Comparison of Pain Scores and Functional Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Hip Labral Repair and Concomitant Capsular Repair or Plication Versus No Closure

Background

The need for capsular closure during arthroscopic hip labral repair is debated.

Purpose

To compare pain and functional outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic hip labral repair with concomitant repair or plication of the capsule versus no closure.

Study Design

Cohort study.

Methods

Outcomes were compared between patients undergoing arthroscopic hip labral repair with concomitant repair or plication of the capsule versus no closure at up to 2 years postoperatively and with stratification by age and sex. Patients with lateral center-edge angle <20°, a history of instability, a history of prior arthroscopic surgery in the ipsilateral hip, or a history of labral debridement only were excluded. Subanalysis was performed between patients undergoing no capsular closure who were propensity score matched 1:1 with patients undergoing repair or plication based on age, sex, and preoperative Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS). We compared patients who underwent T-capsulotomy with concomitant capsular closure matched 1:5 with patients who underwent an interportal capsulotomy with concomitant capsular repair based on age, sex, and preoperative MHHS.

Results

Patients undergoing capsular closure (n = 1069), compared with the no-closure group (n = 230), were more often female (68.6% vs 53.0%, respectively; P < .001), were younger (36.4 ± 13.3 vs 47.9 ± 14.7 years; P < .001), and had superior MHHS scores at 2 years postoperatively (85.8 ± 14.5 vs 81.8 ± 18.4, respectively; P = .020). In the matched analysis, no difference was found in outcome measures between patients in the capsular closure group (n = 215) and the no-closure group (n = 215) at any follow-up timepoint. No significant difference was seen between the 2 closure techniques at any follow-up timepoint. Patients with closure of the capsule achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the 1-year MHHS at a similar rate as those without closure (MCID, 50.3% vs 44.9%, P = .288; PASS, 56.8% vs 51.1%, P = .287, respectively). Patients with T-capsulotomy achieved the MCID and the PASS for the 1-year MHHS at a similar rate compared with those with interportal capsulotomy (MCID, 50.1% vs 44.9%, P = .531; PASS, 65.7% vs 61.2%, P = .518, respectively).

Conclusion

When sex, age, and preoperative MHHS were controlled, capsular closure and no capsular closure after arthroscopic hip labral repair were associated with similar pain and functional outcomes for patients up to 2 years postoperatively.

Biomechanical Performance of Transtibial Pull-Out Posterior Horn Medial Meniscus Root Repair Is Improved With Knotless Adjustable Suture Anchor-Based Fixation

Background

While posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) techniques have evolved, there remains a need to both optimize repair strength and improve resistance to cyclic loading.

Hypothesis

Adjustable tensioning would lead to higher initial repair strength and reduce displacement with cyclic loading compared with previously described transtibial pull-out repair (TPOR) fixation techniques.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 56 porcine medial menisci were used. Eight intact specimens served as a control for the native meniscus. For the others, PMMR tears were created and repaired with 6 different TPOR techniques (8 in each group). Fixed PMMR repairs were executed using 4 different suture techniques (two No. 2 cinch sutures, two cinch tapes, two No. 2 simple sutures, and two No. 2 sutures in a Mason-Allen configuration) all tied over a cortical button. Adjustable PMMR repairs using Mason-Allen sutures were fixed with an adjustable soft tissue anchor fixation tensioned at either 80 N or 120 N. The initial force, stiffness, and relief displacement of the repairs were measured after fixation. Repair constructs were then cyclically loaded, with cyclic displacement and stiffness measured after 1000 cycles. Finally, the specimens were pulled to failure.

Results

The PMMR repaired with the 2 cinch sutures fixed technique afforded the lowest (P < .001) initial repair load, stiffness, and relief displacement. The adjustable PMMR repairs achieved a higher initial repair load (P < .001) and relief displacement (P < .001) than all fixed repairs. The 2 cinch sutures fixed technique showed an overall higher cyclic displacement (P < .028) and was completely loose compared with the native meniscus functional zone. Repairs with adjustable intratunnel fixation showed displacement with cyclic loading similar to the native meniscus. With cyclic loading, the Mason-Allen adjustable repair with 120 N of tension showed less displacement (P < .016) than all fixed repairs and a stiffness comparable to the fixed Mason-Allen repair. The fixed Mason-Allen technique demonstrated a higher ultimate load (P < .007) than the adjustable Mason-Allen techniques. All repairs were less stiff, with lower ultimate failure loads, than the native meniscus root attachment (P < .0001).

