[Reference evaluations for estimating prevalence, incidence, and mortality of public health relevant diseases based on routine data]

The routine data of all statutorily insured persons according to the Data Transparency Regulation (DaTraV data) represent a promising data source for the recurrent and timely surveillance of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Germany. Thereby, it has become apparent that there is a high demand for reference evaluations that enable quick and regularly repeatable analyses on important NCDs. Against this background, ReFern-01 was initiated, a joint project of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) and the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM). In collaboration with experts from the field of secondary data analysis and healthcare research, reference evaluations for estimating prevalence, incidence, and mortality for important public health-relevant diseases were developed. First, 11 central NCDs were selected by means of an online survey, and initial case definitions were created in conjunction with a literature review. These were then discussed and agreed upon in a virtual workshop. The created reference evaluations (analysis scripts) allow a standardized estimation of the mentioned epidemiological figures, which are comparable over time and regionally. In addition to providing the results, the scripts will be available at the BfArM for further analysis. Provided that remote access to the analysis of the DaTraV data is available in the future, the results of the ReFern project can strengthen the surveillance of NCDs and support public health actors, for example, in the planning and implementation of health promotion and prevention measures at the federal, state, county, and local levels.

Protocol for an economic evaluation of a tele-neurologic intervention alongside a stepped wedge randomised controlled trial (NeTKoH)

BACKGROUND

A significant and growing portion of the global burden of diseases is caused by neurological disorders. Tele-neurology has the potential to improve access to health care services and the quality of care, particularly in rural and underserved areas. The economic evaluation of the stepped wedge randomised controlled trial NeTKoH aims to ascertain the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility regarding the effects of a tele-neurologic intervention in primary care in a rural area in Germany.

METHODS

This protocol outlines the methods used when conducting the trial-based economic evaluation of NeTKoH. The outcomes used in our economic analysis are all prespecified endpoints of the NeTKoH trial. Outcomes considered for the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses will be quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EQ-5D-5L, proportion of neurologic problems being solved at the GP's office (primary outcome), hospital length-of-stay and number of hospital stays. Costs will be prospectively collected during the trial by the participating statutory health insurances, and will be analysed from a statutory health insurance perspective within the German health care system. This economic evaluation will be reported complying with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist.

DISCUSSION

This within-trial economic evaluation relaying the costs and outcomes of an interdisciplinary tele-consulting intervention will provide high-quality evidence for cost-effectiveness and policy implications of a tele-neurological programme, including the potential for application in other rural areas in Germany or other jurisdictions with a comparable health system.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00024492), date registered: September 28, 2021.

[Utilization of routine data from different statutory health insurance funds: a practical report of experience from the TIM-HF2 study about data acquisition, validation, and processing]

BACKGROUND

The randomized controlled clinical trial "TIM-HF2" investigated the benefit of telemonitoring in chronic heart failure. The health economic evaluation of this intervention was based on routine data from statutory health insurance (SHI) funds. Since participants were recruited independently of their SHI affiliation, there was a large number of potential data-providing SHI funds. This resulted in both organizational and methodological challenges, from participation of the data providers to data preparation.

METHOD

The procedures are described from study planning and data acquisition to data review and processing in the TIM-HF2 trial. Based on the identification of potential problems for data completeness and data quality, possible solutions have been derived.

RESULTS

In total, participants were insured with 49 different SHI funds, which provided routine data for a total of 1450 participants. About half of all initial data deliveries were correct. The most common problems in data preparation occurred in the machine readability of the data. Success factors for a high level of data completeness were close communication with the SHI funds and a high level of time and personnel commitment to intensive data checking and preparation.

DISCUSSION

Based on the experience of the TIM-HF2 trial, a high heterogeneity has been detected in data management and transmission of routine data. Universally applicable data descriptions are desired to improve data access, quality, and usability for research purposes.

Comparing outcomes of ILD patients managed in specialised versus non-specialised centres

Background

Early appropriate diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung diseases (ILD) is crucial to slow disease progression and improve survival. Yet it is unknown whether initial management in an expert centre is associated with improved outcomes. Therefore, we assessed mortality, hospitalisations and health care costs of ILD patients initially diagnosed and managed in specialised ILD centres versus non-specialised centres and explored differences in pharmaceutical treatment patterns.

Methods

An epidemiological claims data analysis was performed, including patients with different ILD subtypes in Germany between 2013 and 2018. Classification of specialised centres was based on the number of ILD patients managed and procedures performed, as defined by the European Network on Rare Lung Diseases. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for covariates. Mortality and hospitalisations were examined via weighted Cox models, cost differences by weighted gamma regression models and differences in treatment patterns with weighted logistic regressions.

