Prevalence, Pattern, Mortality, and Morbidity of Traumatic Small Bowel Perforation at King Abdulaziz Medical City: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction Bowel perforation, whether from trauma or other causes, presents with diverse clinical scenarios. Small bowel perforation (SBP), a potentially fatal condition often linked to blunt trauma like motor vehicle accidents, necessitates prompt detection and intervention, crucial for improved outcomes. This study investigated the prevalence, predictors, presentation, diagnostic findings, morbidity, and mortality of traumatic SBP for comprehensive insights. Methodology This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh. A review of 838 cases, which represent all abdominal trauma patients from January 2017 to March 2023, was done. Forty patients who developed SBP and have complete data were included in this study. One case was excluded due to incomplete medical records. Data were collected with the non-probability convenience sampling technique via the BestCare system using a data collection sheet. Data were analyzed with IBM SPSS 29 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Out of all abdominal trauma cases (n=838), 40 patients developed SBP (n=40, 4.77%). Males constituted 87.5%, and the most common mechanism was motor vehicle accidents (57.5%). Complications included cardiac arrest, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and leak (7.5% each). In motor vehicle accidents, SBP primarily affected patients who were in the driver's position (78.3%). Clinical signs at presentation revealed abdominal tenderness (52.5%), abdominal distension (22.5%), and abnormal systolic blood pressure (mean 115.3 mmHg). Linear regression showed gender and age positively associated with morbidity (p=0.474, p=0.543) while BMI exhibited a negative relationship (p=0.314). Logistic regression revealed non-significant predictors of mortality, except for mean initial hematocrit (HCT) (p=0.721, aOR=0.098). Conclusion Our study provides crucial findings on the incidence, patterns, mortality, and morbidity of traumatic bowel perforation, contributing to the existing body of research. The identified prevalence of 4.77% and mortality at 17.5% from the studied population underline the serious impact of this condition, and the 37.5% complication rate observed demonstrates the potential risks involved. The average hospital stay is found to be 14 days, adding further to the disease burden. These findings underscore the importance of specific preventative measures, particularly related to motor vehicle accidents (MVAs), and highlight potential markers for predicting outcomes, such as age, gender, and mean initial HCT. This substantiates the need for further research involving larger cohorts and prospective designs to gain comprehensive insights and establish more robust preventative and treatment strategies.

Risk of Injury to Retroperitoneal Structures in Prone and Lateral Decubitus Transpsoas Approaches to Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Pilot Cadaveric Anatomical Study

Introduction The retroperitoneal approach for lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) originally described an initial posterolateral fascial incision enabling finger dissection from behind the peritoneum and guidance of instruments through a second direct-lateral fascial incision. It has since become common for single direct-lateral incisional access to the retroperitoneum. This study attempted to quantify the distance of the peritoneum from posterior landmarks in the space, assess the risk of peritoneal violation in each access trajectory (i.e., posterolateral versus direct lateral retroperitoneal dissection), and determine whether there are differences based on patient position (prone versus lateral decubitus). Methods In three prone cadaveric torsos, Steinman pins were percutaneously placed mid-disc at each level L2-5 bilaterally (for a total of 18 prone approaches). Open dissections exposed the retroperitoneum including the quadratus lumborum and psoas muscles, maintaining the natural reflection of the peritoneum. Visual assessment qualified whether any pin violated any retroperitoneal structure. Distance from the anterior border of the quadratus lumborum to the posterior-most reflection of the peritoneum was measured. For comparison, three additional torsos were positioned in lateral decubitus, and the above steps were repeated, only unilaterally (for a total of nine lateral decubitus approaches). Results In prone, no pin violated the peritoneum; three (3/18 total approaches) violated the kidney, all at L2-3 (3/6 approaches at L2-3). In lateral decubitus, all three L2-3 pins violated the kidney (3/3 approaches at L2-3); five of the six remaining pins from L3-5 violated the peritoneum (totaling eight violations in the nine total approaches). The incidence of any violation was significantly greater in lateral decubitus vs. prone (8/9 vs. 3/18, p=0.0006). The structure at risk (kidney vs. peritoneum) was significantly associated with disc level (p=0.0041): all kidney violations occurred at L2-3 and all peritoneal violations occurred at L3-4 or L4-5. Distance from the quadratus lumborum to the posterior-most reflection of the peritoneum averaged 8.7 cm (range: 6-10) in prone, and 2.9 cm (range: 2.5-3.2) in lateral decubitus (p=0.0129). Conclusion A cadaveric study of retroperitoneal anatomy demonstrates that there is an increased distance from the quadratus lumborum to the peritoneum in prone versus lateral decubitus and that the trajectory of approach to the lumbar discs risks violation of the peritoneum more frequently when accessing directly laterally versus posterolaterally. In either approach, care should be taken to identify and release the peritoneal reflection to create a safe passage to the lumbar discs.

