The role of concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus radiation alone in T1-3N0 HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of curative intent concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) vs radiation (RT) alone for T1-T3N0 HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC).

METHODS

The NCDB was queried for patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 with cT1-3N0M0 OPSCC treated with definitive RT or CCRT. Univariable analysis (UVA) and multivariable analysis (MVA) Cox regression analysis was performed with OS as the endpoint. Propensity score matching (PSM) 1:1 was performed. Interaction test to assess heterogeneity of treatment effect.

RESULTS

A total of 2830 patients were queried. On MVA, CCRT was associated with improved OS for T3N0 tumors (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.39-0.63) but not for T1N0 (HR 1.43; 95% CI 0.99-2.07) and T2N0 (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.75-1.13). For T3 patients, CCRT improved OS for HPV-negative (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.31-0.59) and HPV-positive tumors (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.25-0.61). After PSM, CCRT was not statistically different to RT for patients with T1-2N0 HPV-negative tumors (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.85-1.43; p = 0.48) and T1-2N0 HPV-positive tumors (HR 1.15; 95% CI 0.79-1.68; p = 0.45). After PSM, CCRT improved OS compared to RT alone for patients with T3N0 HPV-negative (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.31-0.59; p < 0.01) and HPV-positive tumors (HR 0.39; 95 %CI 0.25-0.61; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

CCRT is associated with improved OS in HPV-positive and HPV-negative T3N0 OPSCC. RT alone vs. CCRT demonstrated similar OS for T1-T2N0 OPSCC for both HPV negative and HPV positive tumors.

Validation of the T Descriptor (TNM-8) in T3N0 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients; a Bicentric Cohort Analysis with Arguments for Redefinition

Simple Summary

Lung cancer patients have different survival outcomes depending on tumor size and growth pattern after surgery. This study aims to optimize tumor classification, and identify patients who could benefit the most from additional chemotherapy after surgery. In a specific lung cancer cohort, we study how a new redefinition of tumor classification could lead to a more solid recommendation of which patients to offer chemotherapy after surgery.

Abstract

The current pT3N0 category represents a heterogeneous subgroup involving tumor size, separate tumor nodes in one lobe, and locoregional growth pattern. We aim to validate outcomes according to the eighth edition of the TNM staging classification. A total of 281 patients who had undergone curative lung cancer surgery staged with TNM-7 in two German centers were retrospectively analyzed. The subtypes tumor size >7 cm and multiple nodules were grouped as T3a, and the subtypes parietal pleura invasion and mixed were grouped as T3b. We stratified survival by subtype and investigated the relative benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy according to subtype. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates differed between the different subtypes tumor diameter >7 cm (71.5%), multiple nodules in one lobe (71.0%) (grouped as T3a), parietal pleura invasion (59.%), and mixed subtype (5-year OS 50.3%) (grouped as T3b), respectively. The cohort as a whole did not gain significant OS benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In contrast, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS in the T3b subgroup (logrank p = 0.03). This multicenter cohort analysis of pT3N0 patients identifies a new prognostic mixed subtype. Tumors >7 cm should not be moved to pT4. Patients with T3b tumors have significantly worse survival than patients with T3a tumors.

Post-mastectomy radiotherapy is associated with improved overall survival in T3N0 patients who do not receive chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is limited retrospective evidence addressing the utility of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with T3N0 breast cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) comparing overall survival (OS) in T3N0 patients treated with mastectomy alone (MTX) or with PMRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a matched-cohort analysis of NCDB breast cancer patients with pT3N0 disease who did not receive NAC, or cT3N0 patients who received NAC treated between 2006 and 2014. Patients were matched for all available baseline characteristics using propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with stabilized weights.

