A retrospective investigation on clinical and radiographic outcomes of distal tibial fractures after intramedullary nailing using the lateral parapatellar extra-articular approach

INTRODUCTION

According to reports, the modified extra-articular parapatellar approach allows the performance of tibial nailing in the semi-extended position without the concern of joint violation. However, there remains no special study that has provided a detailed assessment of the benefits and risks of this approach for treating distal tibial fractures (DTFs). The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with DTFs after intramedullary nailing using a lateral parapatellar extra-articular (LPE) approach in comparison to using the suprapatellar (SP) and transpatellar (TP) approaches.

METHODS

Data were collected from 99 patients with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Comparisons were conducted between the groups regarding the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, complications, knee pain, knee range of motion (ROM), the Lysholm Knee Scale (LKS), the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and radiological findings.

RESULTS

The demographic characteristics were comparable between the groups. Fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies were performed in the LPE (27.47 ± 4.98) and SP (26.03 ± 5.12) groups than in the TP group (30.20 ± 7.42; P<0.001). When compared with the other two approaches, the LPE approach was associated with less knee pain (P<0.001) and better knee ROM (P<0.001) at one week postoperative. No significant intergroup differences were detected in the incidence of complications, LKS scores (P = 0.687) and OMAS (P = 0.926). Radiological findings demonstrated that postoperative tibial alignment (P = 0.853), the time of bony union and rate of non-union were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The LPE approach can serve as a safe and effective option for tibial nailing, as it offers favourable outcomes in knee pain relief and knee ROM in the early postoperative period and is equivalent to the other two approaches in terms of the incidence of complications, fracture healing, functional recovery and postoperative alignment for patients with DTFs.

Suprapatellar nailing in proximal third tibial fractures - Clinicoradiological outcome

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of proximal third tibia fractures managed by suprapatellar nailing with a minimum follow-up of 12 months.

METHODOLOGY

In our retrospective cohort study of 43 consecutive proximal third tibia fractures from January 2015 to September 2018 treated with intramedullary nailing through suprapatellar approach in semiextended knee position were included. The patients were followed up regularly at 6 weeks, 3 months, 4.5 months, 6 months, 12 months and every 6 months thereafter. At each visit patients were assessed for union, shortening and rotational alignment. The clinical outcome was analysed using Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and anterior knee pain. The radiological outcomes are analysed by evaluating the radiographs for progression of fracture union and tibial alignments.

RESULTS

After fulfilling the exclusion and inclusion criteria, 43 out of 60 consecutive proximal third tibia fracture were included in the study with an average age of 38.4 years (20-71 years), follow up of 20.4 months (12-45 months) after the index procedure. The radiological union was achieved in 7.3 months (4-13 months). At the end of 1 year follow up, the average LEFS was 89.4% (60%-95%). 4 patients had Malunion - with 1 valgus and 3 anterior angulations, 8 delayed unions and 1 non-union (with bone loss- which required bone grafting). All the fractures united eventually. No incidence of anterior knee pain.

CONCLUSION

We recommend suprapatellar nailing in proximal third tibial fractures when meticulously performed using the current surgical principles and techniques with proper implant selection. It results in excellent clinical and radiological outcomes with minimal complications when compared to other modalities of management. Suprapatellar nailing is a viable option for proximal third tibia fractures due to its inherent advantages of positioning, perfect nail entry and placement. Additionally, noteworthy absence of anterior knee pain is an additional benefit of this technique.

Suprapatellar Tibial Nailing

The suprapatellar nailing technique is an important adjunct in the armamentarium of an orthopedic surgeon. Although a variety of new instrumentations are required for insertion of the suprapatellar nail, most companies now carry these instruments. Easier positioning, maintenance of reduction, ease of intraoperative fluoroscopy, more anatomic starting trajectory, decreased malreduction rates, and possible decrease in anterior knee pain are all benefits of suprapatellar nailing, thus making mastery of this technique essential for an orthopedic surgeon.

Surgical approaches to intramedullary nailing of the tibia: Comparative analysis of knee pain and functional outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Post-operative knee pain is common following intramedullary nailing of the tibia, regardless of surgical approach, though the exact source is controversial. Historically, the most common surgical approaches position the knee in hyperflexion, including patellar tendon splitting (PTS) and medial parapatellar (MPP). A novel technique, the semi-extended lateral parapatellar approach simplifies patient positioning, fracture reduction, fluoroscopic assessment, and implant insertion. It also avoids violation of the knee joint capsule. However, this approach has not yet been directly compared against the historical standards. We hypothesised that in a comparison of patient outcomes, the semi-extended approach would be associated with decreased knee pain and better function relative to knee hyperflexion approaches.

METHODS

A trauma patient database from a Level I centre was queried for patients who underwent intramedullary nailing of the tibia between 2009 and 2013. Patients were surveyed for knee pain severity (NRS scale 1 to 10) and location, and completion of the Lysholm Knee Scale (LKS). Data was compared between the semi-extended lateral parapatellar, medial parapatellar, and tendon splitting groups regarding knee pain severity, location, total LKS, and individual knee function scores from the Lysholm questionnaire. Pre-hoc power analysis determined the necessary sample size (n=34). Post-hoc analysis utilised two-way ANOVA analysis with a significance threshold of p<0.05.

RESULTS

Comparison of knee pain severity between the groups found no significant difference (p=0.69), with average ratings of: semi-extended (3.26), PTS (3.59), and MPP (3.63). Analysis found no significant differences in total LKS score (p=0.33), with average sums of: semi-extended (75.97), MPP (77.53), and PTS (81.68). Individual knee function scores from the LKS were similar between the groups, except for limping, with MPP being significantly worse (p=0.04). There was no significant difference in knee pain location (p=0.45).

CONCLUSION

In this adequately-powered study, at minimum 1 year follow-up there were no significant differences between the 3 approaches in knee pain severity, location, or overall function. The three were significantly different in post-operative limping, with medial parapatellar having the lowest score. The semi-extended lateral parapatellar approach vastly simplifies many technical aspects of nailing compared to knee hyperflexion approaches, and does not violate the knee joint.