Mesenteric Injury in Blunt Abdominal Trauma in Children: Is Early Surgical Intervention Need of the Hour?

Objective

There is an increasing trend of observational, nonsurgical management of abdominal injuries in children. We analyzed the feasibility and outcome of our management protocol in managing cases of the mesenteric injuries in blunt trauma abdomen in pediatric age group.

Methods

Single-center retrospective analysis of pediatric trauma case records from July 2018 to March 2020 was performed.

Results

Thirty-four cases of blunt abdominal trauma of whom 13 had mesenteric injuries were reviewed. The male-to-female ratio was 2.2:1, and the mean age was 9.11 ± 4.90 years. Mesentery of the small bowel was the most commonly injured segment and treatment consisted of repair of mesenteric tear, resection, and anastomosis with or without stoma formation.

Conclusions

Isolated mesenteric injury of all grades should be managed either with diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy irrespective of hemodynamic status.

Incidence of bowel injury during gynecologic surgery for benign indications: A nationwide cross-sectional study of cases from 2009 to 2018

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence and risk factors of intestinal injury during gynecologic surgery for benign diseases, based on a national database.

METHOD

The study cohort was generated by extracting patients with operation codes for benign gynecologic diseases from the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service National Inpatient Sample from 2009 to 2018. After analyzing the incidence of bowel injury during gynecologic surgery, a multivariate analysis was performed to identify the associated risk factors for bowel injury.

RESULTS

Among 81 451 patients who underwent gynecologic surgery for benign diseases, the incidence of bowel injury was 6.14 per 1000 women. The risk of bowel injury decreased with laparoscopy (odds ratio [OR] 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.69; P < 0.001) and increased with subtotal hysterectomy (OR 2.83; 95% CI 1.79-4.46; P < 0.001) and adnexectomy (OR 2.83; 95% CI 1.93-4.16; P < 0.001). Old age, higher Charlson comorbidity index, low socioeconomic status, and a higher clinic grade were associated with a higher risk of bowel injury.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed the incidence of bowel injury during benign gynecologic surgery in a Korean national population-based cohort. The risk of bowel injury increased with open surgery, subtotal hysterectomy, and adnexectomy.

Peritonitis following unsafe abortion: a retrospective study in a tertiary health facility in North Central Nigeria

INTRODUCTION

surgical complications following unsafe abortion (UA) are not uncommon and are associated with high morbidity and mortality in developing countries. The commonest need for the general surgeon following UA is after a diagnosis of peritonitis which can occur following use of sharp objects introduced through the vagina. This study aims to highlight the presentation, management types and outcome of patients who presented with peritonitis following UA.

METHODS

this study is a retrospective review of cases of peritonitis following UA seen over 4 years from January 2015 to December 2019 in a tertiary health facility in North Central Nigeria.