RESULTS

We identified 13,901 eligible patients. In the pT3N0 cohort, median follow-up was 47 months for the MTX group and 50 months for the PMRT group. In the cT3N0 cohort, median follow-up was 44 months for the MTX group and 46 months for the PMRT group. OS was higher in pT3N0 patients treated with PMRT compared to MTX: 7-year OS of 74% vs. 65% (P < 0.001). Doubly robust multivariable analysis showed an association between PMRT and improved OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.89, P < 0.001). There was no benefit to PMRT in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). In the NAC cohort, PMRT did not change OS, with 7-year OS of 78% with MTX and 79% with PMRT. There was a trend of improved OS with PMRT in patients with residual disease in the breast and lymph nodes (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.46-1.07).

CONCLUSION

PMRT improves OS in patients with pT3N0 disease, but the benefit appears limited to those who do not receive AC. PMRT does not improve OS in patients with cT3N0 disease who receive NAC, but there might be a benefit in patients with a poor response to chemotherapy. However, longer follow-up may be needed to make a definitive conclusion about the benefit of PMRT in patients who receive chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for cT3N0 rectal cancer: any benefit over upfront surgery? A propensity score-matched study

PURPOSE

Benefits of neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) are well known for locally advanced and/or node-positive rectal cancer, but the best timing for CRT has been less explored for cT3N0 patients. The aim of the present study was to compare the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) probability between neoadjuvant CRT and upfront surgery in patients affected by cT3N0 rectal cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 105 patients affected by cT3N0 rectal cancer, staged by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and treated at the National Cancer Institute of Milan between 2011 and 2017, was performed: 42 (40.0%) were treated by neoadjuvant CRT and 63 (60.0%) by upfront surgery. Propensity score matching was performed to avoid selection bias, and Cox multivariate regression was used to analyze outcomes.

RESULTS

The 5-year DFS probability was 87.5% in neoadjuvant CRT patients vs. 90.0% in upfront surgery cases (Log-rank p = 0.76). The 5-year loco-regional recurrence-free survival probability was respectively 96.8% vs. 96.3% (Log-rank p = 0.954). On multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant CRT had no impact on DFS when compared to upfront surgery (adjusted HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.18-2.70, p = 0.613), but 61.9% of upfront surgery cases were treated by adjuvant chemo-radiation (adjusted HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.11-1.57, p = 0.196). The only independent predictor of improved DFS was age at diagnosis (adjusted HR 0.95, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

CRT should be considered for cT3N0 patients, but its timing (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant) seems not to affect the disease-free survival in the present cohort of patients.

Risk factors for locoregional recurrence in patients with pathologic T3N0 rectal cancer with negative resection margin treated by surgery alone

Purpose

This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for locoregional recurrence (LRR) in pT3N0 rectal cancer patients who were treated with surgery alone and had negative resection margin including circumferential resection margin (CRM) for optimal indication of adjuvant radiotherapy.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed patients with pT3N0 rectal cancer who were treated via upfront surgery and had no other adjuvant treatment from January 2003 to December 2012. In total, 122 patients who had negative resection margin including negative CRM were included in the analysis.

Results

The median follow-up period after surgery was 60 months (range, 3 to 161 months). During this time, 6 patients (4.9%) experienced LRR at the anastomotic site (4 patients), and regional lymphatic area (2 patients). The estimated 5-year rates of overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and LRR-free survival were 96.7%, 84.6%, and 94.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that level of tumor ≤5 cm was a significant prognostic factor for LRR-free survival (LRRFS) (p = 0.04; hazard ratio = 7.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–47.30). Patients with level of tumor ≤5 cm had an estimated 5-year LRRFS of 66.8%, which was much higher than 2.3% in patients with level of tumor >5 cm. There was no significant factor for recurrence-free survival or overall survival.

Conclusion

In T3N0 rectal cancer, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be recommended in patients with level of tumor ≤5 cm for better local control. However, in patients with pT3N0 disease, negative resection margin, and level of tumor >5 cm, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be carefully suggested.

Treatment of T3N0 non-small cell lung cancer with chest wall invasion using stereotactic body radiotherapy

•

The role of SBRT for T3N0 lung cancer invading the chest wall is unknown.