Conclusion

Adjustable TPOR led to considerably higher initial repair load and relief displacement than other conventional fixed repairs and restricted cyclic displacement to match the native meniscus function. However, the ultimate failure load of the adjustable devices was lower than that of a Mason-Allen construct tied over a cortical button. All repair techniques had a significantly lower load to failure than the native meniscus root.

Clinical Relevance

Knotless adjustable PMMR repair based on soft anchor fixation results in higher tissue compression and less displacement, but the overall clinical significance on healing rates remains unclear.

A Novel Ligamentous Complex in the Anteromedial Region of the Knee: A Cadaveric Study

Background

The medial knee structures have a primary role in stabilizing valgus and rotational stress, which makes them important in assessing the ligament-injured knee globally and choosing the most adequate treatment.

Purpose

To conduct a layer-by-layer dissection of the knee's anteromedial side and provide a qualitative and quantitative description of the anatomy and histology of a ligament in the anteromedial region of the knee, which we have termed the anterior oblique ligament (AOL). Also, to describe the AOL relationship with what we have termed the medial cross-a ligament complex that stabilizes the medial pivot.

Study Design

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 35 fresh-frozen knees from transfemoral amputations that were exclusively performed for vascular reasons were dissected. Structures were identified after meticulous dissection, respecting the same protocol, measured with a digital caliper rule, and histologically studied for data.

Results

The AOL was found in all dissected knees, with a mean length of 31.47 ± 5.06 mm. This structure presented a ligament histology with densely organized collagen fibrils. The medial cross was represented by the superficial medial collateral ligament, AOL (anterior region), and posterior oblique ligament.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the presence of a ligament in the anteromedial region of the knee, termed the AOL. This structure was in the anterior part of a ligament complex-the medial cross.

Clinical Relevance

Studying and revisiting the medial compartment can provide important information for understanding joint instability and promoting better results in ligament reconstructions.

Biomechanical Comparison of Stability and Strength After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Anchor Fixation Versus Bone Tunnels

Background

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries occur frequently in baseball players, and UCL reconstruction is performed when nonoperative treatment fails.

Purpose

To compare a novel all-suture anchor method of UCL reconstruction with a method using bone tunnels (Ito method) by investigating the displacement against valgus torque and the failure strength.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities (mean age, 82.0 years) were utilized in this study. To evaluate the displacement against valgus torque, the valgus stability test was performed for 4 anterior oblique ligament (AOL) conditions: intact AOL, resected AOL, reconstructed using the anchor method, and reconstructed using the Ito method. The load-to-failure test was performed to evaluate the failure strength of the anchor and Ito methods. Displacement against valgus load was compared between conditions using the repeated-measures 2-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc test, and failure strength between the anchor and Ito methods was compared using the unpaired t test.

Results

Displacements of the intact AOL and anchor method were significantly greater than those of the resected AOL at both 60° and 90° of flexion (intact AOL: P = .005 and P < .001, respectively; and anchor method: P = .024 and P < .001, respectively). The displacement of the Ito method at 90° of flexion was significantly greater than that of the resected AOL (P = .003), but no significant difference was observed at 60° of flexion (P = .109). There were no significant differences in displacement between the anchor and Ito methods at any flexion angle, nor was there a significant difference in failure torque between the anchor and Ito methods (16.3 ± 3.1 vs 17.6 ± 2.3 N·m, respectively; P = .537).

Conclusion

The displacement and failure strength against a valgus load after UCL reconstruction using a suture anchor on the ulnar side were equal to those using bone tunnels.

Clinical Relevance

UCL reconstruction using a suture anchor on the ulnar side is simpler and less invasive than using bone tunnels, with similar outcomes.

Biomechanical Comparison of Fiber Tape Device Versus Transarticular Screws for Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury in a Cadaveric Model

BACKGROUND

The preferred method of fixation and surgical treatment for ligamentous Lisfranc injuries is controversial. Transarticular screws, bridge plating, fusion, and flexible fixation have been described, yet none have demonstrated superiority. Furthermore, screw fixation and plating often require secondary surgery to remove implants, leading surgeons to seek alternative fixation methods.

