Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro efficacy of antibiotic combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli

The superiority of combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) infections remains controversial. In vitro models may predict the efficacy of antibiotic regimens against CR-GNB. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed including pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and time-kill (TK) studies examining the in vitro efficacy of antibiotic combinations against CR-GNB [PROSPERO registration no. CRD42019128104]. The primary outcome was in vitro synergy based on the effect size (ES): high, ES ≥ 0.75, moderate, 0.35 < ES < 0.75; low, ES ≤ 0.35; and absent, ES = 0). A network meta-analysis assessed the bactericidal effect and re-growth rate (secondary outcomes). An adapted version of the ToxRTool was used for risk-of-bias assessment. Over 180 combination regimens from 136 studies were included. The most frequently analysed classes were polymyxins and carbapenems. Limited data were available for ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam. High or moderate synergism was shown for polymyxin/rifampicin against Acinetobacter baumannii [ES = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-1.00], polymyxin/fosfomycin against Klebsiella pneumoniae (ES = 1.00, 95% CI 0.66-1.00) and imipenem/amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ES = 1.00, 95% CI 0.21-1.00). Compared with monotherapy, increased bactericidal activity and lower re-growth rates were reported for colistin/fosfomycin and polymyxin/rifampicin in K. pneumoniae and for imipenem/amikacin or imipenem/tobramycin against P. aeruginosa. High quality was documented for 65% and 53% of PK/PD and TK studies, respectively. Well-designed in vitro studies should be encouraged to guide the selection of combination therapies in clinical trials and to improve the armamentarium against carbapenem-resistant bacteria.

Non-polymyxin-based combinations as potential alternatives in treatment against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections

Due to limited therapeutic options, combination therapy has been used empirically to treat carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Polymyxin-based combinations have been widely studied and used in the clinical setting. However, the use of polymyxins is often limited due to nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the activity of non-polymyxin-based combinations relative to polymyxin-based combinations and to identify potential synergistic and bactericidal two-drug non-polymyxin-based combinations against CRAB. In vitro activity of 14 two-drug combinations against 50 A. baumannii isolates was evaluated using the checkerboard method. Subsequently, the two best-performing non-polymyxin-based combinations from the checkerboard assay were explored in static time-kill experiments. Concentrations of antibiotics corresponding to the fractional inhibitory concentrations (FIC) and the highest serum concentration achievable clinically were tested. The most synergistic combinations were fosfomycin/sulbactam (synergistic against 37/50 isolates; 74%), followed by meropenem/sulbactam (synergistic against 28/50 isolates; 56%). No antagonism was observed for any combination. Both fosfomycin/sulbactam and meropenem/sulbactam combinations exhibited bactericidal and synergistic activity against both isolates at the highest clinically achievable concentrations in the time-kill experiments. The meropenem/sulbactam combination displayed synergistic and bactericidal activity against one of two strains at concentrations equal to the FIC. Non-polymyxin-based combinations such as fosfomycin/sulbactam and meropenem/sulbactam may have a role in the treatment of CRAB. Further in vivo and clinical studies are required to scrutinise these activities further.

Effect of drug combinations on the kinetics of antibiotic resistance emergence in Escherichia coli CFT073 using an in vitro hollow-fibre infection model

Antibiotic resistance is one of the major threats to public health today. To address this problem requires an urgent comprehensive approach. Strategic and multitargeted combination therapy has been increasingly used clinically to treat bacterial infections. The hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) is a well-controlled in vitro bioreactor system that is increasingly being used in the assessment of resistance emergence with monotherapies and combination antibiotic therapies. In this study, the HFIM was evaluated as a reliable in vitro method to quantitatively and reproducibly analyse the emergence of antibiotic resistance using ampicillin, fosfomycin and ciprofloxacin and their simultaneous combinations against Escherichia coli CFT073, a clinical uropathogenic strain. Bacteria were exposed to clinically relevant pharmacokinetic (PK) concentrations of the drugs for 10 days. Drug and bacterial samples were collected at different time points for PK analysis and to enumerate total and resistant bacterial populations, respectively. The results demonstrated that double or triple combinations significantly delayed the emergence of resistant E. coli CFT073 subpopulations. These findings suggest that strategic combinations of antimicrobials may play a role in controlling the emergence of resistance during treatment. Further animal and human trials will be needed to confirm this and to ensure that there is no adverse impact on the host microbiome or unexpected toxicity. The HFIM system could potentially be used to identify clinically relevant combination dosing regimens for use in a clinical trial evaluating the appearance of resistance to antibacterial drugs.

Evaluation of in vitro methods for testing tigecycline combinations against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates

OBJECTIVES

Treatment of infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP) frequently involves combination therapy with various antimicrobial agents in the hope of achieving synergistic effects. Routine laboratory antimicrobial synergy testing is a service that is currently unavailable owing to the laborious nature of the reference time-kill assay (TKA) as well as the widely used chequerboard method. In this study, we explored whether easier methods, based on the Etest technique, might offer a suitable alternative.

METHODS

In vitro interactions of tigecycline combination with colistin, gentamicin, fosfomycin or meropenem against 26 CPKP isolates were evaluated employing the TKA, chequerboard method and three Etest methodologies (the MIC/MIC ratio, the cross formation and the agar/Etest method). Rates of consequent synergy and concordance of the studied methods were determined.

