Anticoagulant-related nephropathy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The aim of this study was to report the prevalence and mortality associated with anticoagulant-related nephropathy (ARN) through a systematic review of the literature.

Methods

Electronic searches were conducted in the Medline and EMBASE databases, and manual searches were performed in the reference lists of the identified studies. The studies were selected by two independent researchers, first by evaluating the titles and abstracts and then by reading the complete texts of the identified studies. Case series, cross-sectional studies, cohort studies and case–control studies reporting the prevalence and factors associated with ARN were selected. The methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Meta-analyses of the prevalence of ARN and 5-year mortality using the random effects model were performed when possible. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.

Results

Five studies were included. Prevalence of ARN ranged from 19% to 63% among the four included cohort studies. Meta-analysis of these resulted in high heterogeneity [I² 96%, summary effect 31%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 22–42%]. Subgroup meta-analysis yielded an ARN prevalence of 20% among studies that included patients with fewer comorbidities (I² 12%; 95% CI 19–22%). In a direct comparison, meta-analysis of the 5-year mortality rate between anticoagulated patients who had experienced ARN and anticoagulated patients without ARN, patients with ARN were 91% more likely to die (risk ratio = 1.91; 95% CI 1.22–3; I² 87%). Risk factors for ARN that were reported in the literature included initial excessive anticoagulation, chronic kidney disease, age, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and heart failure.

Conclusions

ARN studies are scarce and heterogeneous, and present significant methodological limitations. The high prevalence of ARN reported herein suggests that this entity is underdiagnosed in clinical practice. Mortality in patients with ARN seems to be high compared with patients without this condition in observational studies.

Warfarin related acute kidney injury: A case report

Warfarin is an oral anticoagulant used extensively in clinical practice; However, its side-effect of causing renal damage has been recently detected. The mechanism leading to renal damage is glomerular hemorrhage and red blood cell tubular casts prothrombin time. Recently, it was found that warfarin causes renal damage in patients with chronic kidney disease and is also associated with progression of renal disease. Warfarin causing acute kidney injury in patients with normal renal function is a rare manifestation. It is important to be aware of this condition as its innocuous presence can lead to chronic kidney disease if not corrected in time. Further studies have also found that novel oral anticoagulants such as dabigatran also cause a similar syndrome and hence a new term called anticoagulant-related nephropathy is now in vogue.

Warfarin-related Nephropathy

Warfarin-related nephropathy also referred to as anticoagulant-related nephropathy (ACRN) is a type of acute kidney injury (AKI) that may be caused by excessive anticoagulation with warfarin and other anticoagulants. Despite the well-described histological entity, the clinical course and approach to ACRN in patients requiring life-long anticoagulation are however not well described in the literature. We report a 50-year-old Indian woman who was on prolonged anticoagulant therapy post-mitral valve replacement. She presented with AKI, and renal biopsy was suggestive of ACRN. Steroids were given and her creatinine levels reached within the normal range in 2 weeks. A presumptive diagnosis of ACRN should be made if a severe warfarin coagulopathy is present and if other causes of AKI have been excluded, in patients with chronic anticoagulant therapy. Renal function should be monitored regularly in patients who are on anticoagulant therapy.

Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in CKD: Role of Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants. A Narrative Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in chronic kidney disease (CKD), with a close bidirectional relationship between the two entities. The presence of CKD in AF increases the risk of thromboembolic events, mortality and bleeding. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been the mainstay of treatment for the prevention of thromboembolic events in AF until recently, with confirmed benefits in AF patients with stage 3 CKD. However, the risk-benefit profile of VKA in patients with AF and stages 4-5 CKD is controversial due to the lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials. Treatment with VKA in CKD patients has been associated with conditions such as poorer anticoagulation quality, increased risk of bleeding, faster progression of vascular/valvular calcification and higher risk of calciphylaxis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown equal or greater efficacy in stroke/systemic embolism prevention, and a better safety profile than VKA in post-hoc analysis of the pivotal randomized controlled trials in patients with non-valvular AF and stage 3 CKD, yet evidence of its risk-benefit profile in more advanced stages of CKD is scarce. Observational studies associate DOACs with a good safety/effectiveness profile compared to VKA in non-dialysis CKD patients. Further, DOACs have been associated with a lower risk of acute kidney injury and CKD development/progression than VKA. This narrative review summarizes the evidence of the efficacy and safety of warfarin and DOACs in patients with AF at different CKD stages, as well as their effects on renal function, vascular/valvular calcification and bone health.

