[Diagnostics and treatment of local wound infections]

Local wound infections are a multidisciplinary challenge which should be diagnosed as early as possible and adequately treated. In addition to a stagnation of wound healing, it is in particular the threat of development into systemic infections and even sepsis that represent feared, potentially life-threatening complications. This topic has a particularly high and multidisciplinary significance in the treatment of patients with chronic wounds. Until now, there were no generally accepted criteria for the diagnostics. The newly developed and validated TILI score, as a supplement to vital signs and serological values, enables rapid objectification of local wound infections. In addition, the W.A.R. score can be used to identify patients with an increased risk of infections. With these easy to use tools, the indications for antiseptic wound treatment can be assessed individually, quickly and without problems. For many patients with chronic wounds, polihexanide is then the wound antiseptic of first choice. However, the indications for wound antiseptics should be critically reviewed after a treatment duration of 14 days at the latest.

Therapeutic index for local infections score (TILI): a new diagnostic tool

OBJECTIVE

Local wound infections are a major challenge for patients and health professionals. Various diagnostic and therapeutic options are available. However, a generally accepted standard is still lacking in Europe. The aim was to develop an easy-to-use clinical score for the early detection of local wound infections, as a basis for decision-making on antiseptic therapy or decolonisation.

METHOD

An interdisciplinary and interprofessional panel of experts from seven European countries was brought together to discuss the various aspects of diagnosing local wound infections.

RESULTS

The result was the adoption of the Therapeutic Index for Local Infections (TILI) score, developed in Germany by Initiative Chronische Wunden e.V., specifically for health professionals not specialised in wound care. Available in six European languages, the TILI score could also be adapted for different European countries, depending on their specific national healthcare requirements. The six clinical criteria for local wound infection are erythema to surrounding skin; heat; oedema, induration or swelling; spontaneous pain or pressure pain; stalled wound healing; and increase and/or change in colour or smell of exudate. Meeting all criteria indicates that antiseptic wound therapy could be started. Regardless of these unspecific clinical signs, there are also health conditions for the clinical situation which are a direct indication for antimicrobial wound therapy. These include the presence of wound pathogens, such as meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, septic surgical wound or the presence of free pus.

CONCLUSION

The development of the new internationally adapted TILI score, which could also be used by any caregiver in daily practice to diagnose local infections in acute and hard-to-heal wounds, is the result of expert consensus. However, the score system has to be validated through a clinical evaluation. This is to be performed in expert centres throughout Europe.

Therapeutic Index for Local Infections score validity: a retrospective European analysis

OBJECTIVE

A score to identify local wound infections was developed by a panel of experts from seven European countries. The Therapeutic Index for Local Infections (TILI) score was designed for health professionals who are not specialised in wound care. This study was carried out to test the validity of the TILI score in everyday practice.

METHOD

Content validity was analysed by means of evaluation by a panel of experts, individually and face-to-face, followed by a European multicentred, retrospective, observational study. Participating clinicians sent anonymised copies of completed TILI scores for patients with leg ulcers along with a photograph of the wound for analysis by two blinded reviewers. Concordance (Kappa index) and convergent criterion validity (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Youden's J Index and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) or area under the curve (AUC) curve) were calculated to construct validity and reliability.

RESULTS

A total of 307 patients with leg ulcers from seven institutions in five European countries were included in this retrospective analysis. It was shown that the diagnosis of local wound infection could be documented well with five of the six clinical criteria included in the TILI score. By summing up these facultative criteria in comparison with any direct criteria that may be present, there would have been an indication for local antiseptic wound therapy in 22% of patients examined.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that the TILI score is concordant with the expert assessment of patients and with good diagnostic characteristics. Thus, the easy-to-use TILI score can now be used in the daily routine practice of health professionals to diagnose local wound infections.