Results

We compared 2022 patients managed in seven specialised ILD centres with 28,771 patients managed in 1156 non-specialised centres. Specialised ILD centre management was associated with lower mortality (HR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.78; 0.96), lower all-cause hospitalisation (HR: 0.93, 95% CI 0.87; 0.98) and higher respiratory-related costs (€669, 95% CI €219; €1156). Although risk of respiratory-related hospitalisations (HR: 1.00, 95% CI 0.92; 1.10) and overall costs (€− 872, 95% CI €− 75; €1817) did not differ significantly, differences in treatment patterns were observed.

Conclusion

Initial management in specialised ILD centres is associated with improved mortality and lower all-cause hospitalisations, potentially due to more differentiated diagnostic approaches linked with more appropriate ILD subtype-adjusted therapy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-02143-1.

Market access and value-based pricing of digital health applications in Germany

In December 2019, the Digital Health Care Act ("Digitale-Versorgung-Gesetz") introduced a general entitlement to the provision and reimbursement of digital health applications (DiGA) for insured persons in the German statutory health insurance. As establishing a new digital service area within the solidarity-based insurance system implies several administrative and regulatory challenges, this paper aims to describe the legal framework for DiGA market access and pricing as well as the status quo of the DiGA market. Furthermore, we provide a basic approach to deriving value-based DiGA prices.To become eligible for reimbursement, the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices evaluates the compliance of a DiGA with general requirements (e.g., safety and data protection) and its positive healthcare effects (i.e., medical benefit or improvements of care structure and processes) in a fast-track process. Manufacturers may provide evidence for the benefits of their DiGA either directly with the application for the fast-track process or generate it during a trial phase that includes temporary reimbursement. After one year of \]reimbursement, the freely-set manufacturer price is replaced by a price negotiated between the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds and the manufacturer. By February 2022, 30 DiGA had successfully completed the fast-track process. 73% make use of the trial phase and have not yet proven their benefit. Given this dynamic growth of the DiGA market and the low minimum evidence standards, fair pricing remains the central point of contention. The regulatory framework makes the patient-relevant benefits of a DiGA a pricing criterion to be considered in particular. Yet, it does not indicate how the benefits of a DiGA should be translated into a reasonable price. Our evidence-based approach to value-based DiGA pricing approximates the SHI's willingness to pay by the average cost-effectiveness of one or more established therapy in a field of indication and furthermore considers the positive healthcare effects of a DiGA.The proposed approach can be fitted into DiGA pricing processes under the given regulatory framework and can provide objective guidance for price negotiations. However, it is only one piece of the pricing puzzle, and numerous methodological and procedural issues related to DiGA pricing are still open. Thus, it remains to be seen to what extent DiGA prices will follow the premise of value-based pricing.

Pirfenidone vs. nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Two antifibrotic drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are licensed for the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, there is neither evidence from prospective data nor a guideline recommendation, which drug should be preferred over the other. This study aimed to compare pirfenidone and nintedanib-treated patients regarding all-cause mortality, all-cause and respiratory-related hospitalizations, and overall as well as respiratory-related health care costs borne by the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study with SHI data was performed, including IPF patients treated either with pirfenidone or nintedanib. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores was applied to adjust for observed covariates. Weighted Cox models were estimated to analyze mortality and hospitalization. Weighted cost differences with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CI) were applied for cost analysis.

RESULTS

We compared 840 patients treated with pirfenidone and 713 patients treated with nintedanib. Both groups were similar regarding two-year all-cause mortality (HR: 0.90 95% CI: 0.76; 1.07), one-year all cause (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.95; 1.25) and respiratory-related hospitalization (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.72; 1.08). No significant differences were observed regarding total (€- 807, 95% CI: €- 2977; €1220) and respiratory-related (€- 1282, 95% CI: €- 3423; €534) costs.

CONCLUSION

Our analyses suggest that the patient-related outcomes mortality, hospitalization, and costs do not differ between the two currently available antifibrotic drugs pirfenidone and nintedanib. Hence, the decision on treatment with pirfenidone versus treatment with nintedanib ought to be made case-by-case taking clinical characteristics, comorbidities, comedications, individual risk of side effects, and patients' preferences into account.

[The new approval process for the reimbursement of digital health applications (DiGA) from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance]