PURPOSE

To compare transarticular screws and a fiber tape construct under a spectrum of biomechanical loads by evaluating the diastasis at 3 joints in the Lisfranc complex.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Eight matched pairs of fresh, previously frozen lower extremity cadaveric specimens were fixed with either 2 cannulated transarticular crossed screws or a fiber tape construct with a supplemental intercuneiform limb. The diastasis between bones was measured at 3 midfoot joints in the Lisfranc complex: the Lisfranc articulation, the second tarsometatarsal joint, and the intercuneiform joint. Measurements were obtained for the preinjured, injured, and fixation conditions under static loading at 50% donor body weight. Specimens then underwent cyclic loading performed at 1 Hz and 100 cycles, based on 100-N stepwise increases in ground-reaction force from 100 to 2000 N, to simulate postoperative loading from the partial weightbearing stage to high-energy activities. Failure of fixation was defined as diastasis ≥2 mm at the Lisfranc articulation (second metatarsal-medial cuneiform joint).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in diastasis detected at the Lisfranc articulation or the intercuneiform joint throughout all loading cycles between groups. All specimens endured loading up to 50% body weight + 1400 N. Up to and including this stage, there were 2 failures in the cannulated transarticular crossed-screw group and none in the fiber tape group.

CONCLUSION

The fiber tape construct with a supplemental intercuneiform limb, which does not require later removal, may provide comparable biomechanical stability to cannulated transarticular crossed screws, even at higher loads.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Ligamentous Lisfranc injuries are common among athletes. Therefore, biomechanical evaluations are necessary to determine stable constructs that can limit the time to return to play. This study compares the biomechanical stability of 2 methods of fixation for ligamentous injury through a wide spectrum of loading, including those experienced by athletes.

Does Capsular Closure Affect Clinical Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopy? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Background:

There is increasing concern of iatrogenic hip instability after capsulotomy during surgery. Greater emphasis is now being placed on capsular closure during surgery. There are no prospective studies that address whether capsular closure has any effect on outcomes.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient outcomes after interportal capsulotomy repair compared with no repair. We hypothesized that restoration of normal capsular anatomy with interportal repair will achieve clinical outcomes similar to those for no repair.

Study Design:

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods:

Adult patients with femoral acetabular impingement indicated for hip arthroscopy were randomized into either the capsular repair (CR) or the no repair (NR) groups. All patients underwent standard hip arthroscopy with labral repair with or without CAM/pincer lesion resection. Clinical outcomes were measured via the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) subscale, Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific (HOS-SS) subscale, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), visual analog scale for pain, International Hip Outcome Tool, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12).

Results:

A total of 54 patients (56 hips) were included (26 men and 30 women) with a mean age of 33 years. The HOS-ADL score significantly improved at 2 years in both the NR group (from 68.1 ± 20.5 to 88.6 ± 20.0; P < .001) and the CR group (from 59.2 ± 18.8 to 91.7 ± 12.3; P < .001). The HOS-SS score also significantly improved in both the NR group (from 41.1 ± 25.8 to 84.1 ± 21.9; P < .001) and the CR group (from 32.7 ± 23.7 to 77.7 ± 23.0; P < .001). Improvement was noted for all secondary outcome measures; however, there was no significant difference between the groups at any time point. Between 1 and 2 years, the NR group showed significant worsening on the HOS-ADL (–1.21 ± 5.09 vs 4.28 ± 7.91; P = .044), mHHS (1.08 ± 10.04 vs 10.12 ± 11.76; P = .042), and VR-12 Physical (–2.15 ± 5.52 vs 4.49 ± 7.30; P = .014) subsets compared with the CR group.

Conclusion:

There was significant improvement in the VR-12 Physical subscale at 2 years postoperatively in the capsular CR group compared with the NR group. Capsular closure appears to have no detrimental effect on functional outcome scores after hip arthroscopy. We recommend restoration of native anatomy if possible when performing hip arthroscopy.

Using the Remnant Anterior Cruciate Ligament to Improve Knee Stability: Biomechanical Analysis Using a Cadaveric Model

Background:

Injured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tissue retains proprioceptive nerve fibers, vascularity, and biomechanical properties. For these reasons, remnant ACL tissue is often preserved during the treatment of ACL injuries.

Purpose:

To assess through a cadaveric model whether reorienting and retensioning the residual ACL via an osteotomy improves knee stability after partial ACL tear, with substantial remnant tissue and intact femoral and tibial attachments.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

In 8 adult cadaveric knees, we measured anterior tibial translation and rotational laxity at 30° and 90° of flexion with the ACL in its native state and in 3 conditions: partial tear, retensioned, and ACL-deficient. The partial-tear state consisted of a sectioned anteromedial ACL bundle.

