Advances in treatment strategies for COVID-19: Insights from other coronavirus diseases and prospects

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is the third human disease outbreak caused by an emerging coronavirus in the 21st century. Caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the COVID-19 pandemic has been the most devastating, with millions of deaths. Medical countermeasures are needed to limit the number of infections and fatalities. Here, we discuss advances in clinical and research-based treatment methods for SARS-CoV-2 that were initially derived from treatments for other coronaviruses. Recent advances in SARS-CoV-2 treatments, from traditional drugs and immunotherapies to artificial intelligence to predict potential future treatment methods, are summarized and discussed.

Real Clinical Practice and Therapeutic Management Following COVID-19 Crisis in two Hospitals in Iran: A Statistical and Conceptual View

BACKGROUND

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak quickly has spread and became a pandemic. However, no approved therapeutics or effective treatment is available for the treatment of these patients. The present study was done to retrospectively assess the treatment strategies (e.g., pharmaceutical care services) for COVID-19 patients in selected hospitals and highlight the importance of such services in the management of a pandemic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from a series of COVID-19 patients (978 patients; 658 males [66.9%] and 324 females [33.1%]) admitted to the selected hospitals in Tehran from 20 February to 19 March 2020 were retrieved retrospectively from the Health Information System (HIS) of the hospitals. The statistical tests were used for analyzing the effect and correlation of the variables (drugs) with the average length of stay (ALOS) in the hospital.

RESULTS

Diverse medication classes and old drugs with or without strong evidence of therapeutic effects against the novel coronavirus, some previously tried as a treatment for SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, were mostly used for the treatment of patients in the hospitals. Many medications (broad-spectrum antibiotics and antivirals) or combination therapies are used without evidence of their therapeutic effects during pandemics.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, guidelines should be provided for the off-label use of these drugs by policymakers and stakeholders during a pandemic emergency due to high demands. Also, monitoring of the HIS data can play an important role in improving public health response to emerging diseases.

Impact of Different Operative Techniques for Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis on Frontal Curve Correction and Sagittal Balance

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from the posterior approach can be performed by the "all screws" technique; hybrid technique with screws and hooks; hybrid technique or with screws, hooks, and tapes; or selective fusion (SF) or nonselective fusion (NSF). The aim of the present investigation was to analyze the influence from different operative techniques on frontal curve correction and sagittal profile in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis on 55 consecutive patients with scoliosis who had been treated by posterior instrumented fusion. We collected demographic data and analyzed pre- and postoperative radiographs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25. Because data showed normal distribution, t tests were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were treated using the hybrid technique with screws and hooks; 25 were treated using the hybrid technique with screws, hooks, and tape; and 8 were treated using the all screws technique. An SF was performed in 32 patients and NSF in 23 patients. There was no significant difference with regard to curve correction of the main curve between the different techniques. Correction of the minor curve was significantly higher in NSF than in SF patients. In SF, there was a correction of the minor curve of 43.9%. Impact on sagittal balance showed no significant differences between NSF and SF.

CONCLUSION

The different operative techniques did not show a difference with regard to the correction of the main curve. NSF showed a significantly higher degree of correction of the minor curve than SF. However, we still found a correction of 43.9% of the noninstrumented minor curve in SF. Thus, SF and hybrid techniques do not lead to inferior radiographic outcome.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

SF and hybrid techniques are safe and effective techniques that could be used as an alternative to NSF and all screw fixation in the operative treatment for scoliosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Invasive Cervical Root Resorption: A Comprehensive Review on Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Invasive cervical root resorption (ICRR) is a dental pathology, marked by unexpected destruction originating in the cervical region of the tooth. This comprehensive literature review provides a holistic view into the pathogenesis, clinical manifestation, and precise management of ICRR, aiming to guide endodontists and enhance patient care and treatment outcomes. The review delves into the potential etiology of ICRR, covering contributing factors such as trauma, orthodontic treatment, and other pertinent conditions. It outlines the clinical and radiographic indicators, underscoring the crucial role of early detection and precise diagnosis in effectively managing and halting ICRR progression. The exploration of treatment approaches is thorough, ranging from non-surgical methods like vital pulp therapy or root canal treatment to surgical interventions. This review accentuates the essential role of interdisciplinary collaboration among diverse dental specialties in enhancing ICRR management. It highlights the importance of a consolidated strategy in enhancing treatment outcomes and preserving tooth structure and function. Moreover, it investigates prevention methods, risk evaluation, and identifies prospective research pathways to address the existing knowledge gaps.