RESULTS

a total of 14 patients with peritonitis following UA were included in the study. The mean age of patients who presented was 27.4 years (19-40 years) with a mean estimated gestational age at abortion of 7.8 weeks. The average time from the UA procedure till presentation at the hospital was 8.6 days. There were 9 bowel injuries and 5 pelvic abscesses. A total of 3/9 patients had primary resection and anastomosis while 6/9 had stoma formed as part of their management. Pelvic abscesses were drained. In patients with bowel injury, those who had primary anastomosis had a 100% incidence of enterocutaneous fistula formation with associated sepsis requiring repeat exploration and formation of stoma. Mortality in this group was 67% (2/3) compared to the 0% (0/6) mortality rate seen in patients who had stoma. The overall mortality was four out of fourteen patients (28.6%).

CONCLUSION

peritonitis following UA is associated with marked morbidity and mortality as many of the patients present late. Initial preoperative resuscitation and stabilization should be followed by a swift laparotomy. Patients with bowel injury who had primary anastomosis had higher morbidity, reoperation rates and mortality than patients who had stomas.

Inadvertent Bowel Injury Following Repeated Suprapubic Catheterisation in a Patient of Post-Pelvic Radiotherapy

Suprapubic catheterization (SPC) is one of the standard procedures in urological emergencies. The common complications of SPC include loss of track, hematuria, catheter blockage, and catheter-related infections. However, severe complications like bowel injuries, including intestinal obstructionand perforation, can also occur. We present the case of a 54-year-old lady who had received pelvic radiation 30 years ago for carcinoma cervix. She presented to a secondary-level care center with anuria. On failure of per urethral catheterization, she repeatedly underwent unguided SPC. However, unsatisfied with her recovery, she was brought to our tertiary care center by her relatives. She was found to have inadvertent placement of SPC in the small bowel, which was confirmed preoperatively by ultrasound and CT. Intraoperatively, the SPC catheter was seen inside the terminal ileum causing ileal wall necrosis and a localized feco-purulent collection. Urinary bladder rent was also noted at the site of the earlier SPC. Resection of distal ileum with double barrel ileostomy, followed by primary repair of the bladder wall, was done. Unfortunately, she succumbed to overwhelming sepsis and expired in the postoperative period. This case emphasizes a potential higher risk of life-threatening bowel injury due to SPC insertion in patients with previous pelvic irradiation. Such high-risk cases should be approached with the utmost care, preferably under ultrasound guidance. For safe practice, the British Association of Urological Surgeons' guidelines for SPC insertion should be followed.

Types and site distributions of intestinal injuries in seat belt syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Intestinal injuries in seat belt syndrome are relatively uncommon but can be potentially lethal due to accompanying peritonitis and hemorrhaging. It can be difficult to identify the exact injury sites of the intestine as multiple areas are often damaged and massive intraperitoneal hemorrhaging may make it challenging to determine causal bleeding points of mesenteric injuries. This study aimed to clarify the incidence and distribution of intestinal injuries in seat belt syndrome.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 25 patients who underwent laparotomy for suspected intestinal injuries due to seat belt syndrome during a frontal impact. The incidence and distribution of the sites of intestinal injuries, as well as associated injuries, were investigated. Intestinal injuries were divided into bowel and mesenteric injuries. Additionally, bowel injuries were classified into two types: perforation and non-perforation (seromuscular tears/intramural hematomas). Regarding the injured sites, the small intestine was divided into the following three parts: (1) the ligament of Treitz (100-cm distal from the ligament [proximal jejunum]), (2) the ileocecal valve (100-cm proximal from the valve [distal ileum]), and (3) the intermediate area between those two regions (jejunoileal junction).

RESULTS

In total, there were 64 major injuries among 25 patients requiring surgical intervention: 34 bowel injuries (20 perforations and 14 non-perforations) and 30 mesenteric injuries. Significantly more bowel perforations occurred in the small intestine (1 [interquartile range (IQR), 0-1]) than in the large intestine (0 [IQR, 0-0]) (p = 0.003). Similarly, significantly more mesenteric injuries occurred in the small intestine (1 [IQR, 0-1.25]) than in the large intestine (0 [IQR, 0-0]) (p < 0.001). Specific sites of the mesenteric injuries in the small intestine included the jejunoileal junction (0 [IQR, 0-1]) and distal ileum (0 [IQR, 0-1]); the jejunoileal junction was significantly more vulnerable than the proximal jejunum (0 [IQR, 0-0]) (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with seat belt syndrome, the small intestine was more vulnerable to perforation and mesenteric injury than the large intestine. Additionally, for mesenteric injuries, the jejunoileal junction was more likely to be damaged than the proximal jejunum.