Results:

In the native state, the translation was 10 ± 2.7 mm (mean ± SD) at 30° of flexion and 8.4 ± 3.6 mm at 90° of flexion. Anterior translation of the knees in the partial-tear state (14 ± 2.7 mm at 30° and 12 ± 2.7 mm at 90°) was significantly greater than baseline (P < .001 for both). Translation in the ACL-retensioned state (9.2 ± 1.7 mm at 30° and 7.2 ± 2.1 mm at 90°) was significantly less than in the ACL-deficient state (P < .001 for both), and translation was not significantly different from that of the intact state. For ACL-deficient knees, translation (20 ± 4.3 mm at 30° and 16 ± 4.4 mm at 90°) was significantly greater than all other states (P < .001 for all). Although rotational testing demonstrated the least laxity at 30° and 90° of flexion in the retensioned and intact states and the most laxity in the ACL-deficient state, rotation was not significantly different among any of the experimental states.

Conclusion:

In a cadaveric model of an incomplete ACL tear, a reorienting and retensioning core osteotomy at the tibial insertion of the remnant ACL improved anteroposterior translation of the knee without compromising its rotational laxity.

Clinical Relevance:

The findings of this study support the concept of ACL tissue reorienting and retensioning in the treatment of ACL laxity as an area for future investigation.

Tibial Tunnel Placement in ACL Reconstruction Using a Novel Grid and Biplanar Stereoradiographic Imaging

Background:

Nonanatomic graft placement is a frequent cause of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure, and it can be attributed to either tibial or femoral tunnel malposition. To describe tibial tunnel placement in ACLR, we used EOS, a low-dose biplanar stereoradiographic imaging modality, to create a comprehensive grid that combines anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) coordinates.

Purpose:

To (1) validate the automated grid generated from EOS imaging and (2) compare the results with optimal tibial tunnel placement.

Study Design:

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods:

Using EOS, 3-dimensional models were created of the knees of 37 patients who had undergone ACLR. From the most medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior points on the tibial plateau of the EOS 3-dimensional model for each patient, an automated and personalized grid was generated from 2 independent observers’ series of reconstructions. To validate this grid, each observer also manually measured the ML and AP distances, the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and the tibial slope for each patient. The ideal tibial tunnel placement, as described in the literature, was compared with the actual tibial tunnel grid coordinates of each patient.

Results:

The automated grid metrics for observer 1 gave a mean (95% CI) AP depth of 54.7 mm (53.4-55.9), ML width of 75.0 mm (73.3-76.6), MPTA of 84.9° (83.7-86.0), and slope of 7.2° (5.4-9.0). The differences with corresponding manual measurements were means (95% CIs) of 2.4 mm (1.4-3.4 mm), 0.5 mm (–1.3 to 2.2 mm), 1.2° (–0.4° to 2.9°), and –0.4° (–2.1° to 1.2°), respectively. The correlation between automated and manual measurements was r = 0.78 for the AP depth, r = 0.68 for the ML width, r = 0.18 for the MPTA, and r = 0.44 for the slope. The center of the actual tibial aperture on the plateau was a mean of 5.5 mm (95% CI, 4.8-6.1 mm) away from the referenced anatomic position, with a tendency toward more medial placement.

Conclusion:

The automated grid created using biplanar stereoradiographic imaging provided a novel, precise, and reproducible description of the tibial tunnel placement in ACLR.

Clinical Relevance:

This technique can be used during preoperative planning, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative evaluation of tibial tunnel placement in ACLR.

Forces at the Anterior Meniscus Attachments Strongly Increase Under Dynamic Knee Joint Loading

BACKGROUND

The anatomic appearance and biomechanical and clinical importance of the anterior meniscus roots are well described. However, little is known about the loads that act on these attachment structures under physiological joint loads and movements.

HYPOTHESES

As compared with uniaxial loading conditions under static knee flexion angles or at very low flexion-extension speeds, more realistic continuous movement simulations in combination with physiological muscle force simulations lead to significantly higher anterior meniscus attachment forces. This increase is even more pronounced in combination with a longitudinal meniscal tear or after total medial meniscectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A validated Oxford Rig-like knee simulator was used to perform a slow squat, a fast squat, and jump landing maneuvers on 9 cadaveric human knee joints, with and without muscle force simulation. The strains in the anterior medial and lateral meniscal periphery and the respective attachments were determined in 3 states: intact meniscus, medial longitudinal tear, and total medial meniscectomy. To determine the attachment forces, a subsequent in situ tensile test was performed.

RESULTS

Muscle force simulation resulted in a significant strain increase at the anterior meniscus attachments of up to 308% (P < .038) and the anterior meniscal periphery of up to 276%. This corresponded to significantly increased forces (P < .038) acting in the anteromedial attachment with a maximum force of 140 N, as determined during the jump landing simulation. Meniscus attachment strains and forces were significantly influenced (P = .008) by the longitudinal tear and meniscectomy during the drop jump simulation.