Since fall of 2020, the first Digital Health Applications (DiGA) have been available as a service of the statutory health insurance. The National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds considers digital applications to have the potential to improve health care, e.g., for people with chronic diseases, and to consolidate the interconnectedness of the provided offers. DiGA can empower the insured persons to help shape their health care actively and to self-contribute to a successful treatment. At the same time, statutory health insurance identifies a number of basic and substantial critical issues regarding the legal requirements for the authorization of DiGA for reimbursement by insurance and the conceptional design of the fast-track process from the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM).This article examines the DiGA, which have been listed in the BfArM directory up to this point, and takes stock after six months of the fast-track process being in place. According to this, the requirements and legal specifications for directory listings and reimbursement via the fast-track process are insufficient from the point of view of the statutory health insurance regarding proven medical effectiveness and economically efficient health care. At present, most of the authorized DiGA, which so far could not provide sufficient evidence about positive healthcare effects, are subsequently only listed provisionally. At the same time, the requirements for proof of medical benefit do not ensure the generation of valid results in studies or clinical trials with regards to routine everyday care. So far, there has been only a moderate qualitative reliability of results. Furthermore, in the context of free pricing by manufacturers, significant price increases can be observed in some cases compared to prices before the BfArM listing.This paper gives recommendations towards further development of the legal basis for the fast-track process, particularly in the subject areas of benefit and patient safety as well as cost effectiveness.

[COVID-19 with respect to occupational healthcare and public health services]

Hintergrund

Medizinisches Personal hat ein arbeitsbedingtes Risiko für eine Infektion mit dem „severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2“ (SARS-CoV‑2) und kann COVID‑19 auf Patienten übertragen. Bei der zugehörigen Berufskrankheit handelt es sich um die BK 3101.

Fragestellung

Häufigkeit von Verdachtsmeldungen berufsbedingter SARS-CoV-2-Infektionen und anerkannter COVID-19-Berufskrankheiten, Meldepflichten nach Infektionsschutzgesetz (IfSG) und Anzeigepflichten des Arztes.

Material und Methoden

Selektive Literaturrecherche unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Daten der Unfallversicherungsträger zu arbeitsbedingten SARS-CoV-2-Infektionen des medizinischen Personals.

Ergebnisse

Die SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie stellt sich auch als Herausforderung der Arbeitsmedizin und des Öffentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (ÖGD) dar. In den letzten Monaten wurden bei den Unfallversicherungsträgern im Zusammenhang mit COVID-19 vermehrt Verdachtsfälle einer Berufskrankheit (BK 3101) sowie eine steigende Zahl von Arbeitsunfallmeldungen registriert. Der ÖGD bearbeitet die Meldungen gemäß dem IfSG und koordiniert die Kontaktpersonennachverfolgung.

Schlussfolgerungen

Arbeitsbedingte SARS-CoV-2-Infektionen geben Anlass zur Sorge. Die Meldedaten der Unfallversicherungsträger belegen hohe Fallzahlen. Präventive Maßnahmen, z. B. das Tragen der persönlichen Schutzausrüstung (PSA) und COVID-19-Impfungen, reduzieren sowohl das Infektionsrisiko der Beschäftigten signifikant als auch das Risiko einer nosokomialen Übertragung auf die Patienten.

Health economic burden of patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) - A retrospective study of German health insurance claims data

This retrospective matched-cohort analysis compared health-economic burdens of adults (≥18 years; n = 377) with phenylketonuria (PKU) and age/gender-matched non-PKU controls (n = 3770) in Germany. Healthcare costs and resource-utilization were analyzed for the year 2015. Differences between groups were tested using 95% CI of mean differences (MD). PKU patients had significantly higher mean costs in total (MD €3307, 95% CI €1736–€4879), for pharmaceuticals (MD €1912, 95% CI €1195–€2629) [including dietary amino-acid supplements (MD €1268, 95% CI €864–€1672)], and outpatient costs (MD €395, 95% CI €115–€675). Inpatient costs (MD €904, 95% CI -€293 to €2100) and costs for aids and remedies (MD €97, 95% CI -€10 to €203) were also higher in PKU patients. PKU patients had more outpatient visits and stayed longer in hospital. Adult PKU patients incur higher total healthcare costs than non-PKU controls, especially regarding pharmaceuticals and outpatient costs, and more frequent resource-utilization, resulting in higher health-economic burden for the statutory healthcare system.

[How do generic quotas work? An analysis using HIV infection as an example]

Hintergrund

Die Steuerungsinstrumente der Arzneimittelversorgung in der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung (GKV) sind schon länger Bestandteil der gesundheitspolitischen Reformdebatte. Über die Jahre hat sich eine Gemengelage sehr verschiedener Werkzeuge herausgebildet, die zumeist auf eine Kontrolle der Arzneimittelausgaben zielen. Die Instrumente der regionalen Verordnungssteuerung fokussieren vor allem auf eine Verhaltenssteuerung des verordnenden Arztes. Zu erwähnen ist nicht zuletzt der verstärkte Einsatz von indikationsbezogenen Quoten, vorrangig Leitsubstanzen und/oder Generika/Biosimilars. Diese gibt es mittlerweile auch im Bereich des Humanen Immundefizienz-Virus (HIV), etwa die seit 2020 in Bayern und Berlin eingeführten Generikaquoten für HIV-Therapeutika.

