BRAFV600E;K601Q metastatic melanoma patient-derived organoids and docking analysis to predict the response to targeted therapy

The V600E mutation in BRAF is associated with increased phosphorylation of Erk1/2 and high sensitivity to BRAFi/MEKi combination in metastatic melanoma. In very few patients, a tandem mutation in BRAF, V600 and K601, causes a different response to BRAFi/MEKi combination. BRAF^V600E;K601Q patient-derived organoids (PDOs) were generated to investigate targeted therapy efficacy and docking analysis was used to assess BRAF^V600E;K601Q interactions with Vemurafenib. PDOs were not sensitive to Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib given alone and sensitive to their combination, although not as responsive as BRAF^V600E PDOs. The docking analysis justified such a result showing that the tandem mutation in BRAF reduced the affinity for Vemurafenib. Tumor analysis showed that BRAF^V600E;K601Q displayed both increased phosphorylation of Erk1/2 at cytoplasmic level and activation of Notch resistance signaling. This prompted us to inhibit Notch signaling with Nirogacestat, achieving a greater antitumor response and providing PDOs-based evaluation of treatment efficacy in such rare metastatic melanoma.

Immunomodulatory effects of BRAF and MEK inhibitors: Implications for Melanoma therapy

Targeted therapy with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) and MEK inhibitors (MEKi) provides rapid disease control with high response rates in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. However, the majority of patients develop resistance to therapy during the course of therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors show a slower onset of action with lower response rates, with responders showing sustained response. The combination of BRAFi/MEKi and immune checkpoint inhibitors combines the hope for a fast, reliable and lasting response to therapy. Preclinical data supports this hypothesis. With the help of the PubMed database, a comprehensive search and analysis of preclinical and clinical studies on the combination of BRAFi/MEKi with immune checkpoint inhibitors was performed and yielded the following results: 1) In vivo, BRAFi and MEKi have no negative effects on immune cells; BRAFi and MEKi generate 2) an immune stimulating tumor microenvironment, 3) an increased infiltration of immune cells into the tumors, 4) a better recognition of melanoma cells by immune effector cells, and 5) a better functionality of the immune effector cells. In addition, in vivo experiments 6) demonstrated a superiority of the combination treatment compared to the individual strategies in both BRAF-mutant and BRAF wild-type melanomas. In summary, available data show that both BRAFi and MEKi have beneficial effects on the antitumor immunity and the tumor microenvironment as a whole, which is mediated by different mechanisms. Currently, clinical studies are underway to investigate combinations of BRAFi and MEKi with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The results of these studies are eagerly awaited.

BRAF-mutated cells activate GCN2-mediated integrated stress response as a cytoprotective mechanism in response to vemurafenib

In BRAF-mutated melanoma cells, the BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib, induces phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) and subsequent induction of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), the central regulation node of the integrated stress response (ISR). While the ISR supports cellular adaptation to various stresses, the role of vemurafenib-triggered ISR has not been fully characterized. Here, we showed that in response to vemurafenib, BRAF-mutated melanoma and colorectal cancer cells rapidly induced the ISR as a cytoprotective mechanism through activation of general control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2), an eIF2α kinase sensing amino acid levels. The vemurafenib-triggered ISR, an event independent of downstream MEK inhibition, was specifically prevented by silencing GCN2, but not other eIF2α kinases, including protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase, which transmits endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Consistently, the ER stress gatekeeper, GRP78, was not induced by vemurafenib. Interestingly, ATF4 silencing by siRNA rendered BRAF-mutated melanoma cells sensitive to vemurafenib. Thus, the GCN2-mediated ISR can promote cellular adaptation to vemurafenib-induced stress, providing an insight into the development of drug resistance.

3D cell culture systems modeling tumor growth determinants in cancer target discovery

Phenotypic heterogeneity of cancer cells, cell biological context, heterotypic crosstalk and the microenvironment are key determinants of the multistep process of tumor development. They sign responsible, to a significant extent, for the limited response and resistance of cancer cells to molecular-targeted therapies. Better functional knowledge of the complex intra- and intercellular signaling circuits underlying communication between the different cell types populating a tumor tissue and of the systemic and local factors that shape the tumor microenvironment is therefore imperative. Sophisticated 3D multicellular tumor spheroid (MCTS) systems provide an emerging tool to model the phenotypic and cellular heterogeneity as well as microenvironmental aspects of in vivo tumor growth. In this review we discuss the cellular, chemical and physical factors contributing to zonation and cellular crosstalk within tumor masses. On this basis, we further describe 3D cell culture technologies for growth of MCTS as advanced tools for exploring molecular tumor growth determinants and facilitating drug discovery efforts. We conclude with a synopsis on technological aspects for on-line analysis and post-processing of 3D MCTS models.