Complications associated with monopolar resectoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Resectoscopic injuries to bowel and/or vessels, although rare, can be catastrophic, resulting in significant patient harm including death and can provoke medicolegal litigation.

OBJECTIVE

To examine indications, preoperative risk factors, perioperative findings and intervention, and clinical outcomes of resectoscopic injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eleven cases of resectoscopic complications were reviewed by one author (G.A.V.) for medicolegal purposes. After grouping of the complications, one case for each complication was selected, edited and reconstructed to reflect and highlight all potential complications associated with monopolar resectoscopes (26F, 9-mm) and nonconductive distending medium. Although these cases are reconstructed from actual complications, they do not reflect specific cases of medicolegal opinions and outcomes. Indications for resectoscopic surgery included abnormal uterine bleeding and/or infertility in premenopausal women.

RESULTS

Injuries were associated with uterine perforation resulting in hemorrhage or bowel injury; urinary bladder injury without uterine perforation; and thermal injuries to lower genital tract and dispersive electrode site.

CONCLUSIONS

Resectoscopic complications are associated with any one or a combination of trauma during uterine access or intra-operatively, excessive fluid intravasation of distending medium or thermal injuries from applied energy. Uterine perforation in the presence of distorted anatomy (e.g. uterine fibroids) may be considered as a known and accepted complication. Lower genital tract and dispersive electrode site burn occur due to inherent design of monopolar resectoscopes. Appropriate intra- and post-operative intervention minimizes adverse clinical and medicolegal outcomes. Lack of post-operative vigilance and inappropriate delay in investigation and intervention is associated with adverse clinical and, potentially, unfavourable legal outcomes.

WHAT IS NEW?

Reviewing resectoscopic complications raises awareness; provides insight for avoidance, recognition and timely intervention to minimise adverse clinical and medicolegal outcomes.

Injuries of the small and large intestine

INTRODUCTION

Patients with abdominal trauma appear frequently. The most vulnerable organs in these patients are the liver and the spleen. Injuries of the small and large intestines are relatively less frequent. The diagnostic process of these injuries is complex and requires an analysis of all results. Therefore it is highly probable that the final diagnosis can be delayed and so can be delayed an indication of surgical exploration of the abdominal cavity, which can have serious consequences on the morbidity and mortality of these patients with intestinal trauma.

METHODS

We collected our data using the WinMedicalc 2000 software. We searched for patients hospitalised in years 20082017 in the Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen subjected to surgical revision of the abdominal cavity for intestinal trauma.

RESULTS

Our set comprised 41 patients, including 30 men and 11 women. The mean age of the patients was 41 years, 4 of the patients were children. Twenty-three of the patients suffered from polytrauma, while 9 of the patients had a relatively isolated injury of either the small intestine or the colon. Six of the patients died. The small intestine was injured in 17 patients, the colon was injured in 14 patients and both were injured in 10 patients. The intestinal injury was diagnosed in 17 cases based on CT imaging (performed 31 times in total); 23 cases were diagnosed in the peroperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

We assessed a set of patients with an intestinal injury in terms of specific diagnosis, severity of trauma, diagnostic process and treatment. The results are similar to the results of studies in large sets of patients. Even though imaging methods can help to reach the right diagnosis, they are insufficient as a sole diagnostic method, and physical examination plays a major role.

Iatrogenic Bowel Injury Following Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine: A Retrospective Analysis of 3 Cases

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Anterior approaches are often used during lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Visceral injuries (bowel injuries) are rare but represent a primary risk during anterior approaches to the lumbar spine. Left untreated, these injuries can result in significant complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the presentation and management of bowel injury cases following anterior approaches to the lumbar spine to raise the surgeon's awareness of this rare complication.

