Percutaneous rhinolift procedure for droopy tip

OBJECTIVE

Droopy tip may lead to functional impairment due to nasal valve insufficiency. There are several techniques available in order to correct under rotated tip, including sutures, resection and grafting. The major drawback of these standart procedures is the correction of nasal cartilage framework rather than droopy skin envelope. In this study, we demonstrated the long-term results of percutaneous rhinolift procedure which aids in the correction of cartilage framework position and droopy skin at the same time, in patients who had isolated nasal tip ptosis.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with nasal tip ptosis who underwent rhinolift procedure under local anesthesia, between September 2016 and February 2017, included in the study. Nasal obstruction was evaluated by Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before the procedure, and 1st month and 3rd month after the procedure. Long-term follow-up scores were also analyzed.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between preoperative NOSE scores and 1st, 3rd month and long-term follow-up scores (p < 0.001). When we analyzed the VAS scores of patients, there was significant difference between preoperative scores and 1st month, 3rd month and long-term follow-up scores (p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Suspension sutures have been used to hang and lift the ptotic tissues of nasal tip. In this study, we found that rhinolift procedure is an effective method for droopy nasal tip cases especially with excess skin volume who cannot undergo a major invasive surgical operation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

It is a conservative and cheap method which does not require general anesthesia.

Double Columellar Strut: A New Method for Tip Surgery-A Study of 642 Cases with a 15-Year Follow-up

GOAL

Of the first nasal tip modeling procedures performed, the Anderson tripod concept is the most well known, and many anatomy-related studies have analyzed the components involved in tip surgery. The main goals of nasal tip surgery are to stabilize the tip complex, which largely affects the shape, projection and rotation of the nasal tip.

OBJECTIVE

The present study describes a new, original method, the double columellar strut and its main advantages compared to conventional techniques used for structural rhinoplasty.

METHODS

The study involved 642 patients (496 women and 146 men, with an average age of 38.67 years) who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2018 by two operators. The patients were re-examined to evaluate the outcomes at least 1 year after surgery, and long-term results (15 years) were recorded for the oldest patients in regard to esthetics (projection, shape, rotation) and breathing function.

RESULTS

Of the 642 patients, 34 required a surgical revision for minor defects of the tip due to asymmetry, and the natural appearance after the first surgery was not affected. For the primary rhinoplasties, there were no breathing disorders that required revision surgery due to systematic restoration or preservation of the middle third.

CONCLUSION

The double columellar strut could be performed in the same conditions that the others conventional structural grafts. As a polyvalent alternative, it can be used with closed or open approaches and involves the use of only a limited amount of cartilaginous material. This anatomical approach yields natural results, acting as a foundation for controlling the shape, projection and rotation of the nasal tip. In addition, with or without complementary techniques such as the "tongue-in-groove" technique or tip grafts, the double columellar strut can be considered a "multifunction pocket knife" for tip surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Evaluation of Nasal Tip Support in Septorhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

A good understanding of nasal tip support mechanisms is essential for achieving successful and functional rhinoplasty results. The loss of nasal tip support resulting from different maneuvers adopted during rhinoplasty and how this loss is affected by reconstructive applications should be known. This study evaluated and compared changes in nasal tip support perioperatively after different techniques were used during septorhinoplasty.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary open rhinoplasty between January 2018 and March 2018 in a tertiary medical center were included in this prospective blind case series. Nasal tip resistance measurements were taken after perioperative maneuvers by creating enough force to achieve 1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm of displacement at the tip region. Measurements were obtained during six different stages using a Newton meter: preoperatively, after caudal septal resection, after skin flap elevation, after the columellar strut or tongue-in-groove procedure, after tip suturing and postoperatively. Our hypothesis was that during septorhinoplasty, each maneuver used changes the tip support intraoperatively. The predictor variables were the different rhinoplasty techniques used. The outcome variable was nasal tip resistance to compression intraoperatively and immediate postoperatively. Appropriate statistics were computed, and a p < 0.05 value was considered significant.