Zielstellung

Ziel des vorliegenden Beitrages ist es, auf Grundlage von GKV-Apothekenabrechnungsdaten das Potenzial sowie Grenzen von Generikaquotenlösungen in der HIV-Versorgung zu analysieren und Handlungsempfehlungen zu skizzieren.

Ergebnisse

Es zeigte sich, dass das Quotenpotenzial für Generika im patentfreien Bereich in der HIV-Versorgung bereits weitgehend ausgeschöpft wird. Dieser Umstand ist vor allem darauf zurückzuführen, dass die HIV-Verordner den Austausch durch Verzicht auf Aut-idem-Kreuze auf dem Kassenrezept unterstützen.

Diskussion

Das steuerungspolitische Optimum ist fast erreicht. Dies ist auf das geeignete Instrumentarium zurückzuführen, das aus dem Rahmenvertrag zur Arzneimittelversorgung und einer leitliniengerechten Wirkstoffverordnung durch den Arzt besteht – in Verbindung mit dem AMNOG(Arzneimittelmarktneuordnungsgesetz)-Verfahren und Festbeträgen. Leitlinienkonformität und (existierende) Eintablettenregime müssen beibehalten werden, damit die gute Versorgungsqualität gewährleistet bleibt.

["Alternative study designs" for the evaluation of digital health applications - a real alternative?]

INTRODUCTION

After the Digital Healthcare Act (Digitale-Versorgung-Gesetz, DVG) reformed digital health applications' (Digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen, DiGAs) access to German Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) reimbursement, the discussion concerning necessary evidence requirements has intensified. In the past, different "alternative study designs" have been proposed to replace randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the DiGA efficacy and benefit assessments. The present paper examines the suitability of these alternative designs for informing SHI reimbursement decisions.

METHODS

The four alternative study designs primarily discussed in the context of DiGA - "Continuous Evaluation of Evolving Behavioral Intervention Technologies" (CEEBIT), "Multiphase Optimization Strategy" (MOST), "Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial" (SMART) and "Micro-Randomized Trial" (MRT) - are characterized and compared on the basis of relevant primary and secondary sources. Subsequently, their suitability for effectiveness and benefit evaluation in the context of SHI reimbursement decisions is discussed.

RESULTS

None of the study designs examined aims primarily at conclusively demonstrating efficacy and benefit. Three of the four designs (MOST, SMART, MRT) focus on the development and optimization of interventions. In order to reduce resource requirements, the approaches presented sometimes deviate considerably from the methodological approach in traditional RCTs. This is especially true for their applied statistical error tolerance and their underlying randomization logic. Three of the four concepts (MOST, SMART, MRT) therefore still require RCTs after the development phase in order to demonstrate the effectiveness and benefit of the optimized intervention.

DISCUSSION

The methodological differences of the alternative study designs compared to classical RCTs are accompanied by serious potentials for bias and uncertainties with regard to the identified intervention effects. These may be acceptable in the context of intervention development, but do not appear to be appropriate for use in collective SHI reimbursement decisions.

CONCLUSION

The alternative study designs presented cannot be regarded as a suitable RCT alternative for efficacy and benefit assessments. A pragmatic study design, which continues to meet high methodological standards, and better utilization of real-world data could, in the future, contribute to a compromise between the justified claims to sufficient certainty of results on the one hand and appropriate procedural effort on the other.

Burden of HPV related anogenital diseases in young women in Germany - an analysis of German statutory health insurance claims data from 2012 to 2017

Background

Most individuals are infected with human papillomavirus (HPV) at least once in their lifetime. Infections with low-risk types can cause genital warts, whereas high-risk types can cause malignant tumors. The aim of this study was to determine the burden of anogenital diseases potentially related to HPV in young women based on German statutory health insurance claims data.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective claims data analysis using the “Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin” (InGef) Research Database, containing claims data from approximately 4 million individuals. In the period from 2012 to 2017 all women born in1989–1992, who were continuously insured between the age of 23–25 years were identified. Using ICD-10-GM codes (verified diagnosis in the outpatient sector or primary or secondary diagnosis in the inpatient sector) the administrative prevalence (95% confidence interval) of genital warts (A63.0), anogenital diseases grade I (K62.8, N87.0, N89.0, N90.0), grade II (N87.1, N89.1, N90.1) and grade III (D01.3, D06.-, D06.0, D07.1, D07.2, N87.2, N89.2, N90.2) was calculated (women with diagnosis divided by all women).

