At a glance: a guide to venepuncture in adults

This article will provide clinical guidance on carrying out venepuncture on an adult. It will discuss site, equipment selection and aseptic non-touch technique. The aims are to increase knowledge of the anatomical structures associated with venepuncture, demonstrate the clinical procedural technique of venepuncture, and provide an awareness of the dangers and complications of this invasive technique.

Can virtual reality headsets be used safely as a distraction method for paediatric orthopaedic patients? A feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Virtual reality (VR) has been shown to decrease pain and anxiety in clinical areas. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of 'Rescape DR.VR Junior' headset as a distraction method for paediatric orthopaedic patients.

METHODS

An internal risk assessment by medical engineers to determine its safety deemed the device safe to be used only in the venepuncture and plaster rooms, while further investigation is needed to establish its safety in the operating theatre/anaesthetic room. A total of 32 children (age range: 2-15 years) took the option to use the device while they underwent venepuncture or a cast procedure. Anxiety scores, measured on a Likert scale, were collected pre and postprocedure. Participants were asked if they would use the device again. Subjective feedback was also collated from the supervising clinical staff.

RESULTS

A total of 66% (21) showed a reduction in anxiety scores, 28% (9) had no change in score; all scores being mild, 1-3 on the Likert scale; 6% (2) showed an increase in postprocedure score. All participants stated they would use the device again. One patient declined the device. Health professionals also gave positive subjective feedback and they would all use it again with their paediatric patients. No adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSION

The 'Rescape DR.VR Junior' headset has been found to be a safe and feasible distraction method for use in children in the venepuncture and plaster room. Further research is required to assess its safety and effectiveness in other clinical areas, including the paediatric orthopaedic operating theatre.

Management of difficult intravenous access: a qualitative review

BACKGROUND

A perennial challenge faced by clinicians and made even more relevant with the global obesity epidemic, difficult intravenous access (DIVA) adversely impacts patient outcomes by causing significant downstream delays with many aspects of diagnoses and therapy. As most published DIVA strategies are limited to various point-of-care ultrasound techniques while other "tricks-of-the-trade" and pearls for overcoming DIVA are mostly relegated to informal nonpublished material, this article seeks to provide a narrative qualitative review of the iterature on DIVA and consolidate these strategies into a practical algorithm.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search on PubMed using the keywords "difficult intravenous access", "peripheral vascular access" and "peripheral venous access" and searched emergency medicine and anaesthesiology resources for relevant material. These strategies were then categorized and incorporated into a DIVA algorithm.

RESULTS

We propose a Vortex approach to DIVA that is modelled after the Difficult Airway Vortex concept starting off with standard peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) techniques, progressing sequentially on to ultrasound-guided cannulation and central venous cannulation and finally escalating to the most invasive intraosseous access should the patient be in extremis or should best efforts with the other lifelines fail.

CONCLUSION

DIVA is a perennial problem that healthcare providers across various disciplines will be increasingly challenged with. It is crucial to have a systematic stepwise approach such as the DIVA Vortex when managing such patients and have at hand a wide repertoire of techniques to draw upon.

Can virtual reality headsets be used safely as a distraction method for paediatric orthopaedic patients? A feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Virtual reality (VR) has been shown to decrease pain and anxiety in clinical areas. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of 'Rescape DR.VR Junior' headset as a distraction method for paediatric orthopaedic patients.

METHODS

An internal risk assessment by medical engineers to determine its safety deemed the device safe to be used only in the venepuncture and plaster rooms, while further investigation is needed to establish its safety in the operating theatre/anaesthetic room. A total of 32 children (age range: 2-15 years) took the option to use the device while they underwent venepuncture or a cast procedure. Anxiety scores, measured on a Likert scale, were collected pre and postprocedure. Participants were asked if they would use the device again. Subjective feedback was also collated from the supervising clinical staff.