METHODS

All direct anterior, oblique anterior, and transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion surgeries performed at our institution between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Charts were screened for cases requiring return to the operating room owing to a suspected bowel injury and details of the case were extracted for illustrative purposes.

RESULTS

A total of 775 anterior lumbar surgeries were conducted at a single tertiary care institution between July 2012 and June 2017. A total of 590 transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion (TPIF) surgeries were performed. Four patients, each having undergone TPIF, were suspected of bowel injury and underwent an exploratory laparotomy. At surgery, 3 patients were confirmed to have a bowel injury, giving a procedure-specific incidence of 0.51% and overall incidence of 0.39%. Among the 3 confirmed bowel injury cases, average delay between surgery and visceral injury diagnosis was 4.7 days (range 3-7 days).

CONCLUSIONS

We noted abdominal pain, distention, and fever as the most common findings in the setting of a visceral injury. A high index of suspicion and computed tomography imaging remain critical for identifying postoperative bowel injuries.

Primary repair of duodenal injuries: a retrospective cohort study from a major trauma centre in South Africa

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The management of duodenal trauma remains controversial. This retrospective audit of a prospectively maintained database was intended to clarify the operative management of duodenal injury at our institution and to assess the risk factors for leak following primary duodenal repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study undertaken at the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. Operative techniques used for duodenal repair were recorded. Our primary outcome was duodenal leak in the postoperative period. Patients from January 2012 to December 2016 were included. All duodenal injuries were graded according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading. Only patients who had a primary repair were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS

During the five-year data collection period, a total of 562 patients underwent a trauma laparotomy; of which 94 patients sustained a duodenal injury. A primary pyloric exclusion and gastro-jejunostomy (PEG) was performed in three patients. These three were then excluded from further analysis. Of the 91 primary duodenal repairs, seven (8%) subsequently leaked. These were managed by PEG in three and by secondary repair and para-duodenal drainage in four. The two physiological parameters most associated with subsequent leak were lactate and pH level. There was a significantly higher mortality rate for those who leaked vs those who did not leak. Chi-squared test revealed a significant difference in the leak rate between AAST I (0%), AAST-II (1.6%) and AAST-3 (66.7%) grade injuries (p <0.01).

CONCLUSION

The trend towards primary repair of duodenal injuries appears to be justified. However duodenal leak remains a significant risk in certain high risk patients and strategies to manage injuries in this subset requires further work.

Gastrointestinal injuries during gynaecologic operations at a university teaching hospital in Thailand: a 10-year review

The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of gastrointestinal injuries during gynaecologic operations, the management of such injuries and associated risk factors. This case-control study (1:4) examined patients who received gynaecologic operations from 2007 to 2016 in Ramathibodi Hospital. The study cases comprised patients who had gastrointestinal injuries, while the control cases comprised patients who had gynaecologic surgeries in the same period with matching the types of procedures. The 10-year incidence was 0.38% (104 cases of gastrointestinal injuries among a total of 27,520 cases). The most common injury site was the small bowel (43.3%). There were 102 cases (98%) of gastrointestinal injuries which were diagnosed intraoperatively and which were immediately repaired with successful outcomes. Logistic regression indicated that a pelvic adhesion, previous pelvic surgery and previous abdominal surgery were predictive risk factors associated with the injuries (odds ratios: 9.45, 3.20 and 11.84, respectively). An immediate consultation with a surgeon and surgical repair of the injury resulted in excellent outcomes. Impact statement What is already known about this subject? Gastrointestinal injury is a rare, but fatal complication of gynaecologic operations. The previous small study identified some risk factors such as surgical approach and pelvic surgery associated with the injury. What do the results of this study contribute? Our study identified the associated risk factors for gastrointestinal injury, including previous abdominal injury, pelvic adhesion and previous pelvic surgery. A previous abdominal surgery was the most associated risk factor. Patients with the history of abdominal surgery had an almost 4-fold higher odds ratio than the ones with previous pelvic surgery. Other factors, including endometriosis, ovarian cancer and subsequent oncological procedures, and surgical staging were less related to the gastrointestinal injury. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The knowledge is useful for pre-operative evaluation and preparation. Bowel preparation and consultation with surgeon are necessary for patients with these risk factors prior to their surgeries. Moreover, an immediate intra-operative surgical correction of the injury results in excellent outcomes.