•

We treated 12 patients with T3N0 chest wall-invading lung cancer with SBRT.

•

Local control was excellent and no grade 3+ toxicity was observed.

•

Pre-treatment chest wall pain was relieved after SBRT in most patients.

Objectives

Chest wall invasion (CWI) is observed in 5% of localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in these patients is unknown. We investigate the safety and efficacy of SBRT in patients with T3N0 NSCLC due to CWI.

Methods

Patients with T3N0 NSCLC due to CWI were identified using a prospective registry. CWI was defined as radiographic evidence of soft tissue invasion or bony destruction. We excluded patients with recurrent or metastatic disease. All patients were treated with definitive SBRT. Prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 5 fractions for most patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate survival outcomes.

Results

We identified 12 patients treated between 2006 and 2017. Median age was 70 (range, 58–85). Median tumor diameter was 3.0 cm (range, 0.9–7.2). Median survival was 12.0 months (range, 2.4–63). At a median follow-up of 8.9 months (range, 2.1–63), 1-year primary tumor control was 89%, involved lobar control was 89%, local–regional control was 82%, distant control was 91%, and survival was 63%. Of the 4 patients with pre-treatment chest wall pain, 3 reported improvement after SBRT. Two patients reported new grade 1–2 chest wall pain. No grade 3+ toxicity was reported, with 1 patient experiencing grade 1 skin toxicity and 3 patients experiencing grade 1–2 radiation pneumonitis.

Conclusions

SBRT for CWI NSCLC is safe, with high early tumor control and low treatment-related toxicity. Most patients with pre-treatment chest wall pain experienced relief after SBRT, with no grade 3+ toxicity observed.

Outcomes and utilization of postmastectomy radiotherapy for T3N0 breast cancers

BACKGROUND

The role of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for women with pT3N0M0 breast cancer is controversial. We sought to determine the benefit of PMRT in this cohort using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

METHODS

We analyzed women with pT3N0M0 breast cancer who received mastectomy with or without PMRT between 2004 and 2012. We excluded men, women ≤18 years, neoadjuvant or unknown radiation or chemotherapy status, unknown estrogen or progesterone receptor status, unknown surgical margin status, histology other than invasive ductal or lobular carcinoma, and if death occurred <3 months after diagnosis. A total of 4291 patients was included for analysis. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare patient characteristics. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to identify factors associated with survival. Propensity score matching was performed to address confounding variables. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and shared frailty models.

RESULTS

Of the 4291 women analyzed, 2030 (47%) received PMRT. On MVA, PMRT (HR 0.72, p < 0.001), chemotherapy (HR 0.51, p < 0.001), and hormone therapy (HR 0.63, p < 0.001) were associated with improved overall survival (OS). After propensity score matching, a matched cohort of 2800 women was analyzed. At 5 years, OS was 83.7% and 79.8% with and without PMRT, respectively (p < 0.001). This difference in OS benefit increased with time. At 10 years, OS was 67.4% and 59.2% with and without PMRT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PMRT was associated with improved OS in women with pT3N0M0 breast cancer, which strongly suggests PMRT may provide a survival advantage and should be considered.

Evaluating the fate of patients who undergo resections of very large, node-negative lung cancers using the National Cancer DataBase

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether there are differences in survival associated with different treatment modalities among patients with lymph node-negative, very large non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs).

METHODS

The National Cancer DataBase was used to identify patients diagnosed with NSCLCs >7 cm (T3) without lymph node involvement (N0) or metastatic disease (M0) from 1999 to 2006. Surgical therapy included surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy or chemotherapy, surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation therapy or chemotherapy and surgery followed by postoperative radiation therapy (PORT). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons were made using log-rank tests and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 2296 patients identified with cT3N0M0 disease, 45% underwent surgical therapy. The 5-year OS rate was 38%. Across the different treatment regimens, there was a significant difference in 5-year OS. Neither neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy or chemotherapy nor adjuvant chemoradiation therapy was associated with improved 5-year OS. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS relative to surgery alone [hazard ratio (HR) 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.91, P = 0.008]. PORT alone was associated with a detrimental effect on 5-year OS relative to surgery alone [HR 2.04; 95% CI 1.38-3.03, P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Large T3N0 NSCLCs appear to be optimally treated with surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.