RESULTS

A total of 66% (21) showed a reduction in anxiety scores, 28% (9) had no change in score; all scores being mild, 1-3 on the Likert scale; 6% (2) showed an increase in postprocedure score. All participants stated they would use the device again. One patient declined the device. Health professionals also gave positive subjective feedback and they would all use it again with their paediatric patients. No adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSION

The 'Rescape DR.VR Junior' headset has been found to be a safe and feasible distraction method for use in children in the venepuncture and plaster room. Further research is required to assess its safety and effectiveness in other clinical areas, including the paediatric orthopaedic operating theatre.

Vasovagal reactions following venepuncture result in aberrant stress-induced cortisol levels

Venepuncture is recognized as a potent stressor and, by activating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, can interfere with measuring subsequent HPA axis indices such as cortisol. A resting period of 110 min is recommended between venepuncture and the commencement of psychosocial stress induction or cortisol measurement to allow cortisol levels to return to baseline first. In experiment 1 (n = 65), in which stress induction occurred 120 min after venepuncture, we observed three cortisol stress response patterns: conventional response ("responders", 77%), conventional non-response ("non-responders", 6.15%), and aberrant non-response characterized by high baseline (pre-stress) cortisol levels ("high-baseliners", 16.9%). Based on subjective clinical observation, the aberrant non-response was exclusively present in those who experienced vasovagal reactions during venepuncture, ranging from nervousness, lightheadedness, nausea, feeling of being extremely hot or cold, confusion, slight inability to speak, weakness and visual disturbances, to loss of consciousness (syncope). In experiment 2 (n = 79), we showed that allowing 210 min between venepuncture and stress induction permits the return of cortisol levels back to baseline even in participants who experience vasovagal reactions, thereby allowing for the exhibition of a conventional cortisol stress response. In sum, while 110 min may be sufficient to circumvent the usual effects of venepuncture on cortisol levels, 210 min are needed to effectively adjust for the effects of venepuncture-induced vasovagal reactions and the subsequent sustained rise in cortisol. Allowing sufficient time between venepuncture and stress induction or cortisol measurement should also prevent misclassification of participants who show aberrant responses as non-responders or anticipatory responders.

A method to produce high contrast vein visualization in active dynamic thermography (ADT)

In this study, a method that will aid in the visualization of vein topology on a target area on the body of a human subject is demonstrated. An external cooling means is configured to cool the left forearm of fourteen study participants, effecting an active thermal change or recovery in the target area upon removal of cooling. An infrared (IR) thermal camera was used to capture a series of transient thermal images. These images were then processed to extract Dynamic synthetic images (SI) throughout the active thermal change or recovery process. Dynamic SI was calculated using a quantitative parameter called tissue activity ratio (TAR), which is defined by the rate of rewarming to the rate of cooling at each pixel of interest. A fixed step size of rewarming temperature (0.5 °C) was used to progressively extract multiple synthetic images throughout the whole recovery process. Compared to a Static SI extraction method, where only a single SI results from the whole active dynamic thermography (ADT) sequence, this study demonstrates a live feed of high contrast vein visualizations by using the Dynamic SI method. Furthermore, the dependency of Dynamic SI contrast on the temperature of the external cooling stimulation was investigated. Three cooling stimulation temperatures (5 °C, 8 °C, and 11 °C) were tested, where no statistically significant difference in the resulting SI contrast was found. Lastly, a discussion is put forth on assisting venipuncture or cannulation-based clinical applications, through the incorporation of the proposed method with a projection system.

Blood Pressure during Blood Collection and the Implication for Absolute Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

Background

Blood collection and blood pressure (BP) measurements are routinely performed during the same consultation to assess absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. This study aimed to determine the effect of blood collection on BP and subsequent calculation of the absolute CVD risk.

Methods

Forty-five participants aged 58 ± 9 years (53% male) had systolic BP (SBP) measured using clinical guideline methods (clinic SBP). Then, on a separate visit, BP was measured immediately before, during, and after blood collection. Absolute CVD risk scores were calculated (Framingham equation) using SBP from each measurement condition and compared.