Role of glomerular filtration rate-modifying drugs in the development of anticoagulant-related nephropathy

Introduction

Anticoagulant‐related nephropathy (ARN), that was described in humans first as warfarin‐related nephropathy, is characterized by acute kidney injury and red blood cell (RBC) tubular casts in the kidney. 5/6 nephrectomy (5/7NE) rats treated with warfarin or dabigatran show changes in kidney function and morphology that are similar to human disease. The role of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the pathogenesis of ARN is not clear. The aim of these studies was to elucidate the role of GFR in the pathogenesis of dabigatran‐induced ARN in 5/6NE rats.

Methods

5/6NE rats were treated per os with 150 mg/kg/day dabigatran alone or with drugs that lower (enalapril, 1.5 mg/kg/day) or increase (albuterol, 4.0 mg/kg/day) GFR for 7 days. Changes in coagulation and kidney function were recorded daily. Kidney morphology was evaluated on day 7 after the treatment.

Results

Dabigatran resulted in activated partial thromboplastin time increase that was not affected by GFR‐modifying drugs. Blood pressure was significantly lower in 5/6NE rats treated with enalapril and dabigatran as compared to dabigatran alone. The GFR was decreased by 35% in enalapril/dabigatran‐ and increased by 26% in albuterol/dabigatran‐treated animals. There were no changes in serum creatinine, hematuria or urinary kidney injury molecule (KIM‐1) levels when GFR‐modifying drugs were added to dabigatran. All dabigatran‐treated animals had RBC casts in the kidney regardless of the GFR modification.

Conclusions

GFR does not play a significant role in the dabigatran‐induced acute kidney injury in 5/6 nephrectomy model in rats. Based in these data, modification of GFR in patients with ARN is not warranted.

Differences in risk factors for anticoagulant-related nephropathy between warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants: Analysis of the Japanese adverse drug event report database

Limited information is available on anticoagulant-related nephropathy (ARN). We therefore reviewed the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database to investigate kidney injury (KI) in patients administered warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and sought to clarify the risk factors for ARN. KI risk in warfarin users was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-2.13; P < .01) and age ≥80 years (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.07-1.72; P = .01). KI risk in DOAC users was associated with body weight ≥80 kg (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.01-2.53; P = .04) and use of dabigatran (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.09-2.37; P < .01). Our findings suggest that risk factors for ARN differ between warfarin and DOACs and that these risk factors may be associated with bleeding risk. Therefore, the risk of ARN may be decreased by better managing bleeding risk in patients taking anticoagulants.

Research Letter: Is the 129S1/SvImJ Mouse Strain More Suitable to Study Anticoagulant-Related Nephropathy Than the C57BL/6 Strain?

Background

We have previously demonstrated that excessive anticoagulation with warfarin or dabigatran may result in acute kidney injury with red blood cell (RBC) tubular casts in some patients with chronic kidney disease, and this condition was named anticoagulant-related nephropathy (ARN). 5/6 nephrectomy (5/6NE) rats treated with warfarin or dabigatran reproduce the main pathologic features of human ARN. We had reported that 5/6NE C57BL/6 mice only partially develop ARN with increased serum creatinine and hematuria but no RBC tubular casts in the kidney.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate whether ARN can develop in 5/6NE 129S1/SvImJ mice.

Methods

5/6NE was performed in 129S1/SvImJ mice. Three weeks after 5/6NE, mice were treated with warfarin (1.0 and 1.5 mg/kg/day) or vehicle for 7 days. Serum creatinine, hematuria, and prothrombin time (PT) were monitored daily. Renal morphology was evaluated at the end of the studies.

