Social isolation is a direct determinant of decreased home-cage activity in mice: A within-subjects study using a body-implantable actimeter

NEW FINDINGS

What is the central question of this study? It is generally recognized that social isolation is associated with physical inactivity; however, is social isolation a direct determinant of decreased physical activity? What is the main finding and its importance? We conducted a within-subjects experiment with the aid of a body-implantable actimeter. Our results clearly demonstrated that social isolation decreased home-cage activity in mice. This might have resulted from increased immobility and decreased vigorous activity, suggesting that avoiding social isolation is important to preventing physical inactivity.

ABSTRACT

An inactive lifestyle can negatively affect physiological and mental health. Social isolation is associated with physical inactivity; however, it remains uncertain whether social isolation is a direct determinant of decreased physical activity. Hence, we assessed whether social isolation decreases home-cage activity using a within-subjects design and examined the effects of social isolation on hippocampal neurogenesis in mice. This study used a body-implantable actimeter called nanotag®, which enabled us to measure home-cage activity despite housing the mice in groups. We first examined the influence of the intraperitoneal implantation of nanotag® on home-cage activity. Although nanotag® implantation decreased home-cage activity temporarily, 7 days post-implantation, it recovered to the same level as that of control (non-implanted) mice, suggesting that implantation of nanotag® does not have a negative influence on home-cage activity if mice undergo a 1-week recovery period after implantation. In the main experiment, after the 1-week baseline measurement performed while in group housing, the mice were placed in a group or in isolation. Home-cage activity was measured for an additional 4 weeks. Home-cage activity in isolated mice during the dark period decreased by 26% from pre-intervention to the last week of intervention. Furthermore, the reduction in the number of 5-minute epochs during which the activity count exceeded 301 (an index of vigorous activity) was significantly larger for isolated mice. Contrary to expectations, social isolation did not impair hippocampal neurogenesis. Our results demonstrate that social isolation is a direct determinant of decreased physical activity, possibly because of reduced vigorous physical activity. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Comparison of actigraphy indices among patients with depression and schizophrenia: A preliminary study

Background:

Schizophrenia (SCZ) and depression (MDD) are associated with changes in sleep and activity patterns. However, because of a lack of objective evaluation, the diagnostic or clinical value of these sleep-activity patterns is unknown. In this study, we attempted to assess and compare the sleep and activity patterns using actigraphy.

Materials and Methods:

We have recruited 35 patients with SCZ (mean age: 29.29 ± 7.54 years) and 42 patients with MDD (mean age: 27.5 ± 5.59 years) in this cross-sectional study. The actigraphy indices [Time in bed (minutes), Onset latency (minutes), Total sleep time (Minutes), Sleep efficiency (%), WASO (minutes), number of awakening, and activity duration (minutes) were compared among the two groups using unpaired t-test and Fisher exact test.

Results:

In the MDD group, the time in bed (minutes) was significantly higher than in the SCZ group (402.7 ± 41.97 vs. 379.1 ± 40.45, P = 0.01), while the sleep efficiency was lower in the SCZ group than in the MDD group (60.04 ± 9.25 vs. 65.05 ± 7.16, P = 0.0092). An increase in onset latency (minutes) was observed in the SCZ group compared to the MDD group (49.06 ± 16.09 vs. 43.6 ± 10.14, P = 0.074). The difference in WASO (minutes), the number of awakenings, and activity duration (minutes) among the two groups were insignificant.

Conclusion:

Actigraphy parameters such as sleep efficiency and time in bed may be a useful sleep process, etiological, and prognostic markers in patients with SCZ and MDD. The longitudinal studies are needed to estimate the predictive role of these parameters for therapeutic outcome in these patients.