Results

From 2012 to 2017, a total of 15,358 (birth cohort 1989), 16,027 (birth cohort 1990), 14,748 (birth cohort 1991) and 14,862 (birth cohort 1992) women at the age of 23–25 were identified. A decrease of the administrative prevalence was observed in genital warts (1.30% (1.12–1.49) birth cohort 1989 vs. 0.94% (0.79–1.10) birth cohort 1992) and anogenital diseases grade III (1.09% (0.93–1.26) birth cohort 1989 vs. 0.71% (0.58–0.86) birth cohort 1992). In anogenital diseases grade III, this trend was especially observed for severe cervical dysplasia (N87.2) (0.91% (0.76–1.07) birth cohort 1989 vs. 0.60% (0.48–0.74) birth cohort 1992). In contrast, anogenital diseases grade I (1.41% (1.23–1.61) birth cohort 1989 vs. 1.31% (1.14–1.51) birth cohort 1992) and grade II (0.61% (0.49–0.75) birth cohort 1989 vs. 0.52% (0.42–0.65) birth cohort 1992) remained stable.

Conclusions

A decrease of the burden of anogenital disease potentially related to HPV was observed in the younger birth cohorts. This was observed especially for genital warts and anogenital diseases grade III. Further research to investigate this trend for the upcoming years in light of varying HPV vaccination coverage for newer birth cohorts is necessary.

Metamizole and the risk of drug-induced agranulocytosis and neutropenia in statutory health insurance data

The non-opioid analgesic metamizole (dipyrone) is used for the treatment of acute and chronic pain and fever. Agranulocytosis is known as a serious adverse drug reaction of metamizole with potentially fatal outcome. However, its frequency is controversially discussed. The aim of our study was to determine the risk of metamizole-associated agranulocytosis and neutropenia using statutory health insurance data. We analyzed data from a large German health insurance fund in the period from 2010 to 2013. Metamizole-exposed subjects were identified and compared to a propensity score-matched control cohort. A total of 630,285 metamizole-treated subjects and 390,830 matched control subjects were included. In the metamizole cohort, ICD codes for agranulocytosis and neutropenia appeared more often than in non-users. The relative risk for drug-induced agranulocytosis and neutropenia (D70.1) was 3.03 (95% confidence interval, 2.49 to 3.69). The risk for developing drug-induced agranulocytosis and neutropenia after metamizole prescription was 1: 1602 (CI 95%, 1:1926 to 1:1371). Our results confirm the risk estimation of previous studies. However, the outcome of our study may be confounded by an association of metamizole treatment and chemotherapy. Therefore, consequences for treatment have to be drawn with care.

Clinical burden of illness in patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) and associated comorbidities - a retrospective study of German health insurance claims data

BACKGROUND

Phenylketonuria (PKU) is an inherited deficiency in the enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH), which, when poorly-managed, is associated with clinical features including deficient growth, microcephaly, seizures, and intellectual impairment. The management of PKU should start as soon as possible after diagnosis to prevent irreversible damage and be maintained throughout life. The aim of this study was to assess the burden of illness in PKU patients in general and in PKU patients born before and after the introduction of newborn screening in Germany.

METHODS

This retrospective matched cohort analysis used the Institut für angewandte Gesundheitsforschung Berlin (InGef) research database containing anonymized healthcare claims of approximately 4 million covered lives. PKU patients were compared with matched controls from the general population within the same database (1:10 ratio via direct, exact matching on age and gender without replacement). PKU patients were included if they were aged ≥18 years on 01/01/15 and were continuously enrolled from 01/01/10 to 31/12/15. The 50 most commonly reported comorbidities and 50 most commonly prescribed medications in the PKU population were analyzed. Differences between groups were tested using 95% confidence interval (CI) of prevalence ratio (PR) values.

RESULTS

The analysis included 377 adult PKU patients (< 5 of which were receiving sapropterin dihydrochloride) and 3,770 matched controls. Of the 50 most common comorbidities in the PKU population, those with a statistically significant PR > 1.5 vs controls included major depressive disorders (PR = 2.3), chronic ischemic heart disease (PR = 1.7), asthma (PR = 1.7), dizziness and giddiness (PR = 1.8), unspecified diabetes mellitus (PR = 1.7), infectious gastroenteritis and colitis (PR = 1.7), and reaction to severe stress and adjustment disorders (PR = 1.6). The most commonly prescribed Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) subcodes among PKU patients (vs the control population) are for systemic antibacterials (34.7% vs 32.8%), anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic (29.4% vs 27.5%), renin-angiotensin agents (30.0% vs 27.0%), acid-related disorders (29.4% vs 20.2%), and beta-blockers (24.9% vs 19.9%).

CONCLUSION

The overall clinical burden on patients with PKU is exacerbated by a significantly higher risk of numerous comorbidities and hence, prescribing of the requisite medication, both for recognized (e.g. major depressive disorders) and more unexpected comorbidities (e.g. ischemic heart disease).

Retrospective analysis into differences in heart failure patients with and without iron deficiency or anaemia

Aims

The aim of this study was to assess the burden of heart failure (HF) patients with/without iron deficiency/iron deficiency anaemia (ID/A) from the health insurance perspective.

