Penta-peptide ATN-161 based neutralization mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein

SARS-CoV-2 has become a big challenge for the scientific community worldwide. SARS-CoV-2 enters into the host cell by the spike protein binding with an ACE2 receptor present on the host cell. Developing safe and effective inhibitor appears an urgent need to interrupt the binding of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with ACE2 receptor in order to reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection. We have examined the penta-peptide ATN-161 as potential inhibitor of ACE2 and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binding, where ATN-161 has been commercially approved for the safety and possess high affinity and specificity towards the receptor binding domain (RBD) of S1 subunit in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. We carried out experiments and confirmed these phenomena that the virus bindings were indeed minimized. ATN-161 peptide can be used as an inhibitor of protein-protein interaction (PPI) stands as a crucial interaction in biological systems. The molecular docking finding suggests that the binding energy of the ACE2-spike protein complex is reduced in the presence of ATN-161. Protein-protein docking binding energy (-40.50 kcal/mol) of the spike glycoprotein toward the human ACE2 and binding of ATN-161 at their binding interface reduced the biding energy (-26.25 kcal/mol). The finding of this study suggests that ATN-161 peptide can mask the RBD of the spike protein and be considered as a neutralizing candidate by binding with the ACE2 receptor. Peptide-based masking of spike S1 protein (RBD) and its neutralization is a highly promising strategy to prevent virus penetration into the host cell. Thus masking of the RBD leads to the loss of receptor recognition property which can reduce the chance of infection host cells.

Time to Treat: Applying Lessons Learned from Other Viral Syndromes to SARS-CoV-2

In many different infectious syndromes, most notably several viral conditions, time to therapy initiation from symptom onset has been identified as a critical component contributing to the success of therapy. Regarding COVID-19, several therapeutic antivirals, both repurposed and novel, have been evaluated for overall safety and efficacy. As the literature related to these therapies has expanded recently, a wide array of trial designs, time to therapy initiation thresholds, and clinical outcomes in regard to time to initiation have been reported. We describe the potential effects of time to therapy initiation on outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and detail the existing data surrounding this topic in relation to remdesivir, convalescent plasma, lopinavir/ritonavir, and hydroxychloroquine.