Results

The prevalence of low (<10%), moderate (10-15%), and high (≥15%) absolute CVD risks among the participants was 67%, 22%, and 11%, respectively, using clinic SBP. SBP values before and during blood collection were significantly higher compared to values after blood collection (130 ± 18 and 132 ± 19 vs. 126 ± 18 mm Hg; p = 0.010 and p = 0.003, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between clinic SBP (128 ± 18 mm Hg) and blood collection SBP (p = 0.99) or the absolute CVD risk scores (7.3 ± 6.5; 7.6 ± 5.9; 7.7 ± 6.1; and 7.1 ± 5.7%, respectively; p = 0.995 for all). The mean intraclass correlation (95% CI) indicated good agreement between absolute CVD risk scores calculated with clinic SBP and each blood collection SBP (0.86 [95% CI 0.74-0.92], 0.85 [95% CI 0.71-0.91], and 0.87 [95% CI 0.76-0.93], respectively; p < 0.001, for all).

Conclusion

Absolute CVD risk calculation is not affected by use of SBP measurements recorded at the time of blood collection. Therefore, it is acceptable to collect blood and measure BP during the same consultation for absolute CVD risk assessment.

Blood sampled from existing peripheral IV cannulae yields results equivalent to venepuncture: a systematic review

Objectives

To establish whether blood samples taken from used peripheral intravenous cannulae are clinically interchangeable with venepuncture.

Design

Systematic review. PubMed, Web of Science and Embase were searched for relevant trials.

Setting

Trials which compared blood samples from used peripheral intravenous cannulae to venepuncture and provided limits of agreement or data which allowed calculation of limits of agreement.

Participants

Seven trials with 746 participants. Blood tests included 13 commonly ordered biochemistry, haematology and blood gas measurements.

Main outcome measures

95% limits of agreement. Data were pooled using inverse variance weighting and compared to a clinically acceptable range estimated by expert opinion from previous trials.

Results

Limits of agreement for blood samples from used peripheral intravenous cannulae were within the clinically acceptable range for sodium, chloride, urea, creatinine and haematology samples. Limits of agreement for potassium were ±0.47 mmol/L which exceeded the clinically acceptable range. Peripheral intravenous cannula samples for blood gas analysis gave limits of agreement which far exceeded the clinically acceptable range.

Conclusions

Blood sampling from used peripheral intravenous cannulae is a reasonable clinical practice for haematology and biochemistry samples. Potassium samples from used peripheral intravenous cannulae can be used in situations where error up to ±0.47 mmol/L is acceptable. Peripheral intravenous cannula samples should not be used for blood gas analysis.

Randomised controlled trial showed that neonates received better pain relief from a higher dose of sucrose during venepuncture

AIM

We compared the effect of two different doses of sucrose on neonatal pain scores during venepuncture.

METHODS

This randomised crossover study focused on neonates born weighing more than 1000 g from December 2014 to June 2016, who received neonatal intensive care at two hospitals: one in Empangeni, South Africa, and one in Trondheim, Norway. During two consecutive venepuncture procedures, 27 neonates from South Africa and 26 neonates from Norway were randomised to receive 0.2 mL or 0.5 mL sucrose. Half was administered two minutes before venepuncture and the rest immediately before the procedure. South Africa used 25% sucrose and Norway 24%. Pain scores were measured twice using the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised: during skin puncture and after the needle was removed.

RESULTS

The mean pain scores during skin puncture were significantly lower with 0.5 mL sucrose than with 0.2 mL (5.3 versus 6.8, p=0.008), but the mean pain scores after the needle was removed were similar with both doses (4.7 versus 5.4, p=0.29). We found no significant association between weight and pain scores.

CONCLUSION

We showed that neonates received better pain relief from 0.5 mL than 0.2 mL sucrose during venepuncture but not after the needle was removed.

A randomised crossover study to compare the cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches to ultrasound-guided peripheral venepuncture in a model

Background

Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access may present an alternative to central or intraosseous access in patients with difficult peripheral veins. Using venepuncture of a phantom model as a proxy, we investigated whether novice ultrasound users should adopt a cross-sectional or longitudinal approach when learning to access peripheral veins under ultrasound guidance. This result would inform the development of a structured training method for this procedure.

