An observational report of universal GeneXpert testing of inpatients with diagnosed or presumptive TB in the Philippines

Background

The Philippines is a high TB and multidrug-resistant TB burden country. Although the scale-up of GeneXpert testing is occurring, the benefits of universal Xpert-Mycobacterium tuberculosis/ rifampicin (MTB/RIF) testing in inpatients have not been documented.

Methods

Routine GeneXpert testing irrespective of priority criteria for testing was conducted within a prospective cohort of all adults with known or presumptive TB admitted to a tertiary infectious diseases hospital in Manila. Study-specific TB diagnosis was decided upon bacteriological results, chest x-ray assessment, if already on anti-TB treatment (ATT) at admission and a cough duration of ≥2 wk.

Results

Of submitted sputum samples, 87.1% (277/318) had valid acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy and Xpert® MTB/RIF results. Xpert® MTB/RIF was positive in 97.7% (n = 87/89) of AFB-positive patients and 25.5% (n = 48/188) of AFB-negative patients. Bacteriological confirmation in smear negative cases not on ATT prior to admission was 25.2% (34/135). Rifampicin resistance was detected in 26/135 Xpert positive cases (19.3%), including nine who might not otherwise have been detected, representing a 53% increase in yield.

Conclusion

Universal GeneXpert testing in this setting enhanced the yield of bacterial confirmation, revealing a high incidence of rifampicin resistance and suggesting a need for further investigations in Xpert-negative/smear-positive patients who may not have mycobacterial TB.

Xpert® MTB/RIF assay testing on stool for the diagnosis of paediatric pulmonary TB in Tanzania

SETTING

Six health facilities in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of stool specimens in the diagnostic workup of paediatric TB using the Xpert^® MTB/RIF assay.

DESIGN

Between December 2018 and May 2019, we performed a cross-sectional diagnostic study of children aged between 1 month and 14 years with presumptive TB. A single stool specimen was tested using Xpert. The result was compared with the reference microbiological standard for respiratory or gastric specimens tested using Xpert and/or solid culture. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of stool Xpert assay were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 225 children with a median age of 2.17 years (IQR 1.16-5.19) were enrolled; 165/225 (73.3%) were aged <5 years. Of 225 children, 8 (3.6%) were diagnosed with TB as they were culture- or Xpert-positive on sputum/gastric aspirate. The stool Xpert assay showed a sensitivity of 62.5% (95% CI 25-92) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 98-100) against the reference standard.

CONCLUSION

Use of the Xpert assay on stool specimens had a moderate sensitivity and high specificity in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in children. Our data adds to the body of evidence for the use of Xpert assay on stool as a non-respiratory specimen to complement conventional methods used to diagnose the disease.

Performance of Xpert® MTB/RIF in diagnosing tuberculous pleuritis using thoracoscopic pleural biopsy

BACKGROUND

Etiological diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis is challenging, owing to a paucity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in the affected region. Moreover, currently available methods, such as the detection of acid-fast bacilli and microbiological culture, are not always conducive to timely diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we evaluated the performance of Xpert® MTB/RIF assay (hereinafter referred to as "Xpert") in detecting MTB in difficult-to-diagnose patients using suspensions of pleural biopsy tissue specimens obtained under direct thoracoscopic guidance.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty patients with an unexplained pleural effusion were included from the Shenyang Tenth People's Hospital and Shenyang Chest Hospital, China, between 2017 and 2018. The included patients underwent thoracoscopy under local anesthesia, with an intercostal incision of approximately 1.0 cm for biopsy. The biopsy specimens were used for pathological and etiological examinations. The Xpert test was evaluated for its sensitivity and specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively), against data obtained using standards: the BACTEC™ MGIT™ 960 liquid culture system and a composite reference standard (CRS).

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of Xpert were 68.8 and 64.6%, respectively, against the MGIT 960 culture data. The PPV and NPV of Xpert were 56.4 and 75.6%, respectively. The sensitivity of Xpert was 69.0% against the CRS data, which was significantly higher than that of MGIT 960 culture (56.6%). The PPV and NPV of Xpert against the CRS data were 100.0 and 57.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Xpert is a good rule-in test but has limited value as a rule-out test for the diagnosis of tuberculosis pleuritis.

