Feasibility of Wet and Non-Wet Placement of Seprafilm in Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Seprafilm becomes brittle and sticky after contact with water, rendering it difficult to use in laparoscopic surgery. Hence, Seprafilm is not used frequently in laparoscopic surgery. This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the feasibility of two methods of application of Seprafilm: wet and non-wet. Two groups comprised 30 patients, each with 180 pieces of Seprafilm. Symptomatic patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeries, including hysterectomy and adnexal surgeries, were recruited. Successful application of Seprafilm was defined as a smooth attachment to the site of application. Sticky and fractured Seprafilm sheets were defined as failed applications. Between March 2016 and December 2017, 60 patients underwent laparoscopic Seprafilm placement. The preparation time was 32.67 ± 16.63 and 79.50 ± 22.01 s in the non-wet and wet groups, respectively (p < 0.00). The success rate of application was 95.4% in the non-wet group and 98.3% in the wet group (p = 0.09). Placement time was 599.50 ± 90.18 s and 592.53 ± 105.82 s in the non-wet and wet groups, respectively (p = 0.25). In conclusion, the wet and non-wet application methods of Seprafilm were feasible in laparoscopic surgeries. The preparation time was different between the two groups. However, the rate of successful application and placement time was not different between the two groups.

Effect of hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) on outcomes of abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials

We aimed to evaluate comparative outcomes of abdominal surgery with and without hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm).We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases and bibliographic reference lists with application of a combination of free text and controlled vocabulary search adapted to thesaurus headings, search operators and limits. Small bowel obstruction, anastomotic leak, surgical site infections, ileus, and severity of adhesions were the evaluated outcome measures. Thirteen randomised controlled trials reporting a total of 3665 patients evaluating outcomes of abdominal surgeries with (n = 1800) or without (n = 1865) use of Seprafilm were identified. Use of Seprafilm was associated with significantly lower risk of small bowel obstruction (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.73, P = 0.0001) but significantly higher rate of anastomotic leak (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.15-3.00 P = 0.01). Moreover, while Seprafilm resulted in significantly more adhesions-free patients (RR 5.57, 95% CI 3.37-9.19, P < 0.0001) compared to no Seprafilm, its use was associated with significantly lower grade 2 (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.95, P = 0.003) or 3 (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17-0.55, P < 0.0001) adhesions. There was no significant difference in surgical site infection (RR: 1.21, 95 CI 0.86-1.70, P = 0.28), intra-abdominal abscess (RR 1.46, 95 CI 0.92-2.32, P = 0.11) or paralytic ileus (RR 0.97, 95 CI 0.68-1.38, P = 0.87) between two groups. The trial sequential analysis demonstrated that the meta-analysis findings are conclusive. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that Seprafilm reduces the risk of small bowel obstruction and severity of adhesions after abdominal surgery. However, it may increase the risk of anastomotic leak. We recommend use of Seprafilm in any abdominal surgery which does not involve an anastomosis.

Efficacy and safety of Seprafilm for preventing intestinal obstruction after gastrointestinal neoplasms surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

It was controversial that hyaluronate-carboxy-methylcellulose-based membrane (Seprafilm) could prevent intestinal obstruction after gastrointestinal neoplasms operation. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Seprafilm in preventing postoperative intestinal obstruction of gastrointestinal neoplasms patients.

METHODS

A systematic research of multiple databases was performed to identify relevant studies, and the studies satisfying the inclusion criteria were included. Risk ratio (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

2937 patients from 10 studies who were enrolled in this meta-analysis were divided into the Seprafilm group (n = 1334) and the control group (n = 1603). The Seprafilm group had lower incidence of intestinal obstruction (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.38-0.70; p < .0001), reoperation rates due to intestinal obstruction (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.28 - 0.80; p = .005), incidence of overall complications (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.97; p = .03) and higher serum creatinine on postoperative day 5 (WMD, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.25; p = .003). There were no differences regarding time to intestinal obstruction after operation, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, white blood cell count results on day 5 and 7, serum creatinine on day 7, hospital stay, and incidence of intra-abdominal infection, wound infection, anastomotic leakage between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provided valuable evidence-based support for the efficacy and safety of Seprafilm in preventing postoperative intestinal obstruction of gastrointestinal neoplasms patients. However, more multicenter randomized controlled trials from different countries are needed.

