Nursing Considerations for the Clinical Management of Adverse Events Associated with Talquetamab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

OBJECTIVES

Talquetamab is a newly approved bispecific antibody targeting the CD3 receptor on T cells and a receptor, G protein-coupled receptor family C group 5 member D (GPRC5D), highly expressed on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. In addition to immune therapy-related adverse events (AEs) associated with bispecific antibody therapies, talquetamab is associated with unique skin/nail and oral GPRC5D-related side effects that require additional supportive care. This review provides clinical management strategies for talquetamab based on oncology nurses' experience during the MonumenTAL-1 (NCT03399799/NCT04634552) clinical trial. The objective of this review is to raise awareness among nurses and patients to better understand and manage the side effects associated with talquetamab treatment in order to optimize patient outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

MonumenTAL-1 is a phase 1/2 clinical trial of talquetamab in patients with relapsed/refractory MM who are triple-class exposed. Details on overall response, safety, and AE incidence and occurrence were previously published. Management strategies for the T-cell-related and unique GPRC5D-related AEs were collected from oncology nurses from different study sites.

CONCLUSION

Talquetamab has shown overall response rates of >71% in patients with relapsed/refractory MM in the MonumenTAL-1 study. AEs were low grade and predictable; few led to study discontinuation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Oncology nurses have specialized knowledge of treatment administration monitoring based on their participation in the MonumenTAL-1 trial. This review provides information for nurses in both the academic and community settings on how to monitor, counsel, and support patients, which will in turn improve patients' quality of life and overall survival.

Targeting GPRC5D in multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) continues to improve. Recent progress in therapies, using immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, has greatly improved patients' outcomes. Despite these advancements, relapses still happen often, and patients can become resistant to the usual treatments. Newer treatments, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), have resulted in excellent outcomes in patients with limited treatment options. G protein - coupled receptor, class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) is considered a very promising target with early results from clinical trials showing high response rates in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the efficacy and safety of CAR-T and BsAbs targeting GPRC5D in MM, focusing on talquetamab - the inaugural FDA-approved BsAb targeting GPRC5D. Talquetamab has exhibited promising response rates alongside a distinctive side effect profile. Additionally, ongoing trials examining talquetamab in combination with agents like daratumumab and teclistamab are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

We offer insights into the potential utilization of various GPRC5D-based therapies in the treatment paradigm for MM, either independently or in combination with established therapies.

Management of Toxicities Associated with BCMA, GPRC5D, and FcRH5-Targeting Bispecific Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The introduction of bispecific antibodies is one of the most significant recent advances in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. This review will summarize the management of the toxicities associated with newly approved T cell-engaging bispecific antibodies and those which may be approved in the near future.

RECENT FINDINGS

Numerous trials have shown that bispecific antibodies can be both effective and tolerable when adverse events are properly managed. Cytokine release syndrome and increased infections are observed across all bispecific antibodies. Additional adverse events are target-specific, such as the more severe hypogammaglobulinemia and infections of BCMA bispecific antibodies and the dysgeusia, nail dystrophy, and skin changes of GPRC5D bispecific antibodies. Bispecific antibodies will surely become a mainstay of multiple myeloma therapy given their efficacy and accessibility. Their unique toxicities must be carefully considered and managed to ensure they are utilized safely.

Beyond BCMA, why GPRC5D could be the right way: treatment strategies with immunotherapy at relapse after anti-BCMA agents

Multiple Myeloma remains incurable, and there is a need for therapies with novel mechanisms of action. Recently, B cell maturation antigen targeted therapy has demonstrated deep and durable responses in a largely treated population. However, the relapse rate of myeloma patients after anti-BCMA treatment strategies is increasing worldwide, and one of the most challenging issues for them is to choose the best therapy sequencing. After anti-BCMA treatment, retreatment with anti-BCMA drugs remains an option, but new targets are emerging strongly. One of them is G protein-coupled receptor, class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D), that due to the very promising data from the use of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) and bispecific antibodies (BsAb) seems to be the ideal candidate in the relay of myeloma treatment at relapse. In this literature review, we discuss data from treatment with the new drugs at relapse after anti-BCMA therapies, observing an undeniable benefit from the use of drugs directed against GPRC5D.

Peeling Back the Layers: Recurrent Talquetamab Skin Toxicity after Supportive Stem Cell Boost in Multiple Myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Bispecific antibodies have meaningfully expanded the therapeutic armamentarium in multiple myeloma. Talquetamab is a CD3+ T-cell-redirecting antibody targeting GPRC5D, which is expressed on multiple myeloma plasma cells as well as in keratinized tissues. Due to the expression pattern, toxicity of talquetamab involves skin toxicity.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here we report the case of a patient who was treated with talquetamab after relapse after CAR-T therapy. The patient developed a severe recurrence of talquetamab-mediated skin toxicity after the administration of a supportive hematopoietic stem cell boost to treat persistent late cytopenias after CAR-T therapy.

CONCLUSION

This case underscores the complex dynamics between novel immunotherapies like talquetamab and stem cell-based interventions in the context of MM treatment, shedding light on the need for personalized approaches to maximize the benefits of these therapies while minimizing their associated adverse effects.

Comparative Efficacy of Talquetamab vs. Current Treatments in the LocoMMotion and MoMMent Studies in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Talquetamab, a bispecific antibody targeting GPRC5D × CD3, is approved for the treatment of patients with triple-class -exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) on the basis of the results from the phase I/II MonumenTAL-1 trial. The relative effectiveness of talquetamab vs. real-world physician's choice of therapy (RWPC) was assessed using adjusted comparisons.

METHODS

An external control arm for MonumenTAL-1 (subcutaneously administered talquetamab 0.4 mg/kg weekly [QW] and 0.8 mg/kg every other week [Q2W]) was created from two observational real-world studies: LocoMMotion and MoMMent. Imbalances in baseline covariates were adjusted using inverse probability weighting. The relative effectiveness of talquetamab vs. RWPC was estimated for overall response rate (ORR), ≥ very good partial response (VGPR), and ≥ complete response (CR); odds ratios and relative response ratios (RRs) were derived from weighted logistic regression. Hazard ratios (HRs) for duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using a weighted Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

After reweighting, baseline characteristics were balanced across cohorts. In adjusted comparisons, patients treated with talquetamab QW (n = 143) had significantly improved outcomes vs. RWPC; RRs were ORR 2.67, p < 0.0001; ≥ VGPR 4.70, p < 0.0001; ≥ CR 78.05, p = 0.0002; and HRs were PFS 0.52, p < 0.0001; TTNT 0.48, p < 0.0001; OS 0.36, p < 0.0001. Patients treated with talquetamab Q2W (n = 145) also had significantly improved outcomes vs. RWPC; RRs were ORR 2.62, p < 0.0001; ≥ VGPR 5.04, p < 0.0001; ≥ CR 101.14, p = 0.0002; and HRs were PFS 0.40, p < 0.0001; TTNT 0.39, p < 0.0001; OS 0.37, p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSION

Effectiveness of talquetamab for both schedules was significantly better than RWPC for ORR, ≥ VGPR, ≥ CR, PFS, OS, and TTNT, highlighting its clinical benefit for patients with TCE RRMM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

MonumenTAL-1, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03399799/NCT04634552; LocoMMotion, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04035226; MoMMent, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05160584.