Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of image-guided FNA specimens improves subsequent core biopsy adequacy in clinical trial patients: The impact of preanalytical factors and its correlation with survival

BACKGROUND

Sufficient tumor collection has become of utmost importance in therapeutic experimental protocols. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) ensures adequate sampling for quantification of biomarkers, molecular analyses, and other ancillary studies. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the role of ROSE in trial-associated fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and to analyze predictors of adequacy and cumulative survival from in-house FNA cases used in clinical trials.

METHODS

Clinical trial FNA biopsies performed at a large academic institution were analyzed over 10 months using a comprehensive chart review of the electronic medical records. SPSS version 28 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-five FNAs were collected for 57 clinical trials. In total, 225 individual patients had an average of 1.4 FNA procedures each as a result of a multidepartmental collaborative effort. ROSE was performed for all patients, and adequacy was evaluated by cytotechnologists. Seventy-eight percent of samples were considered adequate, 14% were considered less than optimal, and 8% were considered inadequate, with the latter two categories designated together as less than adequate. The imaging modalities were mainly ultrasound-guided (n = 267; 82%) and computed tomography-guided (n = 58; 18%). There was a statistically significant association between adequate sampling and ultrasound-guided biopsies (83%) compared with computed tomography-guided biopsies (59%; p < .01). The effect of body mass index (BMI) on mortality was also a significant finding. The authors observed a survival benefit in patients who had elevated BMIs (range, 25.0-34.9 kg/m2 ) compared with those who were underweight (BMI, <18.5 kg/m2 ) or class III obese (BMI, >35.0 kg/m2 ; p < .01). Therefore, the best predictors of adequacy and mortality were imaging modality and BMI, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided modalities are recommended for obtaining adequate FNA sampling for clinical trials. In addition, patients with cancer who had slightly elevated BMIs (25.0-34.0 kg/m2 ) had increased overall survival in this cohort.

Endoscopic ultrasound comes of age: Mature, established, creative and here to stay!

Research in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is alive and kicking! This paper will present recent interesting developments in EUS based on research presented at the Digestive Disease Week (DDW) held in Chicago in 2014. Endosonographers are looking at various techniques to improve yield of fine needle aspiration and core biopsies, assess circulating tumor cells, apply EUS for personalized medicine and develop devices to ensure the adequacy of sampling. EUS may open new vistas in understanding of neurogastroenterology and gastrointestinal motility disorders as discussed in this paper. EUS guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, bile duct and gallbladder is feasible, and many randomized trials are being done to compare different techniques. EUS guided delivery of fiducials, drugs, coils or chemo loaded beads in possible. EUS has come off age, has matured and is here to stay! The DDW in 2014 in Chicago was a very active year for EUS. There were numerous papers on different aspects of EUS, some perfecting and improving old techniques, others dealing with randomized trials and many with novel concepts. In this paper, I will highlight some of the papers that were presented. It is not possible to discuss all the abstracts in detail. I have, therefore, chosen selected papers in different aspects of EUS to give the readers a flavor of the kind of research that was presented at DDW.