Bowel Perforation Resulting in Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infection of the Abdomen, Flank, and Lower Extremities

BACKGROUND

Fournier's gangrene is a necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI) that often originates from a break in bowel integrity and affects the perineum, anus, or genitalia. Although the pathogenesis is similar, NSTI caused by a break in bowel integrity less commonly presents as infection of other sites.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize NSTIs originating from bowel perforation and presenting as infection of the abdominal wall, flank, or thigh but that largely spare the perineum, anus, and genitalia.

METHODS

We describe a characteristic case and summarize findings from 67 reported cases.

RESULTS

The causes of bowel injury included trauma (29%), perforated appendicitis (23%), perforated diverticulitis (16%), and perforation of a gastrointestinal tract cancer (16%). The symptomatic prodrome is indolent and nondescript. Most patients have polymicrobial infections and require antibiotic therapy combined with serial surgical debridements. Because the presentation differs from that of typical Fournier's gangrene, recognition of NSTI was delayed in the reported cases, and the associated bowel perforation often was overlooked, leading to delayed surgical treatment. As a result, the mortality rate was >33%, far exceeding that of typical Fournier's gangrene. Delays in diagnosis or surgical intervention predict a poor outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

An NSTI resulting from bowel perforation can present in an atypical fashion carrying significant morbidity and mortality rates. Delayed diagnosis and treatment of this condition is associated with a poor outcome.

A network meta-analysis of comparison of operative time and complications of laparoscopy, laparotomy, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most frequently occurring female genital cancer. The authors performed this network meta-analysis to compare operative time and the incidence of bowel injury and wound infection of 3 operative approaches (laparoscopy, laparotomy, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy [LAVH]) in the treatment of EC.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for EC from the day of databases establishment to February 2017 were included. Direct and indirect evidences were combined to calculate the combined weighted mean difference (WMD) or odd ratio values and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of 3 operative approaches in the treatment of EC.

RESULTS

A total of 9 qualified RCTs were included into the study. The results showed that laparotomy had a shorter-operative time than LAVH (WMD = -40.36, 95% confidence interval = -75.03 to -2.57). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of bowel injury and wound infection among 3 operative approaches. Besides, the SUCRA values indicated that laparotomy had the shortest operative time but the incidence of bowel injury and wound infection was relatively higher.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study indicate that laparotomy had highest incidence of bowel injury and wound infection but shortest operative time among 3 operative approaches in the treatment of EC.

Single-Contrast CT for Detecting Bowel Injuries in Penetrating Abdominopelvic Trauma

OBJECTIVE

Many centers advocate use of triple-contrast (IV, oral, and rectal) CT for assessing hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating abdominopelvic trauma. Enteric contrast material has several disadvantages, leading our practice to pursue use of single-contrast (IV) CT. We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records at our institution to assess the accuracy of single-contrast CT for diagnosing bowel injuries in cases of penetrating abdominopelvic trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who presented to our emergency department between January 1, 2004, and March 1, 2014, with penetrating abdominopelvic trauma, underwent an abdominopelvic CT, and had surgery performed thereafter. We reviewed pertinent emergency department records for details regarding the site of injury, the number of injuries per patient, and the type of weapon used. We correlated CT reports with operative notes for presence and sites of bowel injury.

RESULTS

A total of 274 patients (median age, 27 years old) met our inclusion criteria; 77% had sustained gunshot wounds (GSWs). CT showed bowel injury in 173 cases; surgery revealed bowel injury in 162 cases. CT had 142 true-positive, 31 false-positive, 81 true-negative, and 20 false-negative cases, resulting in sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 72%, positive predictive value of 82%, and negative predictive value of 80% for detecting bowel injuries. CT had the highest sensitivity and specificity in patients with multiple GSWs (94% and 79%, respectively) and those with injuries to the stomach and rectum.