[Accuracy of Xpert® MTB/RIF for the detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin-resistance tuberculosis in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis]

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert^® Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin (Xpert^® MTB/RIF) for the detection of active tuberculosis (TB) and rifampicin-resistance TB in Chinese patients.

METHODS

Four Chinese databases (SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang database, and VIP) and three English databases (PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library) were searched from January 1, 2000 to September 15, 2017, to identify diagnostic tests about the accuracy of Xpert^® MTB/RIF in Chinese patients. Two investigators screened the articles and extracted the information independently, and then the quality of each included study was evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool the sensitivity and specificity. In addition, subgroup analyses were performed based on patient type (TB patient and TB suspected patient), sample type (sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and others). All statistical analyses were conducted with Stata version 13.0.

RESULTS

A total of 47 articles were included in this systematic review. Most of them (38 articles) were in Chinese and only 9 articles were in English. All the articles were published during 2014 to 2017, and the sample size ranged from 31 to 3 151. Forty articles including 42 comparisons about TB were finally included with the pooled sensitivity of 0.94 (95%CI: 0.92, 0.95) and the pooled specificity of 0.87 (95%CI: 0.84, 0.91). Subgroup analysis showed that different patient and specimen types had no significant differences on sensitivity, but the specificity of sputum group was higher than that of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. As for the detection of rifampicin-resistant TB, 33 articles (38 comparisons) were analyzed, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95%CI: 0.89, 0.94) and 0.98 (95%CI: 0.97, 0.99) respectively. There were no significant differences between the patient and specimen in the subgroup analyses. The Deeks funnel plot showed a possible publication bias for detecting active tuberculosis (P=0.08) and no publication bias for rifampicin-resistant TB (P=0.24). The likelihood ratio scatter gram showed that in clinical applications, Xpert^® MTB/RIF had a good diagnostic ability for detecting active tuberculosis, and it had good clinical diagnostic value in detecting rifampicin-resistant TB.

CONCLUSION

Xpert^® MTB/RIF has good sensitivity and specificity in detecting TB and rifampicin-resistant TB in Chinese people. In particular, it has good clinical value in diagnosing rifampicin-resistance TB.

Performance of the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay in the rapid diagnosis of tracheobronchial tuberculosis using bronchial washing fluid

Objective

To assess the diagnostic value of the Xpert® MTB/RIF (GeneXpert) assay for tracheobronchial tuberculosis (TBTB) using bronchial washing fluid (BWF).

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled patients suspected of having TBTB and patients with non-TB pulmonary disease as controls. BWF were used to undertake acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smears, the GeneXpert assay and the Lӧwenstein–Jensen (LJ) culture method. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were compared among BWF AFB smears, BWF GeneXpert and the BWF LJ culture method.

Results

A total of 130 patients with TBTB and 102 patients with non-TB pulmonary disease were enrolled in the study. Sputum AFB smears were positive in 62 of 130 patients (47.7%) with TBTB. Using the clinical diagnosis of TBTB as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the three methods using BWF were as follows: 93.1%, 99.0%, 99.2% and 91.8% for BWF GeneXpert; 73.1%, 100.0%, 100.0% and 74.5% for BWF LJ cultures; 53.8%, 99.0%, 98.6% and 62.7% for BWF AFB smears. The diagnostic yield of BWF GeneXpert was significantly higher compared with BWF cultures for type III and IV TBTB.

Conclusion

The Xpert® MTB/RIF assay using BWF exhibited higher sensitivity than bacteriological diagnostic methods and was particularly useful for the early diagnosis of smear-negative TBTB.

