Patient Reported Outcome and Experience Measures (PROMs and PREMs) in substance use disorder treatment services: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Substance use disorders (SUD) pose significant challenges for healthcare systems, and there is a need to monitor the provision of effective, individualized care to persons accessing treatment. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) are increasingly used in healthcare services to measure treatment outcomes and quality of care as perceived by patients, and to guide service improvement.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to identify and characterize international developments regarding the use and systematic implementation of PROMs and PREMs in SUD treatment services.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted searching multiple databases to identify studies on the use and routine implementation of PROMs and PREMs in SUD treatment services.

RESULTS

23 articles were selected, all dating from 2016 onwards. There was large variation in the patient-reported measures that were used, how they were developed and how and when patient-reported data were collected. Treatment providers identified leadership support, the presence of an integrated electronic patient record, and regular feedback to be the most important facilitators of successful implementation of patient-reported measures into clinical practice, whilst treatment dropout and burden to staff and patients were the most important barriers to consider.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMs and PREMs are increasingly used in SUD treatment services, but guidance is needed to support researchers and clinicians in selecting and implementing valid, meaningful, and comparable measures if we want to understand the effects of PROM and PREM data collection and feedback on treatment quality and results.

Integrated dual diagnosis treatment among United States mental health treatment facilities: 2010 to 2018

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the correlates of and recent trends in implementation of Integrated Dual Diagnosis model, an evidence-based approach for dual diagnosis services, in US mental health facilities between 2010 and 2018.

METHODS

Changes over time in Integrated Dual Diagnosis Treatment use were examined using multiple waves of a national survey of mental health treatment facilities that reported offering any substance use services. State and facility correlates of offering integrated dual diagnosis services among these facilities in 2018 were examined.

RESULTS

The proportion of mental health treatment facilities that reported offering any substance use services increased significantly from 50.1% in 2010 to 57.1% in 2018. Among these facilities, significantly fewer reported offering Integrated Dual Diagnosis Treatment in 2018 (74.8%) than in 2010 (79.6%). The prevalence of Integrated Dual Diagnosis Treatment use increased in more recent years in tandem with increase in substance use services, though the increases in Integrated Dual Diagnosis Treatment have not matched the expansion of substance use services. Mental health facilities with substance use services more commonly offered other mental health services and had more funding sources available. Facilities with any substance use disorder services that offered Integrated Dual Diagnosis Treatment were more commonly licensed by State Substance Agencies and more commonly offered psychotropics and group therapies. Facilities located in states that implemented the Integrated Dual Diagnosis Treatment model had a higher odds of offering this model.

CONCLUSIONS

The growth in the co-location of substance use treatment services within mental health treatment facilities has not been matched by true integration of these treatments, highlighting the need for further efforts to comprehensively address the complex needs of dually diagnosed patients.