Human Chromosome 18 and Acrocentrics: A Dangerous Liaison

The presence of thousands of repetitive sequences makes the centromere a fragile region subject to breakage. In this study we collected 31 cases of rearrangements of chromosome 18, of which 16 involved an acrocentric chromosome, during genetic screening done in three centers. We noticed a significant enrichment of reciprocal translocations between the centromere of chromosome 18 and the centromeric or pericentromeric regions of the acrocentrics. We describe five cases with translocation between chromosome 18 and an acrocentric chromosome, and one case involving the common telomere regions of chromosomes 18p and 22p. In addition, we bring evidence to support the hypothesis that chromosome 18 preferentially recombines with acrocentrics: (i) the presence on 18p11.21 of segmental duplications highly homologous to acrocentrics, that can justify a NAHR mechanism; (ii) the observation by 2D-FISH of the behavior of the centromeric regions of 18 respect to the centromeric regions of acrocentrics in the nuclei of normal subjects; (iii) the contact analysis among these regions on published Hi-C data from the human lymphoblastoid cell line (GM12878).

Instability of Short Arm of Acrocentric Chromosomes: Lesson from Non-Acrocentric Satellited Chromosomes. Report of 24 Unrelated Cases

Satellited non-acrocentric autosomal chromosomes (ps–qs-chromosomes) are the result of an interchange between sub- or telomeric regions of autosomes and the p arm of acrocentrics. The sequence homology at the rearrangement breakpoints appears to be, among others, the most frequent mechanism generating these variant chromosomes. The unbalanced carriers of this type of translocation may or may not display phenotypic abnormalities. With the aim to understand the causative mechanism, we revised all the ps–qs-chromosomes identified in five medical genetics laboratories, which used the same procedures for karyotype analysis, reporting 24 unrelated cases involving eight chromosomes. In conclusion, we observed three different scenarios: true translocation, benign variant and complex rearrangement. The detection of translocation partners is essential to evaluate possible euchromatic unbalances and to infer their effect on phenotype. Moreover, we emphasize the importance to perform both, molecular and conventional cytogenetics methods, to better understand the behavior of our genome.

NORs on human acrocentric chromosome p-arms are active by default and can associate with nucleoli independently of rDNA

A detailed description of how the genome is organized within the human nucleus is a major research goal. Nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) comprising ribosomal DNA (rDNA) arrays are located on the p-arms of the five human acrocentric chromosomes. Here we characterize the rules of engagement between NORs and nucleoli. We reveal variation in rDNA distribution, with some primary cell lines containing as many as four acrocentrics devoid of rDNA. We establish the default status of NORs as active and show that acrocentric p-arms devoid of rDNA retain nucleolar association potential. Based on our data, we propose that in diploid human cells, all 10 acrocentric chromosomes are nucleolar-associated, with involvement of non-rDNA sequences buffering against variable rDNA distribution.

Nucleoli, the sites of ribosome biogenesis and the largest structures in human nuclei, form around nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) comprising ribosomal DNA (rDNA) arrays. NORs are located on the p-arms of the five human acrocentric chromosomes. Defining the rules of engagement between these p-arms and nucleoli takes on added significance as describing the three-dimensional organization of the human genome represents a major research goal. Here we used fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immuno-FISH on metaphase chromosomes from karyotypically normal primary and hTERT-immortalized human cell lines to catalog NORs in terms of their relative rDNA content and activity status. We demonstrate that a proportion of acrocentric p-arms in cell lines and from normal human donors have no detectable rDNA. Surprisingly, we found that all NORs with detectable rDNA are active, as defined by upstream binding factor loading. We determined the nucleolar association status of all NORs during interphase, and found that nucleolar association of acrocentric p-arms can occur independently of rDNA content, suggesting that sequences elsewhere on these chromosome arms drive nucleolar association. In established cancer lines, we characterize a variety of chromosomal rearrangements involving acrocentric p-arms and observe silent, rDNA-containing NORs that are dissociated from nucleoli. In conclusion, our findings indicate that within human nuclei, positioning of all 10 acrocentric chromosomes is dictated by nucleolar association. Furthermore, these nucleolar associations are buffered against interindividual variation in the distribution of rDNA.

Human NORs, comprising rDNA arrays and functionally conserved distal elements, are located within dynamic chromosomal regions

In this study, van Sluis et al. investigated the role of chromosomal context in nuclear organizer regions (NORs)/ribosomal gene (rDNA) in nucleolar formation and function. The analyses combined sequence capture and long-read sequencing to characterize the regions distal to rDNA arrays (DJ) on isolated acrocentric chromosomes, and their findings provide direct evidence for exchanges between heterologous human acrocentric p-arms, and uncover extensive structural variation between chromosomes and among individuals.