CONCLUSION

Medial and lateral anterior meniscus attachment strains and forces were significantly increased with physiological muscle force simulation, corroborating our hypothesis. Therefore, in vitro tests applying uniaxial loads combined with static knee flexion angles or very low flexion-extension speeds appear to underestimate meniscus attachment forces.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The data of the present study might help to optimize the anchoring of meniscal allografts and artificial meniscal substitutes to the tibial plateau. Furthermore, this is the first in vitro study to indicate reasonable minimum stability requirements regarding the reattachment of torn anterior meniscus roots.

Long-term Effect of a Single Subcritical Knee Injury: Increasing the Risk of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a well-known risk factor for the development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), but patients with the "same injury" can have vastly different trajectories for the onset and progression of disease. Minor subcritical injuries preceding the critical injury event may drive this disparity through preexisting tissue pathologies and sensory changes.

PURPOSE

To investigate the role of subcritical injury on ACL rupture risk and PTOA through the evaluation of pain behaviors, joint mechanics, and tissue structural change in a mouse model of knee injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were allocated to naïve control and subcritical knee injury groups. Injury was induced by a single mechanical compression to the right hindlimb, and mice were evaluated using joint histopathology, anteroposterior joint biomechanics, pain behaviors (mechanical allodynia and hindlimb weightbearing), and isolated ACL tensile testing to failure at 1, 2, 4, or 8 weeks after injury.

RESULTS

Subcritical knee injury produced focal osteochondral lesions in the patellofemoral and lateral tibiofemoral compartments with no resolution for the duration of the study (8 weeks). These lesions were characterized by focal loss of proteoglycan staining, cartilage structural change, chondrocyte pathology, microcracks, and osteocyte cell loss. Injury also resulted in the rapid onset of allodynia (at 1 week), which persisted over time and reduced ACL failure load (P = .006; mean ± SD, 7.91 ± 2.01 N vs 9.37 ± 1.01 N in naïve controls at 8 weeks after injury), accompanied by evidence of ACL remodeling at the femoral enthesis.

CONCLUSION

The present study in mice establishes a direct effect of a single subcritical knee injury on the development of specific joint tissue pathologies (osteochondral lesions and progressive weakening of the ACL) and allodynic sensitization. These findings demonstrate a predisposition for secondary critical injuries (eg, ACL rupture) and an increased risk of PTOA onset and progression (structurally and symptomatically).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Subcritical knee injuries are a common occurrence and, based on this study, can cause persistent sensory and structural change. These findings have important implications for the understanding of risk factors of ACL injury and subsequent PTOA, particularly with regard to prevention and management strategies following an often underreported event.

Medial Elbow Instability Resulting From Partial Tears of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament: Stress Ultrasound in a Cadaveric Model

BACKGROUND

There is consensus that most complete ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries in throwers would benefit from surgical intervention. Optimal treatment for partial UCL tears remains controversial. Stress ultrasonography has become a well-accepted diagnostic modality for assessing UCL injury.

HYPOTHESIS

Partial UCL tears will result in an intermediate increase in ulnohumeral joint space gapping as compared with that of an intact UCL and a complete UCL tear, but the degree of joint space gapping will vary by anatomic location of the partial tear.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty-one cadaveric elbows were divided into 7 groups representing different anatomic locations of UCL partial tears. Partial tears were simulated by cutting 50% of the measured width of the UCL at 6 locations: distal anterior/posterior, midsubstance anterior/posterior, and proximal anterior/posterior. A seventh partial tear was created by partially elevating the undersurface of the distal UCL to simulate the radiographic "T-sign." Valgus stress (15 daN) was applied to each cadaveric elbow at 30° of flexion using a standardized device. Each specimen was tested intact, partially torn, and completely torn. At each state, joint space was measured using stress ultrasonography, and the difference in joint space from unstressed to stressed (delta) was recorded.

RESULTS

There were 10 right and 11 left upper extremity specimens. The mean delta was 0.58 mm for the intact state and <0.75 mm in all groups. Both distal partial tear groups had mean deltas <0.75 mm, similar to intact elbows. Proximal tears and the T-sign demonstrated intermediate deltas (0.99-1.23 mm). Midsubstance partial tears demonstrated the largest deltas (1.57-2.03 mm), similar to those of the complete tears. All complete tear groups had a mean delta >1.5 mm (1.54-3.03 mm).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that partial tears introduce a spectrum of instability from functionally intact to completely torn. As a result, some may be biomechanically amenable to nonoperative treatment, while others would be indicated for early reconstruction. Further research into the biological and biomechanical determinants of nonoperative treatment failure will assist with more precise treatment recommendations.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Describing the biomechanical consequences of different, clinically significant partial UCL tears potentially allows more precise recommendations for operative and nonoperative treatment.

