The Role of Ureaplasma and Mycoplasma Species in Recurrent Lower Urinary Tract Infection in Females: A Scoping Review

It is unknown if recurrent urinary tract infection in the gynecologic population is associated with Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma genitourinary infections. The purpose of this scoping review is to highlight the literature surrounding Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma infections in the setting of recurrent urinary tract infections in the gynecologic population. MEDLINE ALL and Embase were searched to retrieve articles published in or after 1950 through 2024. Studies included were those with adults over age 18, non-pregnant, diagnosed with recurrent urinary tract infection and concurrent genitourinary infection with Ureaplasma or Mycoplasma published in English. Study designs eligible were quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies. Publication types were also extended to conference abstracts and unpublished data. 2 independent investigators systematically performed title/abstract screening and full-text review using standardized inclusion criteria. For disagreements in either title and abstracts or full-text articles, consensus was reached through discussion by the 2 screeners and/or a 3rd final adjudicator. Screening and data extraction were performed on Covidence, a web-based platform for systematic review management. There were 1170 studies identified before title and abstract screening. 26 full-text articles were reviewed for eligibility. Of these, 23 full-text studies were excluded. 3 studies met full inclusion criteria and data extraction was performed on these 3 studies. There were 2 additional studies included after identification via other methods. There is a need for more recent and robust studies examining the role of Ureaplasma and Mycoplasma genitourinary infections amongst gynecologic patients with recurrent urinary tract infections.

The urogenital microbiome in chronic kidney disease patients on peritoneal dialysis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Diabetes, dyslipidemia, older age, gender, urinary tract infections, and recent antibiotic intake have been associated with a decrease in the urobiome richness and other fluctuations in this microbiome. Gut and blood microbiome have been reported to be altered in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and specifically in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Still, there are currently no studies describing the urogenital microbiome in CKD-PD patients. In this study we characterized the urobiome profile in 46 PD patients and analyzed its clinical and inflammatory parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mid-stream urine, fecal and blood samples were collected from 46 patients undergoing PD at Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João (CHUSJ) in Porto, Portugal. Exclusion criteria were age under 18 years old, inability to give informed consent, history of infection in the last three months, and antibiotic intake in the last three months. The microbiome communities were analyzed by amplification and sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. Correlations with the patients' clinical data and inflammatory profile were performed.

RESULTS

CKD-PD patients presented a unique urobiome profile dominated by Bacillota, Actinomycetota and Pseudomonadota and characterized by a lower Shannon diversity than fecal and blood microbiome. The taxonomic profiles of urogenital samples were organized in multiple subtypes dominated by populations of Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Gardnerella, Prevotella, Escherichia-Shigella, being similar to other non-PD-CKD patients. Gender, sCD14, residual diuresis and history of peritonitis were significantly associated to variations in the urobiome. Although not reaching statistical significance, diabetes and the time on PD also showed association with particular taxonomic groups. Depletion of Gardnerella, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Lactobacillus or Dermabacter populations correlated with CKD-PD patients with history of diabetes, history of peritonitis and altered levels of sCD14.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight urogenital microbiome as a potential partner and/or marker in the overall health state of CKD-PD patients.

A pilot study using unique targeted testing of the urogenital microbiome has potential as a predictive test during IVF for implantation outcome

PURPOSE

This pilot study aimed to develop a methodology characterising the urogenital microbiome as a predictive test in the IVF workup.

METHODS

Using unique custom qPCRs, we tested for the presence of specific microbial species from vaginal samples and First Catch Urines from the male. The test panel included a range of potential urogenital pathogens, STIs, 'favourable bacteria' (Lactobacillus spp.) and 'unfavourable bacteria' (anaerobes) reported to influence implantation rates. We tested couples attending Fertility Associates, Christchurch, New Zealand for their first round of IVF.

RESULTS

We found that some microbial species affected implantation. The qPCR result was interpreted qualitatively using the Z proportionality test. Samples from women at the time of Embryo Transfer who did not achieve implantation had significantly higher percent of samples that were positive for Prevotella bivia and Staphylococcus aureus compared to women who did achieve implantation.

DISCUSSION

The results provide evidence that most other microbial species chosen for testing had little functional effect on implantation rates. The addition of further microbial targets (yet to be determined) could be combined in this predictive test for vaginal preparedness on the day of embryo transfer. This methodology has a substantial advantage of being affordable and easily performed in any routine molecular laboratory. This methodology is most suitable as a foundation on which to develop a timely test of microbiome profiling. Using the indicators detected to have a significant influence, these results can be extrapolated.

CONCLUSION

Using a rapid antigen test, a woman can self-sample prior to embryo transfer and obtain an indication of microbial species present which could influence implantation outcome.