RESULTS

Ten of the 15 patients were female, and 5 were male. The patient age ranged from 19 to 40 (mean 24.8 ± 4.9). The tongue-in-groove technique was applied in 5 of the patients, while columellar strut grafting was performed in 10. The application of columellar strut grafting did not create a significant increase in nasal tip support (p > 0.05). An increase in nasal tip support was observed at each stage (85%, 53%, 35%) after application of the tongue-in-groove technique (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A novel and reproducible technique for digitally evaluating manual force is presented for determining changes in nasal tip support with different maneuvers applied in living patients undergoing rhinoplasty. No significant difference was noted between the preoperative and postoperative measurements for columellar strut grafting. The tongue-in-groove technique is an important maneuver that has a significant effect on nasal tip support. According to our data, the interdomal and intercrural ligaments, the medial crus-septum connections and the connections between alar cartilage and overlying skin and muscle tissue are important structures for tip support.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Hump Nose Correction in Asians

Nasal hump surgery is frequently regarded as a reduction surgery in most Western rhinoplasty textbooks and referred to as reduction rhinoplasty. Most Asian hump noses have a small hump frequently associated with a low nasal dorsum and underprojection of the nasal tip. Correcting a hump nose in Asians has distinct differences in concept and technique. A small hump and additional need for augmentation of the dorsum and the tip often minimizes the amount of hump removal or obviates resection itself. Characteristics of the Asian hump nose with emphasis on surgical techniques commonly used to obtain reliable results are presented.

Approach to the correction of drooping tip: common problems and solutions

The drooping tip deformity is both a bothersome aesthetic feature and functional impairment of the nose. Both static and dynamic factors may affect tip appearance and it seems logical to take into account these factors when planning correction of drooping tip. Many studies have examined this topic, but its treatment remains controversial. In order to make nasal tip surgery successful, it is useful to identify the keystone anatomical characteristics of the tip itself. Naso-labial angle, nostril axis, tip rotation angle according to Frankfort plane and columellar-facial angle may be measured to assess nasal tip position. The present study focuses on the authors' personal experience on the key anatomic changes of the nose that deserve correction and on the main surgical steps needed to achieve consistent results when dealing with a drooping tip. Pre- and post-operative nasal tip rotation and projection were studied. Correction of the drooping tip was accomplished by an open or closed septorhinoplasty approach according to patient's needs. The surgical techniques mostly employed for tip repositioning was septum straightening (41/41) and tongue-in-groove (36/41 cases) (87.8%). A columellar strut was used in 8/41 (19.51%) cases. LLC cephalic resection was applied in 29/41 patients (70.73%), LLC re-orienting sutures were made in 18/41 cases (43.9%) and lateral crural overlay was needed in 2/41 (4.8%). The key anatomic changes of the nose that deserve correction and the surgical steps needed to ease the often intriguing pre-operative decision-making process are reviewed.

[Correction of the broad nasal tip]

AIM OF STUDY

The multiple techniques, the accurate examination and the checking of the various anatomic components (skin, cartilage resistance) could explain the difficulty for the surgeon to choose a main line, achieving the purpose of perfect and permanent results. Facing this complexity, the goal of this study is to plan step by step, using a simple and original technique in order to correct a broad nose.

METHODS

The modification of the nasal tip includes resection techniques, currently the most used, the cartilaginous reshaping with sutures or onlay grafts and more recently the reinforcement structures approach by inlay grafts. Basically, there are 3 important stages in the performing of a new nose tip: projection and rotation control of the tip, nasal base stability and reshaping of the tip. The author reports an original technique for the control of the tip projection and reshaping the middle crus with two cartilaginous grafts disposed on the external side of the medial crus. These two grafts permit both improving naturally the support of the tip and stabilizing the columella, avoiding the classical median columellar strut.

RESULTS

Through a ten-year experience with 203 cases, every patient result was analyzed and criticized. All the cases were reviewed after 2 years at least, and the unwanted effects were noted. Nineteen patients have had a secondary rhinoplasty (11%), 4 for a revision tip surgery (2%). There is no respiratory dysfunction and more than 90% of patients are satisfied for their aesthetic result. We think that the main problems as resection techniques with skin or mucosa retraction, unpredictable long-term effect on the tip, unknown future of the grafts, especially onlay grafts responsible sometimes for unpleasant irregularities, could be minimized with this procedure. The more the nasal tip is stabilized, the more the results are better and longer lasting.

CONCLUSION

The surgery of the nose tip is focused not only with shaping procedures of the middle or lateral crus. The technique reported is very simple and safety for the nasal tip surgery through a modification and/or a reinforcement of the initial structure, maximizing the contact between skin and anatomical component and economizing the interposition of a cartilage graft as far as possible. It is a new concept including respect of the anatomy, and stability, which are the best guarantee for a durable result.