The Influence of Graft Tensioning Sequence on Tibiofemoral Orientation During Bicruciate and Posterolateral Corner Knee Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND

During multiple knee ligament reconstructions, the graft tensioning order may influence the final tibiofemoral orientation and corresponding knee kinematics. Nonanatomic tibiofemoral orientation may result in residual knee instability, altered joint loading, and an increased propensity for graft failure.

PURPOSE

To biomechanically evaluate the effect of different graft tensioning sequences on knee tibiofemoral orientation after multiple knee ligament reconstructions in a bicruciate ligament (anterior cruciate ligament [ACL] and posterior cruciate ligament [PCL]) with a posterolateral corner (PLC)-injured knee.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten nonpaired, fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were utilized for this study. After reconstruction of both cruciate ligaments and the PLC and proximal graft fixation, each knee was randomly assigned to each of 4 graft tensioning order groups: (1) PCL → ACL → PLC, (2) PCL → PLC → ACL, (3) PLC → ACL → PCL, and (4) ACL → PCL → PLC. Tibiofemoral orientation after graft tensioning was measured and compared with the intact state.

RESULTS

Tensioning the ACL first (tensioning order 4) resulted in posterior displacement of the tibia at 0° by 1.7 ± 1.3 mm compared with the intact state ( P = .002). All tensioning orders resulted in significantly increased tibial anterior translation compared with the intact state at higher flexion angles ranging from 2.7 mm to 3.2 mm at 60° and from 3.1 mm to 3.4 mm at 90° for tensioning orders 1 and 2, respectively (all P < .001). There was no significant difference in tibiofemoral orientation in the sagittal plane between the tensioning orders at higher flexion angles. All tensioning orders resulted in increased tibial internal rotation (all P < .001). Tensioning and fixing the PLC first (tensioning order 3) resulted in the most increases in internal rotation of the tibia: 2.4° ± 1.9°, 2.7° ± 1.8°, and 2.0° ± 2.0° at 0°, 30°, and 60°, respectively.

CONCLUSION

None of the tensioning orders restored intact knee tibiofemoral orientation. Tensioning the PLC first should be avoided in bicruciate knee ligament reconstruction with concurrent PLC reconstruction because it significantly increased tibial internal rotation. We recommend that the PCL be tensioned first, followed by the ACL, to avoid posterior translation of the tibia in extension where the knee is primarily loaded during most activities. The PLC should be tensioned last.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study will help guide surgeons in decision making for the graft tensioning order during multiple knee ligament reconstructions.

Does the Beighton Score Correlate With Specific Measures of Shoulder Joint Laxity?

Background

Evaluation of shoulder joint laxity is an important component of the shoulder examination, especially in the setting of shoulder instability. Measures of generalized joint laxity, particularly the Beighton score, are often recorded and used to help make management decisions in these cases. However, no evidence is available to show that the Beighton score corresponds to specific measures of shoulder joint laxity.

Purpose

To assess the correlation between the Beighton score and validated measures of shoulder joint laxity.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 160 participants (age range, 16-35 years) with no history of shoulder joint abnormality were examined. The Beighton score, glenohumeral external rotation (standing and lying), glenohumeral abduction, and the sulcus sign were recorded. The relationship between the Beighton score and each measure of shoulder joint laxity was assessed.

Results

A high proportion of participants (34%) had a Beighton score of 4 or higher. Rates of positive shoulder laxity tests were lower (11%-19%). A positive Beighton score was a poor predictor of abnormal shoulder laxity, with low sensitivity (range, 0.40-0.48) and low positive predictive values (range, 0.13-0.31). Spearman correlation coefficients demonstrated poor correlation between the Beighton score and all measures of shoulder joint laxity when assessed as continuous variables (range, 0.29-0.45).

Conclusion

The Beighton score has poor correlation with specific measures of shoulder joint laxity and should not be considered equivalent to these tests as a method of clinical assessment.

Biomechanical comparison of graft fixation at 30° and 90° of elbow flexion for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction by the docking technique

BACKGROUND

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries have been successfully treated by the docking reconstruction. Although fixation of the graft has been suggested at 30° of elbow flexion, no quantitative biomechanical data exist to provide guidelines for the optimal elbow flexion angle for graft fixation.

METHODS

Testing was conducted on 10 matched pairs of cadaver elbows with use of a loading system and optoelectric tracking device. After biomechanical data on the native UCL were obtained, reconstruction by the docking technique was performed with use of palmaris longus autograft with one elbow fixated at 30° and the contralateral elbow at 90° of elbow flexion. Biomechanical testing was undertaken on these specimens.