Methods and results

We conducted a retrospective claims database analysis using the Institut für angewandte Gesundheitsforschung Berlin research database. The study period spanned from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2014. HF patients were identified by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision, German Modification codes (I50.‐, I50.0‐, I50.00, I50.01, I50.1‐, I50.11, I50.12, I50.13, I50.14, I50.19, and I50.9). HF patients were stratified into HF patients without ID/A and HF patients with ID/A (D50.‐, D50.0, D50.8, D50.9, and E61.1). HF patients with ID/A were stratified into three subgroups: no iron treatment, oral iron treatment, and intravenous iron treatment. A matching approach was applied to compare outcomes for HF patients without ID/A vs. HF patient with untreated incident ID/A without iron treatment and for HF patients receiving no iron treatment vs. oral iron treatment vs. intravenous iron treatment. Matching parameters included exact age, sex, and New York Heart Association functional class. An optimization algorithm was used to balance total health care costs in the baseline period for the potential matched pairs without sample size reduction. In total, 172 394 (4537.4 per 100 000) HF patients were identified in the Institut für angewandte Gesundheitsforschung Berlin research database in 2013. Of these, 11.1% (19 070; 501.9 per 100 000) were diagnosed with ID/A and/or had a prescription for iron medication in 2013. The mean age of HF patients was 77.0 years (±12.0 years). Women were more frequently diagnosed with HF (54.6%). HF patients with untreated incident ID/A (1.77%) had a significantly higher all‐cause mortality than HF patients without ID/A (33.1% vs. 24.1%, P < 0.01). The analysis of health care utilization revealed significant differences in the rate of all‐cause hospitalization (72.9% vs. 50.5%, P < 0.01). The annual health care costs for HF patients with untreated incident ID/A amounted to €17 347 with incremental costs of €849 (P < 0.01) attributed to ID/A.

Conclusions

Heart failure is associated with a major burden for patients and the health care system in terms of health care resource utilization, costs, and mortality. Our findings suggest that there is an unmet need for treating more HF patients with ID/A with iron medication.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an integrated care program for schizophrenia: an analysis of routine data

In Germany, a regional social health insurance fund provides an integrated care program for patients with schizophrenia (IVS). Based on routine data of the social health insurance, this evaluation examined the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the IVS compared to the standard care (control group, CG). The primary outcome was the reduction of psychiatric inpatient treatment (days in hospital), and secondary outcomes were schizophrenia-related inpatient treatment, readmission rates, and costs. To reduce selection bias, a propensity score matching was performed. The matched sample included 752 patients. Mean number of psychiatric and schizophrenia-related hospital days of patients receiving IVS (2.3 ± 6.5, 1.7 ± 5.0) per quarter was reduced, but did not differ statistically significantly from CG (2.7 ± 7.6, 1.9 ± 6.2; p = 0.772, p = 0.352). Statistically significant between-group differences were found in costs per quarter per person caused by outpatient treatment by office-based psychiatrists (IVS: €74.18 ± 42.30, CG: €53.20 ± 47.96; p < 0.001), by psychiatric institutional outpatient departments (IVS: €4.83 ± 29.57, CG: €27.35 ± 76.48; p < 0.001), by medication (IVS: €471.75 ± 493.09, CG: €429.45 ± 532.73; p = 0.015), and by psychiatric outpatient nursing (IVS: €3.52 ± 23.83, CG: €12.67 ± 57.86, p = 0.045). Mean total psychiatric costs per quarter per person in IVS (€1117.49 ± 1662.73) were not significantly lower than in CG (€1180.09 ± 1948.24; p = 0.150). No statistically significant differences in total schizophrenia-related costs per quarter per person were detected between IVS (€979.46 ± 1358.79) and CG (€989.45 ± 1611.47; p = 0.084). The cost-effectiveness analysis showed cost savings of €148.59 per reduced psychiatric and €305.40 per reduced schizophrenia-related hospital day. However, limitations, especially non-inclusion of costs related to management of the IVS and additional home treatment within the IVS, restrict the interpretation of the results. Therefore, the long-term impact of this IVS deserves further evaluation.

The influence of cross-sectoral treatment models on patients with mental disorders in Germany: study protocol of a nationwide long-term evaluation study (EVA64)

BACKGROUND

Close, continuous and efficient collaboration between different professions and sectors of care is necessary to provide patient-centered care for individuals with mental disorders. The lack of structured collaboration between in- and outpatient care constitutes a limitation of the German health care system. Since 2012, a new law in Germany (§64b Social code book (SGB) V) has enabled the establishment of cross-sectoral and patient-centered treatment models in psychiatry. Such model projects follow a capitation budget, i.e. a total per patient budget of inpatient and outpatient care in psychiatric clinics. Providers are able to choose the treatment form and adapt the treatment to the needs of the patients. The present study (EVA64) will investigate the effectiveness, costs and efficiency of almost all model projects established in Germany between 2013 and 2016.

