Diagnostic accuracy of tests for tuberculous pericarditis: A network meta-analysis

Tuberculous pericarditis (TBP) is a relatively uncommon but potentially fatal extrapulmonary manifestation of tuberculosis. Despite its severity, there is no universally accepted gold standard diagnostic test for TBP currently. The objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the most commonly used tests in terms of specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV), and provide a summary of their diagnostic accuracies. A comprehensive literature review was performed using Scopus, MEDLINE, and Cochrane central register of controlled trials, encompassing studies published from start to April 2022. Studies that compared Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA), Xpert MTB/RIF, Adenosine Deaminase levels (ADA), and Smear Microscopy (SM) were included in the analysis. Bayesian random-effects model was used for statistical analysis and mean and standard deviation (SD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the absolute risk (AR) and odds ratio (OR). Rank probability and heterogeneity were determined using risk difference and Cochran Q test, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated using true negative, true positive, false positive, and false negative rates. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) was calculated for mean and standard error. A total of seven studies comprising 16 arms and 618 patients were included in the analysis. IGRA exhibited the highest mean (SD) sensitivity of 0.934 (0.049), with a high rank probability of 87.5% for being the best diagnostic test, and the AUROC was found to be 94.8 (0.36). On the other hand, SM demonstrated the highest mean (SD) specificity of 0.999 (0.011), with a rank probability of 99.5%, but a leave-one-out analysis excluding SM studies revealed that Xpert MTB/RIF ranked highest for specificity, with a mean (SD) of 0.962 (0.064). The diagnostic tests compared in our study exhibited similar high NPV, while ADA was found to have the lowest PPV among the evaluated methods. Further research, including comparative studies, should be conducted using a standardized cutoff value for both ADA levels and IGRA to mitigate the risk of threshold effect and minimize bias and heterogeneity in data analysis.

Automatic bright-field smear microscopy for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis

In recent decades, many studies have been published on the use of automatic smear microscopy for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Most of them deal with a preliminary step of the diagnosis, the bacilli detection, whereas sputum smear microscopy for diagnosis of pulmonary TB comprises detecting and reporting the number of bacilli found in at least 100 microscopic fields, according to the 5 grading scales (negative, scanty, 1+, 2+ and 3+) endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO). Pulmonary TB diagnosis in bright-field smear microscopy, however, depends upon the attention of a trained and motivated technician, while the automated TB diagnosis requires little or no interpretation by a technician. As far as we know, this work proposes the first automatic method for pulmonary TB diagnosis in bright-field smear microscopy, according to the WHO recommendations. The proposed method comprises a semantic segmentation step, using a deep neural network, followed by a filtering step aiming to reduce the number of false positives (false bacilli): color and shape filtering. In semantic segmentation, different configurations of encoders are evaluated, using depth-wise separable convolution layers and channel attention mechanism. The proposed method was evaluated with a large, robust, and annotated image dataset designed for this purpose, consisting of 250 testing sets, 50 sets for each of the 5 TB diagnostic classes. The following performance metrics were obtained for automatic pulmonary TB diagnosis by smear microscopy: mean precision of 0.894, mean recall of 0.896, and mean F1-score of 0.895.

Usefulness of smear microscopy for therapeutic decision-making in patients with infectious keratitis

PURPOSE

To determine the usefulness of smears in the diagnosis of infectious keratitis by comparing smears and 2 different culture methods.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

METHODS

The foci of 73 patients diagnosed with infectious keratitis at Hiroshima University Hospital between July 2011 and September 2015 were abraded, and smear microscopy and culturing were performed. The microorganism detection rates and other parameters were compared.

