Prevalence of and risk factors for gastrointestinal diseases in korean americans and native koreans undergoing screening endoscopy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In South Korea, health check-ups are readily accessible to the public. We aimed to compare the prevalence of upper gastrointestinal (GI) and lower GI diseases in Korean Americans and native Koreans to determine differences and risk factors.

METHODS

In total, 1,942 subjects who visited Gangnam Severance Hospital from July 2008 to November 2010 for a health check-up were enrolled. Basic characteristics and laboratory data for the subjects were collected. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy were performed. In total, 940 Korean Americans (group 1) and 1,002 native Koreans (group 2) were enrolled.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of GI diseases for each group (group 1 vs group 2) were as follows: reflux esophagitis (RE) (9.65% vs 7.9%), gastric ulcer (2.8% vs 3.4%), duodenal ulcer (2.3% vs 3.6%), gastric cancer (0.4% vs 0.3%), colorectal polyp (35.9% vs 35.6%), colorectal cancer (0.5% vs 0.5%), and hemorrhoids (29.4% vs 21.3%). The prevalence of hemorrhoids was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (p=0.001). In the multivariable analysis of group 1, male sex, age over 50 years, hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia predicted colorectal polyps. Male sex and high fasting glucose levels were associated with RE.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the prevalence of GI diseases (except hemorrhoids) in Korean Americans was similar to that observed in native Koreans. Therefore, the Korean guidelines for upper and lower screening endoscopy may be applicable to Korean Americans.

Development and evaluation of a double-check support system using artificial intelligence in endoscopic screening for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to prevent missing gastric cancer and point out low-quality images by developing a double-check support system (DCSS) for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) still images using artificial intelligence.

METHODS

We extracted 12,977 still EGD images from 855 cases with cancer [821 with early gastric carcinoma (EGC) and 34 malignant lymphoma (ML)] and developed a lesion detection system using 10,994 images. The remaining images were used as a test dataset. Additional validation was performed using a new dataset containing 50 EGC and 1,200 non-GC images by comparing the interpretation of ten endoscopists (five trainees and five experts). Furthermore, we developed another system to detect low-quality images, which are not suitable for diagnosis, using 2198 images.

RESULTS

In the validation of 1983 images from the 124 cancer cases, the DCSS diagnosed cancer with a sensitivity of 89.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 93.3%, and an accuracy of 83.3%. EGC was detected in 93.2% and ML in 92.5% of cases. Comparing with the endoscopists, sensitivity was significantly higher in the DCSS, and the average diagnostic time was significantly shorter using the DCSS than that by the trainees. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and accuracy in detecting low-quality images were 65.8%, 93.1%, 79.6%, and 85.2% for "Blur" and 57.8%, 91.7%, 82.2%, and 78.1% for "Mucus adhesion," respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The DCSS showed excellent capability in detecting lesions and pointing out low-quality images.

Duodenal tumor risk in Lynch syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with an increased risk of small bowel tumors but routine screening is not recommended in international guidelines. The aim of our study was to determinate the prevalence of duodenal tumors in a French cohort of LS patients.

METHODS

Patients carrying a germline pathogenic variant in a MMR gene, supported by our local network, in which at least one upper endoscopy had been performed, were included. We registered the occurrence of duodenal lesions in those patients.

RESULTS

154 LS patients were identified including respectively 85 MSH2 and 41 MLH1 mutated patients respectively. Seven out of 154 (4.5%) had at least one duodenal lesion. Median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range: 49-73). The twelve lesions locations were: descending duodenum (n = 7), genu inferius (n = 2), duodenal bulb (n = 1), ampulla (n = 1), fourth duodenum (n = 1). Three lesions were invasive adenocarcinomas. The incidence rate of duodenal lesions in patients with MSH2 or MLH1 pathogenic variants was respectively 7.1% (6 out of 85) and 2.4% (1 out of 41) emphasizing a trend toward increased risk of developing duodenal lesion in MSH2 mutated patients: OR: 5.17, IC95% (0.8-60.07), p = 0.1307.

CONCLUSION

Regarding this high prevalence rate, especially in MSH2 patients, regular duodenal screening during upper endoscopy should be considered in routine in LS patients.

Characteristics of interval gastric neoplasms detected within two years after negative screening endoscopy among Koreans

Background

In Korea, where gastric cancer is highly prevalent, biennial endoscopy is recommended among individuals over 40. Even under regular screening, some are still diagnosed at advanced stages. We aimed to identify characteristics of interval gastric neoplasms (IGNs) with rapid progression.