RESULTS

The load to failure of the native UCL (mean, 20.1 N-m) was significantly higher (P = .004) than that of the reconstructed UCL (mean, 4.6 N-m). There was no statistically significant difference in load to failure of the UCL reconstructions fixated at 30° of elbow flexion (average, 4.86 N-m) compared with those at 90° (average, 4.35 N-m). Elbows reconstructed at 30° and 90° of elbow flexion produced similar kinematic coupling and valgus laxity characteristics compared with each other and with the intact UCL. Although not statistically significant, the reconstructions fixated at 30° more closely resembled the biomechanical characteristics of the intact elbow than did reconstructions fixated at 90°.

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant difference was found in comparing the docking technique of UCL reconstruction with graft fixation at 30° vs. 90° of elbow flexion.

A biomechanical comparison of 2 hybrid techniques for elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

To compare the valgus laxity and fixation strength of 2 hybrid techniques for elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions.

METHODS

Reflective markers were placed near the ligament attachments of the ulnar collateral ligament on the humerus and ulna of 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities for tracking displacement with 4 motion analysis cameras. Valgus laxity testing was performed on the intact, disrupted ligament, and reconstructed elbows by applying a 3.0 Nm moment across the joint at 15° intervals throughout elbow motion from 0° to 120°. Two hybrid techniques for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction were performed: a proximal docking method and a single-point distal fixation method. Failure testing was performed with the elbow at 90° by applying a cyclic valgus load 12 cm distal to the joint that we increased in 10-N intervals.

RESULTS

Valgus laxity testing revealed no difference in ligament displacements between the 2 techniques over the entire range of elbow motion. Ligament displacement for the proximal docking hybrid technique was significantly higher than the intact at 0° and 15° of elbow flexion. Failure testing revealed no differences in ligament displacements or failure load between the 2 techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the proximal docking and the single-point fixation hybrid reconstructions provided sufficient joint stability and strength compared to the intact elbows, with the exception of the proximal docking method at low flexion angles. The reconstructions were not significantly different with respect to valgus laxity or graft fixation displacement at failure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The proximal docking and single-point fixation hybrids tested here are both viable surgical options with sufficient strength and valgus laxity mechanics, warranting clinical evaluation.

Increased slope of the lateral tibial plateau subchondral bone is associated with greater risk of noncontact ACL injury in females but not in males: a prospective cohort study with a nested, matched case-control analysis

BACKGROUND

There is an emerging consensus that increased posterior-inferior directed slope of the subchondral bone portion of the tibial plateau is associated with increased risk of suffering an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury; however, most of what is known about this relationship has come from unmatched case-control studies. These observations need to be confirmed in more rigorously designed investigations.

HYPOTHESIS

Increased posterior-inferior directed slope of the medial and lateral tibial plateaus are associated with increased risk of suffering a noncontact ACL injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

In sum, 176 athletes competing in organized sports at the college and high school levels participated in the study: 88 suffering their first noncontact ACL injury and 88 matched controls. Magnetic resonance images were acquired, and geometry of the subchondral bone portion of the tibial plateau was characterized on each athlete bilaterally by measuring the medial and lateral tibial plateau slopes, coronal tibial slope, and the depth of the medial tibial plateau. Comparisons between knees of the same person were made with paired t tests, and associations with injury risk were assessed by conditional logistic regression analysis of ACL-injured and control participants.

RESULTS

Controls exhibited side-to-side symmetry of subchondral bone geometry, while the ACL-injured athletes did not, suggesting that the ACL injury may have changed the subchondral bone geometry. Therefore, the uninjured knees of the ACL-injured athletes and the corresponding limbs of their matched controls were used to assess associations with injury risk. Analyses of males and females as a combined group and females as a separate group showed a significant association between ACL injury risk and increased posterior-inferior directed slope of the lateral tibial plateau slope. This relationship was not apparent when males were analyzed as a group. Multivariate analyses indicated that these results were independent of the medial tibial plateau slope, coronal tibial slope, and depth of the medial tibial plateau, which were not associated with ACL injury.

CONCLUSION

There is a 21.7% increased risk of noncontact ACL injury with each degree increase of the lateral tibial plateau slope among females but not among males. The medial tibial plateau slope, coronal tibial slope, and depth of the medial tibial plateau were not associated with risk of injury for females or males.