CONCLUSION

Single-contrast CT can show bowel injuries in patients with penetrating abdominopelvic trauma with accuracy comparable with that reported for triple-contrast CT.

Jejunal Injury as a Rare Complication of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Case Report

Background: Colonic injury represents a rare complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Injury of the small bowel is very rare, with only anecdotal case reports in the literature. We report here a rare PCNL complication of jejunal perforation without concomitant colonic injury.

Case Presentation: A 45-year-old male underwent PCNL for multiple left kidney stones. At the beginning of the procedure, we faced difficulty in achieving access, but after that the procedure was straightforward and ended smoothly. However, from the third day, the postoperative course became stormy with progressive development of picture of acute peritonitis. Laparotomy was mandatory and jejunal perforation was found and repaired.

Conclusion: Although extremely rare, small bowel injury should be kept in mind during planning for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Prompt diagnosis and active treatment should be undertaken without delay especially if picture of acute peritonitis is developed.

Complications of Laparoscopy in Connection with Entry Techniques

The anatomy of the human being has not changed. However, technical developments in operating materials and methods call for improvements in surgical procedures as well as the management of complications. A fundamental distinction between any operating method and laparoscopy is that, in the latter, the initial entry is usually performed in blind fashion. Blind entry may result in vessel or organ damage, especially in patients who have undergone previous surgery. One of the difficulties associated with the entry is that the damage may not be identified immediately and then necessitate major abdominal repair. Furthermore, the improvement of surgical instruments and techniques enables the surgeon to perform even major operations by the laparoscopic approach. This is associated with renewed learning curves and a high rate of complications due to vascular, bowel, uterine, or bladder damage. The improvement of surgical techniques must be accompanied by advancements in the management of complications. The aim of this review is to address the risks of laparoscopy as well as their correct and professional management. (J GYNECOL SURG 33:81)

Disembowelment following unsafe home delivery: Young life lost!

Injuries to the bowel are seldom reported. Yet these pose serious problems associated with uterine perforation during deliveries that take place outside of hospitals. This is also true for abortions that are performed illegally in developing countries by persons without any medical training. This case study is about a 20 years old girl who lost her life following an unsafe delivery at home. To avoid morbidity and mortality associated with unsafe deliveries, it is necessary to understand the scope of this problem and the factors related to it: governments, nongovernmental organizations, religious groups and women groups.

Spontaneous seromuscular laceration of the sigmoid colon: a case report

Injury to bowel can result in high morbidity and death. Bowel injuries typically occur after external trauma to the abdomen. Bowel injury in the absence of external trauma is rare. Here, we report a 36‐year‐old male presenting with a sigmoid colon laceration likely due to long‐standing constipation.

Adhesions are the major cause of complications in operative gynecology

Adhesion formation has been found to be highly prevalent in patients with a history of operations or inflammatory peritoneal processes. These patients are at a high risk of serious intraoperative complications during a subsequent operation if adhesiolysis is performed. These complications include bowel perforation, ureteral or bladder injury, and vascular injury. In order to minimize the risk of these complications, adhesiolysis should only be performed by experienced surgeons, and intraoperative strategies must be adopted. The reduction of the overall incidence of adhesions is essential for subsequent surgical treatments. Anti-adhesion strategies must be adopted for preventing the reoccurrence of adhesions after abdominopelvic operations. The strategies employed to reduce the risk and the overall incidence of adhesions have been elucidated in this article.

Large bowel injury during total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Large bowel injuries are unfortunate complications of laparoscopic surgery, with an incidence of 0.62 to 1.6 per 1000 laparoscopies. One-third of these injuries can be diagnosed intraoperatively, with the rest going unnoticed and revealed later. Rectal injury, a very rare complication, may be caused during pelvic dissection of dense adhesions. Injury at the rectosigmoid junction due to traction with a rectal probe is extremely rare and highly underreported. We report a case of rectal injury during total laparoscopic hysterectomy in a case with dense pelvic adhesions.