RESULTS

Microorganisms were detected in 47 of 73 specimens. Microorganisms were identified in 32 of 69 cases cultured on plain medium (detection rate, 46.4%) compared with 22 of 61 cases cultured on swab transport medium (detection rate, 36.1%). There was no significant difference in the microbial detection rate between the plain medium method and the swab transport medium method (P = 0.23). Smear microscopy and culture findings were concordant in 21 (28.8%) cases, and different microorganisms were detected in 9 cases. In 17 cases, the culture was negative, despite the presence of microorganisms on smear microscopy, and in 7 cases, the culture was positive, despite the absence of microorganisms on smear microscopy. The positivity rate of microbial detection was significantly higher when no antimicrobial agents had been administered previously (odds ratio 7.50, P = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Smear microscopy of abrasions from lesions is useful for the initiation of treatment for infectious keratitis. However, culture studies should be conducted at the same time to confirm antimicrobial sensitivity. If possible, smear microscopy should be performed before the initiation of antimicrobial therapy.

Evaluation of BACTEC MGIT 960 system for recovery of Nocardia from clinical specimens

Nocardia spp. is an aerobic Gram-positive bacillus responsible for nocardiosis. Herein, we performed a retrospective study to evaluate the performance of BACTEC MGIT 960 system, in comparison with smear microscopy and blood agar plate (BAP) culture, to recover Nocardia from different clinical specimens. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of antibiotics contained in MGIT 960 tube on Nocardia was also evaluated. The sensitivities for Nocardia recovery using smear microscopy, BAP culture, and MGIT 960 were 39.4% (54/137), 46.1% (99/215), and 81.3% (156/192), respectively. N. farcinica was the most detected species (60.4%, 136/225). In MGIT 960-recovered Nocardia strains, N. farcinica accounted for 76.9%. Furthermore, trimethoprim in MGIT 960 tube inhibited less N. farcinica growth than that of other Nocardia species, partially explaining why MGIT 960 recovered more N. farcinica from sputa. The current study demonstrated that MGIT 960 could recover Nocardia strains from heavily-contaminated samples if its components and antibiotics are redesigned.

Comparing rates of mycobacterial clearance in sputum smear-negative and smear-positive adults living with HIV

Background

Pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in people living with HIV (PLH) frequently presents as sputum smear-negative. However, clinical trials of TB in adults often use smear-positive individuals to ensure measurable bacterial responses following initiation of treatment, thereby excluding HIV-infected patients from trials.

Methods

In this prospective case cohort study, 118 HIV-seropositive TB patients were assessed prior to initiation of standard four-drug TB therapy and at several time points through 35 days. Sputum bacillary load, as a marker of treatment response, was determined serially by: smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF, liquid culture, and colony counts on agar medium.

Results

By all four measures, patients who were baseline smear-positive had higher bacterial loads than those presenting as smear-negative, until day 35. However, most smear-negative PLH had significant bacillary load at enrolment and their mycobacteria were cleared more rapidly than smear-positive patients. Smear-negative patients’ decline in bacillary load, determined by colony counts, was linear to day 7 suggesting measurable bactericidal activity. Moreover, the decrease in bacterial counts was comparable to smear-positive individuals. Increasing cycle threshold values (Ct) on the Xpert assay in smear-positive patients to day 14 implied decreasing bacterial load.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that smear-negative PLH can be included in clinical trials of novel treatment regimens as they contain sufficient viable bacteria, but allowances for late exclusions would have to be made in sample size estimations. We also show that increases in Ct in smear-positive patients to day 14 reflect treatment responses and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay could be used as biomarker for early treatment response.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06133-4.

Evaluation of 'TBDetect' sputum microscopy kit for improved detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a multi-centric validation study

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to evaluate the performance of the 'TBDetect' kit-based bio-safe fluorescent microscopy filter (BioFM-Filter) microscopy in comparison with direct smear microscopy and culture for the detection of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in a multi-centric setting in India.

METHODS

The TBDetect kit enables sputum concentration through filtration using the BioFM-Filter for improved and bio-safe smear microscopy. We evaluated the performance of the TBDetect kit in a six-site multi-centric validation study on sputum collected from 2086 presumptive TB patients.