Superficial medial collateral ligament anatomic augmented repair versus anatomic reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical analysis

BACKGROUND

When surgical intervention is required for a grade 3 superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) tear, there is no consensus on the optimal surgical treatment. Anatomic augmented repairs and anatomic reconstructions for treatment of grade 3 sMCL tears have not been biomechanically validated or compared.

HYPOTHESIS

Anatomic sMCL augmented repairs and anatomic sMCL reconstruction techniques will reproduce equivalent knee kinematics when compared with the intact state, while creating significant improvements in translational and rotational laxity compared with the sMCL sectioned state.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Eighteen match-paired, fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (average age, 52.6 years; range, 40-59 years) were each used to test laxity of an intact sMCL, a deficient sMCL, and either an anatomic augmented repair or an anatomic reconstruction. Knees were biomechanically tested in a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system, which included valgus rotation, internal and external rotation, simulated pivot shift, and coupled anterior drawer with external rotation.

RESULTS

Anatomic augmented repairs and anatomic reconstructions had significantly less medial joint gapping than the sectioned state at all tested flexion angles and showed significant reductions in valgus rotation compared with the sectioned state at all flexion angles. No significant differences between the anatomic augmented repair and anatomic reconstruction were found for any test performed. Despite the similar behavior between the 2 reconstruction groups, neither technique was able to reproduce the intact state.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic sMCL augmented repairs and anatomic sMCL reconstructions were not significantly different when tested at time zero. Both the anatomic augmented repair and the anatomic reconstruction were able to improve knee stability and provide less than 2 mm of medial joint gapping at 0° and 20° of flexion.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

These results suggest that both an anatomic sMCL augmented repair and an anatomic sMCL reconstruction improve knee kinematics compared with a deficient sMCL and provide equivalent joint stability.

Central-third bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts demonstrate superior biomechanical failure characteristics compared with hemi-patellar tendon grafts

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is commonly performed with a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) allograft. However, grafts may result from harvesting the central region of a whole graft (C-BTB), the medial 10 mm of a lateral hemi-BTB (L-BTB) graft, or the lateral 10 mm of a medial hemi-BTB (M-BTB) graft.

PURPOSE

To quantify potential differences in graft biomechanical properties when comparing whole versus hemi-BTB grafts.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten pairs of human BTB allografts (irradiated with 1.0-1.2 Mrad) were randomized to preparation as whole grafts or hemigrafts. From these, 10-mm grafts were prepared from the center or the most central portion, respectively. After measurements of tendon thickness, width, and length, specimens underwent cyclic tensile testing, followed by load-to-failure analysis. Biomechanical outcomes included cyclic elongation and creep strain along with the following failure characteristics: maximum load, elongation at maximum load, maximum stress, strain at maximum stress, and linear stiffness.

RESULTS

Regionally, the mean thickness of the C-BTB (5.18 ± 0.75 mm), M-BTB (5.08 ± 0.56 mm), and L-BTB (5.32 ± 0.62 mm) grafts were comparable (P > .72). Similarly, the mean length of the C-BTB (47.4 ± 6.73 mm), M-BTB (47.0 ± 5.45 mm), and L-BTB (50.7 ± 6.42 mm) grafts were alike (P > .43). While differences in cyclic elongation and strain were not significant, the M-BTB graft tended to elongate more (0.204 ± 0.13 mm; P = .075) and experience greater strain (0.56% ± 0.32%; P = .054) compared with the C-BTB graft (0.09 ± 0.03 mm and 0.23% ± 0.07%, respectively). Load-to-failure testing demonstrated a higher maximum load (2293 ± 531 N) and stiffness (356 ± 46 N/mm) of the C-BTB graft as compared with the M-BTB graft (1575 ± 325 N [P < .007] and 275 ± 37 N/mm [P < .008], respectively) and L-BTB graft (1585 ± 452 N [P < .008] and 277 ± 65 N/mm [P < .009], respectively). No differences were noted with respect to elongation or stress at maximum load among the grafts. Maximum stress in the C-BTB graft (45.4 ± 11.5 MPa) was greater than in the L-BTB graft (29.7 ± 10.6 MPa) (P < .03) and tended to be greater than the M-BTB graft (34.1 ± 6.27 MPa) (P = .087).

CONCLUSION

Biomechanical failure properties (maximum load, stress, and stiffness) of the central portion of a whole BTB graft are superior to those of the medial portion of a lateral hemi-BTB graft and the lateral portion of a medial hemi-BTB graft. However, cyclic loading characteristics did not differ between grafts.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although the true central-third BTB graft is biomechanically superior to hemi-BTB grafts, future studies are necessary to determine if the use of hemigrafts leads to an increased incidence of clinical failure.