Results

Treatment with warfarin resulted in PT elevation 2 to 3 folds from baseline (1.0 mg/kg/day warfarin) and 4 to 5 folds from baseline (1.5 mg/kg/day warfarin) by day 7. Serum creatinine and hematuria elevated by day 7 in a dose-dependent manner. Histologically, 2 of 8 (25%) 5/6NE mice had RBCs in the tubules, and there was acute tubular epithelial cell injury in all warfarin-treated 5/6NE 129S1/SvImJ mice.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that 129S1/SvImJ mouse strain is a more suitable murine model to study ARN than C57BL/6 mouse strain.

An Inconspicuous Offender: Apixaban-Induced Anticoagulant-Related Nephropathy

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shifted the landscape of anticoagulation over the past decade, becoming a frequently used pharmaceutical agent. The increased use of DOACs for long-term anticoagulation has led to a rise in reported anticoagulant-related adverse reactions, such as anticoagulant-related nephropathy (ARN). The occurrence of ARN is well reported with warfarin; however, there are few cases of ARN reported with DOAC use. We report the case of an elderly man with coronary artery disease and hypertension who was initiated on apixaban for atrial fibrillation three years prior to presentation but developed rapid renal decline over the six months prior to presentation. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) had decreased precipitously from 48 mL/min/1.73 m2 to 19 mL/min/1.73 m2 with a concurrent drop in hemoglobin in the setting of persistent microscopic hematuria. A renal biopsy showed red blood cell casts consistent with glomerular hematuria, despite no crescents or signs of other forms of glomerulonephritis. The patient's renal function ceased to deteriorate and had a 35% recovery (serum creatinine 2.6 mg/dL, eGFR 25 mL/min/1.73 m2) after the discontinuation of apixaban and conversion to rivaroxaban without the use of corticosteroids. The patient reported at follow-up that he discontinued rivaroxaban four days after initiation on his own accord due to extrarenal bleeding. Our case highlights the importance of prompt recognition and treatment of the underreported but potentially significant incidence of ARN with apixaban in a patient with an otherwise unexplained kidney injury.

Evaluating Renal Benefits of Rivaroxaban Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-world Evidence

Background

AF is a global health concern, with systemic complications including renal dysfunction. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the effects of rivaroxaban, a Factor Xa inhibitor, and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) on renal outcomes in AF patients.

Methods

The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023462756). We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from 1 January 2017 to 30 June 2023 for real-world studies comparing the effects of rivaroxaban and VKAs on renal outcomes in AF patients, including acute kidney injury, a .30% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate, doubling of serum creatinine and worsening renal function. Subgroup analyses targeted diabetes, pre-existing kidney disease, the elderly (age .65 years) and Asian populations. The risk of bias was assessed used the Robins-I tool. HRs and 95% CIs were synthesised through a random-effects model. Two sensitivity analyses were performed, using a fixed-effects model and excluding conference abstracts.

Results

We identified 1,666 records. After screening, 14 studies comparing rivaroxaban and VKAs were included. Rivaroxaban exhibited superiority over VKAs in preventing: acute kidney injury (HR 0.68; 95% CI [0.61.0.77]; p<0.00001); a .30% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR 0.71; 95% CI [0.60.0.84]; p<0.0001); doubling of serum creatinine (HR 0.50; 95% CI [0.36.0.70]; p<0.0001); and worsening renal function (HR 0.56; 95% CI [0.45.0.69]; p<0.00001). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses consistently confirmed rivaroxaban's favourable effects on renal outcomes in diabetes, pre-existing kidney disease, the elderly and Asian populations.

Conclusion

Our findings support the preference of rivaroxaban over VKAs for renal outcomes in AF. The findings endorse rivaroxaban as the preferred anticoagulant to mitigate renal complications, offering clinicians valuable insights for tailored strategies.