RESULTS

The combined positivity of TBDetect microscopy performed on these sputum samples was 20% (n = 417/2086) vs 16.1% of light-emitting diode fluorescence microscopy (LED-FM, n = 337/2086) and 16% of Ziehl Neelsen (ZN) smear microscopy (n = 333/2086). The increment in positivity of TBDetect over both LED-FM and ZN smears was significant (p < 0.001). The overall sensitivity of TBDetect for six sites was ~55% (202/367, 95% confidence interval (CI): 50, 60%) vs 52% (191/367, 95% CI: 47, 57%) for LED-FM (p 0.14) and 50.9% (187/367, 95% CI: 46, 56%) for ZN smear (p < 0.05), using Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube culture (MGIT, n = 1949, culture positive, n = 367) as the reference standard. A bio-safety evaluation at six sites confirmed efficient sputum disinfection by TBDetect; 99.95% samples (1873/1874) were sterile after 42 days of incubation. Scientists and technicians at the study sites indicated the ease of use and convenience of TBDetect microscopy during feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

TBDetect added value to the smear microscopy test due to its improved performance, convenience and user safety. These findings indicate that equipment-free TBDetect technology has the potential to improve TB diagnosis in basic laboratory settings by leveraging on the existing nationwide network of designated microscopy centres and primary healthcare centres.

Role of microbiological tests in diagnosis of genital tuberculosis of women with infertility: A view

OBJECTIVE

India is a country sharing one fourth of the global incidence of tuberculosis. It is much easier to diagnose pulmonary cases, but challenges are with extrapulmonary cases. Genital tuberculosis is considered as an important cause of infertility in young females in India and difficult to diagnose. It requires incorporation of different modalities that should correctly, timely and rapidly diagnose the case.

METHODS

This study was conducted retrospectively for a period of 12 months on 438 endometrial samples from females with history of infertility. Three modalities namely Ziehl-Neelsen staining, Automated liquid culture and Nucleic acid amplification technique (TB-PCR) were compared and their sensitivity in diagnosis of genital tuberculosis was ascertained.

RESULTS

Out of 438 samples, 18 samples were found positive with at least one modality. TB-PCR positivity was 3.6% (16 cases) in comparison to culture where positivity was 1.59% (7 cases). Five samples were found culture and TB-PCR positive and only one sample was positive by all three diagnostic tests.

CONCLUSION

Infertility in young female per se is usually heart breaking and distressing. Therefore, it is essential to diagnose and treat the cases of genital tuberculosis before irreversible damage of tube may happen. Although, advancement in diagnostic field is there from microscopy to molecular method, but still diagnosis of genital tuberculosis is challenging. Correct diagnosis prevents young female from mental trauma and toxicity of anti-tuberculosis drugs given on suspicion in high prevalence country like India.

The incremental value of bronchoalveolar lavage for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in a high-burden urban setting

OBJECTIVES

We prospectively evaluated the use of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) specimens to assess their added incremental value to pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic strategies used currently in a high-burden urban setting in China.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted of patients with presumptive pulmonary TB registered at the Fifth Hospital of Suzhou between March 2018 and July 2018. BALF samples from patients with initial Xpert-negative sputum results were tested to diagnose TB.

RESULTS

Of 440 participants, 316 (71.8%) were initially diagnosed with TB from sputum, including 245 (55.7%) definitive TB cases based on a positive culture and/or Xpert result(s) and 71 (16.1%) positive cases based on clinical diagnosis. Of 153 patients with initial positive cultures, a significantly higher proportion were confirmed as TB-positive using Xpert (94.1%) versus smear microscopy (45.8%, P < 0.01). Xpert testing of BALF from 182 Xpert-negative cases exhibited greater detection sensitivity (97.4%) than did smear microscopy (23.4%, P < 0.01). Meanwhile, 74.1% of TB patients initially diagnosed as TB-negative via smear microscopy were identified using Xpert testing of BALF at reduced diagnostic cost/patient (from USD 266.9 to 171.5).