[CME: Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis]

CME: Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Abstract. While tuberculosis mostly manifests as pulmonary infection, a dissemination in any extrapulmonary organ is possible. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis mostly affects lymph nodes, pleura and bones. Patients with immunosuppressive conditions such as an HIV co-infection or immunosuppressive therapies like TNF-alpha-inhibitors have a higher risk of a dissemination of tuberculosis. Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis is difficult, as microbiological testing mostly requires invasive procedures to obtain a sample for direct proof of tuberculosis by microscopy, culture, molecular methods (e.g. Xpert® MTB/RIF) or histology. Treatment follows guidelines of pulmonary tuberculosis with a two-month regimen consisting of four drugs (rifampicin, isoniazide, pyrazinamide and ethambuthol), followed by a four-month therapy with two drugs (rifampicin and isoniazide). Duration of therapy is extended in tuberculous meningitis to one year and in a skeletal dissemination up to six to nine months. Corticosteroids are recommended in cerebral and pericardial tuberculosis.

Drug-resistant tuberculosis diagnosis since Xpert® MTB/RIF introduction in Papua New Guinea, 2012-2017

SETTING

Xpert® MTB/RIF was introduced in Papua New Guinea in 2012 for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) and of rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB), a marker of multi-drug-resistant TB (MDR-TB).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the concordance of Xpert with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) performed at the supranational reference laboratory and to describe the patterns of drug-resistant TB observed.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective descriptive study of laboratory data collected from April 2012 to December 2017.

RESULTS

In 69 months, 1408 specimens with Xpert results were sent for mycobacterial culture and DST; Mycobacterium tuberculosis was cultured from 63% (884/1408) and DST was completed in 99.4%. The concordance between Xpert and culture for M. tuberculosis detection was 98.6%. Of 760 RR-TB cases, 98.7% were detected using Xpert; 98.5% of 620 MDR-TB cases were identified using phenotypic DST. Phenotypic resistance to second-line drugs was detected in 59.4% (522/879) of specimens tested, including 29 with fluoroquinolone resistance; the majority were from the National Capital District and Daru Island.

CONCLUSION

The high concordance between phenotypic DST and Xpert in identifying RR-TB cases supports the scale-up of initial Xpert testing in settings with high rates of drug resistance. However, rapid DST in addition to the detection of RR-TB is required.

Has the utilisation of Xpert® MTB/RIF in Manicaland Province, Zimbabwe, improved with new guidance on whom to test?

Setting: Manicaland Province, Zimbabwe. Objectives: To compare the utilisation and results of deploying Xpert^® MTB/RIF in 13 (one provincial, six district and six rural) hospitals between January and June 2016, when Xpert was recommended only for those with presumptive multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and between January and June 2017, when Xpert was recommended for all presumptive TB patients. Design: This was a cross-sectional study. Results: Xpert assays averaged 759 monthly in 2016 and 1430 monthly in 2017 (88% increase). Utilisation of Xpert averaged 22% monthly in 2016 and 42% in 2017 (88% increase). In 2017, utilisation of Xpert was significantly higher in provincial (82%) than in district (51%) and rural (26%) hospitals (P < 0.001). The proportion of successful assays that detected TB decreased significantly from 13% in 2016 to 7% in 2017 (a 46% decrease, P < 0.001); this phenomenon was observed in all types of hospital. The proportion of persons detected with rifampicin-resistant TB was similar between hospitals (4% in 2016 and 3% in 2017). The proportion of registered TB cases with bacteriological confirmation increased from 48% in 2016 to 53% in 2017 (P = 0.04). Conclusion: Xpert use in all presumptive TB patients led to a significant increase in assay numbers and utilisation of Xpert instruments, resulting in more bacteriological confirmation of cases.