Postmastectomy radiation therapy for T3N0: a SEER analysis

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting evidence regarding the benefit of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) for pathologic stage T3N0M0 breast cancers. We analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to investigate the benefit of PMRT in this patient population.

METHODS

We queried the SEER database for T3N0M0 breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2010 who underwent modified radical mastectomy. We excluded males, patients with unknown radiation timing/type, other primary tumors, and survival <6 months. A total of 2525 patients were included in the analysis. We performed univariate and multivariate statistical analysis using chi-square tests, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards regression. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

Of the 2525 patients identified, 1063 received PMRT. The median follow-up was 56 months (range, 6-131 months). On univariate analysis, PMRT improved OS (76.5% vs 61.8%, P<.01) and CSS (85.0% vs 82.4%, P<.01) at 8 years. The use of PMRT remained significant on multivariate analysis: PMRT improved OS (hazard ratio 0.63, P<.001) and CSS (hazard ratio 0.77, P = .045). Low tumor grade (P<.01) and marital status of "married" (P = .01) also was a predictor of improved CSS on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

PMRT was associated with significant improvements in both CSS and OS in patients with T3N0M0 breast cancers treated with modified radical mastectomy from 2000 to 2010. PMRT should be strongly considered in T3N0M0 patients. Postmastectomy radiation therapy is associated with significant improvements in overall and cause-specific survival in patients with T3N0M0 breast cancers treated with modified radical mastectomy from 2000 to 2010 in the SEER database. Postmastectomy radiation therapy should be strongly considered for patients who have T3N0M0 tumors.

Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-based analysis of the impact of preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy on survival outcomes for T3N0 rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemoradiation has been established as standard of care for T3/T4 node-positive rectal cancer. Recent work, however, has called into question the overall benefit of radiation for tumors with lower risk characteristics, particularly T3N0 rectal cancers. We retrospectively analyzed T3N0 rectal cancer patients and examined how outcomes differed according to the sequence of treatment received.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to analyze T3N0 rectal cancer cases diagnosed between 1998 and 2008. Treatment consisted of surgery alone (No RT), preoperative radiation followed by surgery (Neo-Adjuvant RT), or surgery followed by postoperative radiation (Adjuvant RT). Demographic and tumor characteristics of the three groups were compared using t-tests for the comparison of means. Survival information from the SEER database was utilized to estimate cause-specific survival (CSS) and to generate Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Multivariate analysis (MVA) of features associated with outcomes was conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression models with Adjuvant RT, Neo-Adjuvant RT, No RT, histological grade, tumor size, year of diagnosis, and demographic characteristics as covariates.

RESULTS

10-Year CSS estimates were 66.1% (95% CI 62.3-69.6%; P=0.02), 73.5% (95% CI 68.9-77.5%; P=0.02), and 76.1% (95% CI 72.4-79.4%; P=0.02), for No RT, Neo-Adjuvant RT, and Adjuvant RT, respectively. On MVA, Adjuvant RT (HR=0.688; 95% CI, 0.578-0.819; P<0.001) was associated with significantly decreased risk for cancer death. By contrast, Neo-Adjuvant RT was not significantly associated with improved cancer survival (HR=0.863; 95% CI, 0.715-1.043; P=0.127).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant RT was associated with significantly higher CSS when compared with surgery alone, while the benefit of Neo-Adjuvant RT was not significant. This indicates that surgery followed by Adjuvant RT may still be an important treatment plan for T3N0 rectal cancer with potentially significant survival advantages over other treatment sequences.