CONCLUSIONS

BALF samples added incremental value to pulmonary TB diagnostic strategies for patients with Xpert-negative sputum. Xpert outperformed smear microscopy for tubercle bacilli detection in both sputum and BALF.

Spot sputum samples are at least as good as early morning samples for identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

The use of early morning sputum samples (EMS) to diagnose tuberculosis (TB) can result in treatment delay given the need for the patient to return to the clinic with the EMS, increasing the chance of patients being lost during their diagnostic workup. However, there is little evidence to support the superiority of EMS over spot sputum samples. In this new analysis of the REMoxTB study, we compare the diagnostic accuracy of EMS with spot samples for identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis pre- and post-treatment.

METHODS

Patients who were smear positive at screening were enrolled into the study. Paired sputum samples (one EMS and one spot) were collected at each trial visit pre- and post-treatment. Microscopy and culture on solid LJ and liquid MGIT media were performed on all samples; those missing corresponding paired results were excluded from the analyses.

RESULTS

Data from 1115 pre- and 2995 post-treatment paired samples from 1931 patients enrolled in the REMoxTB study were analysed. Patients were recruited from South Africa (47%), East Africa (21%), India (20%), Asia (11%), and North America (1%); 70% were male, median age 31 years (IQR 24-41), 139 (7%) co-infected with HIV with a median CD4 cell count of 399 cells/μL (IQR 318-535). Pre-treatment spot samples had a higher yield of positive Ziehl-Neelsen smears (98% vs. 97%, P = 0.02) and LJ cultures (87% vs. 82%, P = 0.006) than EMS, but there was no difference for positivity by MGIT (93% vs. 95%, P = 0.18). Contaminated and false-positive MGIT were found more often with EMS rather than spot samples. Surprisingly, pre-treatment EMS had a higher smear grading and shorter time-to-positivity, by 1 day, than spot samples in MGIT culture (4.5 vs. 5.5 days, P < 0.001). There were no differences in time to positivity in pre-treatment LJ culture, or in post-treatment MGIT or LJ cultures. Comparing EMS and spot samples in those with unfavourable outcomes, there were no differences in smear or culture results, and positive results were not detected earlier in Kaplan-Meier analyses in either EMS or spot samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data do not support the hypothesis that EMS samples are superior to spot sputum samples in a clinical trial of patients with smear positive pulmonary TB. Observed small differences in mycobacterial burden are of uncertain significance and EMS samples do not detect post-treatment positives any sooner than spot samples.

Comparison of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay and smear microscopy with culture for the diagnostic accuracy of tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis is one of the leading causes of death from infectious diseases worldwide. Sputum smear microscopy remains the most widely available pulmonary TB diagnostic tool particularly in resource limited settings. A highly sensitive diagnostic with minimal infrastructure, cost and training is required. Hence, we assessed the diagnostic performance of Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay in detecting M.tuberculosis infection in sputum sample compared to LED fluorescent smear microscopy and culture.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study was conducted at the University of Gondar Hospital from June 01, 2015 to August 30, 2015. Pulmonary TB diagnosis using sputum LED fluorescence smear microscopy, TB-LAMP assay and culture were done. A descriptive analysis was used to determine demographic characteristics of the study participants. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity for smear microscopy and TB-LAMP compared with culture as a reference test was performed. Cohen's kappa was calculated as a measure of agreement between the tests.