Methods

We conducted a randomised controlled trial of 30 medical students. Subjects received 35 min of training, then attempted to aspirate 1 ml of synthetic blood from a deep vein in a training model under ultrasound guidance. Subjects attempted both the cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. Group 1 used cross-sectional first, followed by longitudinal. Group 2 used longitudinal first, then cross-sectional. We measured the time from first puncture of the model’s skin to aspiration of fluid, and the number of attempts required. Subjects also reported difficulty ratings for each approach. Paired sample t-tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results

The mean number of attempts was 1.13 using the cross-sectional approach, compared with 1.30 using the longitudinal approach (p = 0.17). Mean time to aspiration of fluid was 45.1 s using the cross-sectional approach and 52.8 s using the longitudinal approach (p = 0.43). The mean difficulty score out of 10 was 3.97 for the cross-sectional approach and 3.93 for the longitudinal approach (p = 0.95).

Conclusions

We found no significant difference in effectiveness between the cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches to ultrasound-guided venepuncture when performed on a model. We believe that both approaches should be included when teaching ultrasound-guided peripheral vascular access. To confirm which approach would be best in clinical practice, we advocate future testing of both approaches on patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13089-017-0064-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Neonatal Pain And Preventive Strategies: An Experience In A Tertiary Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Little is known about neonatal pain in Pakistan. So, to know about neonatal pain, its scoring and the effectiveness of oral dextrose in neonatal pain management we carried this study in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of military hospital (MH) Rawalpindi.

METHODS

This randomized control trial was carried out in NICU of MH, Rawalpindi from Jan to Dec 2013. Total of 252 babies were enrolled in the study. We assessed neonatal pain by using Modified Behavioural Pain Scale (MBPS). Babies were given 10% dextrose and sterile water two minutes before a painful procedure and pain assessment was done after the procedure. The different painful procedures included, heel prick, nasogastric (NG) tube insertion, cannulation, catheterization and venepuncture for blood sampling.

RESULTS

A total of 252 babies were enrolled in the study. Of these 139 (55%) were male and 113 (45%) were female babies. Painful procedures included heel lancing 120 (48%), I/V cannulations 60 (24%), venepuncture 40 (16%), NG insertion 26 (10%) and Foley catheterization 6 (2%). Mean MBPS score with 10% dextrose and sterile water were 4.31 and 6.26 respectively and the difference between two was significant statically.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral dextrose is a cheap and easily available solution and can be used in neonatal pain management during various painful procedures.

Do venepuncture procedures induce cortisol responses? A review, study, and synthesis for stress research

Venepuncture procedures are frequently employed to continuously monitor humoral stress markers. As such procedures are conceived as "potent psychological and physiological stressors", there is a need to determine whether venepuncture procedures themselves elicit cortisol responses and if so, how to deal with them appropriately. In order to assess the rate of cortisol responses to venepuncture, we conducted a literature review, which suggested that venepuncture procedures induce cortisol responses with a probability of approximately 30%. By utilizing Bayesian analysis, this result was integrated with the cortisol data of 18 healthy men who were exposed to a venepuncture procedure twice (time lag: 1 week). The currently observed response rate of 47% differed substantially from the earlier findings, which we attribute to a self-selective sampling of participants. In addition, participants showing a response to the first venepuncture were highly likely to also show a response to the second one. In this regard, we discuss the presumed conditioning of cortisol responses to venepuncture procedures. To prevent the superposition of venepuncture-induced cortisol responses and responses induced by target stressors, we propose a time- and selection-based strategy: cortisol samples taken about 110min after venepuncture should be virtually adjusted for its superimposing effects. Furthermore, previous experiences of venepuncture were highly predictive for cortisol responsiveness. This association could be utilized in further studies to identify participants who will probably show a cortisol response to venepuncture.