CEPH dogs received 1, 2 or 4 mg/kg of sildenafil orally twice a day for seven days. Then, haemodynamic measurements including pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), systemic artery pressure (SAP), pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), right atrial pressure (RAP) and cardiac output (CO) were obtained after seven days of sildenafil administration via right heart catheterisation and oscillometric blood pressure measurements. Sildenafil was well tolerated in this study. Sildenafil administered at doses of 2 and 4 mg/kg significantly decreased systolic PAP compared with before administration. In addition, all doses of sildenafil significantly decreased the mean and diastolic PAP. Furthermore, 4 mg/kg of sildenafil significantly decreased PAP compared with 1 mg/kg. Sildenafil also significantly decreased pulmonary vascular resistance without notable changes in SAP or systemic vascular resistance. The PAWP, RAP and CO did not increase significantly at any doses. In conclusion, the oral administration of sildenafil to CEPH models decreased PAP in a dose-dependent manner.

Right Heart Catheterisation: How To Do It

Right heart catheterisation (RHC) is a minimally invasive procedure that provides direct haemodynamic measurement of intracardiac and pulmonary pressures. It is the gold standard investigation for the diagnosis and management of pulmonary hypertension. This article will describe how to perform right heart catheterisation, indications and contraindications.

[Evaluation of cardiac MRI in the follow up assessment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension]

Haemodynamic follow up in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is currently based on right heart catheterisation (RHC). The primary objective of the EVITA study is to compare the use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) with RHC in the identification of an unfavourable hemodynamic status. The secondary objectives are to determine the role of cMRI in the follow up process. Patients will undergo at diagnosis and at follow up visits both RHC and cMRI. Patients will be followed and treated according to the current guidelines. The primary endpoint will be an unfavourable haemodynamic status defined by cardiac index<2.5L/min/m² or a right atrial pressure≥8mm Hg measured with RHC compared with a cardiac index<2.5L/min/m² or right ventricle ejection fraction<35% or an absolute decrease of 10% from the previous measurement with cMRI. Exact values of sensitivity, specificity and 95% confidence intervals will be computed. A population of 180 subjects will have a power of 90% with an α risk of 5%. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis will allow answering to the secondary objectives. We expect to demonstrate that cMRI could be partly used instead of RHC in the follow up of patients with PAH.

Acute hemodynamic changes by breathing hypoxic and hyperoxic gas mixtures in pulmonary arterial and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND

There is insufficient evidence to counsel patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing altitude or air travel. We thus aimed to study hemodynamic response of patients with pulmonary arterial or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (PAH/CTEPH) during changes in inspiratory oxygen partial pressure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients undergoing right heart catheterization had hemodynamic assessments whilst breathing ambient air (normoxia, FiO₂ 0.21, at altitude 490 m), nitrogen-enriched air (hypoxia, FiO₂ 0.16, simulated altitude 2600 m) and oxygen (hyperoxia, FiO₂ 1.0), each for 10 min. Data from patients with PAH/CTEPH with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg, pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤15 mmHg, were compared to data from controls, mPAP <20 mmHg. 28 PAH/CTEPH-patients, 15 women, median age (quartiles) 62y (49;73), mPAP 35 mmHg (31;44), PaO₂ 7.1 kPa (6.8;9.3) and 16 controls, 12 women, 60y (52;69), mPAP 18 mmHg (16;18), PaO₂ 9.5 kPa (8.5;10.6) were included. Hypoxia reduced the PaO₂ in PAH/CTEPH-patients by median of 2.3 kPa, in controls by 3.3 kPa, difference (95%CI) in change 1.0 (0.02 to 1.9), p < 0.05. Corresponding changes in pulmonary vascular resistance, mPAP and cardiac output were nonsignificant in both groups. Hyperoxia decreased mPAP in PAH/CTEPH-patients by 4 mmHg (2 to 6), in controls by 2 mmHg (0 to 3), difference in change 3 mmHg (0 to 5), p < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PAH/CTEPH, very short-term exposure to moderate hypoxia similar to 2600 m altitude or during commercial air travel did not deteriorate hemodynamics. These results encourage studying the response of PAH/CTEPH during daytrips to the mountain or air travel.

