Considerations when using alpha-glucosidase inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Introduction: Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs) - oral antihyperglycemic drugs, inhibit upper gastrointestinal enzymes that break down complex carbohydrates into glucose. As a result, the absorption of glucose is delayed, postprandial glucose reduced, and glycemic control improved.Areas covered: In this review, the authors describe the current recommendations on the use of the three major approved AGIs (acarbose, miglitol, voglibose). Efficacy and safety parameters together with ethnic considerations have been highlighted throughout the manuscript. The article also discusses potential diabetes prevention and cardiovascular effects of these medications.Expert opinion: The overall safety and efficacy of this class of drug appears to be high: AGIs do not increase the risk of hypoglycemia, do not cause weight gain; they also significantly improve postprandial hyperglycemia, have been associated with the reduction in risk factors for cardiovascular disease and may also delay the progression of prediabetes to T2DM. In general, we continue to believe that acarbose, miglitol, and voglibose should be used as third-line add on treatment options to other anti-hyperglycemic agents. However, this class can have earlier consideration in elderly and/or when metformin is contraindicated.

Diabetes pharmacotherapy and effects on the musculoskeletal system

Persons with type 1 or type 2 diabetes have a significantly higher fracture risk than age-matched persons without diabetes, attributed to disease-specific deficits in the microarchitecture and material properties of bone tissue. Therefore, independent effects of diabetes drugs on skeletal integrity are vitally important. Studies of incretin-based therapies have shown divergent effects of different agents on fracture risk, including detrimental, beneficial, and neutral effects. The sulfonylurea class of drugs, owing to its hypoglycemic potential, is thought to amplify the risk of fall-related fractures, particularly in the elderly. Other agents such as the biguanides may, in fact, be osteo-anabolic. In contrast, despite similarly expected anabolic properties of insulin, data suggests that insulin pharmacotherapy itself, particularly in type 2 diabetes, may be a risk factor for fracture, negatively associated with determinants of bone quality and bone strength. Finally, sodium-dependent glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors have been associated with an increased risk of atypical fractures in select populations, and possibly with an increase in lower extremity amputation with specific SGLT2I drugs. The role of skeletal muscle, as a potential mediator and determinant of bone quality, is also a relevant area of exploration. Currently, data regarding the impact of glucose lowering medications on diabetes-related muscle atrophy is more limited, although preclinical studies suggest that various hypoglycemic agents may have either aggravating (sulfonylureas, glinides) or repairing (thiazolidinediones, biguanides, incretins) effects on skeletal muscle atrophy, thereby influencing bone quality. Hence, the therapeutic efficacy of each hypoglycemic agent must also be evaluated in light of its impact, alone or in combination, on musculoskeletal health, when determining an individualized treatment approach. Moreover, the effect of newer medications (potentially seeking expanded clinical indication into the pediatric age range) on the growing skeleton is largely unknown. Herein, we review the available literature regarding effects of diabetes pharmacotherapy, by drug class and/or by clinical indication, on the musculoskeletal health of persons with diabetes.