Human nucleolar organizer regions (NORs), containing ribosomal gene (rDNA) arrays, are located on the p-arms of acrocentric chromosomes (HSA13–15, 21, and 22). Absence of these p-arms from genome references has hampered research on nucleolar formation. Previously, we assembled a distal junction (DJ) DNA sequence contig that abuts rDNA arrays on their telomeric side, revealing that it is shared among the acrocentrics and impacts nucleolar organization. To facilitate inclusion into genome references, we describe sequencing the DJ from all acrocentrics, including three versions of HSA21, ∼3 Mb of novel sequence. This was achieved by exploiting monochromosomal somatic cell hybrids containing single human acrocentric chromosomes with NORs that retain functional potential. Analyses revealed remarkable DJ sequence and functional conservation among human acrocentrics. Exploring chimpanzee acrocentrics, we show that “DJ-like” sequences and abutting rDNA arrays are inverted as a unit in comparison to humans. Thus, rDNA arrays and linked DJs represent a conserved functional locus. We provide direct evidence for exchanges between heterologous human acrocentric p-arms, and uncover extensive structural variation between chromosomes and among individuals. These findings lead us to revaluate the molecular definition of NORs, identify novel genomic structural variation, and provide a rationale for the distinctive chromosomal organization of NORs.

Presence of 15p Marker D15Z1 on the Short Arm of Acrocentric Chromosomes is Associated with Aneuploid Offspring in Mexican Couples

Variation in the location of the 15p region D15Z1 is recognized as a polymorphism in several human populations. We used high-stringency Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) to detect D15Z1 in a Mexican cohort. Here, we report the presence of extra D15Z1 sequences on the p-arm of acrocentric chromosomes other than 15 in two groups of Mexican couples, one with healthy offspring (n = 75) and the other with aneuploid offspring (n = 87), mainly trisomy 21. The additional D15Z1 polymorphism was significantly increased in individuals with aneuploid offspring (26.4%), in comparison to individuals with healthy offspring (14%). The most frequent acceptor chromosome of D15Z1 was chromosome 13p, followed by 14p, and finally, 21p. Our results show an overall frequency of 21.6% of this polymorphism in the Mexican population and suggest that its presence might be associated with the mis-segregation of other acrocentric chromosomes and aneuploid offspring. The high frequency of the polymorphism of the D15Z1 sequence on acrocentric chromosomes other than 15 suggests a sequence homogenization of the acrocentric p arms, related to the important function of the centromere and the nucleolar organization region, which flank satellite III DNA.

The Targeted Sequencing of Alpha Satellite DNA in Cercopithecus pogonias Provides New Insight Into the Diversity and Dynamics of Centromeric Repeats in Old World Monkeys

Alpha satellite is the major repeated DNA element of primate centromeres. Specific evolutionary mechanisms have led to a great diversity of sequence families with peculiar genomic organization and distribution, which have till now been studied mostly in great apes. Using high throughput sequencing of alpha satellite monomers obtained by enzymatic digestion followed by computational and cytogenetic analysis, we compare here the diversity and genomic distribution of alpha satellite DNA in two related Old World monkey species, Cercopithecus pogonias and Cercopithecus solatus, which are known to have diverged about 7 Ma. Two main families of monomers, called C1 and C2, are found in both species. A detailed analysis of our data sets revealed the existence of numerous subfamilies within the centromeric C1 family. Although the most abundant subfamily is conserved between both species, our fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments clearly show that some subfamilies are specific for each species and that their distribution is restricted to a subset of chromosomes, thereby pointing to the existence of recurrent amplification/homogenization events. The pericentromeric C2 family is very abundant on the short arm of all acrocentric chromosomes in both species, pointing to specific mechanisms that lead to this distribution. Results obtained using two different restriction enzymes are fully consistent with a predominant monomeric organization of alpha satellite DNA that coexists with higher order organization patterns in the C. pogonias genome. Our study suggests a high dynamics of alpha satellite DNA in Cercopithecini, with recurrent apparition of new sequence variants and interchromosomal sequence transfer.

Translocation Breakpoints Preferentially Occur in Euchromatin and Acrocentric Chromosomes

Chromosomal translocations drive the development of many hematological and some solid cancers. Several factors have been identified to explain the non-random occurrence of translocation breakpoints in the genome. These include chromatin density, gene density and CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF)/cohesin binding site density. However, such factors are at least partially interdependent. Using 13,844 and 1563 karyotypes from human blood and solid cancers, respectively, our multiple regression analysis only identified chromatin density as the primary statistically significant predictor. Specifically, translocation breakpoints preferentially occur in open chromatin. Also, blood and solid tumors show markedly distinct translocation signatures. Strikingly, translocation breakpoints occur significantly more frequently in acrocentric chromosomes than in non-acrocentric chromosomes. Thus, translocations are probably often generated around nucleoli in the inner nucleoplasm, away from the nuclear envelope. Importantly, our findings remain true both in multivariate analyses and after removal of highly recurrent translocations. Finally, we applied pairwise probabilistic co-occurrence modeling. In addition to well-known highly prevalent translocations, such as those resulting in BCR-ABL1 (BCR-ABL) and RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (AML1-ETO) fusion genes, we identified significantly underrepresented translocations with putative fusion genes, which are probably subject to strong negative selection during tumor evolution. Taken together, our findings provide novel insights into the generation and selection of translocations during cancer development.

Location of ribosomal DNA in the human chromosome complement

Hybridization of (3)H-labeled ribosomal RNA to human chromosomes on slides resulted in specific labeling of the satellite regions of chromosomes 13, 14, 15, 21, and 22, with an over-all efficiency of about 5%. Differences between D and G chromosomes, and between associated and unassociated satellites, were not significant. Labeling of all other parts of the preparations was nonspecific, and increased in the order: extrachromosomal regions < chromosome arms < centric regions.