[Screening for pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis: Comparison of DETECT algorithm to decisions of a multidisciplinary team, in a competence centre]

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe complication of systemic sclerosis and detecting PAH efficiently remains challenging. The DETECT study has offered in 2013 a composite screening tool for PAH. The objective of our study was to compare the indication of right heart catheterisation (RHC) as suggested by the DETECT algorithm with the decisions of a multidisciplinary team.

METHODS

This prospective monocentric non-interventional study consecutively included systemic sclerosis patients when data required to apply DETECT algorithm were available. We evaluate the number of RHC as requested by this algorithm and confronted it with the indications of RHC suggested by a multidisciplinary group blinded for the result of DETECT algorithm.

RESULTS

In total, 117 systemic sclerosis patients were included. When DETECT algorithm was applied to all patients, RHC was suggested by this algorithm for 70 patients, whereas only 15 indications were required by the multidisciplinary group; among those patients only 7 had PAH. When DETECT algorithm was applied only to the 42 patients with DLCO<60% and disease duration of more than 3 years, RHC was suggested for 31 patients whereas only 13 were indicated by the multidisciplinary group; among those patients only 7 had PAH.

CONCLUSION

The DETECT algorithm is able to efficiently detect all PAH patients finally diagnosed by our multidisciplinary team. However, it increases by 3 the number of RHC that should be performed.

Pulmonary hypertension in lymphangioleiomyomatosis: prevalence, severity and the role of carbon monoxide diffusion capacity as a screening method

Background

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is included within group 5 of the current PH classification (unclear multifactorial mechanisms). However, data regarding the occurrence of PH in LAM are scarce. The aims of the study were to describe the prevalence and characteristics of PH in a large cohort of LAM patients with different levels of severity, and to evaluate the role of echocardiography and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DL_CO) as screening methods for PH in LAM.

Methods

One hundred five LAM patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and 6-min walk test (6MWT). Patients with a suspicion of PH on echocardiography, defined by the presence of estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) over 35 mmHg or PFT showing DLco below 40% of the predicted value, underwent right heart catheterisation to confirm the diagnosis of PH.

Results

Eight patients (7.6%) had PH confirmed on right heart catheterisation, six patients (5.7%) had a pre-capillary pattern and two patients (1.9%) had a post-capillary profile. Only one patient (1%) had mean PAP over 35 mmHg. Patients with PH had lower FEV₁ and DL_CO in PFTs and greater oxygen desaturation and dyspnea intensity during 6MWT compared with those without PH. In 63% of the patients with confirmed PH, the right heart catheterisation was performed based only on DL_CO result.

Conclusions

The prevalence of PH is low in LAM patients. Pulmonary hypertension in LAM is typically mild and significantly associated with pulmonary parenchymal involvement. Carbon monoxide diffusion capacity significantly improved the identification of PH in LAM patients.

Acute vasodilator response to vardenafil and clinical outcome in patients with pulmonary hypertension

PURPOSE

Acute vasodilator testing is recommended in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension to identify individuals who may benefit from long-term treatment with oral calcium channel blockers. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of vardenafil in acute vasoreactivity testing compared to adenosine.

METHODS

A total of 20 patients eligible for right heart catheterisation were enrolled. Acute vasoreactivity testing was carried out with intravenous (iv) adenosine (n = 18) followed by oral vardenafil (n = 20). Haemodynamic responses were recorded at baseline and after 60 min (vardenafil). Responders were defined according to consensus guideline criteria.

RESULTS

Both vardenafil and adenosine significantly decreased mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP, p < 0.001 and p = 0.026, respectively) and pulmonary vascular resistance (p < 0.001 and p > 0.001, respectively), and significantly increased cardiac output (p = 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). Vardenafil reduced mPAP more than adenosine (p = 0.044), while adenosine resulted in higher responses of cardiac index (p = 0.009) and pulmonary arterial oxygen saturation (p = 0.042). Acute adverse reactions were common with adenosine, while no side effects were observed after a single oral dose vardenafil. Vardenafil identified five responders (out of 20), while adenosine identified three responders (out of 18). During a 7-year follow-up, vardenafil responders had significantly lower NT-proBNP levels compared to non-responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Vardenafil may be safely used for acute vasoreactivity testing in patients with PH. A single oral dose of vardenafil is better tolerated than iv adenosine and may identify additional responders who could benefit from long-term vasodilator treatment.