Seprafilm® Application Method in Laparoscopic Surgery

Background and Objectives:

Postoperative adhesions occur less often in laparoscopies than in laparotomies, but the incidence can be reduced further. Seprafilm, a sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose absorbable barrier, was developed to prevent adhesions after abdominal surgery, and is approved for postoperative adhesion prevention. However, Seprafilm is seldom used in laparoscopic surgery because of its tendency to break apart when it is inserted into the abdominal cavity through a trocar, resulting in a high placement failure rate. We propose a better method for applying the adhesion barrier Seprafilm in single- or multiport gynecologic surgery.

Methods:

This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent multi- or single-port gynecologic laparoscopies from December 2014 through January 2016 in Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, 46 patients received Seprafilm (Genzyme Corp., Cambridge, MA, USA) via the proposed method. A piece of Seprafilm was cut into quarters. To moisten and soften the Seprafilm, each piece was placed on a wet wrung gauze until it became naturally curled. Two pieces of the film were rolled up with the backing paper that came from the package of Seprafilm. Holding the rolled Seprafilm with a grasper, the surgeon delivered it into the abdomen through a 11-mm trocar.

Results:

The success rates of Seprafilm insertion and correct placement were 100% (46/46) and 95.7%, respectively. In 2 single-port (2/26) laparoscopic surgeries, the placement of the film failed; all placements in the multiport laparoscopic surgeries were successful (20/20). The average time required for placement of pieces of Seprafilm per surgery was 4.0 ± 1.47 minutes among all surgeries; significantly more time was needed in the single-port surgeries (mean, 4.4 ± 1.59 minutes) than in the multiport surgery (mean, 3.4 ± 1.13 minutes) (P < .05).

Conclusions:

This method of Seprafilm placement is a simple technique that does not need special equipment and ensures a high success rate. The placement of the film takes longer in single-port surgeries than in multiport surgeries.

Effectiveness and short-term safety of modified sodium hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose at cesarean delivery: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The rising cesarean birth rate has drawn attention to risks associated with repeat cesarean birth. Prevention of adhesions with adhesion barriers has been promoted as a way to decrease operative difficulty. However, robust data demonstrating effectiveness of such interventions are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

We report data from a multicenter trial designed to evaluate the short-term safety and effectiveness of a modified sodium hyaluronic acid (HA)-carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) absorbable adhesion barrier for reduction of adhesions following cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients who underwent primary or repeat cesarean delivery were included in this multicenter, single-blinded (patient), randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized into either HA-CMC (N = 380) or no treatment (N = 373). No other modifications to their treatment were part of the protocol. Short-term safety data were collected following randomization. The location and density of adhesions (primary outcome) were assessed at their subsequent delivery using a validated tool, which can also be used to derive an adhesion score that ranges from 0-12.

RESULTS

No differences in baseline characteristics, postoperative course, or incidence of complications between the groups following randomization were noted. Eighty patients from the HA-CMC group and 92 controls returned for subsequent deliveries. Adhesions in any location were reported in 75.6% of the HA-CMC group and 75.9% of the controls (P = .99). There was no significant difference in the median adhesion score; 2 (range 0-10) for the HA-CMC group vs 2 (range 0-8) for the control group (P = .65). One third of the HA-CMC patients met the definition for severe adhesions (adhesion score >4) compared to 15.5% in the control group (P = .052). There were no significant differences in the time from incision to delivery (P = .56). Uterine dehiscence in the next pregnancy was reported in 2 patients in HA-CMC group vs 1 in the control group (P = .60).

CONCLUSION

Although we did not identify any short-term safety concerns, HA-CMC adhesion barrier applied at cesarean delivery did not reduce adhesion formation at the subsequent cesarean delivery.

Simple and Easy Technique for the Placement of Seprafilm During Laparoscopic Surgery

Laparoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive surgery, and the incidence of postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO) is not high. However, SBO is a disease that detracts from the benefits of laparoscopic surgery due to the need for additional therapies or prolongation of hospital stay. Seprafilm is effective in reducing adhesions and preventing the occurrence of SBO. However, it is very difficult to place the Seprafilm during laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery. Herein, we report a simple and easy method. The Seprafilm including the holder paper is divided into six pieces; each piece is wound around the end of the forceps and the reduction sleeve is slid over it. The forceps with the reduction sleeve is inserted through a 12-mm trocar and moved closer to the target place. Then, the reduction sleeve is slid down the forceps to expose the Seprafilm. This method does not require any special preparation or training. Based on our experience, this method can easily overcome the problems that the Seprafilm is vulnerable to tear and is difficult to spread out in the abdominal cavity.

