Ontogeny and anatomy of Bouteloua (Poaceae: Chloridoideae) species display a basipetal branch formation and a novel modified leaf structure in grasses

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Shoot ontogenesis in grasses follows a transition from a vegetative phase into a reproductive phase. Current studies provide insight into how branch and spikelet formation occur during the reproductive phase. However, these studies do not explain all the complex diversity of grass inflorescence forms and are mostly focused on model grasses. Moreover, truncated inflorescences of the non-model grass genus Urochloa (Panicoideae) with formation of primary branches have basipetal initiation of branches. Bouteloua species (Chloridoideae) are non-model grasses that form truncated inflorescences of primary branches with apical vestiges of uncertain homology at the tips of branching events and sterile florets above the lowermost fertile floret. Sterile florets are reduced to rudimentary lemmas composed of three large awns diverging from an awn column. Conflict about the awn column identity of this rudimentary lemma is often addressed in species descriptions of this genus. We test if Bouteloua species can display basipetal initiation of branches and explore the identity of vestiges and the awn column of rudimentary lemmas.

METHODS

We surveyed the inflorescence ontogeny and branch/awn anatomy of Bouteloua species and compared results with recent ontogenetic studies of chloridoids.

KEY RESULTS

Bouteloua arizonica has florets with basipetal maturation. Branches display basipetal branch initiation and maturation. Branch vestiges are formed laterally by meristems during early branching events. The spikelet meristem forms the awn column of rudimentary lemmas. Vestiges and sterile floret awns have anatomical similarities to C4 leaves.

CONCLUSIONS

Basipetal initiation of branches is a novel feature for Chloridoideae grasses. Branch vestiges are novel vegetative grass structures. Sterile floret awn columns are likely to be extensions of the rachilla.

Precocious progression of tissue maturation instructs basipetal initiation of leaflets in Chelidonium majus subsp. asiaticum (Papaveraceae)

PREMISE OF THE STUDY

On a compound leaf, leaflet primordia are repetitively formed along the apical-basal axis, with the direction varying among taxa. Why and how the directions vary among species is yet to be solved, although a change in a single factor was proposed to cause the variation. In this study, we compared two species in the Papaveraceae with different directions of leaflet initiation, Chelidonium majus subsp. asiaticum (basipetal) and Eschscholzia californica (acropetal). Because E. californica has been studied in some detail, we focused on C. majus and asked how basipetal pattern is achieved. •

METHODS

Since only immature leaf primordial tissue has leaflet-generating competency, we performed histological and gene expression analyses on markers of the tissue maturation state. In addition, we performed a time-course analysis of leaf primordial growth. •

KEY RESULTS

Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis demonstrated that a putative regulator of tissue maturation in C. majus, the CINCINNATA homolog, had higher expression in apical parts than in basal parts during the organogenetic phase. In contrast, expression of the CIN homolog was not elevated in either the apical or basal parts in E. californica during the organogenetic phase. •

CONCLUSIONS

In C. majus, apical parts of leaf primordia have already lost leaflet-generating competency during the organogenetic phase. We propose that precocious progression of the maturation process instructs basipetal progression of leaflet initiation in C. majus. This is not the mirror image of data on E. californica, which shows the opposite direction in leaflet formation, indicating that variation in direction is not attributable to a change in a single factor.