1
|
Lee NMW, Lau SL, Yeung YK, Chiu CPH, Liu F, Lau YY, Fidalgo AM, Cuerva MJ, Aquise A, Nguyen-Hoang L, Gil MM, Poon LC. Implementation of sonopartogram: multicenter feasibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2024. [PMID: 38456522 DOI: 10.1002/uog.27634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Well-established clinical practice to assess progress in labor involves routine abdominal palpation and vaginal examination (VE). However, VE is subjective, poorly reproducible and painful for women. In this study, our aim is to evaluate the feasibility of systematically integrating transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal position, psAOP, HPD and SCD to monitor labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor (IOL). We also aim at determining if ultrasound can reduce women's pain during examinations. METHODS Women were recruited as they presented for IOL in three maternity units. Ultrasound assessments were performed in 100 women between 37+0 and 41+6 weeks' gestation. A baseline combined transabdominal and transperineal scan was performed, including the assessment of fetal biometry, umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery Dopplers, amniotic fluid index (AFI), fetal spine and occiput positions, psAOP, HPD, SCD, and cervical length. Intrapartum scans were performed instead of VEs according to protocol. Participants were asked to indicate their level of pain by verbally giving a pain score from 0 - 10 (with 0 representing no pain) during assessment. The repeated measures data were analyzed by mixed effect models to identify the significant factors that affected the relationship between psAOP, HPD, SCD and mode of delivery. RESULTS 223 intrapartum ultrasound scans with a median of 2 scans per participant (interquartile range (IQR) = 1 - 3), and 151 VEs were performed with a median of 1 per participant (IQR = 0 - 2). There were no adverse fetal or maternal outcomes. After excluding those with epidural anesthesia during examination, median pain score for intrapartum scan was 0 (IQR = 0 - 1) and 3 for VE (IQR = 0 - 6). Cesarean delivery and epidural anesthesia were significantly associated with slower rate of change in psAOP, HPD and SCD. Maternal height, parity and neonatal birth weight did not affect ultrasound measurements of labor progress. CONCLUSIONS Comprehensive transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessment can be successfully used to assess progress in labor and can reduce the level of pain experienced during examination. Ultrasound assessment may be able to replace some transabdominal and VE examinations during labor. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N M W Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR
| | - S L Lau
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Y K Yeung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR
| | - C P H Chiu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR
| | - F Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Y Y Lau
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR
| | - A M Fidalgo
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain
- School of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain
| | - M J Cuerva
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Department of Obstetrics, Madrid, Spain
- School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Aquise
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain
| | - L Nguyen-Hoang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR
| | - M M Gil
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain
- School of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain
| | - L C Poon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Huang A, Litvinchuk T. Traumatic Birth Injury in a Term Neonate. Cureus 2022; 14:e32737. [PMID: 36686149 PMCID: PMC9851849 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Cephalohematoma is among the most common forms of birth trauma. It is described as a benign collection of blood above the skull and is associated with prolonged or difficult deliveries. We present the case of a term male born at 39 weeks of gestation with a large cephalohematoma and additional features of caput succedaneum. The patient's condition was successfully treated with minimal intervention and close observation. This case report is aimed at illustrating an atypical presentation of cephalohematoma and discussing the potential sequelae of extracranial birth trauma.
Collapse
|
3
|
Malvasi A, Vinciguerra M, Lamanna B, Cascardi E, Damiani GR, Muzzupapa G, Kosmas I, Beck R, Falagario M, Vimercati A, Cicinelli E, Trojano G, Tinelli A, Cazzato G, Dellino M. Asynclitism and Its Ultrasonographic Rediscovery in Labor Room to Date: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:2998. [PMID: 36553005 PMCID: PMC9776610 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12122998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Asynclitism, the most feared malposition of the fetal head during labor, still represents to date an unresolved field of interest, remaining one of the most common causes of prolonged or obstructed labor, dystocia, assisted delivery, and cesarean section. Traditionally asynclitism is diagnosed by vaginal examination, which is, however, burdened by a high grade of bias. On the contrary, the recent scientific evidence highly suggests the use of intrapartum ultrasonography, which would be more accurate and reliable when compared to the vaginal examination for malposition assessment. The early detection and characterization of asynclitism by intrapartum ultrasound would become a valid tool for intrapartum evaluation. In this way, it will be possible for physicians to opt for the safest way of delivery according to an accurate definition of the fetal head position and station, avoiding unnecessary operative procedures and medication while improving fetal and maternal outcomes. This review re-evaluated the literature of the last 30 years on asynclitism, focusing on the progressive imposition of ultrasound as an intrapartum diagnostic tool. All the evidence emerging from the literature is presented and evaluated from our point of view, describing the most employed technique and considering the future implication of the progressive worldwide consolidation of asynclitism and ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Malvasi
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Marina Vinciguerra
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70124 Bari, Italy
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Madonna delle Grazie Hospital, 75100 Matera, Italy
| | - Bruno Lamanna
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70124 Bari, Italy
- Fetal Medicine Research Institute, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Eliano Cascardi
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy
- Pathology Unit, FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, Str. Provinciale 142 km 3.95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| | - Gianluca Raffaello Damiani
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Muzzupapa
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Ioannis Kosmas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ioannina State General Hospital G. Chatzikosta, 45332 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Renata Beck
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico Riuniti Hospital, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Maddalena Falagario
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70124 Bari, Italy
- Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
| | - Antonella Vimercati
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Ettore Cicinelli
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Trojano
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Tinelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CERICSAL (CEntro di RIcerca Clinico SALentino), Veris Delli Ponti Hospital, 73020 Scorrano, Italy
- Division of Experimental Endoscopic Surgery, Imaging, Technology and Minimally Invasive Therapy, Vito Fazzi Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy
| | - Gerardo Cazzato
- Section of Pathology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (DETO), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Miriam Dellino
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, 70124 Bari, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Paolo Hospital, 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Birth injuries are a diverse set of traumas afflicting a newborn during labor and/or delivery. These range from temporary paralysis to hematomas. Herein, a comprehensive review of the birth injuries is presented, including the risk factors, classification of various paralyzes and nerve damage, as well as bleeding complications. The predicted outcomes and complications, as well as the treatment options for various birth injuries, are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Ojumah
- SGU Department of Anatomical Sciences, Seattle Science Foundation
| | - Rebecca C Ramdhan
- Department of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University School of Medicine, Grenada, West Indies
| | | | - Marios Loukas
- Department of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University School of Medicine, Grenada, West Indies
| | | | | |
Collapse
|