Modified novel technique for improving the success rate of applying seprafilm by using laparoscopy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe a modified surgical procedure for applying the adhesion barrier Seprafilm laparoscopically.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis with videos and illustrations showing laparoscopic application of Seprafilm.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Women undergoing fertility-sparing laparoscopic surgery (myomectomy, endometriotic ovarian cyst or dermoid cyst enucleation, and tuboplasty) via a modified technique.

INTERVENTION

Two layers of Seprafilm with plastic covering were rolled together and delivered through a 10-mm trocar, and an irrigation tube was used to moisten the Seprafilm and cover the irregular postoperative rough surface of the organ. After application of Seprafilm, the patient was placed in a reverse Trendelenburg position to check whether the Seprafilm remained in situ on the target surgical surface to act as a physical barrier to adhesion development.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After changing the patient's position, illustrations and videos showed that the Seprafilm remained on the postoperative surgical surface, creating a site-specific physical barrier. On day 4 after myomectomy, second-look laparoscopy in 2 patients showed that the Seprafilm had become gel-like and remained between the intestine and posterior rough surface of the uterus. There were no systemic second-look laparoscopic data.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible and easier to apply Seprafilm adhesion barrier laparoscopically using the modified technique. Further studies are warranted to prove its efficacy after such use.

Antiadhesive effect and safety of sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethyl cellulose membrane in thyroid surgery

Purpose

A number of researchers have suggested the use of sodium hyaluronate carboxymethyl cellulose (HA-CMC) membrane for preventing postoperative adhesion. This study evaluated the antiadhesive effect and safety of HA-CMC membrane in thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer.

Methods

One hundred sixty-two patients who underwent thyroidectomy were prospectively randomized. In the study group of 80 patients, the 7.5 cm × 13 cm HA-CMC membrane was applied to the operative field after thyroidectomy. The subjects were asked about complications including adhesive symptoms using an 8-item questionnaire at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. In addition, items on the appearance of neck wrinkles and scars were evaluated by a physician who had no information about the patient's allocation.

Results

There were no significant differences in complications such as swallowing difficulty, and wrinkles between study and control groups. Both groups presented significantly decreased scores over time in swallowing difficulty, and wrinkles. There were no complications regarding the HA-CMC membrane.

Conclusion

The antiadhesive effect of HA-CMC membrane in thyroid surgery is still uncertain, although it is biologically safe. Further investigation is needed to confirm the antiadhesive effect of HA-CMC membrane in thyroid surgery.

Practical implications of postoperative adhesions for preoperative consent and operative technique

Adhesions complicate most intra-peritoneal operations. Once adhesions have formed, patients are at life-long risk for complications that include small bowel obstruction, increased risks during subsequent operations and female infertility. This has two implications for the daily work of surgeons. On the one hand, surgeons need to include the risks from adhesions during pre-operative consent. On the other hand, surgeons need to use operative techniques that minimize adhesions. Therefore this review focuses on the practical implications of adhesions for preoperative consent and operative technique.

Efficacy of Seprafilm for preventing adhesive bowel obstruction and cost-benefit analysis in pediatric patients undergoing laparotomy

PURPOSE

This aim of the study is to determine whether the use of Seprafilm reduces the incidence and the medical costs of adhesive bowel obstruction (ABO) in children.

METHODS

Pediatric patients undergoing laparotomy were prospectively assigned to the Seprafilm group, n = 441). A historical control group consisted of children without using Seprafilm (n = 409). The incidence of ABO during a 24-month follow-up period was compared between the groups. To clarify the cost-benefit relations, expenses for Seprafilm and medical costs for hospitalization related to ABO in the Seprafilm group were compared with the ABO-associated hospitalization costs in the control group.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence rate of ABO in the control group was significantly higher than in the Seprafilm group (4.9% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.015). Nearly all cases that required adhesiolysis had adhesions to areas other than the incision in both groups. In cost-benefit analysis, cost per patient was $105 higher in the control group than in the Seprafilm group, but this did not reach significance (p = 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Seprafilm reduces the incidence of ABO in the pediatric patients undergoing laparotomy. Although associated medical costs in the Seprafilm group were not significantly reduced, use of Seprafilm did not lead to an increase in cost. Wider range of Seprafilm application or an additional anti-adhesion device may help in preventing adhesion to areas other than the incision.