Impact of hospital volume of valve operations on the utilization and outcomes of surgery for patients with infective endocarditis

AIMS

Valve surgery is indicated and can be life-saving in patients with infective endocarditis (IE). We evaluated the impact of hospital valvular surgery volume on utilization and outcomes of surgery for IE.

METHODS AND RESULTS

National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used for IE hospitalizations from 2008 to 2015. Hospitals were divided into quartiles based on valve surgery volume with quartile 1 (Q1) indicating lowest volume and quartile 4 (Q4) highest volume. Primary outcome was utilization of valve surgery in patients hospitalized with IE and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and length of stay for IE patients undergoing valve surgery. Volume-outcome relationship was analysed both as categorical (quartiles) and continuous variable (restricted cubic splines). A total of 36 471 hospitalizations for IE were identified using the NIS database from 2008 to 2015 of which 17.33% underwent any valve surgery. Utilization rates of valve surgery for IE were significantly higher in Q4 hospitals (Q1: 6.73%; Q2: 10.39%; Q3: 14.91%; Q4: 2321%). Amongst the admissions for IE endocarditis undergoing valve surgery, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality when analysed as a categorical variable (as quartiles). However, when analysed as a continuous variable we note significant variation in outcomes across the Q4 hospitals, with highest volume centres having reduced mortality rates and length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Hospital valvular surgery volume has direct impact on utilization and outcomes of surgery for IE. Given rising rates of IE and ongoing intravenous drug pandemic, there is need for regionalization of care for IE patients and development of 'endocarditis centres of excellence' for improved patient outcomes.

Relationship between volume and outcome for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia is a rare and life-threatening anomaly that occurs during fetal development and results in an incomplete or incorrect formation of the diaphragm. Surgical therapy of the diaphragm should be performed after clinical stabilization of the neonate. Higher hospital or surgeon volume has previously been found to be associated with better clinical outcomes for different especially high-risk, low-volume procedures. Therefore, we aim to examine the relationship between hospital or surgeon volume and outcomes for congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

METHODS

This systematic review protocol has been designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol. We will perform a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Biosis Previews without applying any limitations. In addition, we will search for relevant conference abstracts. We will screen titles and abstracts of retrieved studies, obtain potentially relevant full texts, and assess the eligibility of those full texts against our inclusion criteria. We will include comparative studies analyzing the relationship between hospital or surgeon volume and clinical outcomes. We will systematically assess risk of bias of included studies and extract data on the study design, patient characteristics, case-mix adjustments, statistical methods, hospital and surgeon volume, and outcomes into standardized tables. Title and abstract screening, full-text screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction of results will be conducted by two reviewers independently. Other data will be extracted by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by a second one. Any disagreements will be resolved by discussion. We will not perform a meta-analysis as we expect included studies to be clinically and methodologically very diverse. We will synthesize findings from primary studies in a structured narrative way and using GRADE.

DISCUSSION

Given the lack of a comprehensive summary of findings on the relationship between hospital or surgeon volume and outcomes for congenital diaphragmatic hernia, this systematic review will put things right. Results can be used to inform decision makers or clinicians and to adapt medical care.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ( CRD42018090231 ).

Effect of Hospital Volume on Success of Thumb Replantation

PURPOSE

Hospital volume-outcome association has been examined for many high-risk surgical procedures. Little is known about this association for thumb replantation, a complex but essential surgical procedure to restore hand function. We aimed to determine patient and hospital characteristics that are associated with increased probability of replanted thumb survival and to examine volume-outcome association among hospitals that performed thumb replantation.

METHODS

We used data from 2008 to 2012 from the National Trauma Data Bank. Our sample included 773 patients who underwent thumb replantation procedures in 1 of 180 hospitals during the study period. We used patient-level logistic models to examine the association between a hospital's annual thumb replantation volume and the probability of survival for the replanted thumb.

RESULTS

Patients with drug/alcohol abuse record, and higher numbers of comorbid conditions had lower odds of replant success. Treatment in teaching hospitals and hospitals with a higher volume of thumb replantation increased the odds of replant survival. The risk-adjusted replantation success rate in high-volume hospitals was 12% higher than in low-volume hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Regionalization of digit replantation procedures to high-volume centers can achieve the highest rate of successful revascularization.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic/Decision Analysis II.

Quality of care and volume for patients with diabetes mellitus in the primary care setting: A population based retrospective cohort study

AIMS

To examine the association of patient volume with quality of diabetes care in the primary care setting.

METHODS

We analyzed population-based data from Hospital Authority administrative database using a Hong Kong representative sample of 187,031 diabetic patients managed in 74 primary care general outpatient clinics between 04/2011 and 03/2012. We assessed the associations between annual clinic-based patient volume and quality of care in terms of adherence to care criteria of process (HbA1c test, renal function test, full lipid profile, urine protein analysis, diabetic retinopathy screening, and appropriate drug prescription) and clinical outcomes (HbA1c⩽7%, BP⩽130/80mmHg, LDL-C⩽2.6mmol/L) of care criteria, with and without adjustment for patient and clinic characteristics.

RESULTS

Patient volume was associated with three of seven process of care criteria; however, when compared to clinics in higher volume quartiles, those in lowest-volume quartile had more odds of HbA1c test (odds ratios (OR): 0.781, 0.655 and 0.646 for quartile from 2 to 4, respectively), renal function test (OR: 0.357, 0.367 and 0.590 for quartile from 2 to 4, respectively), and full lipid profile test (OR: 0.508, 0.612 and 0.793 for quartile from 2 to 4, respectively). There was no significant association between patient volume and the standards of achieving of HbA1c, BP and LDL-C outcome targets.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in volume and quality of diabetes care were observed in public primary care setting. Lower patient volumes at clinic level were associated with greater adherence to three process criteria but a volume-outcome association was not present.