Bone microarchitecture and estimated failure load are deteriorated whether patients with chronic kidney disease have normal bone mineral density, osteopenia or osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) is recommended in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, most persons in the community and most patients with CKD have osteopenia, suggesting fracture risk is low. Bone loss compromises bone microarchitecture which increases fragility disproportionate to modest deficits in BMD. We therefore hypothesized that patients with CKD have reduced estimated failure load due to deterioration in microarchitecture irrespective of whether they have normal femoral neck (FN) BMD, osteopenia or osteoporosis.

METHODS

We measured distal tibial and distal radial microarchitecture in 128 patients with CKD and 275 age- and sex-matched controls using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, FN-BMD using bone densitometry and estimated failure load at the distal appendicular sites using finite element analysis.

RESULTS

Patients versus controls respectively had: lower tibial cortical area 219 (40.7) vs. 237 (35.3) mm², p = 0.002, lower cortical volumetric BMD 543 (80.7) vs. 642 (81.7) mgHA/cm³ due to higher porosity 69.6 (6.19) vs. 61.9 (6.48)% and lower matrix mineral density 64.2 (0.62) vs. 65.1 (1.28)%, lower trabecular vBMD 92.2 (41.1) vs. 149 (43.0) mgHA/cm³ due to fewer and spatially disrupted trabeculae, lower FN-BMD 0.78 (0.12) vs. 0.94 (0.14) g/cm² and reduced estimated failure load 3825 (1152) vs. 5778 (1467) N, all p < 0.001. Deterioration in microarchitecture and estimated failure load was most severe in patients and controls with osteoporosis. Patients with CKD with osteopenia and normal FN-BMD had more deteriorated tibial microarchitecture and estimated failure load than controls with BMD in the same category. In univariate analyses, microarchitecture and FN-BMD were both associated with estimated failure load. In multivariable analyses, only microarchitecture was independently associated with estimated failure load and accounted for 87% of the variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone fragility is likely to be present in patients with CKD despite them having osteopenia or normal BMD. Measuring microarchitecture may assist in targeting therapy to those at risk of fracture.

Effects of intra-articular corticosteroid injections on lumbar trabecular density

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of intra-articular corticosteroid injections on lumbar spine trabecular density.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was IRB-approved and HIPAA-compliant. We identified 50 patients (26 F, 24 M, mean age 69 ± 14 years) who had undergone at least three medium or large joint corticosteroid injections using insoluble corticosteroids and a subsequent non-contrast abdominal CT within 5 years of the first injection. About 126 age- and sex-matched controls without history of prior corticosteroid use who had undergone non-contrast abdominal CT were identified. Cumulative corticosteroid dose was calculated. Density measurements (HU) of trabecular bone of L1 to L4 were performed, and measurements of L1 were compared to established normative data. Groups were compared using a two-sided paired t-test or a chi-squared test. Linear regression analysis between cumulative corticosteroid dose and trabecular density was performed.

RESULTS

Patients underwent a mean of 4 corticosteroid injections (range 3 to 11) with a mean cumulative corticosteroid dose of 232 ± 100 mg triamcinolone equivalent (range 120 mg to 480 mg). There was no significant difference in trabecular density of L1 to L4 between cases and controls, and there was no significant difference in trabecular density at L1 compared to normative data (p > 0.2). There was no association between cumulative intra-articular corticosteroid dose and mean lumbar trabecular density (p > 0.3).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent repetitive intra-articular insoluble corticosteroid injections showed no increased risk of bone loss compared to controls. Cumulative intra-articular corticosteroid dose was not associated with lumbar trabecular density.

A case-control pilot study of stress fracture in adolescent girls: the discriminative ability of two imaging technologies to classify at-risk athletes

Since stress fractures are common among adolescent athletes, it is important to identify bone assessment tools that accurately identify risk. We investigated the discriminative ability of two imaging technologies to classify at-risk athletes. Findings suggested that peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) has the ability to distinguish differences in bone structure in injured vs. uninjured limbs.

INTRODUCTION

Given the high stress fracture (SFX) prevalence among adolescent girls, an understanding of the most informative assessment tools to identify SFX risks are required. We investigated the discriminative ability of pQCT vs. dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to classify athletes with or without SFX.

METHODS

Twelve adolescent athletes diagnosed with a lower-extremity SFX were compared with 12 matched controls. DXA measured areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and content of the total body, and lumbar spine. Bilateral tibiae were assessed with pQCT. At the metaphysis (3%), total density (ToD), trabecular density (TrD), trabecular area (TrA), and estimated bone strength in compression (BSIc), and at the diaphysis (38% and 66%), total bone area (ToA), cortical density (CoD), cortical area (CoA), estimated bone strength in torsion (SSIp), and peri- and endocortical and muscle area (MuA) were obtained. Cortical bone mass/density around the center of mass and marrow density (estimate of adiposity) were calculated using ImageJ software. General estimated equations adjusting for multiple comparisons (Holm-Bonferroni method) were used to compare means between (1) injured limb of the case athletes vs. uninjured limb of the control athletes and (2) uninjured limb of the case athletes vs. uninjured limbs of the controls and injured vs. uninjured limb of case athletes with a SFX.

RESULTS

aBMD and content showed no significant differences between cases and controls. When comparing the injured vs. uninjured leg in the case athletes by pQCT at the 3% tibia, unadjusted TrD, total density, and BSIc were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the injured vs. uninjured leg. Marrow density at the 66% site was 1% (p < 0.05) lower in the injured vs. uninjured leg.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary data in athletes with SFX suggest that pQCT has the ability to distinguish differences in bone structure in injured vs. uninjured limbs. No discriminative bone parameter classifications were identified between adolescent athletes with or without SFX.