RESULTS

All antimicrobial combinations demonstrated some degree of synergy against the CPKP isolates tested. No antagonism was observed for any of the combinations. All methods showed poor synergy concordance with the TKA, producing non-significant kappa (κ) results. Etest methods (MIC/MIC ratio and agar/Etest) exhibited fair agreement (κ=0.29 and 0.38, respectively) with the chequerboard method.

CONCLUSION

There is a poor correlation between synergy testing methods of tigecycline combinations, which may be associated with their different endpoints. To elucidate method comparability and reliability, their correlation with clinical outcomes appears important.

Clinical relevance of in vitro synergistic activity of antibiotics for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to investigate the outcomes of patients infected with multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria following synergy-guided antibiotic combination therapy (SGACT).

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed and Scopus databases was performed. Published studies of any design reporting outcomes of patients with MDR Gram-negative bacteria treated with SGACT were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the relevancy and quality of the retrieved articles and extracted the available data.

RESULTS

Nineteen reports (530 patients) were included. Eleven case reports/series described 26 cases of systemic infection due to MDR Gram-negative bacteria treated with SGACT. Five deaths were reported, two of which were attributed to the infection. Six studies (including one randomised controlled trial) provided comparative data for patients treated with SGACT and those treated with unguided combination therapy (UCT) or active monotherapy. In the pooled analysis of unadjusted data from these studies (504 patients), there was no difference between SGACT and UCT or monotherapy (OR=0.47, 95% CI 0.21-1.04; I²=52%). Analysis of adjusted data showed that SGACT was significantly associated with survival (OR=0.44, 95% CI 0.20-0.98; I²=54%).

CONCLUSION

These limited but promising findings warrant further investigation of SGACT in the outcome of patients with MDR Gram-negative infections in well-designed trials.

Dose-dependent effect and pharmacokinetics of fexinidazole and its metabolites in a mouse model of human African trypanosomiasis

Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) is a neglected tropical disease, with a population of 70 million at risk. Current treatment options are limited. In the search for new therapeutics, the repurposing of the broad-spectrum antiprotozoal drug fexinidazole has completed Phase III trials with the anticipation that it will be the first oral treatment for HAT. This study used the recently validated bioluminescence imaging model to assess the dose and rate of kill effect of fexinidazole in infected mice, and the dose-dependent effect of fexinidazole on trypanosome infection. Pharmacokinetics of fexinidazole in plasma and central nervous system (CNS) compartments were similar in both infected and uninfected mice. Drug distribution within the CNS was further examined by microdialysis, showing similar levels in the cortex and hippocampus. However, high variability in drug distribution and exposure was found between mice.

Bactericidal activity of penicillin, ceftriaxone, gentamicin and daptomycin alone and in combination against Aerococcus urinae

Aerococcus urinae can cause severe infections (bacteraemia and endocarditis) that are associated with high mortality. However, data on the bactericidal and synergistic activity for clinically implemented antibiotics are scarce. Time-kill analyses were performed on two clinical isolates (AU1 and AU2) and the reference strain ATCC 700306 for penicillin (PG), ceftriaxone (CRO), gentamicin (GEN), daptomycin (DAP) and their combinations. AU1 and AU2 were CRO-resistant (MICs, 2 µg/mL) and ATCC 700306 was high-level GEN-resistant (MIC, 512 µg/mL), whereas all strains were PG- and DAP-susceptible (MICs, ≤0.125 and ≤1 µg/mL, respectively). CFU counts were determined at various time points from 0 to 48 h. All experiments were performed at 0.5×, 1×, 2× and 4× MIC. PG and CRO were not bactericidal for all strains, whereas DAP exhibited bactericidal activity at all concentrations for AU2 and ATCC 700306. The combination of PG or CRO with GEN was bactericidal for AU1 and AU2 at antibiotic concentrations ≥1× MIC. Bactericidal synergism was detected for PG or CRO combined with GEN in the two clinical isolates. PG plus CRO showed non-bactericidal synergism for ATCC 700306. DAP with GEN was synergistic at 1× MIC for AU1, whereas the killing activity of DAP was too pronounced to detect potential synergism in AU2. The combination of PG or CRO with GEN is synergistic and bactericidal. Moreover, these in vitro data suggest that DAP may represent a potential bactericidal treatment alternative against A. urinae. This finding could be important for the treatment of patients with a β-lactam allergy or renal insufficiency.

In vitro time-kill curves study of three antituberculous combinations against Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates

The objective of this study was to examine the in vitro synergism of three-drug combinations against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (levofloxacin/linezolid/ethambutol, levofloxacin/amikacin/ethambutol and levofloxacin/linezolid/amikacin) using the time-kill curves method. In total, 8 multidrug-resistant and 12 drug-susceptible M. tuberculosis isolates were used. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the isolates for each drug were determined by the proportions method. Time-kill curves were studied for the three combinations proposed over 14 days using two different protocols. In protocol 1, 0.5× MIC for each drug was used. In protocol 2, 0.5× MIC for levofloxacin and linezolid and 0.25× MIC for amikacin and ethambutol were used. The MICs for all of the isolates studied were 0.5 mg/L for levofloxacin and linezolid and 2.5 mg/L for ethambutol and amikacin. All of the combinations displayed an additive activity compared with the most active individual drug. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that the three combinations tested were equally effective against M. tuberculosis isolates. The study of antituberculous combinations using in vitro methods is an excellent first step to predict their effect in clinical development phases as well as to test new regimens of the antituberculous drugs currently available.