RESULTS

A total of 78 pulmonary presumptive TB patients sputum sample were analyzed. The overall sensitivity and specificity of LAMP were 75 and 98%, respectively. Among smear negative sputum samples, 33.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity of LAMP were observed. Smear microscopy showed 78.6% sensitivity and 98% specificity. LAMP and smear in series had sensitivity of 67.8% and specificity of 100%. LAMP and smear in parallel had sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 96%. The agreement between LAMP and fluorescent smear microscopy tests was very good (κ = 0.83, P-value ≤0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

TB-LAMP showed similar specificity but a slightly lower sensitivity with LED fluorescence microscopy. The specificity of LAMP and smear microscopy in series was high. The sensitivity of LAMP was insufficient for smear negative sputum samples.

Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF versus smear microscopy in the early diagnosis tuberculosis in the real life of "Umberto I" Hospital Rome

Early diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is one of the primary challenges in curtailing the spread of TB. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for the identification of M. tuberculosis in clinical specimens, and compare this to a microscopist's diagnostic performance. Xpert MTB/ RIF was positive in all specimens with culture-confirmed TB, giving a higher sensitivity than the smear microscopy (100% versus 63%). The use of the Xpert MTB/RIF, as part of routine assay, permits rapid diagnosis of TB and enables clinicians to start an effective treatment.

Comparative Study of GeneXpert with ZN Stain and Culture in Samples of Suspected Pulmonary Tuberculosis

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis remains one of the deadliest communicable diseases. There are number of tests available for the diagnosis of tuberculosis but conventional microscopy has low sensitivity and culture although gold standard, but takes longer time for positivity. On the other side, Nucleic acid amplification techniques due to its rapidity and sensitivity not only help in early diagnosis and management of tuberculosis especially in patients with high clinical suspicion like immunocompromised patients, history of contact with active tuberculosis patient etc., but also curtail the transmission of the disease.

AIM

To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Nucleic acid amplification assay (GeneXpert) using respiratory samples in patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis and compare with AFB smear microscopy (Ziehl Neelsen stain) and Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) culture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the respiratory samples of suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (including Bronchoalveolar lavage and sputum) of 170 patients from Jan 2015 to Nov 2015 for ZN stain, culture and GeneXpert (Xpert(®) MTB/Rif assay). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of GeneXpert and ZN microscopy were calculated using Liquid culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as gold standard.

RESULTS

A total of 170 patient samples were evaluated in final analysis. Of these, 14 samples were positive by all three methods used in our study. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of GeneXpert were 86.8%, 93.1%, 78.5% and 96% respectively and for BAL sample, 81.4%, 93.4%, 73.3% and 95.7% respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of AFB smear microscopy were 22.2%, % and 78.5% respectively and for BAL sample 22.2% and 100% respectively. For AFB negative samples sensitivity and specificity were 79.1% and 93.1% respectively.

CONCLUSION

GeneXpert has a higher sensitivity than AFB smear microscopy in respiratory samples. GeneXpert can be a useful tool for early diagnosis of patients with high clinical suspicion of pulmonary tuberculosis. Positive GeneXpert, but culture negative results should be read cautiously and be well correlated with clinical and treatment history of the patient. The other major advantage of Gene Xpert is that it simultaneously detects Rifampicin resistance and especially beneficial in patient with MDR and HIV associated tuberculosis and should be studied further.

Bead capture increases the sensitivity of sputum microscopy for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in Beijing, China

BACKGROUND

A review of the scientific literature concluded that indirect smear can improve detection of TB in sputum compared to direct smear. However few laboratories have access to centrifugation in order to perform indirect smear. This study investigated whether an alternative method of magnetic bead concentration could enhance diagnosis of TB in China in laboratories which only perform direct smear microscopy.

METHODS

A total of 129 sputum samples were investigated by direct smear microscopy, microscopy after TB-Bead extraction and by solid and liquid culture.

RESULTS

Direct smear had a sensitivity of 40% by Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) and 45% by auramine compared to combined culture results. After TB-Bead extraction, this increased to 65% for ZN and 70% for auramine.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic bead concentration of mycobacteria from sputum led to a significant improvement (p<0.05) in the sensitivity of microscopy compared with direct smear.