METHODS/DESIGN

A health insurance data-based controlled cohort study is used. Data from up to 89 statutory health insurance (SHI) funds, i.e. 79% of all SHI funds in Germany (May 2017), on inpatient and outpatient care, pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical treatments and sick leave for a period of 7 years will be analyzed. All patients insured by any of the participating SHI funds and treated in one of the model hospitals for any of 16 pre-defined mental disorders will be compared with patients in routine care. Sick leave (primary outcome), utilization of inpatient care (primary outcome), utilization of outpatient care, continuity of contacts in (psychiatric) care, physician and hospital hopping, re-admission rate, comorbidity, mortality, disease progression, and guideline adherence will be analyzed. Cost and effectivity of model and routine care will be estimated using cost-effectiveness analyses. Up to 10 control hospitals for each of the 18 model hospitals will be selected according to a pre-defined algorithm.

DISCUSSION

The evaluation of complex interventions is an important main task of health services research and constitutes the basis of evidence-guided advancement in health care. The study will yield important new evidence to guide the future provision of routine care for mentally ill patients in Germany and possibly beyond.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in the database "Health Services Research Germany" (trial number: VVfD_EVA64_15_003713 ).

Waiting times in primary care depending on insurance scheme in Germany

BACKGROUND

Waiting times for an outpatient appointment in Germany differ between insurants of the statutory and private health insurance schemes, especially for specialised care. The aim of this study was to uncover possible differences in waiting times depending on health insurance scheme and to identify predictors for excessive waiting times in primary care.

METHODS

We used data of the Bertelsmann Foundation Healthcare Monitor, which is a repeated cross sectional study dealing with experiences in health care and attitudes towards current health policy themes. We analysed the surveys conducted from 2011 to 2013, with respondents assigned to their health insurance fund, namely AOK, BARMER GEK, BKK, DAK, TK, IKK, other statutory funds and private funds. The mean waiting times for an appointment and spent in a physician's waiting room, and the satisfaction with waiting times were evaluated with respect to different health insurance funds. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the chance of excessive waiting times with respect to health insurance fund, age, sex, health and socioeconomic status. The ninetieth percentile of the waiting time distribution (10 days) was chosen as the cut-off point between average and excessive.

RESULTS

A total of 5618 respondents were analysed. Mean waiting times in primary care were low (4.0 days) and homogeneous (SHIs: 3.6-4.9 days), even though privately insured respondents reported shorter waiting times for appointments (3.3 days). They also reported a greater satisfaction with waiting times (77.5%) than SHI insurants (64.5%). However, we identified a group (10.1%), who experienced excessive waiting times in primary care. Compared to privately insured respondents, the chance of excessive waiting times was increased for SHI insurants (highest odds ratio for BKK: 2.17; 95%-CI: 1.38-3.42). Additionally, higher age and residence in East Germany were associated with higher chances of waiting times of 10 days or more.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care in Germany is readily accessible with generally short waiting times. However, barriers in access to the health care system affect a certain part of patients depending on insurance status, age and region of residence. Ways to improve the access need to be studied.

[Prevalence of dementia of insured persons with and without German citizenship : A study based on statuatory health insurance data]

BACKGROUND

Elderly people with a non-German background are a fast growing population in Germany.

OBJECTIVES

Is administrative prevalence of dementia and uptake of nursing-home care similar in the German and non-German insured?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on routine data, administrative prevalence rates for dementia were calculated for 2013 from a full census of data from one large sickness fund. Patients with dementia (PWD) were identified via ICD-10 codes (F00; F01; F03; F05; G30).

RESULTS

Administrative prevalence of dementia was 2.67% in the study population; 3.06% in Germans, and 0.96% in non-Germans (p value <0.001). Age and sex adjusted prevalence was comparable in the insured with and without German citizenship, except in women aged 80-84 (17.2 vs. 15.4) and for men in the age groups 80-84 (16.5 vs. 14.2), 85-89 years (23.4 vs. 21.5), and above 90 years of age (32.3 vs. 26.3). Standardized to the population of all investigated insured, 31.4% of all Germans with dementia had no longterm care entitlement vs. 35.5% of all patients without German citizenship. Of German patients, 55.1% were institutionalized vs. 39.5% of all patients without German citizenship.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a higher prevalence of dementia in the very old insured without German citizenship compared to those with German citizenship, especially in men. Non-Germans showed lower uptake of nursing home care compared to Germans. Additionally, Germans had slightly higher nursing care entitlements. It should be investigated further how much of the difference is due to underdiagnosis, cultural differences, or lack of adequate diagnostic work-up.

