Novel insights in endocrine and metabolic pathways in sepsis and gaps for future research

Sepsis is defined as any life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. It remains an important cause of critical illness and has considerable short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. In the last decades, preclinical and clinical research has revealed a biphasic pattern in the (neuro-)endocrine responses to sepsis as to other forms of critical illness, contributing to development of severe metabolic alterations. Immediately after the critical illness-inducing insult, fasting- and stress-induced neuroendocrine and cellular responses evoke a catabolic state in order to provide energy substrates for vital tissues, and to concomitantly activate cellular repair pathways while energy-consuming anabolism is postponed. Large randomized controlled trials have shown that providing early full feeding in this acute phase induced harm and reversed some of the neuro-endocrine alterations, which suggested that the acute fasting- and stress-induced responses to critical illness are likely interlinked and benefical. However, it remains unclear whether, in the context of accepting virtual fasting in the acute phase of illness, metabolic alterations such as hyperglycemia are harmful or beneficial. When patients enter a prolonged phase of critical illness, a central suppression of most neuroendocrine axes follows. Prolonged fasting and central neuroendocrine suppression may no longer be beneficial. Although pilot studies have suggested benefit of fasting-mimicking diets and interventions that reactivate the central neuroendocrine suppression selectively in the prolonged phase of illness, further study is needed to investigate patient-oriented outcomes in larger randomized trials.

Impact of tight glucose control on circulating 3-hydroxybutyrate in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests a potentially protective effect of increasing ketone body availability via accepting low macronutrient intake early after onset of critical illness. The impact of blood glucose control with insulin on circulating ketones is unclear. Whereas lowering blood glucose may activate ketogenesis, high insulin concentrations may have the opposite effect. We hypothesized that the previously reported protective effects of tight glucose control in critically ill patients receiving early parenteral nutrition may have been mediated in part by activation of ketogenesis.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials on tight versus liberal blood glucose control in the intensive care unit, including 700 critically ill children and 2748 critically ill adults. All patients received early parenteral nutrition as part of the contemporary standard of care. Before studying a potential mediator role of circulating ketones in improving outcome, we performed a time course analysis to investigate whether tight glucose control significantly affected ketogenesis and to identify a day of maximal effect, if any. We quantified plasma/serum 3-hydroxybutyrate concentrations from intensive care unit admission until day 3 in 2 matched subsets of 100 critically ill children and 100 critically ill adults. Univariable differences between groups were investigated by Kruskal-Wallis test. Differences in 3-hydroxybutyrate concentrations between study days were investigated by Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

In critically ill children and adults receiving early parenteral nutrition, tight glucose control, as compared with liberal glucose control, lowered mean morning blood glucose on days 1-3 (P < 0.0001) via infusing insulin at a higher dose (P < 0.0001). Throughout the study period, caloric intake was not different between groups. In both children and adults, tight glucose control did not affect 3-hydroxybutyrate concentrations, which were suppressed on ICU days 1-3 and significantly lower than the ICU admission values for both groups (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Tight versus liberal glucose control in the context of early parenteral nutrition did not affect 3-hydroxybutyrate concentrations in critically ill patients. Hence, the protective effects of tight glucose control in this context cannot be attributed to increased ketone body availability.

The association of hypoglycemia with outcome of critically ill children in relation to nutritional and blood glucose control strategies

BACKGROUND

Withholding parenteral nutrition (PN) until one week after PICU admission facilitated recovery from critical illness and protected against emotional and behavioral problems 4 years later. However, the intervention increased the risk of hypoglycemia, which may have counteracted part of the benefit. Previously, hypoglycemia occurring under tight glucose control in critically ill children receiving early PN did not associate with long-term harm. We investigated whether hypoglycemia in PICU differentially associates with outcome in the context of withholding early PN, and whether any potential association with outcome may depend on the applied glucose control protocol.

METHODS

In this secondary analysis of the multicenter PEPaNIC RCT, we studied whether hypoglycemia in PICU associated with mortality (N = 1440) and 4-years neurodevelopmental outcome (N = 674) through univariable comparison and multivariable regression analyses adjusting for potential confounders. In patients with available blood samples (N = 556), multivariable models were additionally adjusted for baseline serum NSE and S100B concentrations as biomarkers of neuronal, respectively, astrocytic damage. To study whether an association of hypoglycemia with outcome may be affected by the nutritional strategy or center-specific glucose control protocol, we further adjusted the models for the interaction between hypoglycemia and the randomized nutritional strategy, respectively, treatment center. In sensitivity analyses, we studied whether any association with outcome was different in patients with iatrogenic or spontaneous/recurrent hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

Hypoglycemia univariably associated with higher mortality in PICU, at 90 days and 4 years after randomization, but not when adjusted for risk factors. After 4 years, critically ill children with hypoglycemia scored significantly worse for certain parent/caregiver-reported executive functions (working memory, planning and organization, metacognition) than patients without hypoglycemia, also when adjusted for risk factors including baseline NSE and S100B. Further adjustment for the interaction of hypoglycemia with the randomized intervention or treatment center revealed a potential interaction, whereby tight glucose control and withholding early PN may be protective. Impaired executive functions were most pronounced in patients with spontaneous or recurrent hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

Critically ill children exposed to hypoglycemia in PICU were at higher risk of impaired executive functions after 4 years, especially in cases of spontaneous/recurrent hypoglycemia.