Comparison of the Purelyse® - IS6110 nested PCR with the Xpert® MTB/RIF test in clinical samples with suspected tuberculosis

Tuberculosis (TB) has a high incidence, prevalence and mortality in the world. Due to its high level of transmission and long-term pharmacological treatment, it is important to have sensitive and specific diagnostic tests. Recently, the PureLyse® system, which is a novel DNA extraction method, was proposed to be an important tool for molecular diagnosis of TB. Here, we compare the PureLyse® system followed by an IS6110 nested PCR (PureLyse® - IS6110 nested PCR) with the Xpert® MTB/RIF test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) identification in 40 clinical samples. Among the 40 samples, 26 samples were positive and 14 negative for the Xpert® MTB/RIF test as well as for the PureLyse® - IS6110 nested PCR. According to the Xpert® MTB/RIF test, positive samples presented different bacillary concentrations from "High" to "Very low" and rifampin resistance was observed in 5 samples. The concordance of both molecular methods makes the PureLyse® - IS6110 nested PCR suitable for MTBC detection in patients for low-income resources.

Improved performance of Xpert MTB/RIF assay on sputum sediment samples obtained from presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis cases at Kibong'oto infectious diseases hospital in Tanzania

Background

The introduction of Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) has significantly improved diagnosis of Tuberculosis (TB) in resource limited human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) endemic settings. We aimed to modify the Xpert protocol to improve the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB).

Methods

This cross sectional study was conducted among presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients at Kibong’oto Infectious Diseases Hospital between August and November 2015. Each patient consented to provide 2 samples of raw sputa. One-sputum sample was sedimented using the Petroff’s method and divided into two portions. One portion of sediment was inoculated on Lowenstein-Jensen culture media and observed for any growth for up to 8 weeks. Both, raw sputum and the portions of sediments were tested separately using Xpert with a sample reagent ratio of 1:2. Mean age of patients, prevalence of MTB, Xpert sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were calculated. An incremental sensitivity was determined. Pearson chi-square and either an independent T or Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compared categorical and continuous variables respectively. A p- value of ≤0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Of the 270 presumptive PTB cases, 262 were eligible for analysis. Eight (3%) were excluded due to contaminated culture. Patients’ mean age was 42.9 (±SD 15.1) years of which 173 (66%) were female. The overall prevalence of PTB was 112 (43%), of which the Xpert detected 105 (40%) in sediments and 98 (37%) in raw sputa as compared to culture which detected 85 (32%) cases of PTB. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of Xpert on sputum sediments were 92%, 85%, 74% and 96% respectively. Overall, the incremental sensitivity of Xpert on sediment over raw sputum was 6%. In HIV infected Presumptive PTB, the incremental sensitivity was 12%.

Conclusion

Lowering the sample reagent to sediment dilution ratio increases sensitivity of Xpert on MTB detection among presumptive PTB cases, especially in HIV infected individuals.

Xpert® MTB/RIF: Usefulness for the diagnosis of tuberculosis and resistance to rifampicin

The advent of the Xpert® MTB/RIF technique was a revolution in the diagnosis of tuberculosis, especially in areas with high incidence and low resources. It allows the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and simultaneously the most common resistance mutations to rifampicin in less than 2h. For respiratory samples the sensitivity is very high, but it decreases for extrapulmonary samples and children. Although it is faster and simpler than conventional methods, it presents some limitations and new and better techniques are needed to reduce the number of cases and deaths caused by tuberculosis. This review aims to assess the scientific evidence around the diagnostic performance of Xpert® MTB/RIF in different types of samples and populations, as well as analyse its strengths and limitations for TB diagnosis.

Gastric specimens for diagnosing tuberculosis in adults unable to expectorate in Rawalpindi, Pakistan

Setting: Adult pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) patients unable to expectorate quality sputum represent a diagnostic challenge. A private hospital in Pakistan routinely performs gastric aspiration in adults with difficulties expectorating. Objective: To assess the usefulness of gastric specimens (GS) in diagnosing pulmonary TB (PTB) and drug-resistant TB in adult presumptive TB patients unable to expectorate, and to compare the diagnostic yield and sensitivity of smear, culture and the Xpert^® MTB/RIF assay. Design: This was a comparative cross-sectional study based on retrospective record review. Results: Of 900, 885 and 877 GS tested by smear, Xpert and culture, respectively, interpretable results were obtained for respectively 900 (100%), 859 (97.1%) and 754 (86.0%), with a diagnostic yield of respectively 23.6%, 30.3% and 24.9%. The yield was significantly higher for Xpert in previously treated patients. There were 313 patients with definite TB, defined as positive on Xpert and/or culture. The 82.8% sensitivity of Xpert was significantly higher than that of smear (61.0%) and culture (67.8%). Conclusion: GS obtained by aspiration under routine programme conditions is useful for detecting TB and drug-resistant TB in adult patients unable to expectorate. Xpert, with its rapid testing, high proportion of interpretable results and better sensitivity, can substantially improve the diagnosis of bacteriologically confirmed TB and rifampicin resistance.

