Our Efforts to Create a Welcoming Surgical Residency for LGBTQ Trainees

OBJECTIVE

To provide a more welcoming environment for LGBTQ residents.

DESIGN

This paper is based upon the authors experience creating a training program welcoming to LGBTQ residents.

SETTING

University General Surgery Training Program.

PARTICIPANTS

Surgical Residents and Surgical Faculty.

RESULTS

Over a 9 year period, our residency has made intentional efforts to welcome LGBTQ applicants and support LGBTQ residents. We now have a residency in which over 25% of our residents identify as LGBTQ.

CONCLUSIONS

We see opportunities for other residencies to signal to applicants and trainees that they are welcome and celebrated for who they are.

The Revised 2017 MSPE: Better, But Not "Outstanding"

AIM

The medical student performance evaluation (MSPE) is relied on as an objective summary evaluation by surgical program directors. In 2017, an MSPE task force released recommendations for best practice for their format and content. The purpose of this study was to analyze US medical schools' adherence to these guidelines.

METHODS

MSPEs from 113 of 147 Liaison committee on Medical Education (LCME)-accredited medical schools were analyzed for measurable attributes such as word counts, transparent clerkship grading, comparative performance data, and statements of professionalism. 2017 MSPEs were compared to a baseline group of 45 MSPEs from 2016 to measure change over time. Measurable attributes were compared using the Fisher exact and Mann Whitney-U tests. A p value < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

RESULTS

We analyzed 113 MSPEs from 2017. The median page count decreased by one from the prior year, with a narrower range of variation. 96% of schools reported a discreet grade in surgery. We observed substantial compliance with the recommendation for a statement of professionalism, noteworthy characteristics, and comparative clerkship data. More schools were observed to report school-wide rankings. There were significant variations in the graphical depiction of student achievement.

CONCLUSIONS

In response to the 2017 task force guidelines, MSPEs have become more standardized and transparent with regard to medical student evaluation. There is increased (but not ubiquitous) adherence with the recommendation for three noteworthy characteristics and statements of professionalism. Of particular importance to surgical program directors, 95.6% of 2017 MSPEs report a grade in the surgical clerkship and 85.8% include school-wide comparative clerkship performance data. Still, only 69.9% currently report school-wide summative performance data.

The American Board Style Practice In-Training Examination as a Predictor of Performance on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination

BACKGROUND

The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE), is an annual 250 question, multiple-choice test that assesses residents' surgical knowledge in preparation for board examinations. At our program, we developed a Surgical Council on Resident Education-based American Board Style Practice In-Training Examination: The ABSPITE. The 40-question examination was designed to help with test preparation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ABSPITE's predictive value on ABSITE performance.

METHODS

From 2013 to 2016, the ABSPITE was administered to residents at our program. Performances (N = 134) were graded based on a standardized scale to determine resident percent and percentile performance, then compared to average ABSITE performance.

RESULTS

Combined analysis showed a statistically significant positive correlation between average ABSITE and ABSPITE percentages and percentiles. This held true when categorical and preliminary residents were compared. When stratified by resident PGY level, the same results were seen for PGY 1 and PGY 2 residents but correlations failed to reach statistical significance for higher resident training levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The practice ABSPITE examination strongly correlates with ABSITE performance among junior residents at our program, and may be a valuable tool to predict ABSITE performance and guide review efforts.