The scientific evidence of arterial line filtration in cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

The indication for arterial line filtration (ALF) is to inhibit embolisation during cardiopulmonary bypass. Filtration methods have developed from depth filters to screen filters and from a stand-alone component to an integral part of the oxygenator. For many years, ALF has been a standard adopted by a majority of cardiac centres worldwide. The following review aims to summarize the available evidence in support for ALF and report on its current practice in Europe.

METHOD

The principles and application of ALF in Europe was investigated using a survey conducted in 2014. The scientific evidence for ALF was examined by performing a systematic literature search in six different databases, using the following search terms: "Cardiopulmonary bypass AND filters AND arterial". The primary endpoint was protection against cerebral injury verified by the degree of cerebral embolisation or cognitive tests. The secondary endpoint was improvement of the clinical outcome verified elsewise. Only randomised clinical trials were considered.

RESULTS

The response rate was 31% (n=112). The great majority (88.5%) of respondents were using ALF, following more than 10 years of experience. Integrated arterial filtration was used by 55%. Of respondents not using ALF, fifty-four percent considered starting using integrated arterial filtration. The systematic literature database search returned 180 unique publications where 82 were specifically addressing ALF in cardiopulmonary bypass. Only four out of the 82 identified publications fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Of these, three were more than 20 years old and based on the use of bubble oxygenation.

CONCLUSION

ALF is a standard implemented in a majority of cardiopulmonary bypass procedures in Europe. The level of scientific evidence available in support of current arterial line filtration methods in cardiopulmonary bypass is, however, poor. Large, well-designed, randomised trials are warranted.

Can the oxygenator screen filter reduce gaseous microemboli?

Gaseous microemboli (GME) define small bubbles as < 200 microm in size. GME are reported to increase morbidity after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardiac surgery. To prevent intrusion of GME into the systemic circulation during CPB, arterial line filtration is generally recommended. New trends in oxygenator design promote location of arterial filtration as an integral part of the oxygenator housing. The present experimental study aimed to evaluate the GME removal properties of an integrated arterial screen filter in a standard microporous oxygenator. The GME properties of Terumo Capiox FX25 with an integrated arterial screen filter was assessed in an experimental setup and compared with Capiox RX25, in which no arterial screen filter is present. A blood analog prime solution was recirculated using a roller pump at 4 and 6 L per minute flow rate, respectively, through a customized CPB circuit comprising oxygenator, reservoir, and connecting tubing. A controlled volume of air was introduced into the circuit. The GME activity was measured and computed using a Gampt BCC200 ultrasonic device placing one probe at the venous inlet and one other at the arterial outlet of the oxygenator. Transmembrane delta values of GME activity were used to calculate the removal efficacy based on counts and volume of GME. Use of screen filtration reduced the GME volume by 99.1% +/- .1% compared with 98.0% +/- .1% for controls at 4 L/min flow rate (p < .001). At 6 L/min, the reduction was 97.9% +/- .1% compared with 97.0% +/- .1% (p < .001). In contrast, the reduction of GME counts was less effective after screen filtration compared with controls: 89.6 +/- .6% versus 91.4 +/- .4% at 4 L/min and 55.6% +/- 1.6% versus 76.0% +/- 1.4% at 6 L/min, respectively (p < .001). The tested oxygenator with incorporated arterial screen filter reduced GME activity based on the calculated volume at the same time as counts of GME increased.