[Differences in chronic back pain and joint disorders among health insurance funds : Results of a cross-sectional study based on the data of the Socioeconomic Panel from 2013]

BACKGROUND

Health services research uses increasingly data from health insurance funds. It is well known that the funds differ with regard to sociodemographic characteristics and morbidity. It is uncertain if there are also differences in the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the sociodemographic characteristics in various health insurance funds and the prevalence of joint disorders and chronic back pain.

METHOD

The 30^th wave (2013) of the German Socioeconomic Panel served as a database. Average age, sex distribution, nationality, education, and employment status were evaluated according to the health insurance funds. The prevalence of joint disorders and chronic back pain were also stratified according to the insurance funds and standardized according to age and sex.

RESULTS

A total of 19,146 participants were included. Most participants (4,934) were insured by AOK, followed by BKK (2,632) and BARMER GEK (2,398). There were huge differences among the health insurance funds with regard to the sociodemographic characteristics. For example, the proportion of unemployed insurants was between 33.3 % (IKK) and 50.6 % (AOK). The prevalence of joint disorders standardized according to age and sex (20.7 %; 95 % CI: 20.1-21.3) was between 17.4 % (95 % CI: 15.8-19.0; PKV) and 22.4 % (95 % CI: 21.1-23.6; AOK). The prevalence of chronic back pain (18.0 %; 95 % CI: 17.4-18.5) was between 13.5 % (95 % CI: 12.2-14.9; PKV) and 20.6 % (95 % CI: 19.4-21.8; AOK).

CONCLUSION

There are differences in the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among health insurance funds. The extrapolation of analyses of one health insurance fund to the German population is thus limited.

Epidemiology and use of compression treatment in venous leg ulcers: nationwide claims data analysis in Germany

Chronic venous diseases are the most common causes of leg ulcers. Compression treatment (CT) is a central component of venous leg ulcer (VLU) therapy along with prevention based on guidelines and clinical evidence. However, large-scale data on the use of CT are rare. In particular, there have not yet been published nationwide data for Germany. We analysed data from a large German statutory health insurance (SHI) on incident VLU between 2010 and 2012. VLUs were identified by ICD-10 diagnoses. The status of active disease was defined by wound-specific treatments. Compression stockings and bandages were identified by SHI medical device codes. The overall estimated incident rate of active VLU of all insured persons was 0·34% from 2010 to 2012. Adapted to the overall German population, n = 229 369 persons nationwide had an incident VLU in 2010-2012. Among all VLU patients, only 40·6% received CT within 1 year, including 83·3% stockings, 31·8% bandages and 3·1% multi-component compression systems. Compression rates showed significant differences by gender and age. Large regional variations were observed. Validity of data is suggested by high concordance with a primary cohort study. Although recommended by guidelines, there is still a marked under-provision of care, with CT in incident VLUs in Germany requiring active measures.

Regional distribution of physicians: the role of comprehensive private health insurance in Germany

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, the co-existence in Germany of two parallel comprehensive insurance systems-statutory health insurance (SHI) and private health insurance (PHI)-has been posited as a possible cause of a persistent unequal regional distribution of physicians. The present study investigates the effect of the proportion of privately insured patients on the density of SHI-licensed physicians, while controlling for regional variations in the average income from SHI patients.

METHODS

The proportion of residents in a district with private health insurance is estimated using complete administrative data from the SHI system and the German population census. Missing values are estimated using multiple imputation techniques. All models control for the estimated average income ambulatory physicians generate from treating SHI insured patients and a well-defined set of covariates on the level of districts in Germany in 2010.

RESULTS

Our results show that every percentage change in the proportion of residents with private health insurance is associated with increases of 2.1 and 1.3 % in the density of specialists and GPs respectively. Higher SHI income in rural areas does not compensate for this effect.

CONCLUSION

From a financial perspective, it is rational for a physician to locate a new practice in a district with a high proportion of privately insured patients. From the perspective of patients in the SHI system, the incentive effects of PHI presumably contribute to a concentration of health care services in wealthy and urban areas. To date, the needs-based planning mechanism has been unable to address this imbalance.

Health Care Service Utilization of Dementia Patients before and after Institutionalization: A Claims Data Analysis

BACKGROUND

Community-based and institutional dementia care has been compared in cross-sectional studies, but longitudinal information on the effect of institutionalization on health care service utilization is sparse.

METHODS

We analyzed claims data from 651 dementia patients via Generalized Estimation Equations to assess health care service utilization profiles and corresponding expenditures from four quarters before to four quarters after institutionalization.

RESULTS

In all domains, utilization increased in the quarter of institutionalization. Afterwards, the use of drugs, medical aids, and non-physician services (e.g., occupational therapy and physiotherapy) remained elevated, but use of in- and outpatient treatment decreased. Cost of care showed corresponding profiles.

CONCLUSION

Institutional dementia care seems to be associated with an increased demand for supportive services but not necessarily for specialized medical care.