Blood pressure and dementia risk by physical frailty in the elderly: a nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Midlife hypertension has been recognized as a modifiable risk factor for dementia, but association between blood pressure (BP) in late life and dementia has been inconclusive. In addition, few studies have investigated effects of BP control on dementia incidence in the frail elderly. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the association of BP and dementia incidence with concomitant consideration of physical frailty in the young elderly population.

METHODS

Using the Korean National Health Information Database, we identified 804,024 subjects without history of dementia at age 66. Dementia diagnosis was defined with prescription records of anti-dementia drugs and dementia-related diagnostic codes. Physical frailty was measured using the Timed Up and Go test. Association of BP and dementia incidence with concomitant consideration of physical frailty was investigated using Cox hazards analyses.

RESULTS

The risks of Alzheimer's and vascular dementia increased from systolic BP ≥ 160 and 130-139 mmHg, respectively; a significant association of dementia incidence with low BP was not observed. In the analyses stratified by the physical frailty status, low BP was not associated with increased risks of dementia within the groups both with and without physical frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

High BP was associated with increased risks of dementia, especially for vascular dementia, while low BP was not associated with increased risks of any type of dementia in young elderly people, even in those with physical frailty. This study suggests the need for tight BP control in young elderly people, irrespective of frailty status, to prevent dementia and supports the current clinical guidelines of hypertension treatment.

Efficacy of Repetitive Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation for Patients with Parkinson's Disease: a Randomised Controlled Trial

We evaluated the effect of repetitive trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (rTSMS) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in a randomised, single-blind study. Participants were hospitalised and administered a single trial of rTSMS or sham treatment 2 days a week for 4 weeks. In addition, all participants underwent rehabilitation 5 days a week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the difference between the two groups in the mean change from baseline to post-training in the total score on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Secondary endpoints included the differences between the two groups in the mean change on the UPDRS part III (motor) score and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) score. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to either the rTSMS group (n = 50) or sham group (n = 50). The between-group difference in mean change in the total UPDRS score was 10.28 (95% confidence interval (CI), 4.42 to 16.13; P = 0.014) immediately after intervention from baseline, 5.04 (95% CI, - 5.41 to 15.50; P = 0.024) 3 months after intervention from baseline and 2.38 (95% CI, 7.18 to 11.85; P = 0.045) 6 months after intervention from baseline. Significant differences between groups in UPDRS part III and TUG scores were maintained more strictly than those in the UPDRS total score. These results strongly indicate that rTSMS promotes the effect of rehabilitation on motor function in patients with PD.