Results

Newly-diagnosed gastric neoplasms detected in screening endoscopy between January 2004 and May 2016 were reviewed. Among them, those who had previous endoscopy within 2 years were enrolled. Endoscopic findings, family history of gastric cancer, smoking, and H. pylori status were analysed. Totally, 297 IGN cases were enrolled. Among them, 246 were endoscopically treatable IGN (ET-IGN) and 51 were endoscopically untreatable IGNs (EUT-IGN) by the expanded criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Among EUT-IGNs, 78% were undifferentiated cancers (40/51) and 33% showed submucosal invasion (13/40). They were median 2.0 cm in size and more commonly located in the proximal stomach than ET-IGNs (70.6% vs. 41.9%, p < 0.001). EUT-IGN was independently related with age < 60 (OR, 2.09; 95%CI, 1.03–4.26, p = 0.042), H. pylori (OR, 2.81; 95%CI, 1.20–6.63, p = 0.018), and absent/mild gastric atrophy (OR, 2.67; 95%CI, 1.25–5.72, p = 0.011). Overall and disease-specific survival were not significantly different between the two groups, however EUT-IGN tended to have short disease-specific survival (overall survival, p = 0.143; disease-specific survival, p = 0.083).

Conclusions

Uniform screening endoscopy with two-year interval seems not enough for rapid-growing gastric neoplasms, such as undifferentiated cancers. They tended to develop in adults younger than 60 with H. pylori infection without severe gastric atrophy. More meticulous screening, especially for proximal lesions is warranted for adults younger than 60 with H. pylori infection before development of gastric atrophy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07929-y.

Colonic Intramucosal Cancer in the Interposed Colon Treated with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Colon interposition is a surgical procedure used for maintenance of luminal conduit after esophagectomy. Although epithelial neoplasia, such as adenoma and adenocarcinoma, may develop in the interposed colon, there are only few case reports on the condition. Due to the rarity of this condition, there is no definite consensus on recommending screening endoscopy for the early detection of neoplasia in the interposed colons. Here, we report a case of intramucosal adenocarcinoma in an interposed colon. Initial endoscopic resection for this tumor failed to accomplish complete resection. A subsequent endoscopic resection was performed 1 month later and complete resection was achieved. Based on our experience and recommendation on screening endoscopy for gastric cancer in Korea, we suggest that regular screening esophagogastroduodenoscopies should be performed following esophagectomy to detect early neoplasia in the stomach and interposed colon and avoid adverse results induced by delayed detection.

Gender disparities and woman-specific trends in Barrett's esophagus in the United States: An 11-year nationwide population-based study

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a known premalignant precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The prevalence rates continue to rise in the United States, but many patients who are at risk of EAC are not screened. Current practice guidelines include male gender as a predisposing factor for BE and EAC. The population-based clinical evidence regarding female gender remains limited.

AIM

To study comparative trends of gender disparities in patients with BE in the United States.

METHODS

A nationwide retrospective study was conducted using the 2009-2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis code of BE were identified. The major outcome of interest was determining the gender disparities in patients with BE. Trend analysis for respective outcomes for females was also reported to ascertain any time-based shifts.

RESULTS

We identified 1204190 patients with BE for the study period. Among the included patients, 717439 (59.6%) were men and 486751 (40.4%) were women. The mean age was higher in women than in men (67.1 ± 0.4 vs 66.6 ± 0.3 years, P < 0.001). The rate of BE per 100000 total NIS hospitalizations for males increased from 144.6 in 2009 to 213.4 in 2019 (P < 0.001). The rate for females increased from 96.8 in 2009 to 148.7 in 2019 (P < 0.001). There was a higher frequency of obesity among women compared to men (17.4% vs 12.6%, P < 0.001). Obesity prevalence among females increased from 12.3% in 2009 to 21.9% in 2019 (P < 0.001). A lower prevalence of smoking was noted in women than in men (20.8% vs 35.7%, P < 0.001). However, trend analysis showed an increasing prevalence of smoking among women, from 12.9% in 2009 to 30.7% in 2019 (P < 0.001). Additionally, there was a lower prevalence of alcohol abuse, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), and diabetes mellitus among females than males (P < 0.001). Trend analysis showed an increasing prevalence of alcohol use disorder and a decreasing prevalence of H. pylori and diabetes mellitus among women (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of BE among women has steadily increased from 2009 to 2019. The existing knowledge concerning BE development has historically focused on men, but our findings show that the risk in women is not insignificant.