Natural Barcodes for Longitudinal Single Cell Tracking of Leukemic and Immune Cell Dynamics

Blood malignancies provide unique opportunities for longitudinal tracking of disease evolution following therapeutic bottlenecks and for the monitoring of changes in anti-tumor immunity. The expanding development of multi-modal single-cell sequencing technologies affords newer platforms to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these processes at unprecedented resolution. Furthermore, the identification of molecular events that can serve as in-vivo barcodes now facilitate the tracking of the trajectories of malignant and of immune cell populations over time within primary human samples, as these permit unambiguous identification of the clonal lineage of cell populations within heterogeneous phenotypes. Here, we provide an overview of the potential for chromosomal copy number changes, somatic nuclear and mitochondrial DNA mutations, single nucleotide polymorphisms, and T and B cell receptor sequences to serve as personal natural barcodes and review technical implementations in single-cell analysis workflows. Applications of these methodologies include the study of acquired therapeutic resistance and the dissection of donor- and host cellular interactions in the context of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Multiple instance learning method based on convolutional neural network and self-attention for early cancer detection

Early cancer detection using T-cell receptor sequencing (TCR-seq) and multiple instances learning methods has shown significant effectiveness. We introduce a multiple instance learning method based on convolutional neural networks and self-attention (MICA). First, MICA preprocesses TCR-seq using word vectors and then extracts features using convolutional neural networks. Second, MICA uses an enhanced self-attention mechanism to extract relational features of instances. Finally, MICA can extract the crucial TCR-seq. After cross-validation, MICA achieves an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.911 and 0.946 on the lung and thyroid cancer datasets, which are 7.1% and 2.1% higher than other methods, respectively.