Case report of a false positive result of the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex

In the present case, we report a false positive result for the detection of rifampicin (RIF) resistance by the Xpert^® MTB/RIF assay, version G4.Miliary Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (miliary TB) was suspected in a 50-year old Angolan woman. Imaging of the thorax and abdomen displayed diffuse lesions. The Xpert^® MTB/RIF assay conducted on the broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) fluid was positive for TB and positive for RIF resistance. Confirmatory molecular tests and the phenotypic drug susceptibility determination supported the diagnosis of TB but not RIF resistance. The patient was treated successfully with a conventional therapeutic scheme. Because, the Xpert^® MTB/RIF assay allows the simultaneous detection of TB and RIF resistance, the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends its use as initial diagnostic test, over microscopy, culture and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing. Even though specificity of the Xpert^® MTB/RIF assay version G4 is high, false positive test results remain possible and have to be considered for the interpretation of the RIF resistance detection by Xpert^® MTB/RIF assay.

Countrywide roll-out of Xpert(®) MTB/RIF in Swaziland: the first three years of implementation

SETTING

All 19 public health laboratories in Swaziland that had Xpert(®) MTB/RIF machines installed as part of a countrywide roll-out between June 2011 and June 2014.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utilisation and functionality of Xpert from 2011 to mid-2014.

DESIGN

Descriptive study of Xpert implementation using routinely collected data.

RESULTS

Of 48 829 Xpert tests conducted, 93% were successful: 14% detected Mycobacterium tuberculosis and 12% showed rifampicin resistance. The most common cause of unsuccessful tests was an 'Error' result (62%). Similar findings were obtained in government-supported and partner-supported laboratories. Annual utilisation of Xpert improved from 51% of maximum capacity in 2011 and 2012 to 74% in 2013 and 2014. A monitoring and supervision exercise of all Xpert testing sites in 2014 showed a generally good performance, with over 50% of laboratories achieving a ⩾80% score on most components. However, poor scores were obtained with equipment use and maintenance (6% achieving a score of ⩾80%), internal audit (19% achieving a score of ⩾80%) and process control (25% achieving a score of ⩾80%).

CONCLUSION

Countrywide roll-out of Xpert in Swaziland has been successful, although operational issues have been identified and need to be resolved.

Evaluation of the implementation of the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay in Fiji

SETTING

All Xpert® MTB/RIF tests performed in the three TB (tuberculosis) treatment centres in Fiji from June 2012 to February 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To determine 1) the number of Xpert tests performed in each centre, 2) the association between sputum quality and Xpert results, 3) the agreement of Xpert with acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy and TB culture and 4) error rates.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of records.

RESULTS

A total of 415 Xpert tests were performed in the study period. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was detected in 69 (16.6%) samples. No rifampicin resistance was detected. M. tuberculosis was detected from 60 (18.7%) good-quality sputum samples. A total of 43 (10.4%) errors occurred during this period. M. tuberculosis was detected in 10 (2.9%) smear-negative specimens. There was a substantial and an almost perfect agreement between Xpert and AFB microscopy (κ = 0.793) and culture results (κ = 0.818), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although a good correlation between Xpert and the two tests were shown in the study, Xpert should not replace the routine first-line TB diagnostic tests used in Fiji for reasons related to logistics and sustainability. A further evaluation of the assay's performance is required over a longer time period to gauge its diagnostic value in detecting smear-negative, Xpert-positive cases in Fiji.